Abstract
This article—which includes a complete translation of Mūlamadhyamakakārikā chapter 2 together with Candrakīrti's commentary thereon—argues that notwithstanding the many different and often arcane interpretations that have been offered of Nāgārjuna's arguments against motion, there is really just one straightforward kind of argument on offer in this vexed chapter. It is further argued that this basic argument can be understood as a philosophically interesting one if it is kept in mind that the argument essentially has to do with whether a personal level of description will admit of an exhaustively impersonal explanation.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Abhyankar, K. V. (1961). A dictionary of Sanskrit grammar. Gaekwad's Oriental Series, no. 134. Baroda: Oriental Institute.
Apte, V. S. (1957/1992). The practical Sanskrit-English dictionary. Revised and enlarged edition, P. K. Gode & C. G. Garve (Eds.) (1st rev. and enlarged ed.: Poona: Prasad Prakashan; 1992 reprint, Kyoto: Rinsen).
Arnold, D. (2005). Buddhists, Brahmins, and belief: Epistemology in South Asian philosophy of religion. New York: Columbia University Press.
Arnold, D. (2010). Nāgārjuna's ‘middle way': A non-eliminative understanding of selflessness. Revue Internationale de Philosophie, 64(253, no. 3), 367–395.
Arnold, D. (2012). Brains, Buddhas, and believing: The problem of intentionality in classical Buddhist and cognitive-scientific philosophy of mind. New York: Columbia University Press.
Bhattacharya, K. (1980). Nāgārjuna's arguments against motion: Their grammatical basis. In A. L. Basham, et al. (Eds.), Corpus of Indian studies: Essays in honour of Professor Gaurinath Sastri (pp. 85–95). Calcutta: Sanskrit Pustak Bhandar.
Bhattacharya, K. (1980–1981). The grammatical basis of Nāgārjuna's arguments: Some further considerations. Indological Taurenensia, 8–9, 35–43.
Bhattacharya, K. (1985). Nāgārjuna's arguments against motion. Journal of the International Association of Buddhist Studies, 8, 7–15.
Bhattacharya, K. (1994–1995). Back to Nāgārjuna and grammar. Adyar Library Bulletin, 58–59, 178–189.
Cardona, G. (1991). A path still taken: Some early Indian arguments concerning time. Journal of the American Oriental Society, 111(3), 456–461.
Carpenter, A. (forthcoming). Persons keeping their karma together: The reasons for the Pudgalavāda in early Buddhism. In G. Priest, J. Garfield, & K. Tanaka (Eds.), Analytic philosophy and ancient thought (ms.).
de Jong, J. W. (1978). Textcritical Notes on the Prasannapadā. Indo-Iranian Journal, 20(1/2), 25–59, and (3/4), 217–252.
de Jong, J. W. (Ed.) 2004. Nāgārjunīyā Mūlamadhyamakakārikā Prajñā nāma = Nāgārjuna's Mūlamadhyamakakārikā Prajñā nāma (2nd ed., revised by Christian Lindtner). Chennai: Adyar Library and Research Centre.
Galloway, B. (1987). Notes on Nāgārjuna and Zeno on motion. Journal of the International Association of Buddhist Studies, 10, 81–87.
Garfield, J. L. (1995). The fundamental wisdom of the middle way: Nāgārjuna's Mūlamadhyamakakārikā. New York: Oxford University Press.
Ingalls, D. H. H. (1954). The comparison of Indian and Western Philosophy. Journal of Oriental Research, Madras, 22, 1–11.
La Vallée Poussin, L. de (Ed.). (1970). Mūlamadhyamakakārikās (Mādhyamikasūtras) de Nāgārjuna, avec la Prasannapadā Commentaire de Candrakīrti. Bibliotheca Buddhica IV. Osnabrück: Biblio Verlag. (Reprint; first published in St. Petersburg, 1903–1913.)
Mabbett, I. (1984). Nāgārjuna and Zeno on motion. Philosophy East & West, 34(4), 401–420.
Matilal, B. K. (1990). The word and the world: India's contribution to the study of language. Delhi: Oxford University Press.
May, J. (1959). Candrakīrti Prasannapadā Madhyamakavṛtti: Douze chapitres traduits du sanscrit et du tibétain, accompagnés d'une introduction, de notes et d'une édition critique de la version tibétaine. Collection Jean Przyluski (Vol. 2). Paris: Adrien-Maisonneuve.
McCrea, L. J., & Patil, P. G. (2010). Buddhist philosophy of language in India: Jñānaśrīmitra on exclusion. New York: Columbia University Press.
McDowell, J. (1998). Having the world in view: Sellars, Kant, and intentionality. Journal of Philosophy, 95(9), 431–491.
McDowell, J. (2009). Having the world in view: Essays on Kant, Hegel, and Sellars. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
Monier-Williams, M. (1970). A Sanskrit dictionary (New ed.). Oxford: Clarendon Press.
Oetke, C. (1988). Die metaphysische Lehre Nāgārjunas. Conceptus, XXII(56), 47–64.
Oetke, C. (2007). On MMK 24.18. Journal of Indian Philosophy, 35, 1–32.
Oetke, C. (2011). Two investigations on the Madhyamakakārikās and the Vigrahavyāvartanī. Journal of Indian Philosophy, 39, 245–325.
Patil, P. (2009). Without brackets: A minimally annotated translation of Ratnakīrti's demonstration of exclusion. (Available online, in connection with Patil P. (2009). Against a Hindu God: Buddhist Philosophy of Religion in India. New York: Columbia University Press. http://www.cup.columbia.edu/media/7285/side15360_patil.pdf).
Rödl, S. (2012). Categories of the temporal: An inquiry into the forms of the finite intellect. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
Saito, A. (1995). Problems in translating the Mūlamadhyamakakārikā as cited in its commentaries. In D. Tulku (Ed.), Buddhist translations: Problems and perspectives (pp. 87–96). Delhi: Tibet House/Manohar.
Schayer, S. (1929–1930). Feur und Brennstoff: Ein Kapitel aus dem Mādhyamika-Śāstra des Nāgārjuna mit der Vṛtti des Candrakīrti. Rocznik Orjentalistyczny, 7, 26–52.
Siderits, M. (2009). Is reductionism expressible? In M. D'Amato, J. Garfield, & T. Tillemans (Eds.), Pointing at the Moon: Buddhism, Logic, analytic philosophy (pp. 57–69). New York: Oxford University Press.
Siderits, M, & Katsura, S. (Trans.). (2006). Mūlamadhyamakakārikā I–X. Indogakuchibettogaku Kenkyū (= Journal of Indian and Tibetan Studies), 9(10), 129–185.
Siderits, M., & O'Brien, J. D. (1976). Zeno and Nāgārjuna on motion. Philosophy East & West, 26(3), 281–299.
Sprung, M. (Trans.) (in collaboration with T. R. V. Murti & U. S. Vyas). (1979). Lucid Exposition of the Middle Way: The Essential Chapters from the Prasannapadā of Candrakīrti. London: Routledge and Kegan Paul.
Staal, J. F. (1965). Euclid and Pāṇini. Philosophy East & West, 15, 99–116.
Steinkellner, E. (1982). Review of Mervyn Sprung, Lucid exposition of the middle way. Journal of the American Oriental Society, 102, 411–414.
Vetter, T. (1982). Zum Problem der Person in Nāgārjunas Mūla-Madhyamaka-Kārikās. In W. Strolz & Sh. Ueda (Eds.), Offenbarung als Heilserfahrung im Christentum, Hinduismus und Buddhismus (pp. 167–185). Freiburg: Herder.
Vetter, T. (1992). On the authenticity of the Ratnāvalī. Asiatische Studien/Études Asiatiques, 46(1), 492–506.
Westerhoff, J. (2009). Nāgārjuna's Madhyamaka: A philosophical introduction. New York: Oxford University Press.
Ye, S. (Ed.). (2011). Zhong lun song: Fan Zang Han he jiao, dao du, yi zhu [Mūlamadhyamakakārikā: New Editions of the Sanskrit, Tibetan and Chinese Versions, with Commentary and a Modern Chinese Translation; ISBN 978-7-5475-0239-6]. Shanghai: Zhongxi Book Company.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Arnold, D. The Deceptive Simplicity of Nāgārjuna's Arguments Against Motion: Another Look at Mūlamadhyamakakārikā Chapter 2. J Indian Philos 40, 553–591 (2012). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10781-012-9167-y
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10781-012-9167-y