Abstract
The purpose of this exploratory research was to review, update, and revise Havighurst’s classic social role studies for their relevance in contemporary society. Based on the input of expert panels, 13 roles, Association/Club Member, Citizen, Daughter/Son, Friend, Grandparent, Home/Services Manager, Kin/Relative, Learner, Leisure Time Consumer, Parent, Religious Affiliate, Spouse/Partner, and Worker, were incorporated into an instrument to assess social role importance. The instrument was administered to a stratified, quota sample of 300 respondents. Univariate repeated-measures analysis and Dunn’s test for multiple comparisons were conducted. Perceived social role importance ratings were established for age, gender, and socio-economic status (SES) groupings. The Friend role and a cluster of family-associated roles received the highest overall ratings. Many roles appeared to have a distinct age-related factor. SES differences, particularly among the lowest level, were also significant in many roles.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Abney H. M. Jr. (1993). The development and initial validation of a domain of adult social roles and developmental events within Havighurst’s model. (Doctoral dissertation, University of South Florida, 1992). Dissertation Abstracts International 53(07A): 2202.
Beeghley L. (1989). The structure of social stratification in the United States. Boston: Allyn & Bacon.
Boucouvalas M., Krupp J. (1989). Adult development and learning. In S. Merriam, P. Cunningham (Eds.), Handbook of adult and continuing education (pp. 183–200). San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
Chickering, A. W., & Havighurst, R. J. (1981). The life cycle. In A. W. Chickering, & Associates (Eds.), The modern American college (pp. 16–50). San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
Erikson, E. (1978). Adulthood. New York: Norton.
Galbraith M. W., James W. B. (2002). Implications of social role research for community colleges. Community College Journal of Research and Practice 26(6), 521–533.
Gould R. L. (1978). Transformations: Growth and change in adult life. New York: Simon & Schuster.
Havighurst R. J. (1953). Social roles of the middle-aged person. Notes and essays on education for adults. Chicago: Center for the Study of Liberal Education for Adults.
Havighurst R. J. (1957). The social competence of middle-aged people. Genetic Psychology Monographs 56: 297–375.
Havighurst R. J. (1970). Changing status and roles during the adult life cycle: Significance for adult education. In R. W. Burnes (Eds.), Sociological backgrounds of adult education (pp. 17–38). Syracuse, NY: Center for the Study of Liberal Education for Adults.
Havighurst R. J. (1973). Social roles, work, leisure, and education. In C. Eisdorfer, M. P. Lawton (Eds.), The psychology of adult development and aging (pp. 598–618). Washington, DC: American Psychological Association.
Havighurst R. J., Albrecht R. (1953). Older people. New York: Longmans, Green.
Havighurst R. J., Munnichs J. M. A., Neugarten B., Thomae H. (1969). Adjustment to retirement: A cross-national study. Assen, Netherlands: Royal Van Gorcum.
Havighurst R. J., Orr B. (1956). Adult education and adult needs. Chicago: Center for the Study of Liberal Education for Adults.
Hughes J. A., & Graham, S. W. (1990). Adult life roles: A new approach to adult development. Journal of Continuing Higher Education 38(2): 2–8.
Hughes J., Graham S. W., Galbraith M. W. (1986). Adult development: A multifaceted approach. Journal of Continuing Higher Education 34(3): 24–28.
James, W. B., & Abney, H. M. Jr. (1992). Exploring socio-economic status. Unpublished manuscript, Tampa: University of South Florida.
James W. B., Witte J. E., Abney H. M. Jr., Kirkman M. S., Dye L., Hargiss K., Wall N. (1996). Revision and validation of Havighurst’s social role research. In H. Reno, M. M. Witte (Eds.), 37th annual adult education research conference proceedings (pp. 351–356). Tampa, FL: University of South Florida.
Levinson D. J. (1978). The seasons of a man’s life. New York: Knopf.
Levinson D. J., Levinson J. D. (1996). The seasons of a woman’s life. New York: Knopf.
McCoy, M. J. (1993). A comparison of Havighurst’s adult social roles and developmental events by gender, age, and socioeconomic status levels. (Doctoral dissertation, University of South Florida, 1993). Dissertation Abstracts International, 54A, 4333.
Merriam S. B., Cafferella R. S. (1999). Learning in adulthood: A comprehensive guide (2nd ed.). San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
Nam C. B., Powers M. G. (1983). The socioeconomic approach to status measurement. Houston, TX: Cap & Gown.
Nam C. B., Terrie E. W. (1988). 1980-Based Nam-Powers occupational status scores. Tallahassee, FL: Florida State University, Center for the Study of Population.
Robertson I. (1989). Society: A brief introduction. New York: Worth.
Rossides D. W. (1990). Social stratification: The American class system in comparative perspective. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice Hall.
Vaillant G. E. (1978). Adaptation to life. New York: Little Brown.
Vaillant G. E. (2002). Aging well: Surprising guideposts to a happier life from the landmark Harvard study of adult development. NY: Little, Brown.
Warner W. L., Meeker M., Eells K. (1960). Social class in America. New York: Harper and Row.
Witte J. E., Guarino A. J., James W. B. (2001). Assessing adult learner social role performance. Academic Exchange Quarterly 5(4): 184–189.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
James, W., Witte, J. & Galbraith, M. Havighurst’s Social Roles Revisited. J Adult Dev 13, 52–60 (2006). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10804-006-9007-y
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10804-006-9007-y