Abstract
The paper aims to clarify Ratnākaraśānti?s epistemological theory that mental images in a cognition are false (*alīkākāravāda) in comparison with Śāntarakṣita?s criticism of the Yogācāra position. Although Ratnākaraśānti frequently uses the neither-one-nor-many argument for explaining his Yogācāra position, the argument, unlike Śāntarakṣita?s original one, does not function for refuting the existence of awareness itself as the basis of mental images. This point is examined in the first two sections of this paper by analyzing Ratnākaraśānti?s proof of the selflessness of entities (dharmanairātmya) and his application of the neither-one-nor-many argument for demonstrating the falsehood of mental images. On the other hand, the last section investigates into his defense of the alīkākāravāda against Śāntarakṣita?s severe criticism of it. Here, too, we can find his tactical usage of the neither-one-nor-many argument, or more precisely, one of its variants: the neither-identical-nor-different argument. Through the above procedure, we can see how Yogācāra philosophy survived in the late period of Indian Buddhism by blending the Madhyamaka opponent?s argument with its own thought.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Primary Literature and Abbreviations
BhKr I Kamalaśīla, Bhāvanākrama I. G. Tucci (Ed.), Minor Buddhist texts: Part II first Bhāvanākrama of Kamalaśīla. Roma: Is. M. E. O., 1958.
CAP Ratnakīrti, Citrādvaitaprakāśavāda. See RNA, pp. 129–144.
D Takasaki, J., Yamaguchi, Z., Ejima, Y. (Eds.), sDe dge Tibetan Tripiṭaka bsTan ’gyur—preserved at the Faculty of Letters, University of Tokyo. Tōkyō: The Sekai Seiten Kankō Kyōkai, 1981–1984.
JNA A. Thakur (Ed.), Jñānaśrīmitranibandhāvali. Patna: Kashi Prasad Jayaswal Research Institute, 1987 [2nd edition].
LAS Laṅkāvatārasūtra. B. Nanjio (Ed.), The Laṅkāvatārasūtra. Kyōto: Ōtani University, 1923.
MA Śāntarakṣita, Madhyamakālaṅkāra. M. Ichigō (Ed.), Madhyamakālaṃkāra of Śāntarakṣita: With his own commentary or Vṛtti and with the subcommentary or Pañjikā of Kamalaśīla. Kyōto: Bun’eidō, 1985.
MAU Ratnākaraśānti, *Madhyamālaṅkāropadeśa. Tibetan translation: dBu ma rgyan gyi man ngag, translated by Śāntibhadra & Śākya ’od. D 4085, Hi 223b2–231a7.
MAV/MPS Ratnākaraśānti, *Madhyamakālaṅkāravṛtti/Madhyamapratipadāsiddhi. Tibetan translation: dBu ma rgyan gyi ’grel pa dbu ma’i lam grub pa, translated by Śākya ’od. D 4072, Hi 102a5–120b1.
MAVi Maitreya, Madhyāntavibhāgakārikā. G. Nagao (Ed.), Madhyāntavibhāga-bhāṣya, Tokyo: Suzuki Research Foundation, 1964.
PPU Ratnākaraśānti, Prajñāpāramitopadeśa. Tibetan translation: Shes rab kyi pha rol tu phyin pa’i man ngag, translated by Shi ba bzhang po & Lhas btsas. D 4079, Hi 133b7–162b1.
PV III Dharmakīrti, Pramāṇavārttika, Chap. III (pratyakṣa). See Tosaki (1979/1985).
RNA A. Thakur (ed.), Ratnakīrtinibandhāvaliḥ. Patna: Kashi Prasad Jayaswal Research Institute, 1975 [2nd edition].
SSŚ Sākārasiddhiśāstra (Jñānaśrīmitra): JNA, pp. 367–513.
TR Advayavajra, Tattvaratnāvalī. See Ui (1963, pp. 1–52).
TSP Kamalaśīla, Tattvasaṅgrahapañjikā. D. Shastri (Ed.), Tattvasaṅgraha of Ācārya Shāntarakṣita. With the commentary ‘Pañjikā’ of Shrī Kamalashīla. Varanasi: Bauddha Bharati, 1968.
Viṃś Vasubandhu, Viṃśiā. S. Lévi (Ed.), Vijñaptimātratāsiddhi, deux traité de Vasubandhu: Viṃśatikā et Triṃśikā. Paris: Librairie Ancienne Honoré Champion, 1925. [For the title Viṃśikā, which is better attested than Viṃśatikā, see Kanō 2008: 345.]
VMS Ratnākaraśānti, *Vijñaptimātratāsiddhi. Tibetan translation: rNam par rig pa tsam nyid du grub pa, translated by Śāntibhadra & Śākya ’od. D 4259, She 306b4–309b4.
Secondary Literature
Blumenthal, J. (2009). Śāntarakṣita’s “Neither-one-nor-many” argument from Madhamakālaṃkāra (The ornament of the middle way): A classical Buddhist argument on the ontological status of phenomena. In W. Edelglass & J. L. Garfield (Eds.), Buddhist philosophy: Essential readings (pp. 46–60). New York: Oxford University Press.
Ejima, Y. (1980). Chūganshisō no tenkai [*Development of Madhyamaka philosophy]. Tōkyō: Shunjūsha.
Funayama, T. (2007). Kamalaśīla’s distinction between the two sub-schools of Yogācāra. A provisional survey. In B. Kellner, H. Krasser, H. Lasic, M. T. Much, & H. Tauscher (Eds.), Pramāṇakīrtiḥ: Papers dedicated to Ernst Steinkellner on the occasion of his 70th birthday (pp. 187–202). Vienna: Arbeitskreis für tibetische und buddhistische Studien.
Ichigō, M. (1985). Chūganshisō no kenkyū – Śāntarakṣita no shisō [*Studies in Madhyamaka philosophy: Śāntarakṣita’s philosophy]. Kyōto: Bun’eido.
Iwata, T. (1991). Sahopalambhaniyama (2 Vols.). Stuttgart: Franz Steiner Verlag.
Kajiyama, Y. (1965). Controversy between the Sākāra- and Nirākāra-vādins of the Yogāchāra School—Some materials. Indogaku Bukkyōgaku Kenkyū, 14(1), 418–429.
Kajiyama, Y. (1983). Bukkyō ni okeru sonzai to chishiki [*Existence and knowledge in Buddhism]. Tōkyō: Kinokuniya Shoten.
Kajiyama, Y. (1998). An introduction to Buddhist philosophy. Vienna: Arbeiitskreis für tibetische und buddhistische Studien Universität Wien.
Kanō, K. (2005). Pakṣa to sapakṣa no ittaika to fuhentekihenjūkankei no kakuritsu [*Incorporation of pakṣa with sapakṣa and the establishment of universal pervasion]. In Buddhism and Jainism: Essays in honour of Dr. Hojun Nagasaki on his seventieth birthday (pp. 512–482). Kyōto: Heirakuji Shoten.
Kanō, K. (2008). Two short glosses on Yogācāra texts by Vairocanarakṣita: Vimśikākārikāvivṛti and *Dharmadharmatāvibhagāvivṛti. In F. Sferra (Ed.), Sanskrit texts from Giuseppe Tucci’s collection, Part I (pp. 343–380). Roma: Istituto Italiano per L’Africa e L’Oriente.
Katsura, S. (1976). A synopsis of the Prajñāpāramitopadeśa of Ratnākaraśānti. Indogaku Bukkyōgaku Kenkyū, 25(1), 38–41.
Keira, R. (2004). Mādhyamika and epistemology: A study of Kamalaśīla’s method for proving the voidness of all dharmas. Vienna: Arbeitskreis für tibetische und buddhistische Studien Universität Wien.
Matsumoto, S. (1980a/1980b). Ratnākaraśānti no chūganhahihan” [*Ratnākaraśānti’s Criticism of the Madhyamaka]. Part I: Tōyōgakujutsu Kenkyū, 19(1), 148–174; Part II: Tōyōgakujutsu Kenkyū, 19(2), 152–180.
Moriyama, S. (2011a). Keishōkyogiron to tayōfuniron (Jō)” [*Alīkākāravāda and Citrādvaitavāda I]. Studies in Humanities <Human Sciences>: Bulletin of Faculty of Arts, Shinshu University, 45, 23–41.
Moriyama, S. (2011b). Ratnākaraśānti no pramāṇa ron [*Ratnākaraśānti’s theory of pramāṇa]. Indogaku Bukkyōgaku Kenkyū, 60(1), 80–87.
Nguyen, T. Y. (2007). Ratnākaraśānti Prajñāpāramitopadeśa ni mirareru sansho-setu no ichi-kōsatsu [A study on the three natures theory concerned on Ratnākaraśānti’s Prajñāpāramitopadeśa]. Ōtani Daigaku Daigakuin Kenkyū Kiyō, 24, 29–52.
Oki, K. (1977). Ratnākaraśānti no ukeishō-setsu-hihan [*Ratnākaraśānti’s criticism of the Sākāravāda]. Indogaku Bukkyōgaku Kenkyū, 25(2), 940–937.
Oki, K. (1982). Usō-yuishiki to Musō-yuishiki [*Sākāra- and Nirākāra-Vijñaptimātravāda]. In Kōza Daijōbukkyō (Vol. 8, pp. 177–209). Tōkyō: Shunjūsha.
Ono, M. (2004). Bukkyōronrigakuha ni okeru naihenjū to gaihenjū: Prajñākaragupta o chūshin ni [*Antarvyāpti and bahirvyāpti in the school of Buddhist logic]. In Studies on Indian philosophy and Buddsist thoughts: Volume in honor of Professor Esho Mikogami (pp. 457–492). Kyōto: Nagatabunshodō.
Seyfort Ruegg, D. (1981). The literature of the Madhyamaka school of philosophy in India. Wiesbaden: Otto Harrassowitz.
Shiga, K. (2011). Remarks on the origin of all-inclusive pervasion. Journal of Indian Philosophy, 39, 521–539.
Tillemans, T. J. F. (1983). The ‘Neither one nor many’ argument for śūnyatā and its Tibetan interpretations. In E. Steinkellner & H. Tauscher (Eds.), Contributions on Tibetan and Buddhist religion and philosophy (pp. 305–320). Vienna: Arbeitskreis für tibetische und buddhistische Studien.
Tosaki, H. (1979/1985). Bukkyōninshikiron no kenkyū [*Studies in Buddhist epistemology] (2 Vols.). Tōkyō: Daitō Shuppansha, 1979.
Ui, H. (1963). Daijōbutten no kenkyū [*Studies in Mahāyāna texts]. Tōkyō: Iwanami Shoten.
Umino, T. (2002). Indokōkiyuishikishisō no kenkyū [*Studies in later Yogācāra philosophy]. Tōkyō: The Sankibō Press.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Moriyama, S. Ratnākaraśānti’s Theory of Cognition with False Mental Images (*alīkākāravāda) and the Neither-One-Nor-Many Argument. J Indian Philos 42, 339–351 (2014). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10781-013-9200-9
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10781-013-9200-9