Skip to main content
Log in

Corporate and personal income tax declarations

  • Published:
International Tax and Public Finance Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Decisions by firms and individuals on the extent of their tax payments have generally been treated as separate choices. Empirically, a positive relationship between corporate and personal income tax evasion can be observed. The theoretical analysis in this paper shows that a manager's decision on the firm's behaviour will be independent of his personal preferences if the gain from reducing corporate tax payments is certain, as in the case of tax avoidance. If, however, the firm evades taxes so that the manager's income depends on whether the firm's activities are detected or not, corporate and personal income tax evasion choices cannot be separated.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Allingham, M. G., & Sandmo, A. (1972). Income tax evasion: A theoretical analysis. Journal of Public Economics, 1, 323–338.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Alm, J. (1988). Compliance costs and the tax avoidance-tax evasion decision. Public Finance Quarterly, 16(1), 31–66.

    Google Scholar 

  • Alm, J. (1999). Tax compliance and tax administration. In W. B. Hildreth, & A. R. James (Eds.), Handbook on Taxation, (pp. 741–768). New York, NY: Marcel Dekker, Inc.

    Google Scholar 

  • Alm, J., & McCallin, N. J. (1990). Tax avoidance, tax evasion, and portfolio choice. Public Finance/Finances Publiques, 45(2), 193–200.

    Google Scholar 

  • Andreoni, J., Erard, B., & Feinstein, J. (1998). Tax compliance. Journal of Economic Literature, 36(2), 818–860.

    Google Scholar 

  • Baldry, J. C. (1987). Income tax evasion and the tax schedule: Some experimental results. Public Finance/ Finances Publiques, 42(3), 357–383.

    Google Scholar 

  • Balestrino, A., & Galmarini, U. (2003). Imperfect tax compliance and the optimal provision of public goods. Bulletin of Economic Research, 55(1), 37–52.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chen, K.-P., & Chu., C.Y. C. (2005). Internal control vs. external manipulation: a model of corporate income tax evasion. Rand Journal of Economics, 36(1), 151–164.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cowell, F. A. (1990a). Cheating the Government—The Economics of Evasion. Cambridge (Massachusetts) and London: The MIT Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cowell, F. A. (1990b). Tax sheltering and the cost of evasion. Oxford Economic Papers, 42(1), 231–243.

    Google Scholar 

  • Crocker, K. J., & Slemrod, J. (2005). Corporate tax evasion with agency costs. Journal of Public Economics, 89, 1593–1610.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Joulfaian, D. (2000). Corporate income tax evasion and managerial preferences. Review of Economics and Statistics, 82, 698–701.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Landskroner, Y., Paroush, J., & Swary, I. (1990). Tax evasion and portfolio decisions. Public Finance/Finances Publiques, 45(3), 409–422.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lee, K. (1995). Risk-taking and business income tax evasion. Public Finance/Finances Publiques, 50(1), 106–120.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lee, K. (1998). Tax evasion, monopoly, and nonneutral profit taxes. National Tax Journal, 51, 333–338.

    Google Scholar 

  • Marchese, C. (2004). Taxation, black markets, and other unintended consequences. In J. G. Backhaus & R. E. Wagner (Eds.), Handbook of Public Finance, (pp. 237–273). Boston et al.: Kluwer Academic Publishers.

  • Marelli, M. (1984). On indirect tax evasion. Journal of Public Economics, 25, 181–196.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Marelli, M., & Martina, R. (1988). Tax evasion and strategic behaviour of the firms. Journal of Public Economics, 37, 55–69.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Martinez-Vazquez, J., & Rider, M. (2005). Multiple modes of tax evasion: theory and evidence. National Tax Journal, 68(1), 51–76.

    Google Scholar 

  • Panteghini, P. M. (2000). Tax evasion and entrepreneurial flexibility. Public Finance Review, 28, 199–209.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Slemrod, J., & Yitzhaki, S. (2002). Tax avoidance, evasion, and administration, In A. J. Auerbach & M. Feldstein (Eds.), Handbook of Public Economics. (Vol. 3, pp. 1423–1470). Elsevier: Amsterdam et al.

  • Wang, L.F. S., & Conant, J. L. (1988). Corporate tax evasion and output decisions of the uncertain monopolist. National Tax Journal, 41, 579–581.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wrede, M. (1995). Tax evasion and risk-taking: is tax evasion desirable? Public Finance/Finances Publiques, 50(2), 303–316.

    Google Scholar 

  • Yaniv, G. (1995). A note on the tax evading firm. National Tax Journal, 48, 113–120.

    Google Scholar 

  • Yaniv, G. (1996). Tax evasion and monopoly output decisions: note. Public Finance Quarterly, 24, 501–505.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Yaniv, G. (1999). Tax evasion, risky laundering, and optimal deterrence policy. International Tax and Public Finance, 6, 27–38.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Yitzhaki, S. (1974). A note on income tax evasion: A theoretical analysis. Journal of Public Economics, 3, 201–202.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Laszlo Goerke.

Additional information

Jel Code H 24 · H 25 · H 26

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Goerke, L. Corporate and personal income tax declarations. Int Tax Public Finance 14, 281–292 (2007). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10797-006-9001-0

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10797-006-9001-0

Keywords

Navigation