Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Long-term outcomes of Ahmed tube implantation in pediatric glaucoma after multiple surgeries

  • Case Report
  • Published:
International Ophthalmology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Purpose

To report success of Ahmed glaucoma valve (AGV) implantation in eyes with pediatric glaucoma and subconjunctival scarring from previous surgeries.

Methods

A retrospective review of pediatric glaucoma patients who underwent AGV implantation after ≥ 2 previous surgeries with conjunctival scarring. Preoperative and postoperative parameters were recorded to study success, defined as intraocular pressure (IOP) < 22 mmHg with or without medications and without serious complications.

Results

Eleven eyes of 10 patients were included, and the mean age was 12.7 years. Diagnoses included primary childhood glaucoma, aphakic glaucoma, and anterior segment anomalies. Mean number of prior ocular surgeries was 3.3 (± 1.3). Final mean IOP was 17.5 (± 4.3) mmHg, significantly different from the preoperative mean of 24.8 (± 6.8) mmHg, p = 0.01. Mean number of anti-glaucoma medications also decreased significantly from 2.8 (± 1.5) to 1.4 (± 1.5), p = 0.02. The success rate was 82% at a mean follow-up of 51.6 (± 10.8) months. Complications were minor and transient.

Conclusion

Subconjunctival scarring did not increase the risk of failure of tube shunt surgery.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

References

  1. Coleman AL, Hill R, Wilson MR et al (1995) Initial clinical experience with the Ahmed glaucoma valve implant. Am J Ophthalmol 120:23–31

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  2. Coleman AL, Smyth RJ, Wilson MR, Tam M (1997) Initial clinical experience with the Ahmed glaucoma valve implant in pediatric patients. Arch Ophthalmol 115:186–191

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  3. Huang MC, Netland PA, Coleman AL et al (1999) Intermediate-term clinical experience with the Ahmed glaucoma valve implant. Am J Ophthalmol 127:27–33

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  4. Ayyala RS, Zurakowski D, Smith JA et al (1998) A clinical study of the Ahmed glaucoma valve implant in advanced glaucoma. Ophthalmology 105:1968–1976

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  5. Al-Torbak AA (2004) Outcome of combined Ahmed glaucoma valve implant and penetrating keratoplasty in refractory congenital glaucoma with corneal opacity. Cornea 23:554–559

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Feldman RM, El-Harazi SM, Villanueva G (1997) Valve membrane adhesion as a cause of Ahmed glaucoma valve failure. J Glaucoma 6:10–12

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Lai JS, Poon AS, Chua JK et al (2000) Efficacy and safety of the Ahmed glaucoma valve implant in Chinese eyes with complicated glaucoma. Br J Ophthalmol 84:718–721

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  8. Schotthoefer EO, Yanovitch TL, Freedman SF (2008) Aqueous drainage device surgery in refractory pediatric glaucomas: I. Long-term outcomes. J AAPOS 12:33–39

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Englert JA, Freedman SF, Cox TA (1999) The Ahmed valve in refractory pediatric glaucoma. Am J Ophthalmol 127:34–42

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  10. Papadaki TG, Zacharopoulos IP, Pasquale LR et al (2007) Long-term results of Ahmed glaucoma valve implantation for uveitic glaucoma. Am J Ophthalmol 144:62–69

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Christiane Al-Haddad.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of interest

The authors declared that they have no conflict of interest.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Al-Haddad, C., Al-Salem, K., Ismail, K. et al. Long-term outcomes of Ahmed tube implantation in pediatric glaucoma after multiple surgeries. Int Ophthalmol 38, 2649–2652 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10792-017-0743-8

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10792-017-0743-8

Keywords

Navigation