Abstract
The purpose of this study was to test two hypotheses that specify different ways of configuring the interface between wisdom and humility. The first hypothesis specifies that greater wisdom is associated with greater humility. This hypothesis is based on the notion that wisdom is needed in order to know when to activate the virtue of humility. The second hypothesis specifies that the relationship between humility and life satisfaction will vary according to the level of wisdom that is possessed by study participants. This hypothesis is based on the notion that wisdom is needed to successfully implement and regulate humility once it has been activated. The data come from a nationwide survey of middle-aged and older adults (N = 1535). The data support both hypotheses. First greater wisdom is associated with greater humility. Second, the results suggest that the relationship between humility and life satisfaction varies across levels of wisdom. The findings help ground the study of wisdom more firmly in the literature on virtues.
Similar content being viewed by others
Notes
As Enders (2010) points out, the EM algorithm may produce standard errors that are too small, thereby making study findings appear to be more highly significant than they are in reality. As discussed below, repeating the analyses after employing listwise deletion of missing values provided virtually identical results. Some readers may wonder why multiple imputation was not used instead of EM. Unfortunately, multiple imputation does not provide standardized regression coefficients that are based on the pooled data nor does this procedure provide pooled R2 values. This makes it more difficult to determine the substantive importance of the study findings.
Based on data that utilize listwise deletion of missing values, the relationship between wisdom and humility was: β = .396; p < .001.
The analyses were repeated after using listwise deletion of missing values. The data reveal that the interaction between wisdom and humility on life satisfaction was: b = .020; p < .01.
References
Aiken, L., & West, S. G. (1991). Multiple regression: Testing and interpreting interactions. Newbury Park, CA: Sage.
Ardelt, M. (2003). Empirical assessment of a three-dimensional wisdom scale. Research on Aging, 25, 275–324.
Ardelt, M., Landes, S. D., Gerlach, K. R., & Fox, L. P. (2013). Rediscovering internal strengths of the aged: The beneficial impact of wisdom, mastery, purpose in life, and spiritual well-being. In J. D. Sinnott (Ed.), Positive psychology: Advances in understanding adult motivation (pp. 97–119). New York: Springer.
Aristotle. (2000). In R. Crisp (Ed) Nicomachean ethics. Cambridge University Press: New York.
Baltes, P. B. (2004). Wisdom as orchestration of mind and virtue. Unpublished manuscript found at the following website: http://library.mpib-berlin.mpg.de/ft/pb/PB_Wisdom_2004.pdf.
Brugman, C. M. (2006). Wisdom and aging. In J. E. Birren & K. W. Schaie (Eds.), Handbook of the psychology of aging (pp. 445–476). San Diego, CA: Elsevier Academic Press.
Clifton-Soderstrom, K. (2009). The phenomenology of religious humility in Heidegger’s reading of Luther. Contemporary Philosophical Review, 42, 171–200.
Curnow, T. (2011). Sophia and Phronesis: Past, present, and future. Research in Human Development, 8, 95–108.
Enders, C. C. (2010). Applied missing data analysis. New York: Guilford.
Etezadi, S., & Pushkar, D. (2013). Why are wise people happier? An exploratory model of wisdom and emotional well-being in older adults. Journal of Happiness Studies, 14, 929–950.
Fetzer Institute/National Institute on Aging Working Group. (1999). Multidimensional measurement of religiousness/spirituality for use in health research. Kalamazoo, MI: John E. Fetzer Institute.
Fowers, B. J. (2012). Placing virtue and the human good in psychology. Journal of Theoretical and Philosophical Psychology, 32, 1–9.
Grossman, I., Na, J., Varnum, M. E., Kitayama, S., & Nisbett, R. E. (2013). A route to well-being: Intelligence versus wise reasoning. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 142, 944–953.
Hall, S. S. (2010). Wisdom: From philosophy to neuroscience. New York: Random House.
Jason, L. A., Reichler, A., King, C., Madsen, D., Camacho, J., & Marchese, W. (2001). The measurement of wisdom: A preliminary effort. Journal of Community Psychology, 29, 585–598.
Judge, T. A., Ilies, R., & Dimotakis, N. (2010). Are health and happiness the product of wisdom? The relationship of general mental ability to educational and occupational attainment, health, and well-being. Journal of Applied Psychology, 95, 454–468.
Krause, N. (2002a). Church-based social support and health in old age: Exploring variations by race. Journal of Gerontology: Social Sciences, 57B, S332–S347.
Krause, N. (2002b). A comprehensive strategy for developing closed-ended survey items for use in studies of older adults. Journal of Gerontology: Social Sciences, 57B, S263–S274.
Krause, N., & Hayward, R. D. (2014a). Religious involvement and death anxiety. Omega Journal of Death and Dying, 69, 59–78.
Krause, N., & Hayward, R. D. (2014b). Religious involvement and humility. Journal of Positive Psychology, 9, 254–265.
Krause, N., & Hayward, R. D. (2015a). Humility, compassion, and gratitude to God: Assessing the relationships among key religious virtues. Psychology of Religion and Spirituality, 7, 192–204.
Krause, N., & Hayward, R. D. (2015b). Virtues, practical wisdom, and psychological well-being: A Christian perspective. Social Indicators Research, 122, 735–755.
Ladd, K. L., & Spilka, B. (2006). Inward, outward, and upward prayer: Scale reliability and validation. Journal for the Scientific Study of Religion, 45, 233–251.
Le, T. N. (2011). Life satisfaction, openness value, self-transcendence, and wisdom. Journal of Happiness Studies, 12, 171–182.
Leonardi, A., & Gailamas, V. (2009). Religiosity and psychological well-being. International Journal of Psychology, 44, 241–248.
Levenson, M. R., & Crumpler, C. A. (1996). Three models of adult development. Human Development, 39, 135–149.
Lewis, C. S. (2001). Mere Christianity. New York: Harper Collins.
Moore, D. A., & Healy, P. J. (2008). The trouble with overconfidence. Psychological Review, 115, 502–517.
Neugarten, B. R., Havighurst, J., & Tobin, S. S. (1961). The measurement of life satisfaction. Journal of Gerontology, 16, 134–143.
Peterson, C., & Seligman, M. E. P. (2004). Character strengths and virtues: A hand book and classification. New York: Oxford University Press.
Rowatt, W. C., Ottenbreit, A., Nesselroade, K. P., & Cunningham, P. A. (2002). On being holier-than-thee: A social-psychological perspective on religiousness and humility. Journal for the Scientific Study of Religion, 41, 227–237.
Seligman, M. E. (2002). Authentic happiness. New York: Free Press.
Sparrow-Simpson, W. J. (1919). The letters of St. Augustine. New York: Macmillan.
Staudinger, U. M., & Gluck, J. (2011). Psychological wisdom research: Commonalities and differences in a growing field. Annual Review of Psychology, 62, 214–241.
Tangney, J. P. (2005). Humility: Theoretical perspectives, empirical findings, and directions for future research. Journal of Social and Clinical Psychology, 19, 70–82.
Tornstam, L. (2005). Gerotranscendence: A developmental theory of positive aging. New York: Springer.
Uziel, L. (2010). Rethinking social desirability scales: From impression management to interpersonally oriented self-control. Perspectives on Psychological Science, 5, 243–262.
Webster, J. D., & Westerhof, G. J. (2014). Wisdom and mental health across the lifespan. Journal of Gerontology: Psychological Sciences, 69B, 209–218.
Zagzebski, L. T. (1998). Virtues of the mind: An inquiry into the nature of virtue and the ethical foundations of knowledge. New York: Cambridge University Press.
Acknowledgments
This research was supported by grants from the John Templeton Foundation and the National Institute on Aging (RO1 AG014749).
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Krause, N. Assessing the Relationships Among Wisdom, Humility, and Life Satisfaction. J Adult Dev 23, 140–149 (2016). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10804-016-9230-0
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10804-016-9230-0