Skip to main content
Log in

Adoption of Software as a Service (SaaS) Enterprise Resource Planning (ERP) Systems in Small and Medium Sized Enterprises (SMEs)

Information Systems Frontiers Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Enterprise Resource Planning (ERP) systems are now offered on the cloud under the Software as a Service (SaaS) model. For small and medium sized enterprises (SMEs), this is considered the best opportunity to take advantage of the capabilities of an ERP system without the investment and management costs associated with the on-premise model. Using a cross-sectional field study conducted across four case study organizations, this study investigated the determinants and challenges in the adoption of SaaS ERP systems by SMEs. The study found that the determining factors in deciding to adopt SaaS ERP are software vendor’s reputation in the market, software fit to the business, the potential willingness of the vendor to support the customer throughout the product life cycle, the vendor’s participation in co-creation of value for customers and the generic benefits of implementing an integrated ERP system. With switching considered a costly option, accounting shift of capital costs to operating expenses is considered advantageous by firms. Competitive pressures faced by the enterprise, external factors, concerns about data security and system performance have no influence on adoption decision, according to this study. Change management and increasing the effectiveness of use are challenges, but the willingness of the software vendor to work with organizations’ requests for changes and improvements and the continuous co-creation of value through improved product offerings is reassuring to the firms in the post-implementation phase.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Aberdeen Group. (2012). SaaS and Cloud ERP Observations. Aberdeen Group.

  • Ada, S. (2009). SMEs’ e-commerce adoption: perspectives from Denmark and Australia. Journal of Enterprise Information Management, 22, 152.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ahrens, T., & Dent, J. F. (1998). Accounting and organizations: realizing the richness of field research. Journal of Management Accounting Research, 10, 1–39.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ajzen, I. (1991). The theory of planned behaviour. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 50, 179–211.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Benlian, A., & Hess, T. (2011). Opportunities and risks of software-as-a-service: findings from a survey of IT executives. Decision Support Systems, 52(1), 232–246.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Benlian, A., Hess, T., & Buxmann, P. (2009). Drivers of SaaS-adoption: an empirical study of different application types. Business and Information Systems Engineering, 1(5), 357–369.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Brynjolfsson, E., & Saunders, A. (2010). Wired for innovation: How information technology is reshaping the economy. Cambride: MIT Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Caldeira, M. M., & Ward, J. M. (2002). Understanding the successful adoption and use of IS/IT in SMEs: an explanation from Portuguese manufacturing industries. Information Systems Journal, 12(2), 121–152.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Candan, K.S., Seluck, K., Li, W.S. and Zhou, M. (2009). Frontiers in information and software as services. Proceedings of the 25th IEEE International Conference on Data Engineering (ICDE’09), Shanghai, China, 29 March – 2 April, pp.1761–1768.

  • Carr, N. (2005). The end of corporate computing. MIT Sloan Management Review, 46(3), 67–73.

    Google Scholar 

  • Chan, S. C. H., & Ngai, E. W. R. T. (2007). A qualitative study of information technology adoption: how ten organizations adopted web-based training. Information Systems Journal, 17(3), 289–315.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Clark L.M. (2006). Hype Cycle for Software as a Service. Gartner Research, ID Number G00141122, 21 December 2012.

  • Corsello, J. (2009). The Continuous Innovation Advantage of Software-As-A-Service. Knowledge Infusion Center of Excellence.

  • Davenport, T. H., Harris, J. G., & Cantrell, S. (2004). Enterprsie systems and ongoing process change. Business Process Management Journal, 10(1), 16–26.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Davis, F. D., Bagozzi, R. P., & Warshaw, P. R. (1989). User acceptance of computer-technology – a comparison of 2 theoretical models. Management Science, 35(8), 982–1003.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Deep, A., Guttridge, P., Dani, S., & Burns, N. (2008). Investigating factors effecting ERP selection in made-to-order SME sector. Journal of Manufacturing Technology Management, 19(4), 430–446.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dehning, B., Richardson, V., & Zmud, R. (2007). The financial performance effects of IT-based supply chain management systems in manufacturing firms. Journal of Operations Management, 25(1), 806–824.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • DeSisto, R. (2009). Software as a Service: Uncertainties Revealed. Gartner Research.

  • Eisenhardt, K. M. (1991). Better stories and better constructs: the case for rigor and comparative logic. Academy of Management Review, 16, 620–627.

    Google Scholar 

  • Eisenhardt, K. M., & Graebner, M. E. (2007). Theory building from cases: opportunities and challenges. Academy of Management Journal, 50(1), 25–32.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Engelstatter, B. (2012). It is not all about performance gains – enterprise software and innovations. Economics of Innovation and New Technology, 21(3), 223–245.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • ENISA. (2009). An SME perspective on cloud computing. http://www.enisa.europa.eu/activities/risk-management/files/deliverables/cloud-computing-sme-survey (accessed on 14 January 2013).

  • Gartner. (2012). Worldwide Spending on Enterprise Application Software to Increase 4.5 percent in 2012. Business Wire, New York, 20 June 2012, downloaded from http://ezproxy.library.usyd.edu.au/login?url=http://search.proquest.com/ docview/1021171508?accountid=14757.

  • Gartner. (2014). Gartner says worldwide IT spending on pace to reach $3.8 trillion in 2014. Downloaded from http://www.gartner/com/newsroom/id/2643919 on 25 Feb 2014.

  • Haselmann, T., & Vossen, G. (2011). Software-as-a-service in small and medium enterprises: an empirical attitude assessment. In A. Boiuguettaya, M. Hauswirth, & L. Liu (Eds.), Web Information Systems Engineering –WISE2011. Heidelberg: Springer Verlag Berlin.

    Google Scholar 

  • Heart, T. (2009). Who is out there? Exploring the effects of trust and perceived risk on SaaS adoption intentions. The DATA BASE for Advances in Information Systems, 41(3), 49–68.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hempell, T., & Zwick, T. (2008). New technology, work organization and innovation. Economics of Innovation and New Technology, 17(4), 331–354.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hoch, F., Kerr, M. and Griffith, A. (2001). Software as a Service: Strategic Backgrounder. Software and Information Industry Association (SIIA).

  • Hofmann, P. (2010). Cloud computing: the limits of public clouds for business applications. IEEE Internet Computing, 14(6), 90–93.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Holsapple, C. W., & Sena, P. (2005). ERP plans and decision-support benefits. Decision Support Systems, 48(4), 575–590.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hudli, A.V., Shivaradhya, B. and Hudli, R.V. (2009). Level-4 SaaS applications for healthcare industry. Proceedings of the 2nd Bangalore Annual Computer Conference, 9–10 January, Bangalore, India, 1–4.

  • Hunton, J. E., Lippincot, B., & Reck, J. L. (2003). Enterprise resource planning systems: comparing firm performance of adopters and non-adopters. International Journal of Accounting Information Systems, 4(3), 165–184.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Johansson, B., & Ruivo, P. (2013). Exploring factors for adoptiong ERP as SaaS. Procedia Technology, 9, 94–99.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ju, J., Wang, Y., Fu, J., Wu, J. and Lin, Z. (2010). Research on key technology in SaaS. Proceedings of the International Conference on Intelligent Computing and Cognitive Informatics, IEEE Computer Society, 383–387.

  • Kaplan, J. (2009). Gartner SaaS Satisfaction Survey Misleading. Downloaded from http://thinkstrategies.com/2009/07/17/gartner-saas-satisfaction-survey-misleading/on 10 Jan 2013.

  • Karabek, M.R., Kleinert, J. and Pohl, A. (2011). Cloud services for SMEs – Evolution or revolution? Business + Innovation, 1/2011, Seite 26-33.

  • Klein, H. K., & Myers, M. D. (1999). A set of principles for conducting and evaluating interpetive field studies in information systems. MIS Quarterly, 23(1), 67–94.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kohli, R., & Grover, V. (2008). Business value of IT: an essay expanding research directions to keep up with the times. Journal of the Association for Information Systems, 9(1), 23–39.

    Google Scholar 

  • Koumbati, K., Themistocleous, M., & Irani, Z. (2006). Evaluating the adoption of enterprise application integration in health-care organizations. Journal of Management Information Systems, 22(4), 69–108.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kuan, K. K., & Chau, P. Y. K. (2001). A perception-based model for EDI adoption in small business using a technology-organization-environment framework. Information and Management, 38(8), 507–521.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kugel, R. D. (2007). The bid midsize challenge. Business Finance, 13(11), 39–41.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lenart, A. (2011). ERP in the cloud – Benefits and challlenges. In S. Wrycza (Ed.), Research in systems analysis and design: Models and methods (pp. 39–50). Heidelberg: Springer Verlag Berlin.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Lewandowski, J., Salako, A.O. and Gracia-Perez, A. (2013). SaaS Enterprise Resource Planning Systems: Challenges of their adoption in SMEs, IEEE 10th International Conference on e-Business Engineering, IEEE Computer Society, 56–61.

  • Li, D., Lai, F., & Wang, J. (2010). E-business assimilation in China’s international trade firms: the technology-organization-environment framework. Journal of Global Information Technology, 18(1), 39–65.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lillis, A. M., & Mundy, J. (2005). Cross-sectional field studies in management accounting research – closing the gaps between surveys and case studies. Journal of Management Accounting Research, 7, 119–141.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Low, C., Chen, Y., & Wu, M. (2011). Understanding the determinants of cloud computing adoption. Industrial Management and Data Systems, 111(7), 1006–1023.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Maiga, A. S., Nilsson, A., & Jacobs, F. A. (2013). Extent of managerial IT use, learning routines and firm performance: a structural equation modeling of their relationship. International Journal of Accounting Information Systems, 14(3), 297–320.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Marston, S., Li, Z., Bandyopadhyay, S., Zhang, J., & Ghalasi, A. (2011). Cloud computing – the business perspective. Decision Support Systems, 51(2), 176–189.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • McAfee, A. (2011). What every CEO needs to know about the cloud. Harvard Business Review, 126–132.

  • McCrea, B. (2011). Putting the spotlight on ERP. Logistics Management, 50(6), 32–35.

  • McNee, B. (2008). SaaS and the Third Wave, Preliminary findings from Saugatuck's 2008 SaaS research agenda, OpSource SaaS Summit by Saugatuck Technology. Downloaded from http://saugatucktechnology.com/news/press-room/66-press-releases/2008/on 14 January 2013.

  • Melville, N., & Ramirez, R. (2008). Information technology innovation diffusion: an information requirements paradigm. Information Systems Journal, 18(3), 247–273.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mijac, M., Picek, R. and Stapic, Z. (2013). Cloud ERP system customization challenges. Proceedings of the Central European Conference on Information and Intelligence Systems, Varazdin, Croatia, 18–20 September, 132–140.

  • Nicolaou, A. I., & Bhattacharya, S. (2006). Organizational performance effects of ERP systems usage: the impact of post-implementation changes. International Journal of Accounting Information Systems, 7(1), 18–35.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Nitu. (2009). Configurability in SaaS (Software as a Service) Applications. Proceedings of the Indian Science and Engineering Congress (ISEC’09), 23–26 February, Pune, India, 19–26.

  • Oliveira, T., & Martins, M. F. (2011). Literature review of information technology adoption models at firm level. The Electronic Journal Information Systems Evaluation, 14(1), 110–121. available online at www.ejise.com/.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pan, M.-J., & Jang, W.-Y. (2008). Determinants of the adoption of enterprise resource planning within the technology-organization-environment framework: Taiwan’s communications industry. The Journal of Computer Information Systems, 48(3), 94–102.

    Google Scholar 

  • RAMCO. (2014). RAMCO. Accesed from http://www.ramco.com/ on 4 January 2014.

  • Rogers, E. M. (1995). Diffusion of innovations (4th ed.). New York: Free Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Roper, S., Du, J. and Love, J.H. (2006). Knowledge Sourcing and Innovation. Aston Business School Research Paper 0605, Birmingham.

  • Saeed, I., Juell-Skielse, G., & Uppstrom, E. (2012). Cloud enterprise resource planning adoption: Motives and barriers. In C. Moller & S. Chaudhry (Eds.), Advances in Enterprise Information Systems II, Leiden, The Netherlands: CRC Press/Balkema.

  • Saini, S.L., Saini, D.K., Yousif, J.H. and Khandage, S.V. (2011). Cloud computing and enterprise resource planning. Proceedings of the World Congress on Engineering (WCE) 2011, London, UK, 6–8 July.

  • Salleh, S.M., Teoh, S.Y. and Chan, C. (2012). Cloud enterprise systems: A review of literature and its adoption. Proceedings of the 16th Pacific Asia Conference on Information Systems (PACIS 2012). Ho Chi Minh City, Vietnam, 11–15 July.

  • Sarker, S., Sarker, S., & Sahaym, A. (2012). Exploring value cocreationin relationships between an ERP vendor and its partners: a revelatory case study. MIS Quarterly, 36(1), 317–338.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schubert, P. and Adisa, F. (2011). Cloud computing for standard ERP Systems: Reference framework and research agenda, Fachbereich Informatik, 16/2011, downloaded from http://openarchive.cbs.dk/bitstream/handle/10398/8443/SchubertAdisa2011.pdf?sequence=1 on 1 Feb 2014.

  • Seethamraju, R. and Seethamraju, J. (2008). Adoption of ERPs in a medium-sized enterprise – A case study. Proceedings of the 19th Australasian Conference on Information Systems ACIS 2008, Christchurch, New Zealand. 5–7 December.

  • Sultan, N. A. (2011). Reaching for the cloud: how SMEs can manage. International Journal of Information Management, 31, 272–278.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tornatzky, L. G., & Fleischer, M. (1990). The processes of technological innovation. Lexington: Lexington Books.

    Google Scholar 

  • Venkatachalam, N., Fielt, E., Rosemann, M. and Mathews, S. (2012). Small and medium enterprise sources software as a service – A dynamic capabilities perspective, Proceedings of the 16th Pacific Asia Conference on Information Systems (PACIS), Ho Chi Minh city, Vietnam, 11–15 July.

  • Venkatesh, V., Morris, M. G., Davis, G. B., & Davis, F. D. (2003). User acceptance of information technology: toward a unified view. MIS Quarterly, 27(3), 425–478.

    Google Scholar 

  • Waters, B. (2005). Software as a Service: a look at the customer benefits. Journal of Digital Asset Management, 1, 32–39.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Weil, N. (2007). CRM’s integration blues: on-demand applications like Salesforce.com have many advantages, but can they integrate easily with your other core apps? Results still vary. Here is the latest o how to avoid CRM integration hassles. CIO, 21(2), 1.

    Google Scholar 

  • Welker, G. A., van der Vaart, T., & Pieter van Donk, D. (2008). The influence of business conditions on supply chain information-sharing mechanisms: a study among supply chain links of SMEs. International Journal of Production Economics, 113(2), 206–220.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Xin, M. and Levina, N. (2008). Software-as-a-Service model: Elaborating client-side adoption factors. Proceedings of the 29th International Conference on Information Systems (ICIS), AIS, Paris, France, paper 6.

  • Yang, H., & Tate, M. (2012). A descriptive literature review and classification of cloud computing research. Communications of the Association for Information Systems, 31, 35–60.

    Google Scholar 

  • Yin, R. (2009). Case study research: Design and methods (4th ed.). London: Sage publications.

    Google Scholar 

  • Zainuddin, E. and Gonzalez, P. (2011). Configurability, maturity, and value co-creation in SaaS: An exploratory case study. Proceedings of the 32nd International Conference on Information Systems. Shanghai., 10–14 December.

  • Zhu, K., Kraemer, K. L., Xu, S., & Dedrick, J. (2004). Information technology payoff in e-business environments: an international perspective on value creation of e-business in the financial services industry. Journal of Management Information Systems, 21(1), 17–54.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Ravi Seethamraju.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Seethamraju, R. Adoption of Software as a Service (SaaS) Enterprise Resource Planning (ERP) Systems in Small and Medium Sized Enterprises (SMEs). Inf Syst Front 17, 475–492 (2015). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10796-014-9506-5

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10796-014-9506-5

Keywords

Navigation