Skip to main content
Log in

Mapping the journey: visualising collaborative experiences for sustainable design education

  • Published:
International Journal of Technology and Design Education Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The paradigm of design is changing. Designers now need to be equipped with the skills and knowledge that will enable them to participate in the global move towards a sustainable future. The challenges arise as Design for Sustainability deals with very complex and often contradictory issues. Collaborative learning experiences recognise that these complex issues can be addressed with the pooling of diverse knowledge, perspectives, cultures, skills and tools. Unless, however the process of collaboration is explored in detail, the opportunity for reflection, learning and improvement is lost. This paper proposes that by introducing and analysing collaboration within third level design education, the capacity for responsible design practice can be developed, leading to a transformative shift in how designers are taught as students and subsequently practice as professionals. Over two multidisciplinary projects devised and undertaken by design students from the University of Limerick (Ireland), Hogeschool Utrecht (Netherlands) and Virginia Commonwealth University (USA), the collaborative path is mapped and critical junctions identified. From this process of mapping and visualisation, collective narratives of the overall project experience are constructed (through the eyes of the participants and planners). This leads to a greater understanding and appreciation of the benefits and limitations of the collaborative experience.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5

Similar content being viewed by others

Notes

  1. A full analysis of the data including extracts and samples can be found in McMahon (2013), Designed from the inside out: developing capacity for social sustainability in design through collaboration, https://dspace.lboro.ac.uk/2134/12121.

References

  • Barth, M., Godemann, J., Rieckmann, M., & Stoltenberg, U. (2007). Developing key competencies for sustainable development in higher education. International Journal of Sustainability in Higher Education, 8(4), 416–430.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Baskerville, R. L., & Wood-Harper, T. (1996). A critical perspective on Action Research as a method for information systems research. Journal of Information Technology, 11, 235–246.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bhamra, T., & Dewberry, E. (2007). Re-visioning design priorities through sustainability education. In International Conference on Engineering Design ICED ‘07 (pp. 28–31). Paris.

  • Carr, W., & Kemmis, S. (1986). Becoming critical: Education, knowledge and Action Research. London: The Falmer Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cheng, N. Y. W., & Kvan, T. (2000). Design collaboration strategies. In 4th SIGRADI, Rio de Janeiro.

  • Chiu, M.-L. (2002). An organizational view of design communication in design collaboration. Design Studies, 23(2), 187–210.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cho, J. Y., & Cho, M.-H. (2014). Student perceptions and performance in online and offline collaboration in an interior design studio. International Journal of Technology and Design Education, 24, 473–491.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Clark, N., Perez-Trejo, F., & Allen, P. (1995). Evolutionary dynamics and sustainable development: A systems approach. Aldershot: Edward Elgar.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cohen, L., Manion, L., & Morrison, K. (2000). Research methods in education (5th ed.). Routledge Falmer: London & New York.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Council, Design. (2007). Lessons from America: Report on the Design Council. London: Higher Education Funding Council for England.

    Google Scholar 

  • Davis, M. (2008). Why do we need doctoral study in design? International Journal of Design, 2(3), 71–79.

    Google Scholar 

  • de Haan, G. (2006). The BLK ‘21’ programme in Germany: A ‘Gestaltungskompetenz’-based model for Education for Sustainable Development. Environmental Education Research, 12(1), 19–32.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Denton, H. (1997). Multidisciplinary team-based project work: Planning factors. Design Studies, 18, 155–170.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Eagan, P., Cook, T., & Joeres, E. (2002). Teaching the importance of culture and interdisciplinary education for sustainable development. International Journal of Sustainability in Higher Education, 3(1), 48–66.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Engestrom, Y. (2001). Expansive learning at work: Toward an activity theoretical re-conceptualisation. Journal of Education and Work., 14(1), 133–156.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hansen, M. T. (1999). The search-transfer problem: The role of weak ties in sharing knowledge across organisation subunits. Administrative Science Quarterly, 44, 82–111.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hill, A.-M. (1998). Problem solving in real-life contexts: An alternative for design in technology education. International Journal of Technology and Design Education, 8, 203–220.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Huckle, J., & Sterling, S. (Eds.). (1996). Education for sustainability. London: Earthscan.

    Google Scholar 

  • John-Steiner, V. (2000). Creative collaboration. New York: Oxford University Press Inc.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jonassen, D. H., Strobel, J., & Lee, C. B. (2006). Everyday problem solving in engineering: Lessons for engineering educators. Journal of Engineering Education, 95(2), 1–14.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jupp, V. (Ed.). (2006). The SAGE dictionary of social research methods. London: SAGE Publication.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kelley, T. (2000). The art of innovation. New York: Doubleday.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kvan, T. (2001). The pedagogy of virtual design studios. Automation in Construction, 10, 345–353.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lahti, H. (2007). Collaboration between students and experts in a virtual design studio. Journal of Design Research, 6(4), 403–421.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lasker, R. D., Weiss, E. S., & Miller, R. (2001). Partnership synergy: A practical framework for studying and strengthening the collaborative advantage. The Millbank Quarterly, 79(2), 179–205.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lau, K.-W. (2007). Establishing creative-friendly space for design thinking in shared virtual reality in tertiary design education. In International Association of Societies of Design Research, Hong Kong 12–15, November, 2007.

  • Leidner, D. E., & Jarvenpaa, S. L. (1995). The use of Information Technology to enhance management school education: A theoretical view. Management Information Systems Quarterly, 19(3), 265–291.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lesser, E. L. (2000). Knowledge and social capital. Woburn, MA: Butterworth-Heinemann.

    Google Scholar 

  • McDonnell, J. (2012). Accommodating disagreement: A study of effective design collaboration. Design Studies, 33, 44–63.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • McKay, J., & Marshall, P. (2001). The dual imperatives of Action Research. Information Technology & People, 14(1), 46–59.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • McKernan, J. (1996). Action Research: A handbook of methods and resources for the reflective practitioner (2nd ed.). London: Kogan Page.

    Google Scholar 

  • McMahon, M. (2013). Designed from the inside out: Developing capacity for social sustainability in design through collaboration. https://dspace.lboro.ac.uk/2134/12121.

  • McMahon, M., & Bhamra, T. (2015). Social sustainability in design: Moving the discussions forward. The Design Journal, 18(3), 367–391.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • McNiff, J., & Whitehead, J. (2006). All you need to know about Action Research. London: SAGE Publications Ltd.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mochizuki, Y., & Fadeeva, Z. (2012). Competences for sustainable development and sustainability: Significance and challenges for ESD. International Journal of Sustainability in Higher Education, 11(4), 391–403.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Nagel, R. L., Papapas, E. C., & Pierrakos, O. (2012). On a vision to educating students in sustainability and design—The James Madison University School of Engineering approach. Sustainability, 4, 72–91.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Norman, E. W., & Roberts, P. H. (Eds.). (2001). Design and technology educational research and curriculum development: The emerging international research agenda. Loughborough: Loughborough University.

    Google Scholar 

  • Orr, D. W. (1994). Earth in mind. Washington, DC: Island Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Parker, J. (2010). Competencies for inter-disciplinarity in higher education. International Journal of Sustainability in Higher Education, 11(4), 325–338.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Paulus, P. B. (2002). Different ponds for different fish: A contrasting perspective on team innovation. Applied Psychology: An International Review, 51(3), 394–398.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Scharmer, O. C. (2007). Theory U: Learning from the future as it emerges. Cambridge, MA: Society of Organisational Learning.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schön, D. (1983). The reflective practitioner. USA: Basic Books.

    Google Scholar 

  • Senge, P., Scharmer, C. O., Jaworski, J., & Flowers, B. S. (2005). Presence, exploring profound change in people, organisations and society. London: Nicholoa Brealey Publishing.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sobol, D. (2012). Innovation is about arguing, not brainstorming. Here’s how to argue productively. Fast Company. Accessed March 03, 2012.

  • Sofo, F. (2004). Open your mind: The 7 keys to thinking critically. St.Leonards, NSW: Allen & Unwin.

    Google Scholar 

  • Steiner, G., & Posch, A. (2006). Higher education for sustainability by means of trans-disciplinary case studies: An innovative approach for solving complex real-world problems. Journal of Cleaner Production, 14, 877–890.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Stempfle, J., & Badke-Schaub, P. (2002). Thinking in design teams- an analysis of team communication. Design Studies, 23, 473–496.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sterling, S. (2001). Sustainable education: Revisioning learning and change. Totnes: Green Books.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tilbury, D., & Wortman, D. (2004). Engaging people in sustainability, Commission on Education and Communication. Gland and Cambridge: IUCN.

    Google Scholar 

  • UNESCO. (2009). ‘UNESCO.org’. http://portal.unesco.org/education/en/ev.phpURL_ID=27234&URL_DO=DO_TOPIC&URL_SECTION=201.htm. Accessed June 24, 2012.

  • Valkenburg, R., & Dorst, K. (1998). The reflective practice of design teams. Design Studies, 19, 249–271.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wals, A. E. J. (2010). Mirroring, Gestaltswitching and transformative social learning: Stepping stones for developing sustainability competence. International Journal of Sustainability in Higher Education, 11(4), 380–390.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Warburton, K. (2003). Deep learning and education for sustainability. International Journal of Sustainability in Higher Education, 4(1), 44–56.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • West, M. A. (2002). Sparkling fountains or stagnant ponds: An integrative model of creativity and innovation implementation in work groups. Applied Psychology: An International Review., 51(3), 355–424.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wiek, A., Withycombe, L., & Redman, C. L. (2011). Key competencies in sustainability: A reference framework for academic program development. Integrated Research System for Sustainability Science, 6, 203–218.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Willard, M., Wiedmeyer, C., Warren Flint, R., Weedon, J. S., Woodward, R., Feldman, I., & Edwards, M. (2010). The sustainability professional: 2010 competency survey report. Environmental Quality Management, 20(1), 49–83.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Muireann McMahon.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

McMahon, M., Bhamra, T. Mapping the journey: visualising collaborative experiences for sustainable design education. Int J Technol Des Educ 27, 595–609 (2017). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10798-016-9365-0

Download citation

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10798-016-9365-0

Keywords

Navigation