Aldy, J. E., & Stavins, R. N. (Eds.) (2007). Architectures for agreement: Addressing global climate change in the post-Kyoto world. New York: Cambridge University Press
Arp, H. A. (1993). Technical regulation and politics: The interplay between economic interests and environmental policy goals in EC car emission legislation. In European integration and environmental policy. London: Belhaven Press
Axelrod, R., & Keohane, R. O. (1985). Achieving cooperation under anarchy: Strategies and institutions. World Politics, 38
Barrett, S. (1994). The biodiversity supergame. Environmental and Resource Economics, 4
Barrett, S. (1994). Self-enforcing international environmental agreements. Oxford Economic Papers, 46(Supplement), 878–894.
Barrett, S. (2001). International cooperation for sale. European Economic Review, 45
Barrett, S. (2003). Environment and statecraft: The strategy of environmental treaty-making. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Barrett, S. (2006). Climate treaties and ‘breakthrough’ technologies. American Economic Review, 96
Bechtel, M. M., & Tosun, J. (2009). Changing economic openness for policy convergence: When can trade agreements induce convergence of environmental regulation?. International Studies Quarterly, 53
Beise, M., & Rennings, K. (2005). Lead markets and regulation: A framework for analyzing the international diffusion of environmental innovations. Ecological Economics, 52
Benedick, R. E. (1998). Ozone diplomacy: New directions in safeguarding the planet. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.
Bodansky, D. (2010). The art and craft of international environmental law. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.
Böringer, C., & Rutherford, T. F. (2002). Carbon abatement and international spillovers. Environmental and Resource Economics, 22
Carraro, C., & Siniscalco, D. (1993). Strategies for the international protection of the environment. Journal of Public Economics, 52
Cowan, R. (1991). Tortoises and hares: Choice among technologies of unknown merit. Economic Journal, 101
de Coninck, H., Fischer, C., Newell, R. G., & Ueno, T. (2008). International technology-oriented agreements to address climate change. Energy Policy, 36
Dellink, R., den Elzen, M., Aiking, H., Bergsma, E., Berkhout, F., Dekker, T. et al (2009). Sharing the burden of financing adaptation to climate change. Global Environmental Change, 19
Eaton, J., & Kortum, S. (1999). International technology diffusion: Theory and measurement. International Economic Review, 40
Fearon, J. D. (1998). Bargaining, enforcement, and international cooperation. International Organization, 52
Fischer, C., & Newell, R. G. (2008). Environmental and technology policies for climate mitigation. Journal of Environmental Economics and Management, 55
Garud, R., & Karnøe, P. (2003). Bricolage versus breakthrough: Distributed and embedded agency in technology entrepreneurship. Research Policy, 32
Grossman, S. J., & Hart, O. D. (1986). The costs and benefits of ownership: A theory of vertical and lateral integration. Journal of Political Economy, 94
Grübler, A., Nakićenović, N., & Victor, D. G. (1999). Dynamics of energy technologies and global change. Energy Policy, 27
Haas, P.M. (1989). Do regimes matter? Epistemic communities and mediterranean pollution control. International Organization, 43
Hoel, M., & de Zeeuw, A. (2010). Can a focus on breakthrough technologies improve the performance of international environmental agreements? Environmental and Resource Economics, 47
Jacobsson, S., & Lauber, V. (2006). The politics and policy of energy system transformation: Explaining the German diffusion of renewable energy technology. Energy Policy, 34
Keller, W. (2004). International technology diffusion. Journal of Economic Literature, 42
Keohane, R. O., & Victor, D. G. (2010). The regime complex for climate change. Harvard Project on International Climate Agreements Discussion Paper 10-33. January 2010.
Krasner, S. D. (1991). Global communications and national power: Life on the Pareto frontier. World Politics, 43
Kruger, J., Oates, W. E., & Pizer, W. A. (2007). Decentralization in the EU emissions trading scheme and lessons for global policy. Review of Environmental Economics and Policy, 1
Kverndokk, S., Rosendahl, K. E., & Rutherford, T. F. (2004). Climate policies and induced technological change: Which to choose, the carrot or the stick? Environmental and Resource Economics, 27
Lake, D. A. (2009). Hierarchy in international relations. Ithaca: Cornell University Press.
Levi, M. A., Economy, E. C., O’Neil, S. K., & Segal, A. (2010). Energy innovation: Driving technology competition and cooperation among the U.S., China, India, and Brazil. Council on Foreign Relations, November 2010.
Lipp, J. (2007). Lessons for effective renewable electricity policy from Denmark, Germany and the United Kingdom. Energy Policy, 35
Litfin, K. T. (1994). Ozone discourses: Science and politics in global environmental cooperation. New York: Columbia University Press.
Malerba, F., Nelson, R., Orsenigo, L., & Winter, S. (2007). Demand, innovation, and the dynamics of market structure: The role of experimental users and diverse preferences. Journal of Evolutionary Economics, 17
Markard, J., & Truffer, B. (2008). Technological innovation systems and the multi-level perspective: Towards an integrated framework. Research Policy, 37
McLaren, J. (1997). Size, sunk costs, and judge Bowker’s objection to free trade. American Economic Review, 87(3), 400–420
Mowery, D. C., Nelson, R. R., & Martin, B. R. (2010). Technology policy and global warming: Why new policy models are needed (or why putting new wine in old bottles won’t work). Research Policy, 39
Müller, B. (2001). Varieties of distributive justice in climate change. Climatic Change, 48
Muthoo, A. (1999). Bargaining theory with applications. New York: Cambridge University Press.
Muûls, M. (2008). The effect of investment on bargaining positions: Over-investment in the case of international agreements on climate change. Environment Economics & Management Memorandum Series 79.
Najam, A. (2005). Developing countries and global environmental governance: From contestation to participation to engagement. International Environmental Agreements, 5
Nash, J. F. (1950). The bargaining problem. Econometrica, 18
Newell, R. G., Jaffe, A. B., & Stavins, R. N. (1999). The induced innovation hypothesis and energy-saving technological change. Quarterly Journal of Economics, 114
Ockwell, D. G., Watson, J., MacKerron, G., Pal, P., & Yamin, F. (2008). Key policy considerations for facilitating low carbon technology transfer to developing countries. Energy Policy, 36
Parson, E. A. (2003). Protecting the ozone layer: Science and strategy
. New York: Oxford University Press.CrossRef
PCT (2009). Who’s winning the clean energy race? Growth, competition and opportunity in the world’s largest economies. Washington, DC: Pew Charitable Trusts.
Rector, C. (2009). Federations: The political dynamics of cooperation. Ithaca: Cornell University Press
Robbins, N., Clover, R., & Singh, C. (2009). A climate for recovery: The colour of stimulus goes green. HSCB Global Research.
Rubinstein, A. (1982). Perfect equilibrium in a bargaining model. Econometrica, 50
Sandén, B. A., & Azar, C. (2005). Near-term technology policies for long-term climate targets: Economy wide versus technology specific approaches. Energy Policy, 33
Sebenius, J. K. (1983). Negotiation arithmetic: Adding and subtracting issues and parties. International Organization, 37
Sell, S. K. (1996). North-south environmental bargaining: Ozone, climate change, and biodiversity. Global Governance, 2(1), 97–118.
Sprinz, D., & Vaahtoranta, T. (1994). The interest-based explanation of international environmental policy. International Organization, 48
Stewart, R. B., Kingsbury, B., & Rudyk, B. (Eds.) (2009). Climate finance: Regulatory and funding strategies for climate change and global development. New York: New York University Press.
Stiglitz, J. E., & Wallsten, S. J. (1999). Public-private technology partnerships: Promises and pitfalls. American Behavioral Scientist, 43
Sugiyama, T., & Sinton, J. (2005). Orchestra of treaties: A future climate regime scenario with multiple treaties among like-minded countries. International Environmental Agreements, 5
Tollison, R. D., & Willett, T. D. (1979). An economic theory of mutually advantageous issue linkages in international negotiations. International Organization, 33
Unruh, G. C. (2000). Understanding carbon lock-in. Energy Policy, 28
Urpelainen, J. (2009). Explaining the Schwarzenegger phenomenon: Local frontrunners in climate policy. Global Environmental Politics, 9
Urpelainen, J. (2010). Enforcing international environmental cooperation: Technological standards can help. Review of International Organizations, 5
Urpelainen, J. (2010). Regulation under economic globalization. International Studies Quarterly, 54
Urpelainen, J. (2011). Domestic reform as a rationale for gradualism in international cooperation. Journal of Theoretical Politics, 23
Weyant, J. P., & Olavson, T. (1999). Issues in modeling induced technological change in energy, environmental, and climate policy. Environmental Modeling and Assessment, 4
Williamson, O. E. (1985). The economic institutions of capitalism: Firms, markets, relational contracting. New York: Free Press.
Wurzel, R. J. W. (2002). Environmental policy-making in Britain, Germany and the European Union. Manchester: Manchester University Press.
Yarbrough, B. V., & Yarbrough, R. M. (1992). Cooperation and governance in international trade: The strategic organizational approach. Princeton: Princeton University Press.
Young, O. R. (1989). The politics of international regime formation: Managing natural resources and the environment. International Organization, 43