Amabile, T. M. (1998). How to kill creativity. Harvard Business Review, 76(5), 77–87.
Atkinson, S. (2000). Does the need for high levels of performance curtail the development of creativity in design and technology project work? International Journal of Technology and Design Education
Baer, J. (1993). Creativity and divergent thinking. Hillsdale, New Jersey: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Publishers.
Barak, M., & Goffer, N. (2002). Fostering systematic innovative thinking and problem solving: Lessons education can learn from industry. International Journal of Technology and Design Education, 12
Barlex, D. (2007). Creativity in school design & technology in England: A discussion of the influences. International Journal of Technology and Design Education, 17
Barlex, D. M., & Trebell, D. (2007). Design-without-make: Challenging the conventional approach to teaching and learning in a design and technology classroom. International Journal of Technology and Design Education, Published Online, February 28, 2007.
Brown, J. S., Collins, A., & Duguid, P. (1989). Situated cognition and the culture of learning. Educational Researcher, 18(1), 32–42.
Burghardt, M. D., & Hacker, M. (2004). Informed design. A contemporary approach to design pedagogy as the core process in technology. The Technology Teacher, 64(1), 6–8.
Carlson, M. B., & Gorman, M. E. (1992). A cognitive framework to understand technological creativity: Bell, Edison, and the Telephone. In R. J. Weber & D. N. Perkins (Eds.), Inventive minds: Creativity in technology (pp. 48–79). New York: Oxford University Press.
Caroll, D. R. (1997). Bridge engineering for the elementary grades. Journal of Engineering Education, 86(3), 221–226.
Charles, R. E., & Runco, M. A. (2000–2001). Developmental trends in the evaluative and divergent thinking of children. Creativity Research Journal, 13(3&4), 417–437.
Christiaans, H., & Venselaar, K. (2005). Creativity in design engineering and the role of knowledge: Modeling the expert. International Journal of Technology and Design Education, 15
Claxton, A. F., Pannells, T. C., & Rhoads, P. A. (2005). Developmental trends in the creativity of school age children. Creativity Research Journal, 17
Cotton, S. E. (2002). Making problem-solving simulations more realistic. The Technology Teacher, 62(3), 29–32.
Court, A. W. (1998). Improving creativity in engineering design education. European Journal of Education, 23
Crouch, T. D. (1992). Why Wilbur and Orville? Some thoughts on the Wright Brothers and the process of invention. In R. J. Weber & D. N. Perkins (Eds.), Inventive minds: Creativity in technology (pp. 80–92). New York: Oxford University Press.
Dasgupta, S. (1996). Technology and creativity. New York: Oxford University Press.
Deal, W.F., III (2001). The great robot beetle challenge. The Technology Teacher, 60(8), 17–20.
Defeyter, M. A., & German, T. P. (2003). Acquiring an understanding of design: Evidence from children’s insight problem solving. Cognition, 89
Dewey, J. (1901). The place of manual training in the elementary course of study. Manual Training Magazine, 11(4), 193–199.
Dillon, R. (1995). Using a robotics contest to enhance student creativity and problem solving skills. The Technology Teacher, 55(1), 11–14.
Doppelt, Y. (2007). Assessing creative thinking in design-based learning. International Journal of Technology and Design Education
. DOI: 10.1007/s10798-006-9008-y
Dreistadt, R. (1969). The use of analogies and incubation in obtaining insights in creative problem solving. Journal of Psychology, 71, 159–175.
Druin, A., & Fast, C. (2002). The child as learner, critic, inventor, and technology design painter: An analysis of three years of Swedish Student Journals. International Journal of Technology and Design Education, 12
Duncker, K. (1945). On problem solving. Psychological Monographs, 28(5), Whole Number 270.
Dym, C. L., Agogino, A. M., Eris, O., Frey, D. D., & Leifer, L. J. (2005). Engineering design thinking, teaching, and learning. Journal of Engineering Education, 94(1), 103–120.
Foster, P. N. (2006). Reengineering activities in K-8 classrooms: Focus on formative feedback. The Technology Teacher, 65(7), 20–24.
Gardner, H. (1993). Frames of mind: The theory of multiple intelligences. New York: Basic Books.
Gentner, D. (1983). Structure-mapping: A theoretical framework for analogy. Cognitive Science, 7
Gentner, D., Brem, S., Ferguson, R., Wolff, P., Markman, A. B., & Forbus, K. (1997). Analogy and creativity in the works of Johannes Kepler. In T. Ward, S. Smith, & J. Vaid (Eds.), Creative thought
(pp. 403–459). Washington, DC: American Psychological Association.CrossRef
Gentner, D., & Jeziorski, M. (1993). The shift from metaphor to analogy in Western Science. In A. Ortony (Ed.), Metaphor and thought (pp. 447–480). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Gentner, D., & Markman, A. B. (1997). Structure mapping in analogy and similarity. American Psychologist, 52
Gick, M. L., & Holyoak, K. J. (1980). Analogical problem solving. Cognitive Psychology, 12
Glucksberg, S., & Keysar, B. (1990). Understanding metaphorical comparisons: Beyond similarity. Psychological Review, 97
Glucksberg, S., Manfredi, D. A., & McGlone, M. S. (1997). Metaphor comprehension: How metaphors create new categories. In T. B. Ward, S. N. Smith, & J. Vaid (Eds.), Creative thought: An investigation of conceptual structures and processes
(pp. 327–350). Washington, DC: American Psychological Association.CrossRef
Goel, L. (2006). Engineering a microfluidic device. The Technology Teacher, 66(2), 7–8.
Guilford, J. P. (1950). Creativity. The American Psychologist, 5
Guilford, J. P. (1959). The three faces of intellect. The American Psychologist, 14
Guilford, J. P. (1967). The measure of human intelligence. New York: McGraw-Hill.
Gustafson, B. J., Rowell, P. M., & Guilbert, S. M. (2000). Elementary children’s awareness of strategies for testing structural strength: A three year study. Journal of Technology Education, 11(2), 5–22.
Gustafson, B. J., Rowell, P. M., & Rose, D. P. (1999). Elementary children’s conceptions of structural stability: A three year study. Journal of Technology education, 11(1), 27–44.
Heywood, J. (2005). Engineering design: Research and development in curriculum and instruction. New Jersey: John Wiley and Sons.
Hinrichs, T. R. (1992). Problem solving in open worlds: A case study in design. Hillsdale, NJ: L. Erlbaum Associates.
Hong, J.-C., Tseng, H.-Y., & Chang, H.-Y. (2006). A study of the creative thinking process of robot combat contest: A case study of robot bug contest. In International Conference on Technology Education in the Asia Pacific Region Conference 2006 Proceedings (pp. 120–127). Hong Kong Polytechnic Institute: Hong Kong Technology Education Association.
Howard-Jones, P. A. (2002). A dual-state model of creative cognition for supporting strategies that foster creativity in the classroom. International Journal of Technology and Design Education, 12
International Technology Education Association. (2000). Standards for technological literacy—content for the study of technology. Reston, VA: Author.
Kelley, T. (2001). The art of innovation. New York: Doubleday.
Kolodner, J. L. (1997). Educational implications of analogy. A view from case based reasoning. American Psychologist, 52
Lakoff, G. (1993). The contemporary theory of metaphor. In A. Ortony (Ed.), Metaphor and thought (pp. 202–252). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Lave, J., & Wenger, E. (1991). Situated learning: Legitimate peripheral participation. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Lewis, T. (2005). Creativity: A framework for the design/problem solving discourse in technology education. Journal of Technology Education, 17(1), 36–53.
Liu, Y.-T. (1998). Personal versus cultural cognitive models of design creativity. International Journal of Technology and Design Education, 8
McCormack, A. J. (1984). Teaching inventiveness. Childhood Education, 60(4), 249–255.
McCormick, R. (2004). Issues of learning and knowledge in technology education. International Journal of Technology and Design Education, 14
Middendorf, W. H., & Englemann, R. H. (1998). Design of devices and systems. New York: Marcel Dekker Inc.
Middleton, H. (2005). Creative thinking values and design and technology education. International Journal of Technology Education, 15
Miller, A. I. (1996). Metaphors in creative scientific thought. Creativity Research Journal, 9
Mioduser, D., & Kipperman, D. (2002). Evaluation? Modification cycles in junior high students’ technological problem solving. International Journal of Technology and Design Education, 12
National Advisory Committee on Creative, Cultural Education. (1999). All our futures: Creativity, culture and education. London: Department for Education and Employment (DfEE).
Newell, A., & Simon, H. A. (1972). Human problem solving. Englewood cliffs, CA: Prentice-Hall Inc.
Nussbaum, B. (2004). The power of design. Business Week Online
, May 17, 2004. Retrieved from http://www.businessweek.com/magazine/content/04_20/b3883001_mz001.htm
Peterson, R. E. (2002). Establishing the creative environment in technology education. The Technology Technology, 61(4), 7–10.
Plucker, J. A., & Gorman, M. E. (1999). Invention is in the mind of the adolescent: Effects of a summer course one year later. Creativity Research Journal, 12
Pretz, J. E., Naples, A. J., & Sternberg, R. J. (2003). Recognizing, defining, and representing problems. In J. E. Davidson & R. J. Sternberg (Eds.), The psychology of problem solving (pp. 3–30). Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
Qualifications and Curriculum Authority. (2001). Design and technology
. UK: Department for Education and Skills. Retrieved from see http://www.ncaction.org.uk/subjects/design/index.htm
Rasinen, A. (2003). An analysis of technology education curriculum of six countries. Journal of Technology Education, 15(1), 31–47.
Scott, G. M., Lonergan, D. C., & Mumford, M. D. (2005). Conceptual combination: Alternative knowledge structures, alternative heuristics. Creativity Research Journal, 17
Shlesinger, B. E., Jr. (1982). An untapped resource of inventors: Gifted and talented children. The Elementary School Journal, 82
Sternberg, R. J. (1985). Beyond IQ: A triachic theory of human intelligence. New York: Cambridge University Press.
Sticht, T. G., & Hickey, D. T. (1991). Functional context theory, literacy, and electronics training. In R. F. Dillon & J. W. Pellegrino (Eds.), Instruction: Theoretical and applied perspectives (pp. 82–106). New York: Praeger.
Thompson, J., & Fitzgerald, M. (2006). Super mileage challenge: Combining education and fun. The Technology Teacher, 66(1), 31–35.
Torrance, E. P. (1972). Can we teach children to think creatively. The Journal of Creative Behavior, 6(2), 114–143.
Webster, A., Campbell, C., & Jane, B. (2006). Enhancing the creative process for learning in primary technology education. International Journal of technology and Design Education
Welling, H. (2007). Four mental operations in creative cognition: The importance of abstraction. Creativity Research Journal, 19
Wicklein, R. C. (2006). Five reasons for engineering design as the focus for technology education. Technology Teacher, 65(7), 25–29.
Wilson, V., & Harris, M., (2004). Creative change? A review of the impact of design and technology in schools in England. Journal of Technology Education, 15(2), 46–65.
Woodward, C. M. (1882). The function of an American training School. The Journal of Proceedings and Addresses, National Educational Association, Session of the Year of 1882.
Yu, K.-C., & Lin, K.-Y. (2006). Implementation of design and making, interdisciplinary integration, and creativity in technology education curriculum. In International Conference on Technology Education in the Asia Pacific Region Conference 2006 Proceedings (pp. 74–82). Hong Kong Polytechnic Institute: Hong Kong Technology Education Association.