Abstract
Drawing on Brown (in Br J Sociol Educ 11(1):65–86, 1990) and Barrett DeWiele and Edgerton (in Interchange 47:189–210, 2016), this article explores the relationship between private supplementary tutoring and parentocracy using Singapore as an illustrative case study. It is argued that the ubiquity and affordability of private supplementary tutoring in Singapore indicate that parentocracy is embraced by the majority of parents who seek to give their children a competitive edge. Among the parents, better-educated parents with higher incomes adopt a more proactive interventionist parenting style by paying more for both academic and non-academic enrichment classes. The phenomenon of parentocracy has contributed to educational inequalities in Singapore as children from more privileged home backgrounds have access to more educational resources and opportunities. But the inequalities engendered by parentocracy are mitigated by high-stakes exams that ensure that admission to elite schools is still largely determined by exam results rather than the wealth and wishes of parents. This study offers a nuanced account of private supplementary tutoring through highlighting its diversity and appropriation by different parents in Singapore. The study also illustrates the co-existence of parentocracy and meritocracy where private supplementary tutoring is strategically utilised by parents in Singapore to give their children an equal opportunity to excel in terminal exams.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Angus, L. (2015). School choice: Neoliberal education policy and imagined futures. British Journal of Sociology of Education, 36(3), 395–413.
Barrett DeWiele, C. E. B., & Edgerton, J. D. (2016). Parentocracy revisited: Still a relevant concept for understanding middle class educational advantage? Interchange, 47, 189–210.
Bray, M. (1999). The shadow education system: Private tutoring and its implications for planners. Paris: UNESCO International Institute for Educational Planning.
Bray, M. (2003). Adverse effects of private supplementary tutoring: Dimensions, implications, and government responses. Paris: UNESCO International Institute for Educational Planning.
Bray, M. (2007). Private supplementary tutoring: Comparative perspectives on patterns and implications. Compare, 36(4), 515–530.
Bray, M., & Kwo, O. (2013). Behind the façade of fee-free education: Shadow education and its implications for social justice. Oxford review of Education, 39(4), 480–497.
Bray, M., & Lykins, C. (2012). Shadow education: Private supplementary tutoring and its implications for policy makers in Asia. Mandaluyong City: Asian Development Bank and Hong Kong, Comparative Education Research Centre.
Bray, M., Mazawi, A. E., & Sultana, R. G. (Eds.). (2013). Private tutoring across the Mediterranean: Power dynamics and implications for learning and equity. Rotterdam: Sense.
Brown, P. (1990). The ‘Third Wave’: Education and the ideology of parentocracy. British Journal of Sociology of Education, 11(1), 65–86.
Chan, C., & Bray, M. (2014). Marketised private tutoring as a supplement to regular schooling: Liberal Studies and the shadow sector in Hong Kong secondary education. Journal of Curriculum Studies, 46(3), 361–388.
Coldron, J., Cripps, C., & Shipton, L. (2010). Why are English secondary schools socially segregated? Journal of Education Policy, 25(1), 19–35.
Conway, S. (1997). The reproduction of exclusion and disadvantage: Symbolic violence and social class inequalities in ‘parental choice’ of secondary education. Sociological Research Online, 2(4). Retrieved January 2, 2017, from http://www.socresonline.org.uk/2/4/4.html.
Davie, S. (2015a, July 4). 7 in 10 parents send their children for tuition: ST poll. The Straits Times. Retrieved January 3, 2016, from http://www.straitstimes.com/singapore/education/7-in-10-parents-send-their-children-for-tuition-st-poll.
Davie, S. (2015b, July 9). Tuition has become an educational arms race. The Straits Times. Retrieved January 3, 2016, from http://www.straitstimes.com/opinion/tuition-has-become-an-educational-arms-race.
Davies, S. (2004). School choice by default? Understanding the demand for private tutoring in Canada. American Journal of Education, 110(3), 233–255.
Eckler, R. (2015, April 12). The new tutor dynasty. Maclean’s. Retrieved January 2, 2017, from http://www.macleans.ca/education/the-new-tutor-dynasty/.
En. (2016, October 12). Tuition still in demand, but other types of classes hit. The Straits Times. Retrieved January 2, 2017, from http://www.straitstimes.com/business/tuition-still-in-demand-but-other-types-of-classes-hit.
Evans, M. (2014). Soccer Moms UNITE! Affluent families and the utilisation of grassroots strategies for education reform. Interchange, 45(1–2), 85–114.
Hio, L. (2014). Tuition seen as ‘necessity’ for students to do well. The Straits Times, Sep 2. Retrieved January 2, 2017, from http://www.straitstimes.com/singapore/education/tuition-seen-as-necessity-for-students-to-do-well.
International Association for the Evaluation of Educational Achievement (IEA). (2011). TIMSS 2011. Retrieved March 31, 2016, from http://www.iea.nl/timss_2011.html.
Lareau, A. (2000). Home advantage: Social class and parental intervention in elementary education. New York: Rowman & Littlefield.
Lareau, A. (2011). Unequal childhoods: Class, race and family life (2nd ed.). Berkeley, CA: University of California Press.
Lee, P. (2015, July 4). Primary pupils get most extra classes. The Straits Times. Retrieved January 2, 2017, from http://www.straitstimes.com/singapore/education/primary-pupils-get-most-extra-classes.
Lee, P. (2016, January 28). 3 unhealthy trends plaguing education: Denise Phua. The Straits Times. Retrieved January 2, 2017, from http://www.straitstimes.com/singapore/education/3-unhealthy-trends-plaguing-education-denise-phua.
Lee, C. J., Park, H. J., & Lee, H. (2009). Shadow education systems. In G. Sykes, B. Schneider, & D. N. Plank (Eds.), Handbook of education policy research (pp. 901–919). New York: Routledge for the American Educational Research Association.
Li, T. S. P., & Choi, B. C. (2014). Private supplementary tutoring in Macao: Past, present and the future. Asia Pacific Journal of Education, 34(4), 505–517.
Lim, L. (2016). Bottom 30%, top 10% of Singapore households saw fastest real income growth. Channel NewsAsia. Retrieved January 2, 2017, from http://www.channelnewsasia.com/news/singapore/bottom-30-top-10-of/2551154.html.
Manzon, M., & Areepattamannil, S. (2014). Shadow educations: Mapping the global discourse. Asia Pacific Journal of Education, 34(4), 389–402.
Matsuoka, R. (2012). School socioeconomic compositional effect on shadow education participation: Evidence from Japan. British Journal of Sociology of Education, 36(2), 270–290.
Ministry of Education. (2009). Report of the primary education review and implementation committee. Singapore: Ministry of Education.
Ministry of Education. (2010). Report of the secondary review and implementation committee. Singapore: Ministry of Education.
Ministry of Education. (2015). Ministry of education, Singapore. Retrieved May 7, 2015, from http://www.moe.gov.sg/initiatives/compulsory-education/.
Ministry of Education. (2016a). Direct admission. Retrieved January 2, 2017, from https://www.moe.gov.sg/admissions/direct-admissions.
Ministry of Education. (2016b). Education statistics digest 2016. Retrieved January 2, 2017, from https://www.moe.gov.sg/docs/default-source/document/publications/education-statistics-digest/esd-2016.pdf.
Mori, I., & Baker, D. (2010). The origin of universal shadow education: What the supplemental education phenomenon tells us about the postmodern institution of education. Asia Pacific Education Review, 11, 36–48.
Nogueira, M. A. (2010). A revisited theme—middle classes and the school. In M. W. Apple, S. J. Ball, & L. A. Gandin (Eds.), The Routledge international handbook of the sociology of education (pp. 253–263). Oxon: Routledge.
OECD. (2013). PISA 2012 results: Excellence through equity: Giving every student the chance to succeed (Vol. II). Retrieved January 27, 2017, from https://www.oecd.org/pisa/keyfindings/pisa-2012-results-volume-II.pdf.
OECD. (2015). Programme for International Student Assessment (PISA). Retrieved May 12, 2013, from http://www.oecd.org/pisa/.
Ong, J. (2016). Behind Singapore’s success in the IB: More tuition? Channel NewsAsia. Retrieved January 2, 2016, from http://www.channelnewsasia.com/news/singapore/behind-singapore-s-success-in-the-ib-more-tuition/2778906.html?cx_tag=similarcna&cid=tg:recos:similarcna:standard#cxrecs_s.
Philomin, L. (2014, September 29). More parents enrolling children in pre-school enrichment classes. Today. Retrieved January 2, 2017, from http://www.todayonline.com/singapore/more-parents-enrolling-children-pre-school-enrichment-classes.
Reay, D. (2008). Tony Blair, the promotion of the ‘active’ educational citizen, and middle-class hegemony. Oxford Review of Education, 34(6), 639–650.
Silova, I., Būdienė, V., & Bray, M. (Eds.). (2006). Education in a hidden marketplace: Monitoring of private tutoring. New York: Open Society Institute.
Singapore Press Holdings Ltd. (2014, November 9). $1 billion spent on tuition in one year. AsiaOne. Retrieved January 2, 2017, from http://news.asiaone.com/news/education/1-billion-spent-tuition-one-year.
Smala, S., Paz, J., & Lingard, B. (2013). Languages, cultural capital and school choice: Distinction and second-language immersion programmes. British Journal of Sociology of Education, 34(3), 373–391.
Song, K. O., Park, H. J., & Sang, K. A. (2013). A cross-national analysis of the student- and school-level factors affecting the demand for private tutoring. Asia Pacific Education Review, 14(2), 125–139.
Tan, J. (2009). Private tutoring in Singapore: Bursting out of the shadows. Journal of Youth Studies, 12, 93–103.
Teng, A. (2014, July 7). Getting free real-time tuition on the go. The Straits Times. Retrieved January 3, 2016, from http://www.smu.edu.sg/news/2014/07/07/getting-free-real-time-tuition-go.
Teng, A. (2015a, February 2). Needy students get more private tuition help from centres, religious and college groups. The Straits Times. Retrieved January 2, 2016, from http://www.straitstimes.com/singapore/education/needy-students-get-more-private-tuition-help-from-centres-religious-and-college.
Teng, A. (2015b, July 4). Starting from pre-school, parents sending kids for classes in race to keep up with peers. The Straits Times. Retrieved January 2, 2017, from http://www.straitstimes.com/singapore/education/starting-from-pre-school-parents-sending-kids-for-classes-in-race-to-keep-up.
Teng, A. (2015c, July 4). Better-educated parents with higher incomes spend more. The Straits Times. Retrieved January 2, 2017, from http://www.straitstimes.com/singapore/education/better-educated-parents-with-higher-incomes-spend-more.
Teng, A. (2016a, February 23). Fairly diverse group gains direct school admission, about 60% live in HDB flats: MOE. The Straits Times. Retrieved January 2, 2017, from http://www.straitstimes.com/singapore/education/moe-fairly-diverse-group-gains-direct-school-admission.
Teng, A. (2016b, December 1). More students go for tuition in humanities subjects. The Straits Times. Retrieved January 2, 2017, from http://www.straitstimes.com/singapore/education/more-go-for-tuition-in-humanities-subjects.
Teng, A. (2016c, December 25). Tuition industry worth over $1b a year. The Straits Times. Retrieved January 2, 2017, from http://www.straitstimes.com/singapore/education/tuition-industry-worth-over-1b-a-year.
The Learning Lab. (2017). About the learning lab. Retrieved January 2, 2017, from https://www.thelearninglab.com.sg/aboutus/welcome/.
TIMSS & PIRLS International Study Centre. (2016). TIMSS 2015 and TIMSS advanced 2015 international results. Retrieved December 27, 2016, from http://timss2015.org/#/?playlistId=0&videoId=0.
Tsolidis, G. (2006). Youthful imagination, schooling, subcultures and social justice. New York: Peter Lang.
van Zanten, A., & Darchy-Koechlin, B. (2005). La formation des élites—introduction. Revue Internationale d’Éducation, 39, 19–23.
Windle, J. (2009). The limits of school choice: Some implications for accountability of selective practices and positional competition in Australian education. Critical Studies in Education, 50(3), 231–246.
Yang, C. (2015, December 7). The Straits Times—ensuring less well-off kids are not left behind. The Straits Times. Retrieved January 2, 2017, from http://www.straitstimes.com/singapore/education/ensuring-less-well-off-kids-are-not-left-behind.
Zhan, S. (2014). The private tutoring industry in Taiwan: Government policies and their implementation. Asia Pacific Journal of Education, 34(4), 492–504.
Zhang, W. (2014). The demand for shadow education in China: Mainstream teachers and power relations. Asia Pacific Journal of Education, 34(4), 436–454.
Zhang, W., & Bray, M. (2016). Micro-neoliberalism in China: Public–private interactions at the confluence of mainstream and shadow education. Journal of Education Policy, 32(1), 63–81.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Tan, C. Private Supplementary Tutoring and Parentocracy in Singapore. Interchange 48, 315–329 (2017). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10780-017-9303-4
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10780-017-9303-4