Date: 04 Apr 2013
Examining structural, perceptual, and attitudinal influences on the quality of information sharing in collaborative technology use
Rent the article at a discountRent now
* Final gross prices may vary according to local VAT.Get Access
Using collaborative technologies to improve collaborative work is a long-term concern because of over-expected barriers in the implementation. The “quality of information sharing” is a group-level construct for assessing the outcome of collaborative technology use in collaborative work. However, few studies have addressed this informational influence. We propose a research model, grounded in interactivity and fit-appropriation theories, to examine structural, perceptual, and attitudinal influences on the quality of information sharing. Particularly, we incorporate task complexity into this model to examine the direct and interaction effects on collaborative technology use. We empirically test the model by examining the use of Lotus Notes at offices. The empirical results show that structural and perceptual factors have distinct effects on fit and appropriation attitudes, which indirectly or directly determine the quality of information sharing. We also discuss the academic and managerial implications of the research findings.
Aedo, I., Díaz, P., Carroll, J. M., Convertino, G., & Rosson, M. B. (2010). End-user oriented strategies to facilitate multi-organizational adoption of emergency management information systems. Information Processing and Management, 46(1), 11–21.CrossRef
Bagozzi, R. P., & Yi, Y. (1988). On the evaluation of structural equations models. Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science, 16(1), 74–94.CrossRef
Bagozzi, R. P., Yi, Y., & Phillips, L. (1991). Assessing construct validity in organizational research. Administrative Science Quarterly, 36(3), 421–458.CrossRef
Bajwa, D. S., Lewis, L. F., Pervan, G., & Lai, V. S. (2005). The adoption and use of collaboration information technologies: International comparisons. Journal of Information Technology, 20(2), 130–140.CrossRef
Barki, H. (1989). Rethinking the concept of user involvement. MIS Quarterly, 13(1), 53–63.CrossRef
Barki, H., & Hartwick, H. (1994). Measuring user participation, user involvement, and user attitudes. MIS Quarterly, 18(1), 59–82.CrossRef
Barua, A., & Ravindran, S. (1996). Reengineering information sharing behaviour in organizations. Journal of Information Technology, 11(3), 261–272.CrossRef
Bélanger, F., & Allport, C. D. (2008). Collaborative technologies in knowledge telework: An exploratory study. Information Systems Journal, 18(1), 101–121.CrossRef
Bell-Rokeach, S. J., & Reardon, K. (1988). Monologue, dialogue, and telelog: Comparing an emergent form of communication with traditional forms. In R. P. Hawkins, J. M. Wiemann, & S. Pingree (Eds.), Advancing communication science: Merging mass and interpersonal process (pp. 135–161). Newbury Park, CA: Sage.
Berlanger, F., Collins, R. W., & Cheney, P. H. (2001). Technology requirements and work group communication for telecommuters. Information Systems Research, 12(2), 155–176.CrossRef
Blair, E., & Zinkhan, G. M. (2006). Nonresponse and generalizability in academic research. Academy of Marketing Science, 34(1), 4–7.CrossRef
Blili, S., Raymond, L., & Rivard, S. (1998). Impact of task uncertainty, end-user involvement, and competence on the success of end-user computing. Information Management, 33(3), 137–153.CrossRef
Borges, M. R. S., Brézillon, P., Pino, J. A., & Pomerol, J.-C. (2007). Dealing with the effects of context mismatch in group work. Decision Support Systems, 43(4), 1692–1706.CrossRef
Brown, S. A., Dennis, A. R., & Venkatesh, V. (2010). Predicting collaboration technology use: Integrating technology adoption and collaboration research. Journal of Management Information Systems, 27(2), 9–53.CrossRef
Bucy, E. P. (2004). Interactivity in society: Locating an elusive concept. The Information Society, 20(5), 373–383.CrossRef
Burgoon, J. K., Bonito, J. A., Bengtsson, B., Jr., Ramirez, A., Dunbar, N. E., & Miczo, N. (1999). Testing the interactivity model: Communication processes, partners assessments, and the quality of collaborative work. Journal of Management Information Systems, 16(3), 33–56.
Campbell, D. J. (1988). Task complexity: A review and analysis. Academy of Management Review, 13(1), 40–52.
Chin, W. W., & Gopal, A. (1995). Adoption intention in GSS: Relative importance of beliefs. Data Base, 26(2&3), 43–63.
Cooper, R. B., & Zmud, R. W. (1990). Information technology implementation research: A technological diffusion approach. Management Science, 36(2), 123–139.CrossRef
Davenport, T. H. (1997). Information ecology. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Davis, A., Khazanchi, D., Murphy, J., Zigurs, I., & Owens, D. (2009). Avatars, people, and virtual worlds: Foundations for research in metaverses. Journal of the Association for Information Systems, 10(2), 90–117.
DeLone, W. H., & McLean, E. R. (2003). The DeLone and McLean model of information systems success: A ten-year update. Journal of Management Information Systems, 19(4), 9–30.
Dennis, A. R., & Kinney, S. (1998). Testing media richness theory in the new media: The effects of cues, feedback, and task equivocality. Information Systems Research, 9(3), 256–274.CrossRef
Dennis, A. R., Hilmer, K. M., & Taylor, N. J. (1997). Information exchange and use in GSS and verbal group decision making: Effects of minority influence. Journal of Management Information Systems, 14(3), 61–88.CrossRef
Dennis, A. R., Pootheri, S. K., & Natarajan, V. L. (1998). Lessons from the early adopters of web groupware. Journal of Management Information Systems, 14(4), 65–86.
Dennis, A. R., Wixom, B. H., & Vandenberg, R. J. (2001). Understanding fit and appropriation effects in group support systems via meta-analysis. MIS Quarterly, 25(2), 167–193.CrossRef
Dennis, A. R., Fuller, R. M., & Valacich, J. S. (2008). Media, tasks, and communication processes: A theory of media synchronicity. MIS Quarterly, 32(3), 575–600.
DeSanctis, G., & Fulk, J. (1999). Shaping organization form: Communication, connection, and community. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications.
DeSanctis, G., & Poole, M. S. (1994). Capturing the complexity in advanced technology use: Adaptive structuration theory. Organization Science, 5(2), 121–147
Dourish, P. (2003). The appropriation of interactive technologies: Some lessons from placeless documents. Computer-Supported Cooperative Work, 12(4), 465–490.CrossRef
Dubé, L., & Robey, D. (2008). Surviving the paradoxes of virtual teamwork. Information Systems Journal, 19(1), 3–30.CrossRef
Easley, R. F., Devaraj, S., & Crant, J. M. (2003). Relating collaborative technology use to teamwork quality and performance: An empirical analysis. Journal of Management Information Systems, 19(4), 247–268.
Feldman, M. S., & Pentland, B. T. (2003). Reconceptualizing organizational routines as a source of flexibility and change. Administrative Science Quarterly, 48(1), 94–118.CrossRef
Fjermestad, J., & Hiltz, S. R. (2000). Group support systems: A descriptive evaluation of case and field studies. Journal of Management Information Systems, 17(3), 115–159.
Foa, U. G., & Foa, E. B. (1974). Societal structures of the mind. Springfield: C.C. Thomas.
Fornell, C. R., & Larcker, D. F. (1981). Structural equation models with unobservable variables and measurement error. Journal of Marketing Research, 18, 39–50.CrossRef
Fritz, M. B. W., Narasimhan, S., & Rhee, H. S. (1998). Communication and coordination in the virtual office. Journal of Management Information Systems, 14(4), 7–28.
Fuller, R. M., & Dennis, A. R. (2009). Does fit matter? The impact of task-technology fit and appropriation on team performance in repeated tasks. Information Systems Research, 20(1), 2–17.CrossRef
Ginsburg, M., & Duliba, K. (1997). Enterprise-level groupware choices: Evaluating Lotus Notes and Intranet-based solutions. Computer Supported Cooperative Work: Journal of Collaborative Computing, 6(2&3), 201–225.CrossRef
Goodhue, D. L., & Thompson, R. L. (1995). Task-technology fit and individual performance. MIS Quarterly, 19(2), 213–236.CrossRef
Gopal, A., Bostrom, R. P., & Chin, W. W. (1992). Applying adaptive structuration theory to investigate the process of group support systems use. Journal of Management Information Systems, 9(3), 45–69.
Grudin, J. (1994). Groupware and social dynamics: Eight challenges for developers. Communications of the ACM, 37(1), 92–105.CrossRef
Guillen, M. F. (1994). The age of eclecticism: Current organizational trends and the evolution of managerial models. Sloan Management Review, 36(3), 75–86.
Habermas, J. (1984). The theory of communicative action: Reason and the rationalization of society. Boston: Beacon.
Hair, J. F., Black, W. C., Babin, B. J., & Anderson, R. E. (2010). Multivariate data analysis (7th ed.). Upper Saddle River: Prentice-Hall.
Harris, R. W. (1999). Attitudes towards end-user computing: A structural equation model. Behaviour & Information Technology, 18(2), 109–125.CrossRef
Huang, W. W., & Wei, K. K. (2000). An empirical investigation of the effects of group support systems (GSS) and task type on group interactions from an influence perspective. Journal of Management Information Systems, 17(2), 181–206.
Hutt, M. D., Stafford, E. R., Walker, B. A., & Reingen, P. H. (2000). Case study: The social network of a strategic alliance. Sloan Management Review, 41(2), 51–62.
Jarvenpaa, S. L., & Staples, D. S. (2000). The use of collaborative electronic media for information sharing: An exploratory study of determinants. The Journal of Strategic Information Systems, 9, 129–154.CrossRef
Jarvenpaa, S. L., & Staples, D. S. (2001). Exploring perceptions of organizational ownership of information and expertise. Journal of Management Information Systems, 18(1), 151–183.
Jiang, Z., Chan, J., Tan, B. C. Y., & Chua, W. S. (2010). Effects of interactivity on website involvement and purchase intention. Journal of the Association for Information Systems, 11(1), 34–59.
Kamel, N. N., & Davison, R. M. (1998). Applying CSCW technology to overcome traditional barriers in group interactions. Information Management, 34(4), 209–219.CrossRef
Kang, S., Lim, K. H., Kim, M. S., & Yang, H.-D. (2012). A multilevel analysis of the effect of group appropriation on collaborative technologies use and performance. Information Systems Research, 23(1), 214–230.CrossRef
Karahanna, E., Straub, D. W., & Chervany, N. L. (1999). Information technology adoption across time: A cross-sectional comparison of pre-adoption and post-adoption beliefs. MIS Quarterly, 23(2), 183–213.CrossRef
Karsten, H. (1999). Collaboration and collaborative information technologies: A review of the evidence. Database for Advances in Information Systems, 30(2), 44–65.CrossRef
Karsten, H. (2003). Constructing interdependencies with collaborative information technology. Computer Supported Cooperative Work: Journal of Collaborative Computing, 12, 437–464.CrossRef
Kettinger, W. J., & Grover, V. (1997). The use of computer-mediated communication in an interorganizational context. Decision Sciences, 28(3), 513–555.CrossRef
Kim, K. K., & Umanath, N. S. (1992). Structure and perceived effectiveness of software development units: A task contingency analysis. Journal of Management Information Systems, 9(3), 157–181.
Kyng, M. (1991). Designing for cooperation. Communications of the ACM, 34(12), 83–88.CrossRef
Lee, S., & Leifer, R. P. (1992). A framework for linking the structure of information systems with organizational requirements for information sharing. Journal of Management Information Systems, 3(4), 27–44.
Leiner, D. J., & Quiring, O. (2008). What interactivity means to the user essential insights into and a scale for perceived interactivity. Journal of Computer-Mediated Communication, 14, 127–155.CrossRef
Li, E. Y., Jiang, J. J., & Klein, G. (2003). The impact of organizational coordination and climate on marketing executives’ satisfaction with information systems services. Journal of the Association for Information Systems, 4(4), 99–117.
Liu, Y. (2003). Developing a scale to measure the interactivity of websites. Journal of Advertising Research, 43(2), 207–216.
Liu, Y., & Shrum, L. J. (2009). A dual-process model of interactivity effects. Journal of Advertising, 38(2), 53–68.CrossRef
Lou, H., Luo, W., & Strong, D. (2000). Perceived critical mass effect on groupware acceptance. European Journal of Information Systems, 9, 91–103.CrossRef
Lou, H., Scamell, R., & Shah, J. R. (2006). Use of a groupware product: A test of three theoretical perspectives. The Journal of Computer Information Systems, 46(4), 35–45.
Lowry, P. B., Zhang, D., Zhou, L., & Fu, X. (2010). Effects of culture, social presence, and group composition on trust in technology-supported decision-making groups. Information Systems Journal, 20(3), 297–315.CrossRef
Malone, T. W., & Crowston, K. (1994). The interdisciplinary study of coordination. ACM Computing Surveys, 26(1), 87–119.CrossRef
Markus, M. L., & Silver, M. S. (2008). A foundation for the study of IT effects: A new look at DeSanctis and Poole’s concepts of structural features and spirit. Journal of the Association for Information Systems, 9(10/11), 609–632.
McMillan, S. J. (2002). Exploring models of interactivity from multiple research traditions: Users, documents, and systems. In L. A. Lievrouw & S. Livingstone (Eds.), Handbook of new media: Social shaping and consequences of ICTs (pp. 163–182). London: Sage.
McMillan, S. J., & Hwang, J.-S. (2002). Measures of perceived interactivity: An exploration of the role of direction of communication, user control, and time in shaping perceptions of interactivity. Journal of Advertising, 31(3), 29–42.
McMillan, S. J., Hwang, J.-S., & Lee, G. (2003). Effects of structural and perceptual factors on attitudes toward the website. Journal of Advertising Research, 43(4), 400–409.
Mentzas, G. N. (1993). Coordination of joint tasks in organizational processes. Journal of Information Technology, 8(3), 139–150.CrossRef
Meroño-Cerdán, A. L. (2008). Groupware uses and influence on performance in SMEs. The Journal of Computer Information Systems, 48(4), 87–96.
Migliarese, P., & Paolucci, E. (1995). Improved communications and collaborations among tasks induced by Groupware. Decision Support Systems, 14(3), 237–250.CrossRef
Miranda, S. M., & Saunders, C. S. (2003). The social construction of meaning: An alternative perspective on information sharing. Information Systems Research, 14(1), 87–106.CrossRef
Moore, G. C., & Benbasat, I. (1991). Development of an instrument to measure the perceptions of adopting an information technology innovation. Information Systems Research, 2(3), 192–222.CrossRef
Newhagen, J. E., Corders, J. S., & Levy, M. R. (1995). Nightly@nbc.com: Audience scope and the perception of interactivity in viewer mail on the Internet. Journal of Communication, 45(3), 164–175.CrossRef
Nidumolu, S. R. (1996). A comparison of the structural contingency and risk-based perspectives on coordination in software-development projects. Journal of Management Information Systems, 13(2), 77–113.
Nunnally, J. C. (1978). Psychometric theory (2nd ed.). New York: McGraw-Hill.
Olorunniwo, F. O., & Li, X. (2010). Information sharing and collaboration practices in reverse logistics. Supply Chain Management: An International Journal, 15(6), 454–462.CrossRef
Orlikowski, W.J. (1992). Learning from notes: Organizational issues in groupware implementation. Proceedings of the Conference on computer Supported Cooperative Work (pp. 362–369). New York: ACM Press.
Orlikowski, W. J. (2000). Using technology and constituting structures: A practice lens for studying technology in organizations. Organization Science, 11(4), 404–428.CrossRef
Pavlou, P. A., & EI Sawy, O. A. (2006). From IT leveraging competence to competitive advantage in turbulent environments: The case of new product development. Information Systems Research, 17(3), 198–227.CrossRef
Podsakoff, P. M., Mackenzie, S. B., Lee, J. Y., & Podsakoff, N. P. (2003). Common method biases in behavioral research: A critical review of the literature and recommended remedies. Journal of Applied Psychology, 88(5), 879–903.CrossRef
Rafaeli, S. (1988). Interactivity: From new media to communication. In R. P. Hawkins, J. M. Wiemann, & S. Pingree (Eds.), Advancing communication science: Merging mass and interpersonal processes (pp. 110–134). Newbury Park, CA: Sage.
Rai, A., & Al-Hindi, H. (2000). The effects of development process modelling and task uncertainty on development quality performance. Information Management, 37(6), 335–346.CrossRef
Reddy, M. C., & Jansen, B. J. (2008). A model for understanding collaborative information behavior in context: A study of two healthcare teams. Information Processing and Management, 44(1), 256–273.CrossRef
Rice, D. J., Davidson, B. D., Dannenhoffer, J. F., & Gay, G. K. (2007). Improving the effectiveness of virtual teams by adapting team processes. Computer-Supported Cooperative Work, 16(6), 567–594.CrossRef
Robert, L. P., & Dennis, A. R. (2005). Paradox of richness: A cognitive model of media choice. IEEE Transactions on Professional Communication, 48(1), 10–21.CrossRef
Rogers, E. M. (1995). Diffusion of innovation (4th ed.). New York: The Free Press.
Rosenzweig, P. M. (1994). When can management science research be generalized internationally? Management Science, 40(1), 28–39.CrossRef
Song, J. H., & Zinkhan, G. M. (2008). Determinants of perceived web site interactivity. Journal of Marketing, 72(1), 99–113.CrossRef
Stromer-Galley, J. (2004). Interactivity-as-product and interactivity-as-process. The Information Society, 20(5), 391–394.CrossRef
Sundar, S. S. (2004). Theorizing interactivity’s effects. The Information Society, 20(5), 385–389.CrossRef
Tan, M., & Teo, T. S. E. (2000). Factors influencing the adoption of Internet banking. Journal of the Association for Information Systems, 1(5), 1–44.
Thong, J. Y. L. (1999). An integrated model of information systems adoption in small businesses. Journal of Management Information Systems, 15(4), 187–214.
Thorson, K. S., & Rodgers, S. (2006). Relationships between Blogs as eWOM and interactivity, perceived interactivity, and parasocial interaction. Journal of Interactive Advertising, 6(2), 39–50.
Todd, P., & Benbasat, I. (2000). Evaluating the impact of DSS, cognitive effort, and incentives on strategy selection. Information Systems Research, 10(4), 356–374.CrossRef
Townsend, A. M., Hendrickson, A. R., & DeMarie, S. M. (2002). Meeting the virtual work imperative. Communications of the ACM, 45(1), 23–26.CrossRef
Van de Van, A. H., Delbecq, A. L., & Koenig, R. (1976). Determinants of coordination modes within organizations. American Sociological Review, 41(Apr), 322–338.CrossRef
Vandenbosch, B., & Ginzberg, M. J. (1996). Lotus Notes and collaboration. Journal of Management Information Systems, 13(3), 65–81.
Warkentin, M., & Beranek, P. M. (1999). Training to improve virtual team communication. Information Systems Journal, 9(4), 271–289.CrossRef
Wellman, B., Salaff, J., Dimitrovad, D., Garton, L., Gulia, M., & Haythornthwaite, C. (1996). Computer networks as social networks: Collaborative work, telework, and virtual community. Annual Review of Sociology, 22, 213–238.CrossRef
Wilson, T. D., Lindsey, S., & Schooler, T. Y. (2000). A model of dual attitudes. Psychology Review, 107(1), 101–126.CrossRef
Wu, G. (1999). Perceived interactivity and attitude toward websites. In M. S. Robert (Ed.), Proceedings of the American Academy of Advertising (pp. 254–262). Gainseville: University of Florida.
Xia, W., & Lee, G. (2005). Complexity of information systems development projects: Conceptualization and measurement development. Journal of Management Information Systems, 22(1), 45–84.CrossRef
Yates, J., Orlikowski, W. J., & Okamura, K. (1999). Explicit and implicit structuring of genres: Electronic communication in a Japanese R&D organization. Organization Science, 10(1), 83–103.CrossRef
Yu, C., & Yen, D. C. (2000). Extranet and groupware. The Journal of Computer Information Systems, 40(4), 32–40.
Zack, M. H., & Mckenney, J. L. (1995). Social context and interaction in ongoing computer-supported management groups. Organization Science, 6(4), 394–422.CrossRef
Zeffane, R., & Gul, F. (1993). The effects of task characteristics and sub-unit structure on dimensions of information processing. Information Processing and Management, 29(6), 703–719.CrossRef
Zhang, N., Guo, X., & Chen, G. (2011). Why adoption and use behavior of IT/IS cannot last?—Two studies in China. Information Systems Frontiers, 13(3), 381–395.CrossRef
Zigurs, I., & Buckland, B. K. (1998). A theory of task/technology fit and group support systems effectiveness. MIS Quarterly, 22(3), 313–334.CrossRef
- Examining structural, perceptual, and attitudinal influences on the quality of information sharing in collaborative technology use
Information Systems Frontiers
- Print ISSN
- Online ISSN
- Springer US
- Additional Links
- Collaborative technologies
- Interactivity theory
- Fit-appropriation theory
- Structural influence
- Perceptual influence
- Attitudinal influence
- Informational influence
- Industry Sectors