Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Benchmark comparison of Co3O4 spinel-structured oxides with different morphologies for oxygen evolution reaction under alkaline conditions

  • Research Article
  • Published:
Journal of Applied Electrochemistry Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

In this work, a series of Co3O4 spinels were produced by different synthesis routes (precipitation, solution combustion synthesis, and hard template method), and were used as non-noble catalysts for the oxygen evolution reaction (OER) under basic conditions. The investigated catalysts have a proportional relation between electrochemical activity, surface roughness, and specific surface area. The hard template synthesis method resulted in the most active catalyst compared in this work, which we ascribe to its highly porous structure, and concomitant Co3+/Co4+ redox couple at a lower potential, attributed to the OER. The most performant catalyst was compared with a commercial catalyst (Ni@NiO, Alfa Aesar) showing only 0.01 V overpotential difference, evaluated at 10 mA cm− 2 (overpotential 0.44 V).

Graphical Abstract

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6
Fig. 7

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Holladay JD, Hu J, King DL, Wang Y (2009) An overview of hydrogen production technologies. Catal Today 139:244–260. doi:10.1016/j.cattod.2008.08.039

  2. Turner JA (2004) Sustainable hydrogen production. Science 305:972–974. doi:10.1126/science.1103197

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  3. Koroneos C, Dompros A, Roumbas G, Moussiopoulos N (2004) Life cycle assessment of hydrogen fuel production processes. Int J Hydrogen Energy 29:1443–1450. doi:10.1016/j.ijhydene.2004.01.016

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  4. Zeng K, Zhang D (2010) Recent progress in alkaline water electrolysis for hydrogen production and applications. Prog Energy Combust Sci 36:307–326. doi:10.1016/j.pecs.2009.11.002

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  5. Giordano L, Han B, Risch M et al (2016) PH dependence of OER activity of oxides: current and future perspectives. Catal Today 262:2–10. doi:10.1016/j.cattod.2015.10.006

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  6. Burke MS, Zou S, Enman LJ et al (2015) Revised oxygen evolution reaction activity trends for first-row transition-metal (oxy)hydroxides in alkaline media. J Phys Chem Lett 6:3737–3742. doi:10.1021/acs.jpclett.5b01650

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  7. Hong WT, Risch M, Stoerzinger KA et al (2013) Toward the rational design of non-precious transition metal oxides for oxygen electrocatalysis. Energy Environ Sci 8:1404–1427. doi:10.1039/b000000x/

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Amjad U-ES, Vita A, Galletti C et al (2013) Comparative study on steam and oxidative steam reforming of methane with noble metal catalysts. Ind Eng Chem Res 52:15428–15436. doi:10.1021/ie400679h

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  9. Armaroli N, Balzani V (2011) The hydrogen issue. ChemSusChem 4:21–36. doi:10.1002/cssc.201000182

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  10. Carmo M, Fritz DL, Mergel J, Stolten D (2013) A comprehensive review on PEM water electrolysis. Int J Hydrogen Energy 38:4901–4934. doi:10.1016/j.ijhydene.2013.01.151

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  11. Siracusano S, Van Dijk N, Payne-Johnson E et al (2015) Nanosized IrOx and IrRuOx electrocatalysts for the O2 evolution reaction in PEM water electrolysers. Appl Catal B Environ 164:488–495. doi:10.1016/j.apcatb.2014.09.005

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  12. Burke MS, Enman LJ, Batchellor AS et al (2015) Oxygen evolution reaction electrocatalysis on transition metal oxides and (oxy)hydroxides: activity trends and design principles. Chem Mater 27:7549–7558. doi:10.1021/acs.chemmater.5b03148

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  13. McCrory CCL, Jung S, Peters JC, Jaramillo TF (2013) Benchmarking heterogeneous electrocatalysts for the oxygen evolution reaction. J Am Chem Soc 135:16977–16987. doi:10.1021/ja407115p

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  14. Pletcher D, Li X, Price SWT et al (2016) Comparison of the spinels Co3O4 and NiCo2O4 as bifunctional oxygen catalysts in alkaline media. Electrochim Acta 188:286–293. doi:10.1016/j.electacta.2015.10.020

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  15. Xu L, Jiang Q, Xiao Z, et al (2016) Plasma-engraved Co3O4 nanosheets with oxygen vacancies and high surface area for the oxygen evolution reaction. Angew Chemie Int Ed 55:5277–5281. doi:10.1002/anie.201600687

    Google Scholar 

  16. Zhang L, Li H, Li K et al (2016) Morphology-controlled fabrication of Co3O4 nanostructures and their comparative catalytic activity for oxygen evolution reaction. J Alloys Compd 680:146–154. doi:10.1016/j.jallcom.2016.04.084

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  17. Chen Z, Kronawitter CX, Koel BE (2015) Facet-dependent activity and stability of Co3O4 nanocrystals towards the oxygen evolution reaction. Phys Chem Chem Phys 17:29387–29393. doi:10.1039/c5cp02876k

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  18. Li L, Tian T, Jiang J, Ai L (2015) Hierarchically porous Co3O4 architectures with honeycomb-like structures for efficient oxygen generation from electrochemical water splitting. J Power Sources 294:103–111. doi:10.1016/j.jpowsour.2015.06.056

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  19. Singh SK, Dhavale VM, Kurungot S (2015) Low surface energy plane exposed Co3O4 nanocubes supported on nitrogen-doped graphene as an electrocatalyst for efficient water oxidation. ACS Appl Mater Interfaces 7:442–451. doi:10.1021/am506450c

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  20. Zhang X, Zhang J, Wang K (2015) Codoping-induced, rhombus-shaped Co3O4 nanosheets as an active electrode material for oxygen evolution. ACS Appl Mater Interfaces 7:21745–21750. doi:10.1021/acsami.5b05149

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  21. Wang Y, Zhou T, Jiang K, et al (2014) Reduced mesoporous Co3O4 nanowires as efficient water oxidation electrocatalysts and supercapacitor electrodes. Adv Energy Mater 4:1–7. doi:10.1002/aenm.201400696

    Google Scholar 

  22. Hamdani M, Singh RN, Chartier P (2010) Co3O4 and co-based spinel oxides bifunctional oxygen electrodes. Int J Electrochem Sci 5:556–577

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  23. Esswein AJ, Mcmurdo MJ, Ross PN et al (2009) Size-dependent activity of Co3O4 nanoparticle anodes for alkaline water electrolysis. J Phys Chem C 113:15068–15072. doi:10.1021/jp904022e

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  24. Lv X, Zhu Y, Jiang H, et al (2015) Hollow mesoporous NiCo2O4 nanocages as efficient electrocatalysts for oxygen evolution reaction. Dalton Trans 44:4148–4154. doi:10.1039/c4dt03803g

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  25. Lal B, Singh NK, Samuel S, Singh RN (1999) Electrocatalytic properties of CuxCo(3−x)O4 (0 < x < 1) obtained by a new precipitation method for oxygen evolution. J New Mater Electrochem Syst 2:59–64

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  26. Singh RN, Pandey JP, Singh NK et al (2000) Sol–gel derived spinel MxCo3−xO4 (M = Ni, Cu; 0 ≤ x ≤ 1) films and oxygen evolution. Electrochim Acta 45:1911–1919. doi:10.1016/S0013-4686(99)00413-2

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  27. Laouini E, Hamdani M, Pereira MIS et al (2008) Preparation and electrochemical characterization of spinel type Fe-Co3O4 thin film electrodes in alkaline medium. Int J Hydrogen Energy 33:4936–4944. doi:10.1016/j.ijhydene.2008.07.039

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  28. Mayrhofer KJJ, Strmcnik D, Blizanac BB et al (2008) Measurement of oxygen reduction activities via the rotating disc electrode method: from Pt model surfaces to carbon-supported high surface area catalysts. Electrochim Acta 53:3181–3188. doi:10.1016/j.electacta.2007.11.057

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  29. Meher SK, Rao GR (2011) Ultralayered Co3O4 for high-performance supercapacitor applications. J Phys Chem C 115:15646–15654. doi:10.1021/jp201200e

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  30. You B, Jiang N, Sheng M et al (2015) High-performance overall water splitting electrocatalysts derived from cobalt-based metal–organic frameworks. Chem Mater 27:7636–7642. doi:10.1021/acs.chemmater.5b02877

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  31. Menezes PW, Indra A, Gonzàlez-Flores D, et al (2015) High-performance oxygen redox catalysis with multifunctional cobalt oxide nanochains: morphology-dependent activity. ACS Catal 5:2017–2027. doi:10.1021/cs501724v

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  32. Stelmachowski P, Ciura K, Grzybek G, et al (2016) Morphology-dependent reactivity of cobalt oxide nanoparticles in N2O decomposition. Catal Sci Technol 15:851. doi:10.1039/C6CY00365F

    Google Scholar 

  33. Specchia S, Galletti C, Specchia V (2010) Solution combustion synthesis as intriguing technique to quickly produce performing catalysts for specific applications. Stud Surf Sci Catal 175:59–67

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  34. Ercolino G, Grzybek G, Stelmachowski P, et al (2015) Pd/Co3O4-based catalysts prepared by solution combustion synthesis for residual methane oxidation in lean conditions. Catal Today 257:66–71. doi:10.1016/j.cattod.2015.03.006

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  35. Zheng MB, Cao J, Liao ST et al (2009) Preparation of mesoporous Co3O4 nanoparticles via solid–liquid route and effects of calcination temperature and textural parameters on their electrochemical capacitive behaviors. J Phys Chem C 113:3887–3894. doi:10.1021/jp810230d

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  36. Spinolo G, Ardizzone S, Trasatti S (1997) Surface characterization of Co3O4 electrodes prepared by the sol–gel method. J Electroanal Chem 423:49–57. doi:10.1016/S0022-0728(96)04841-3

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  37. Sing KSW (1982) Reporting physisorption data for gas/solid systems with special reference to the determination of surface area and porosity. Pure Appl Chem 54:2201–2218. doi:10.1351/pac198557040603

    Article  Google Scholar 

  38. Hadjiev VG, Iliev MN, Vergilov IV (1988) The Raman spectra of Co3O4. J Phys C Solid State Phys 21:L199–L201. doi:10.1088/0022-3719/21/7/007

    Article  Google Scholar 

  39. Lorite I, Romero JJ, Fernández JF (2012) Effects of the agglomeration state on the Raman properties of Co3O4 nanoparticles. J Raman Spectrosc 43:1443–1448. doi:10.1002/jrs.4098

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  40. Umeshbabu E, Ranga Rao G (2016) NiCo2O4 hexagonal nanoplates anchored on reduced graphene oxide sheets with enhanced electrocatalytic activity and stability for methanol and water oxidation. Electrochim Acta 213:717–729. doi:10.1016/j.electacta.2016.07.161

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  41. Conway BE (1995) Electrochemical oxide film formation at noble metals as a surface-chemical process. Prog Surf Sci 49:331–452. doi:10.1016/0079-6816(95)00040-6

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  42. Zhan Y, Lu M, Yang S, et al (2016) The origin of catalytic activity of nickel phosphate for oxygen evolution in alkaline solution and its further enhancement by iron substitution. ChemElectroChem 3:615–621. doi:10.1002/celc.201500511

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  43. Łukaszewski M, Soszko M, Czerwiński A (2016) Electrochemical methods of real surface area determination of noble metal electrodes: an overview. Int J Electrochem Sci 11:4442–4469. doi:10.20964/2016.06.71

    Article  Google Scholar 

  44. Patil V (2012) Synthesis and characterization of Co3O4 thin film. Soft Nanosci Lett 2:1–7. doi:10.4236/snl.2012.21001

    Article  Google Scholar 

  45. Wang X, Luo H, Yang H et al (2004) Oxygen catalytic evolution reaction on nickel hydroxide electrode modified by electroless cobalt coating. Int J Hydrogen Energy 29:967–972. doi:10.1016/j.ijhydene.2003.05.001

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

The Executive Programme for Scientific and Technological Cooperation CANALETTO (protocol n. M00478) between the Italian Republic (Ministry of Foreign Affairs) and the Republic of Poland (Ministry of Science and Higher Education) supported this work.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Department of Applied Science and Technology, Politecnico di Torino, Corso Duca degli Abruzzi 24, 10129, Turin, Italy

    Alessandro H. A. Monteverde Videla, Paweł Stelmachowski, Giuliana Ercolino & Stefania Specchia

  2. Faculty of Chemistry, Jagiellonian University in Kraków, ul. Ingardena 3, 30-060, Kraków, Poland

    Paweł Stelmachowski

Authors
  1. Alessandro H. A. Monteverde Videla
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Paweł Stelmachowski
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Giuliana Ercolino
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  4. Stefania Specchia
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Alessandro H. A. Monteverde Videla.

Electronic supplementary material

Below is the link to the electronic supplementary material.

Supplementary material 1 (PDF 946 KB)

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Monteverde Videla, A.H.A., Stelmachowski, P., Ercolino, G. et al. Benchmark comparison of Co3O4 spinel-structured oxides with different morphologies for oxygen evolution reaction under alkaline conditions. J Appl Electrochem 47, 295–304 (2017). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10800-016-1040-3

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10800-016-1040-3

Keywords

Search

Navigation