Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Limbal stem cell and oral mucosal epithelial transplantation from ex vivo cultivation in LSCD-induced rabbits: histology and immunologic study of the transplant epithelial sheet

  • Original Paper
  • Published:
International Ophthalmology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Purpose

To evaluate the results of cultivated limbal epithelial and oral mucosal epithelial transplantation (CLET and COMET) in limbal stem cell deficiency (LSCD)-induced rabbit model.

Materials and methods

Six New Zealand white rabbits were divided into two groups of three rabbits each. Limbal tissue was harvested from the first group, and oral mucosal biopsy was obtained from the second group. The tissues were cultured using an explant technique with amniotic membrane as a substrate and co-culture with the 3T3 fibroblast and air-lifting method. The right eye of each rabbit was induced to have LSCD using alkali burns. After three weeks, the LSCD-induced rabbit eyes were transplanted with the cultivated limbal and oral mucosal epithelial sheet in the first and second group, respectively. The transplanted eye was evaluated weekly post-operation. After 2 months, all transplanted eyes were enucleated and the epithelial morphology and phenotype of ocular surfaces were studied and compared with normal corneal and oral mucosal tissue.

Results

At 2-month post-transplantation, the eyes of four animals recovered with corneal transparency, one partially recovered, and one failed. The histology of the majority of transplanted eyes was stratified layers of corneal epithelia similar to normal rabbit cornea with some different findings such as goblet cells in the limbal region. Corneal epithelial thickening and stromal vascularization in two animals were observed. Phenotypic characterization of transplanted eyes showed a similar pattern of marker expression with the absence of p63 expression in the limbal or corneal epithelium in the COMET group.

Conclusions

The histology and phenotype of transplanted eyes after CLET and COMET were most likely to have similar characteristics as a normal healthy rabbit eye even though the COMET eyes have some inferior characteristics to the CLET eyes.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Kenyon KR, Tseng SC (1989) Limbal autograft transplantation for ocular surface disorders. Ophthalmology 96:709–722

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Dua HS (1998) The conjunctiva in corneal epithelial wound healing. Br J Ophthalmol 82:1407–1411

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  3. Dua HS, Azuara-Blanco A (1999) Allo-limbal transplantation in patients with limbal stem cell deficiency. Br J Ophthalmol 83:414–419

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  4. Dua HS, Azuara-Blanco A (2000) Autologous limbal transplantation in patients with unilateral corneal stem cell deficiency. Br J Ophthalmol 84:273–278

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  5. Tsubota K, Shimmura S, Shinozaki N, Holland EJ, Shimazaki J (2002) Clinical application of living-related conjunctival-limbal allograft. Am J Ophthalmol 133:134–135

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Rao SK, Rajagopal R, Sitalakshmi G, Padmanabhan P (1999) Limbal allografting from related live donors for corneal surface reconstruction. Ophthalmology 106:822–828

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Holland EJ, Schwartz GS (2000) Changing concepts in the management of severe ocular surface disease over twenty-five years. Cornea 19:688–698

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Holland EJ, Djalilian AR, Schwartz GS (2003) Management of aniridic keratopathy with keratolimbal allograft: a limbal stem cell transplantation technique. Ophthalmology 110:125–130

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Pellegrini G, Traverso CE, Franzi AT, Zingirian M, Cancedda R, De Luca M (1997) Long-term restoration of damaged corneal surfaces with autologous cultivated corneal epithelium. Lancet 349:990–993

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Tsai RJ, Li LM, Chen JK (2000) Reconstruction of damaged corneas by transplantation of autologous limbal epithelial cells. N Engl J Med 343:86–93

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Koizumi N, Inatomi T, Suzuki T, Sotozono C, Kinoshita S (2001) Cultivated corneal epithelial stem cell transplantation in ocular surface disorders. Ophthalmology 108:1569–1574

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Rama P, Bonini S, Lambiase A, Golisano O, Paterna P, De Luca M, Pellegrini G (2001) Autologous fibrin-cultured limbal stem cells permanently restore the corneal surface of patients with total limbal stem cell deficiency. Transplantation 72:1478–1485

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Nishida K (2003) Tissue engineering of the cornea. Cornea 22:S28–S34

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Liang L, Sheha H, Tseng SC (2009) Long-term outcomes of keratolimbal allograft for total limbal stem cell deficiency using combined immunosuppressive agents and correction of ocular surface deficits. Arch Ophthalmol 127:1428–1434

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Ma DH, Kuo MT, Tsai YJ, Chen HC, Chen XL, Wang SF, Li L, Hsiao CH, Lin KK (2009) Transplantation of cultivated oral mucosal epithelial cells for severe corneal burn. Eye 3:1442–1450

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Liu J, Sheha H, Fu Y, Giegengack M, Tseng SC (2011) Oral mucosal graft with amniotic membrane transplantation for total limbal stem cell deficiency. Am J Ophthalmol 152:739e1–747e1

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Nakamura T, Endo K, Cooper LJ, Fullwood NJ, Tanifuji N, Tsuzuki M, Koizumi N, Inatomi T, Sano Y, Kinoshita S (2003) The successful culture and autologous transplantation of rabbit oral mucosal epithelial cells on amniotic membrane. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci 44:106–116

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. Kinoshita S, Koizumi N, Nakamura T (2004) Transplantable cultivated mucosal epithelial sheet for ocular surface reconstruction. Exp Eye Res 78:483–491

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. Inatomi T, Nakamura T, Koizumi N, Sotozono C, Kinoshita S (2005) Current concepts and challenges in ocular surface reconstruction using cultivated mucosal epithelial transplantation. Cornea 24:S32–S38

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. Nishida K, Yamato M, Hayashida Y, Watanabe K, Yamamoto K, Adachi E, Nagai S, Kikuchi A, Maeda N, Watanabe H, Okano T, Tano Y (2004) Corneal reconstruction with tissue-engineered cell sheets composed of autologous oral mucosal epithelium. N Engl J Med 351:1187–1196

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  21. Promprasit D, Bumroongkit K, Tocharus C, Mevatee U, Tananuvat N (2015) Cultivation and phenotypic characterization of rabbit epithelial cells expanded ex vivo from fresh and cryopreserved limbal and oral mucosal explants. Curr Eye Res 40:274–281

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  22. Guide for the Care and Use of Laboratory Animals. Washington DC: National Academy of Sciences.; 2011

  23. Avila M, Espana M, Moreno C, Pena C (2001) Reconstruction of ocular surface with heterologous limbal epithelium and amniotic membrane in a rabbit model. Cornea 20:414–420

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  24. Ti SE, Anderson D, Touhami A, Kim C, Tseng SC (2002) Factors affecting outcome following transplantation of ex vivo expanded limbal epithelium on amniotic membrane for total limbal deficiency in rabbits. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci 43:2584–2592

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  25. Sekiyama E, Nakamura T, Kawasaki S, Sogabe H, Kinoshita S (2006) Different expression of angiogenesis-related factors between human cultivated corneal and oral epithelial sheets. Exp Eye Res 83:741–746

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  26. Kanayama S, Nishida K, Yamato M, Hayashi R, Sugiyama H, Soma T, Maeda N, Okano T, Tano Y (2007) Analysis of angiogenesis induced by cultured corneal and oral mucosal epithelial cell sheets in vitro. Exp Eye Res 85:772–781

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  27. Nakamura T, Inatomi T, Cooper LJ, Rigby H, Fullwood NJ, Kinoshita S (2007) Phenotypic investigation of human eyes with transplanted autologous cultivated oral mucosal epithelial sheets for severe ocular surface diseases. Ophthalmology 114:1080–1088

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  28. Chen HC, Chen HL, Lai JY, Chen CC, Tsai YJ, Kuo MT, Chu PH, Sun CC, Chen JK, Ma DH (2009) Persistence of transplanted oral mucosal epithelial cells in human cornea. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci 50:4660–4668

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  29. Davanger M, Evensen A (1971) Role of the pericorneal papillary structure in renewal of corneal epithelium. Nature 229:560–561

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  30. Gipson IK (1989) The epithelial basement membrane zone of the limbus. Eye 3:132–140

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  31. Shortt AJ, Secker GA, Munro PM, Khaw PT, Tuft SJ, Daniels JT (2007) Characterization of the limbal epithelial stem cell niche: novel imaging techniques permit in vivo observation and targeted biopsy of limbal epithelial stem cells. Stem Cells 25:1402–1409

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  32. Daya SM, Watson A, Sharpe JR, Giledi O, Rowe A, Martin R, James SE (2005) Outcomes and DNA analysis of ex vivo expanded stem cell allograft for ocular surface reconstruction. Ophthalmology 112:470–477

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  33. Kawasaki S, Tanioka H, Yamasaki K, Yokoi N, Komuro A, Kinoshita S (2006) Clusters of corneal epithelial cells reside ectopically in human conjunctival epithelium. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci 47:1359–1367

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  34. Pauklin M, Steuhl KP, Meller D (2009) Characterization of the corneal surface in limbal stem cell deficiency and after transplantation of cultivated limbal epithelium. Ophthalmology 116:1048–1056

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

This study was granted by the Faculty of Medicine Endowment Fund, Faculty of Medicine, Chiang Mai University (Grant Number 25/2555). The authors would like to thank Prof. Nipon Chattipakorn, M.D, PhD. for his kind support in the animal laboratory enabling tissue biopsy and transplantation procedures in the rabbits.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Napaporn Tananuvat.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of interest

None.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Tananuvat, N., Bumroongkit, K., Tocharusa, C. et al. Limbal stem cell and oral mucosal epithelial transplantation from ex vivo cultivation in LSCD-induced rabbits: histology and immunologic study of the transplant epithelial sheet. Int Ophthalmol 37, 1289–1298 (2017). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10792-016-0402-5

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10792-016-0402-5

Keywords

Navigation