Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Expressions of Liberal Justice? Examining the Aims of the UN’s Sustainable Development Goals for Education

  • Published:
Interchange Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

This paper analyzes the United Nations’ Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs) for education, which sets benchmarks for member states to “ensure inclusive and equitable quality education and promote lifelong opportunities for all” by the year 2030. I examine ways in which the underlying philosophical rationale for the targets invokes a liberal social justice tradition along the lines of four rationales: equal distribution, just recognition, moralism, and utilitarianism. An analysis of the SDG education targets along each of these views is followed by a discussion of some of the challenges and contradictions inherent in applying a liberal social justice rationale to the achievement of education for all in a global setting. From this analysis, I suggest that while liberalism has provided a compelling rationale to harness public and political will around the claims of equality and democracy in the West, it has not proved adequate to informing the emergence of the kinds of education needed for social and economic justice and transformation on a global scale. Education scholars may well consider an epistemological “shift” that informs a vision of society and human nature reflective of the interconnectedness of a complex world-wide community.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

Notes

  1. The complete set of goals, targets, background, and monitoring frameworks can be found at “Sustainable Development Goals.” https://sustainabledevelopment.un.org/sdgs.

  2. An example of this can be seen in the many indigenous schools and educational innovations that emerged in Latin America in the 1960s and 1970s, but are gradually being extinguished under current neoliberally-driven regimes that privilege a narrow definition of what can be defined and accredited as a school.

  3. For examples of this and other costs assumed by countries, see Jon Schwarz’s (2016) analysis of the price that countries are paying for the “missing” funds presumably in tax havens.

References

  • Abdi, A. A. (2011). African philosophies of education: Deconstructing the colonial and reconstructing the indigenous. In G. S. Dei (Ed.), Indigenous philosophies and critical education (pp. 80–91). New York: Leter Lang.

    Google Scholar 

  • Andreotti, V. D. O. (2011). (Towards) decoloniality and diversality in global citizenship education. Globalisation, Societies and Education, 9(3–4), 381–397.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Appadurai, A. (1994). Disjuncture and difference in the global culture economy. In M. Featherstone (Ed.), Global culture, nationalism, globalization and modernity (pp. 295–310). Newbury Park: Sage Publications.

    Google Scholar 

  • Arbab, F. (2000). Promoting a discourse on science, religion and development. The Lab, the Temple and the Market: Reflections at the Intersection of Science, Religion, and Development (pp. 149–237).

  • Bello, Walden. (2013). Post-2015 development assessment: Proposed goals and indicators. Development, 56(1), 93–102.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Biesta, G. (2015). What is education for? On good education, teacher judgement, and educational professionalism. European Journal of Education, 50(1), 75–87.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bourdieu, P., & Passerson, J.-C. (1990). Reproduction in education, society and culture. Thousand Oaks: Sage Publications.

    Google Scholar 

  • Césaire, A. (2000). Discourse on colonialism. New York: New York University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Committee for Development Policy. (2015). Transitioning from the MDGs to the SDGs: accountability for the post-2015 era: A background report by the CDP subgroup on Accountability. United Nations, Department of Economic and Social Affairs, no. 25 (pp. 16).

  • Dean, J. Solidarity of strangers: Feminism after identity politics. University of California Press, 1996.

  • Farrell, J. (2008). Education in the years to come: What we can learn from alternative education. In P. D. Hershock et al. (Eds.), Changing education—leadership, innovation and development in a globalising Asia Pacific (pp. 199–224).

    Google Scholar 

  • Fraser, N. (1997). From redistribution to recognition? Dilemmas of justice in a ‘Postsocialist’ age. In N. Fraser (Ed.), Justice interruptus: Critical reflections on the “Postsocialist” condition. New York: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ghali, M. (2016). Education and (in)security: The Canadian International Development Agency’s Education Sector Aid to Conflict-Affected States: 20002013. Dissertation, Ontario Institute for Studies in Education/University of Toronto.

  • Gutmann, A. (2007). Interpreting equal educational opportunity. In R. Curren (Ed.), Philosophy of education: An anthology (pp. 236–242). Malden, MA: Blackwell.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jencks, C. (2007). Whom Must We Treat Equally for Educational Opportunity to be Equal? In R. Curren (Ed.), Philosophy of education: An anthology (pp. 243–253). Malden, MA: Blackwell.

    Google Scholar 

  • Karlberg, Michael. (2004). Beyond the culture of contest. Welwyn: Ronald George.

    Google Scholar 

  • Karlberg, M. (2007). Western liberal democracy as new world order? In R. Weinberg (Ed.), The Baha’i World 2005–2006: An international record (pp. 133–156). Haifa: World Centre Publications.

    Google Scholar 

  • Losurdo, D. (2014). Liberalism: A Counter-History. Brookyln: Verso Books.

    Google Scholar 

  • McClelland, J. S. (2005). A history of western political thought. New York: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mundy, Karen. (2016). ‘Leaning in’ on education for all. Comparative Education Review, 60(1), 1–26.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Noddings, N. “The Aims of Education.” In Happiness and Education. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2003, pp. 74-93.

  • Novelli, M. (2011). Are we all soldiers now? The dangers of the securitization of education and conflict. In K. Mundy & S. Dryden-Peterson (Eds.), Educating children in conflict zones: Research, policy and practice for systemic change: A tribute to Jackie Kirk (pp. 49–66). New York: Teachers College Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Psacharopoulos, George, & Patrinos, H. A. (2002). Returns to investment in education: A further update. Washington, DC: The World Bank.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rawls, J. (1971). A theory of justice. Massachusetts: Harvard University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Said, Edward. (1978). Orientalism. New York: Vintage.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schultz, T. P. (2002). Why governments should invest more to educate girls. World Development, 20(2), 207–225.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Schwarz, J. (2016). Here’s the price countries pay for tax evasion exposed in the Panama Papers. The Intercept. Last modified April 5, 2016. https://theintercept.com/2016/04/05/heres-the-price-countries-pay-for-tax-evasion-exposed-in-panama-papers/.

  • Sullivan, Alice. (2001). Cultural capital and educational attainment. Sociology, 35(4), 893–912.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • “Sustainable Development Goals.” Sustainable Development Knowledge Platform. Accessed March 28, 2016. https://sustainabledevelopment.un.org/sdgs.

  • Swanson, D. M. (2015). Ubuntu, indigeneity, and an ethic for decolonizing global citizenship. In A. A. Abdi, L. Shultz, & T. Pillay (Eds.), Decolonizing global citizenship education (pp. 27–38). Rotterdam: Sense Publishers.

    Google Scholar 

  • Todd, S. (2015). Toward an imperfect education: Facing humanity, rethinking cosmopolitanism. New York: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • McClosky, S. (2015). From MDGs to SDGs: We need a critical awakening to succeed. Policy & Practice: A Development Education Review, 12.

  • United Nations. (2016). Transforming our world: The 2030 Agenda for Sustainable Development. Sustainable Development Knowledge Platform. Accessed March 28, 2016. https://sustainabledevelopment.un.org/post2015/transformingourworld.

  • UNSECO. (2017). Global education monitoring report. Accessed Feb 1. http://en.unesco.org/gem-report/.

  • Wane, Njoki. (2013). [Re]Claiming my Indigenous knowledge: Challenges, resistance, and opportunities. Decolonization: Indigeneity, Education & Society, 2(1), 93–107.

    Google Scholar 

  • Westheimer, Joel. (2015). What kind of citizen? Educating our children for the common good. New York: Teachers College Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wolff, J. (2006). The distribution of property. An introduction to political philosophy, Revised Edition (pp. 133–176). Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wynter, S. (2003). Unsettling the coloniality of being/power/truth/freedom: Towards the human, after man, its overrepresentation—An argument. CR: The New Centennial Review, 3(3), 257–337.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zafirovski, M. (2007). Liberal modernity and its adversaries: freedom, liberalism and anti-liberalism in the 21st Century, Brill.

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Elena VanderDussen Toukan.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

VanderDussen Toukan, E. Expressions of Liberal Justice? Examining the Aims of the UN’s Sustainable Development Goals for Education. Interchange 48, 293–309 (2017). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10780-017-9304-3

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10780-017-9304-3

Keywords

Navigation