Skip to main content
Log in

College Students Speak Success

  • Published:
Journal of Adult Development Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

This qualitative study used a phenomenological approach to explore college students’ perceptions of noncognitive variables leading to academic success. Twenty-nine public university undergraduate students in their sophomore year or higher were asked to complete a questionnaire asking for their reflections on what leads to college academic success. A controversial issue described in the literature was brought to life during subsequent interviews with select individuals. Achievement and intelligence tests might be an unnecessary barrier for students striving to go to college. An argument was made that intelligence, and intelligence-based testing (i.e., SAT/ACT), was not a major prognosticator of college success.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Astin, A. W. (1993). Assessment for excellence: The philosophy and practice of assessment and evaluation in higher education. New York: American Council on Education.

    Google Scholar 

  • Barnes, W., Slate, J. R., & Rojas-LeBouef, A. (2010). College-readiness and academic preparedness: The same concepts? Current Issues in Education, 13(4), 1–27. Retrieved from http://cie.asu.edu/ojs/index.php/cieatasu/article/view/678/56.

  • Becker, K. A. (2003). History of the Stanford-Binet intelligence scales: Content and psychometrics (Stanford-Binet Intelligence Scales, Fifth Edition Assessment Service Bulletin No. 1). Itasca, IL: Riverside Publishing. Retrieved from http://www.assess.nelson.com/pdf/sb5-asb1.pdf.

  • Byrd, K. L., & MacDonald, G. (2005). Defining college readiness from the inside out: First-generation college student perspectives. Community College Review Fall, 33(1), 22–37. doi:10.1177/009155210508300102.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cherry, K. (2013). A biography of Alfred Binet. In About.com psychology. Retrieved from http://psychology.about.com/od/profilesal/p/alfred-binet.htm.

  • Combs, J. P., Slate, J. R., Moore, G. W., Bustamante, R. M., Onwuegbuzie, A. J., & Edmonson, S. L. (2010). Gender differences in college preparedness: A statewide study. Urban Review, 42, 441–457. doi:10.1007/s11256-009-0138-x.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Conley, D. T. (2007). Redefining college readiness. Retrieved from ERIC database (ED539251) at http://files.eric.ed.gov/fulltext/ED539251.pdf.

  • Crede, M., & Kuncel, N. R. (2008). Study habits, skills, and attitudes: The third pillar supporting collegiate academic performance. Perspectives on Psychological Science, 3(6), 425–453. doi:10.1111/j.1745-6924.2008.00089.x.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Creswell, J. W. (2013). Qualitative inquiry & research design: Choosing among five approaches. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications Ltd.

    Google Scholar 

  • Diamond Program. (2011). The DIAMOND program: DePaul’s experience with noncognitive assessments in admission, 1-5. Chicago, IL: DePaul University. Retrieved from http://www.depaul.edu/emm/_downloads/NoncogExperience-DIAMOND_March2011.pdf.

  • Duckworth, A. L., Peterson, C., Matthews, M. D., & Kelly, D. R. (2007). Grit: Perseverance and passion for long-term goals. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 92(6), 1087–1101. doi:10.1037/0022-3514.92.6.1087.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Duckworth, A. L., Quinn, P. D., & Tsukayama, E. (2012). What no child left behind leaves behind: The roles of IQ and self-control in predicting standardized achievement test scores and report card grades. Journal of Educational Psychology, 104(2), 439–451. doi:10.1037/a0026280.

    Article  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Duckworth, A. L., & Seligman, M. E. (2006). Self-discipline gives girls the edge: Gender in self-discipline, grades and achievement test scores. Journal of Educational Psychology, 98(1), 198. doi:10.1037/0022-0663.98.1.198.

  • Foust, R., Hertberg-Davis, H., & Callahan, C. M. (2009). Students perceptions of the noncognitive advantages and disadvantages of participation in advanced placement courses and international baccalaureate programs. Adolescence, 44(174), 289–312.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Gay, L. R., Mills, G. E., & Airasian, P. (2006). Educational research: Competencies for analysis and applications (8th ed.). Upper Saddle River, NJ: Pearson Education.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gehring, J. (2001). UC systems takes broader approach to admissions criteria. Education Week, 02774232, 21(14).

  • Giger, M. (2006). Gardner’s multiple intelligences. Retrieved from http://www.gigers.com/matthias/gifted/gardner.html.

  • GlobalElite. (2009). B. F. Skinner—Operant conditioning and free will—YouTube [video file]. Retrieved from https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=yhvaSEJtOV8.

  • Grier, T. (2004). Supplemental instruction and noncognitive factors: Self-efficacy, outcome expectations, and effort regulation. The Learning Assistance Review, 9(2), 17–28.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hoover, E. (2013). Colleges seek ‘noncognitive’ gauges of applicants: Admissions offices want to know about traits, like leadership, initiative, and grit, that the SAT doesn’t test. The Chronicle of Higher Education, LIX(19), News. Retrieved from http://chronicle.com/article/Colleges-Seek-Noncognitive/136621/.

  • Jackson, S. A., & Lunenburg, F. C. (2010). School performance indicators, accountability ratings, and student achievement. American Secondary Education, 39(1), 27–44.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kern, C. W., Fagley, N. S., & Miller, P. M. (1998). Correlates of college retention and GPA: Learning and study strategies, testwiseness, attitudes, and ACT. Journal of College Counseling, 1, 26–34.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kobrin, J. L., Patterson, B. F., Shaw, E. J., Mattern, K. D., & Barbuti, S. M. (2008). Validity of the SAT for predicting first-year college grade point average (College Board Research Report No. 2008-5). Retrieved from The College Board: New York. http://professionals.collegeboard.com/profdownload/Validity_of_the_SAT_for_Predicting_First_Year_College_Grade_Point_Average.pdf.

  • Leech, N. L., & Onwuegbuzie, A. J. (2007). An array of qualitative data analysis tools: A call for data analysis triangulation. School Psychology Quarterly, 22(4), 557–584. doi:10.1037/1045-3830.22.4.557.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Moustakas, C. (1994). Phenomenological research methods. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.

    Google Scholar 

  • No Child Left Behind (NCLB). (2002). Act of 2001, Public Law No. 107–110, Stat. § 115, 1425.

  • Reid, M. J., & Moore, J. L, I. I. I. (2008). College readiness and academic preparation for postsecondary education: Oral histories of first-generation urban college students. Urban Education, 43(2), 240–261. doi:10.1177/0042085907312346.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sedlacek, W. E. (1993). Employing noncognitive variables in admissions and retention in higher education. In Achieving diversity: Issues in the recruitment and retention of underrepresented racial/ethnic students in higher education (pp. 33–39). Alexandria VA: National Association of College Admission Counselors. Retrieved from http://williamsedlacek.info/publications/articles/employing1.html.

  • Sedlacek, W., & Sheu, H. B. (2008). The academic progress of undergraduate and graduate Gates Millennium Scholars and non-scholars by race and gender. Readings on Equal Education, 23, 143–177.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sparkman, L. A., Maulding, W. S., & Roberts, J. G. (2012). Non-cognitive predictors of student success in college. College Student Journal, 41(3), 642–651.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sternberg, R. J. (1985). Beyond IQ: A triarchic theory of human intelligence. New York: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Strauss, A., & Corbin, J. (1990). Basics of qualitative research: grounded theory procedures and techniques. London: Sage.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ting, S.-M. R. (2009). Impact of noncognitive factors on first-year academic performance and persistence of NCAA Division I student athletes. Journal of Humanistic Counseling, Education and Development, 48, 215–228.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ting, S.-M. R., & Sedlacek, W. E. (2000). Validity of the Noncognitive Questionnaire-Revised 2 in predicting the academic success of university freshmen (Research Report # 1-00). Retrieved from http://williamsedlacek.info/publications/articles/validity100.html.

  • Van Etten, S., Pressley, M., McInerney, D. M., & Liem, A. D. (2008). College seniors’ theory of their academic motivation. Journal of Educational Psychology, 100(4), 812–828. doi:10.1037/0022-0663.100.4.812.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Van Manen, M. (1990). Researching lived experience: Human science for an action sensitive pedagogy. Albany: State University of New York Press. Retrieved from http://books.google.com/books?id=Z4HC2UoFaD0C&printsec=frontcover&dq=inauthor:%22Max+Van+Manen%22&hl=en&sa=X&ei=I_wSUrHyLsPD2AXH6ICACA&ved=0CC8Q6AEwAA#v=onepage&q&f=false.

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Renee M. Fauria.

Appendix

Appendix

Renee M. Fauria, while a student in the Educational Leadership and Counseling program at Sam Houston State University (SHSU), developed the following interview items in partial fulfillment of her doctoral degree

figure a

.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Fauria, R.M., Zellner, L.J. College Students Speak Success. J Adult Dev 22, 90–99 (2015). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10804-014-9203-0

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10804-014-9203-0

Keywords

Navigation