Accreditation Board for Engineering and Technology, Inc. (ABET). (2000). Criteria for accrediting engineering programs
Adey, P. (2004). The professional development of teachers: Practice and theory. Dordrecht, Holland: Kluwer.
Akerson, V. L. (2009). Fostering a community of practice through a professional development program to improve elementary teachers’ views of nature of science and teaching practice. Journal of Research in Science Teaching,
Borko, H. (2004). Professional development and teacher learning: Mapping the terrain. Educational Researcher,
Brophy, S., Klein, S., Portsmore, M., & Rogers, C. (2008). Advancing engineering education in P-12 classrooms. Journal of Engineering Education,
Buczynski, S., & Hansen, C. B. (2010). Impact of professional development on teacher practice: Uncovering connections. Teaching and Teacher Education,
Childress, V., & Rhodes, C. (2008). Engineering student outcomes for grades 9–12. The Technology Teacher,
Childress, V., & Sanders, M. (2007). Core engineering concepts foundational for the study of technology in grades 6–12. In R. Custer (Ed.), Professional development for engineering and technology: A national symposium
, February 2007. Retrieved September 03, 2008, http://www.conferences.ilstu.edu/NSA/homepage.html
Crockett, M. D., Chen, C., Namikawa, T., & Zilimu, J. (2009). Exploring discourse-based assessment practice and its role in mathematics professional development. Professional Development in Education,
Custer, R. L., & Daugherty, J. L. (2009). Professional development for teachers of engineering: Research and related activities. The Bridge: Linking Engineering and Society,
Custer, R. L., Daugherty, J. L., & Meyer, J. P. (under review). Formulating a concept base for secondary level engineering: A review and synthesis. Journal of Technology Education.
Darling-Hammond, L., & Baratz-Snowden, J. (Eds.). (2005). A good teacher in every classroom: Preparing the highly qualified teachers our children deserve. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
Daugherty, J. L. (2009). Engineering professional development design for secondary school teachers: A multiple case study. Journal of Technology Education,
Dearing, B. M., & Daugherty, M. K. (2004). Delivering engineering content in technology education. The Technology Teacher,
Desimone, L., Porter, A. C., Garet, M. S., Yoon, K. S., & Birman, B. F. (2002). Effects of professional development on teachers’ instruction: Results from a three-year longitudinal study. Educational Evaluation and Policy Analysis,
Ebert, E. K., & Crippen, K. J. (2010). Applying a cognitive-affective model of conceptual change to professional development. Journal of Science Teacher Education,
Evans, L. (2002). What is teacher development? Oxford Review of Education,
Fishman, B. J., Marx, R. W., Best, S., & Tal, R. T. (2003). Linking teacher and student learning to improve professional development in systemic reform. Teaching and Teacher Education,
Fullan, M. G., & Stiegelbauer, S. (1991). The new meaning of educational change (2nd ed.). New York: Teachers College Press.
Gall, M. D., Gall, J. P., & Borg, W. R. (2003). Educational research: An introduction (7th ed.). Boston: Allyn and Bacon.
Garet, M. S., Porter, A. C., Desimone, L., Birman, B. F., & Yoon, K. S. (2001). What makes professional development effective? Results from a national sample of teachers. American Educational Research Journal,
Gerring, J. (2007). Case study research: Principles and practices. Cambridge, MA: Cambridge University.
Goldschmidt, P., & Phelps, G. (2010). Does teacher professional development affect content and pedagogical knowledge: How much and for how long? Economics of Education Review,
Gordon, S. P. (2004). Professional development for school improvement: Empowering learning communities. Boston: Pearson.
Guskey, T. (2003). What makes professional development effective? Phi Delta Kappan,
Hacker, M., de Vries, M., & Rossouw, A. (2009). CCETE project: Concepts and contexts in engineering and technology education
. Retrieved November 11, 2009, from http://www.hofstra.edu/pdf/Academics/Colleges/SOEAHS/ctl/CTL_Edu_Initiatives_CCETE_revised.pdf
Harris, K. S., & Rogers, G. E. (2008). Secondary engineering competencies: A Delphi study of engineering faculty. Journal of Industrial Teacher Education,
International Technology Education Association. (2000/2002). Standards for technological literacy: Content for the study of technology. Reston, VA.
Jones, A., & Moreland, J. (2004). Enhancing practicing primary school teachers’ pedagogical content knowledge in technology. International Journal of Technology and Design Education,
Katehi, L., Pearson, G., & Feder, M. (Eds.). National Academy of Engineering and National Research Council. Engineering in K-12 education: Understanding the status and improving the prospects. Washington, DC: National Academies Press.
Kazemi, E., Lesseig, K., Mumme, J., Carroll, C., & Kelley-Petersen, M. (2009). Conceptualizing the work of leading mathematical tasks in professional development. Journal of Teacher Education,
Kipperman, D. (2009). Teaching through technology concepts: Strengthening the position of technology education in the curriculum. In Proceedings of the 22nd pupils attitudes toward technology (PATT) conference, international conference on design and technology education research, Delft, Netherlands, (pp. 279–283).
Lewis, T. (2005). Coming to terms with engineering design as content. Journal of Technology Education,
Lewis, T., Petrina, S., & Hill, A. M. (1998). Problem posing: Adding a creative increment to technological problem solving. Journal of Industrial Teacher Education,
Lieberman, A. (1994). Teacher development commitment and challenge. In P. P. Grimmett & J. Neufiled (Eds.), Teacher development and the struggle for authenticity: Professional growth and restructuring in the context of change. New York: Teachers College.
Loucks-Horsley, S. (1999). Effective professional development for teachers of mathematics. In Eisenhower National Clearinghouse, Ideas that work: Mathematics professional development. Columbus, OH: Eisenhower National Clearinghouse.
Loucks-Horsley, S., Love, N., Stiles, K. E., Mundry, S., & Hewson, P. W. (2003). Designing professional development for teachers of science and mathematics (2nd ed.). Thousand Oaks, CA: Corwin.
Loucks-Horsley, S., Stiles, K., & Hewson, P. (1996). Principles of effective professional development for mathematics and science education: A synthesis of standards. National Institute for Science Education Brief,
Marshall, C., & Rossman, G. G. (1989). Designing qualitative research. Newbury Park, CA: Sage.
Mawson, B. (2003). Beyond ‘the design process’: An alternative pedagogy for technology education. International Journal of Design Education,
McLaughlin, M. W. (2002). Sites and sources of teachers’ learning. In C. Sugrue & C. Day (Eds.), Developing teachers and teaching practice: International research perspectives (pp. 95–115). London: Routledge Falmer.
National Research Council. (1999). How people learn: Brain, mind, experience, and school. Washington, DC: National Academy Press.
Oliveira, A. (2010). Developing elementary teachers’ understanding of the discourse structure of inquiry-based science classrooms. International Journal of Science and Mathematics Education,
Parise, L. M., & Spillane, J. P. (2010). Teacher learning and instructional change: How formal and on-the-job learning opportunities predict change in elementary school teachers’ practice. The Elementary School Journal,
Park, S., & Oliver, J. S. (2007). Revisiting the conceptualization of pedagogical content knowledge (PCK): PCK as a conceptual tool to understand teachers as professionals. Research in Science Education,
Peressini, D., Borko, H., Romagnano, L., Knuth, E., & Willis, C. (2004). A conceptual framework for learning to teach secondary mathematics: A situative perspective. Educational Studies in Mathematics,
Rittle-Johnson, B. (2006). Promoting transfer: The effects of direct instruction and self-explanation. Child Development,
Rohaan, E. J., Toconis, R., & Jochems, W. M. G. (2007). Examining teachers’ pedagogical content knowledge with a multiple choice test. In Proceedings of the 18th pupils attitudes toward technology (PATT) conference, international conference on design and technology education research, Glascow, Scotland, (pp. 129–136).
Sanders, M. (2001). New paradigm or old wine? The status of technology education practice in the United States. Journal of Technology Education,
Shulman, L. S. (1986). Those who understand: Knowledge growth in teaching. Educational Researcher,
Stake, R. E. (1995). The art of case study research. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
Stake, R. E. (2006). Multiple case study analysis. New York: Guilford.
Welch, M. (1999). Analyzing the tacit strategies of novice designers. Research in Science & Technological Education,
Wicklein, R. C. (2006). Five good reasons for engineering design as the focus for technology education. The Technology Teacher,
Williams, P. J. (2000). Design: The only methodology of technology? Journal of Technology Education,
Wilson, S. M., & Berne, J. (1999). Teacher learning and the acquisition of professional knowledge: An examination of research on contemporary professional development. Review of Research in Education,