Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Strategy for technology standardization based on the theory of entropy

  • Published:
Information Technology and Management Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Technology standardization has received a lot of attention in industries. Effective standardization strategies can bring many business benefits and help firms to achieve and sustain competitive advantages. In this paper, a systems perspective is proposed that may help in understanding the strategies for technology standardization. Based on an in-depth analysis of the characteristics of technology standards and industrial innovation, this paper applies the theories of entropy to technology standardization and analyzes the interrelationship between technology standards and industrial innovations. We found that applying the theory of entropy to the analysis of technology standardization can help firms to better understand the interrelationship between technology standards and industrial innovations.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Li Y, Li L, Liu Y, Wang L (2005) Linking management control system with product development and process decisions to cope with environment complexity. Int J Prod Res 43(12):2577–2592

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Li L, Benton W (2006) Hospital technology and nurse staffing management decisions. J Oper Manag 24(5):676–691

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Qi J, Li L, Ai H (2009) A system dynamics approach to competitive strategy in mobile telecommunication industry. Syst Res Behav Sci 26:155–168

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Li L, Rubin B (2004) Technology investment in hospital: an empirical study. Int J Manag Enterp Dev 1(4):390–410

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Zhang A, Melcher A, Li L (2004) Mapping the relationships among product complexity, information technology, and transaction governance structure: a case study. J Manag Syst 16(4):41–55

    Google Scholar 

  6. Li L (2006) The effects of information technology implementation on supply chain collaboration. Int J Internet Enterp Manag 4(2):118–134

    Google Scholar 

  7. Adomavicius G, Bockstedt J, Gupta A, Kauffman (2007) Technology roles and paths of influence in an ecosystem model of technology evolution. Inf Technol Manage 8:185–202

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Bardhan I, Gupta A, Tallon P (2008) Research perspectives on innovation through information technology management in a networked world. Inf Technol Manage 9:147–148

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Techatassanasoontorn A, Suo S (2011) Influences on standards adoption in de facto standardization. Inf Technol Manage 12:357–385

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Guo J, Xu L, Gong Z, Che C, Chaudhry S (2012) Semantic inference on heterogeneous e-marketplace activities. IEEE Trans Syst Man Cybern A Syst Hum 42(2):316–330

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Wang C, Xu L, Liu X, Qin X (2005) ERP research, development and implementation in China: an overview. Int J Prod Res 43(18):3915–3932

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Xu L, Liu H, Wang S, Wang K (2009) Modeling and analysis techniques for cross-organizational workflow systems. Syst Res Behav Sci 26(3):367–389

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Guo J, Xu L, Xiao G, Gong Z (2012) Improving multilingual semantic interoperation in cross-organizational enterprise systems through concept disambiguation. IEEE Trans Ind Inf 8(3):647–658

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Xu L, Wang C, Bi Z, Yu J (2012) AutoAssem: an automated assembly planning system for complex products. IEEE Trans Ind Inf 8(3):669–678

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Yin Y, Fan Y, Xu L (2012) EMG & EPP-integrated human-machine interface between the paralyzed and rehabilitation exoskeleton. IEEE Trans Inf Technol Biomed 16(4):542–549

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Xu L (2011) Enterprise systems: state-of-the-art and future trends. IEEE Trans Ind Inf 7(4):630–640

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. He W, Xu L (2012) Integration of distributed enterprise applications: a survey. IEEE Trans Ind Inform. doi:10.1109/TII.2012.2189221

    Google Scholar 

  18. Lyytinen K, King J (2006) Standard making: a critical research frontier for information systems research. MIS Q 30:405–411

    Google Scholar 

  19. Lyytinen K, Keil T, Fomin V (2008) A framework to build process theories of anticipatory information and communication technology (ICT) standardizing. Int J IT Stand Stand Res 6(1):1–38

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. Markus M, Steinfield C, Wigand R, Minton G (2006) Industry-wide information systems standardization as collective action: the case of the US residential mortgage industry. MIS Q 30:439–465

    Google Scholar 

  21. Devezas T, Corrsdine J (2002) The nonlinear dynamics of technoeconomic systems an informational interpretation. Technol Forecast Soc Chang 69:317–357

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. Qian X, Yu J, Dai R (1993) A new discipline of science: the study of open complex giant system and its methodology. J Syst Eng Electron 4(2):2–12

    Google Scholar 

  23. Xu L (2000) The contribution of systems science to information systems research. Syst Res Behav Sci 17:105–116

    Article  Google Scholar 

  24. Fritzsche M, Kittel K, Blankenburg A, Vajna S (2012) Multidisciplinary design optimisation of a recurve bow based on applications of the autogenetic design theory and distributed computing. Enterp Inf Syst 6(3):329–343

    Article  Google Scholar 

  25. Niu N, Jin M, Cheng J (2011) A case study of exploiting enterprise resource planning requirements. Enterp Inf Syst 5(2):183–206

    Article  Google Scholar 

  26. Chen X, He Y, Huang H (2011) An approach to automatic development of interlocking logic based on statechart. Enterp Inf Syst 5(3):273–286

    Article  Google Scholar 

  27. Yin Y, Xie J (2011) Reconfigurable manufacturing execution system for pipe cutting. Enterp Inf Syst 5(3):287–299

    Article  Google Scholar 

  28. Xu L, Viriyasitavat W, Ruchikachorn P, Martin A (2012) Using propositional logic for requirements verification of service workflow. IEEE Trans Ind Inf 8(3):639–646

    Article  Google Scholar 

  29. Viriyasitavat W, Xu L, Martin A (2012) SWSpec: the requirements specification language in service workflow environments. IEEE Trans Ind Inf 8(3):631–638

    Article  Google Scholar 

  30. Lykourentzou I, Dagka F, Papadaki K, Lepouras G, Vassilakis C (2012) Wikis in enterprise settings: a survey. Enterp Inf Syst 6(1):1–53

    Article  Google Scholar 

  31. Belleflame P (2002) Coordination on formal vs. de facto standard: a dynamic approach. Eur J Polit Econ 18(1):153–176

    Article  Google Scholar 

  32. Tushman M, Anderson P (1986) Technological discontinuities and organizational environments. Adm Sci Q 31(3):439–465

    Article  Google Scholar 

  33. Xu S, Xu L (2011) Management: a scientific discipline for humanity. Inf Technol Manage 12(2):51–54

    Article  Google Scholar 

  34. Allen B, Sriram R (2000) The role of standard in innovation. Technol Forecast Soc Chang 64(2–3):171–181

    Article  Google Scholar 

  35. Swann G (2000) The economics of standardization: final report for standards and technical regulations directorate, Department of Trade and Industry. Manchester Business School, UK

  36. Hemphill T (2005) Technology standard development, patent ambush, and US antitrust policy. Technol Soc 27(1):55–67

    Article  Google Scholar 

  37. Boyling J (1973) Carnot engines and the principle of increase of entropy. Int J Theor Phys 7(4):291–299

    Article  Google Scholar 

  38. Lin Y, Duan X, Zhao C, Xu L (2012) Systems science methodological approaches. CRC Press, New York

    Google Scholar 

  39. Blind K (2002) Driving forces for standardization at standardization development organizations. Appl Econ 34(16):1985–1998

    Article  Google Scholar 

  40. Libicki M (2000) The role of technological standards in today’s society and in the future–testimony presented before the Committee on Science Subcommittee on Technology United States House of Representatives on Sept 13, 2000, RAND Corporation

  41. Kuang R, Kuang J (2009) Study of the theory of knowledge entropy for innovative development of industrial group. In: Proceedings of 2009 international conference on information management, innovation management and industrial engineering, Xian, China

  42. Ren Y, Zhou X, Zhang W (2007) The research on evaluation model of enterprise’s technological innovation capacity based on entropy theory and osculating value method. In: Proceedings of 2007 international conference on management science and engineering, Harbin, China

  43. Li L (2012) Effects of enterprise technology on supply chain collaboration: analysis of China-linked supply chain. Enterp Inf Syst 6(1):55–77

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

This study is partially supported by the National Natural Science Foundation of China (NSFC) under the Grant No. 70903029; this work was supported by “985 Project” of Jilin University.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Shukuan Zhao.

Additional information

SI: Advances in E-Business Engineering.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Jiang, H., Zhao, S., Qiu, S. et al. Strategy for technology standardization based on the theory of entropy. Inf Technol Manag 13, 311–320 (2012). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10799-012-0137-6

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10799-012-0137-6

Keywords

Navigation