Abstract
Scholars of international environmental politics who want their work to affect policy must learn to speak and write in a slightly different language – with extreme concision, an appealing format, and ready solutions to pressing policy questions. While communicating directly with policymakers and journalists can be time-consuming and exasperating, the direct approach may be the only way to rise above the din of the increasingly noisy marketplace of ideas.
Similar content being viewed by others
Abbreviations
- op-ed:
-
opposite-editorial
- NGO:
-
Non-Governmental Organization
References
Bruyninckx, H. (2005), ‘Academic Research in a Small Country: Called to Serve!’ International Environmental Agreements: Politics, Law and Economics
Carius, A. (2005), Personal Conversation with Co-Director, Adelphi Research. Berlin, March 20
K. Conca G. D. Dabelko (2002) Environmental Peacemaking Woodrow Wilson Center Press and Johns Hopkins University Press Washington and Baltimore
Conca, K., A. Carius and G. D. Dabelko (2005), ‘Building Peace Through Environmental Cooperation’, in State of the World 2005. (pp. 144–155) Washington, DC: Worldwatch Institute
R. O. Litwak (2000a) Rogue States and U.S. Foreign Policy: Containment after the Cold War Woodrow Wilson Center Press Washington, DC
Litwak, R. O. (2000b), ‘A Handy Label but a Lousy Policy’. The Washington Post, February 20: C3
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Dabelko, G.D. Speaking Their Language: How to Communicate Better with Policymakers and Opinion Shapers – and Why Academics Should Bother in the First Place. Int Environ Agreements 5, 381–386 (2005). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10784-005-8329-8
Accepted:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10784-005-8329-8