Skip to main content
Log in

Punishment and Forgiveness: A Phenomenological Analysis of Archetypal Leadership Patterns and the Implications for Educational Practice

  • Published:
Interchange Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Archetypal psychology suggests the possibility of a punishment archetype representing the unconscious preferences of human beings as a species about what constitutes appropriate ways for leaders (students, teachers and educational leaders) to correct followers who do harm to others. Mythological analysis compared God’s process of punishment, in the Abraham myth, with the theories of Scheler (1973), Kierkegaard (1987) and modern management theory about punishment. While modern theory focused on a contingent tit-for-tat relationship between doing harm and reprisal for it, God used punishment and forgiveness to reestablish effective moral relationships between the harm-doer and the harmed persons. God always forgave harm done to himself, and generally punished harm done to others but then forgave unilaterally, without waiting for Abraham to improve. If students and educators are unconsciously predisposed to expect that punishment is a long term educational activity intended to allow the harm-doer to atone, repent and re-establish effective working relationships with harmed persons, then the focus of modern punishment theory on intimidation will be ineffective and generate unconscious resistance.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Abramson N.R. (2007) The leadership archetype: A Jungian analysis of similarities between modern leadership theory and the Abraham myth in the Judaic-Christian tradition. Journal o f Business Ethics 72: 115–129

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Andreoti J., Harbaugh W., Vesterland L. (2003) The carrot or the stick: Rewards, punishment and cooperation. American Economic Review 93(3): 893–902

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Arvey R.D., Ivancevich J.M. (1980) Punishment in organizations: A review, propositions, and research suggestions. Academy of Management Review 5(1): 123–132

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Brown D.E. (1991) Human universals. McGraw Hill, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Campbell J. (1973) The hero with a thousand faces. Princeton University Press, Princeton, NJ

    Google Scholar 

  • Casseri M. (2005) On the design of peer punishment experiments. Experimental Economics 8: 1–9

    Google Scholar 

  • Corrigan P. (1999) Shakespeare on management: Leadership lessons for today’s managers. London, UK, Kogan Page

    Google Scholar 

  • Cosmides L., Tooby J. (1992) Cognitive adaptations for social exchange. In: Barkow J.H., Cosmides L., Tooby J.(eds) The adapted mind: Evolutionary psychology and the gneration of culture. Oxford University Press, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Eid M., Riemann R., Angleitner A., Borkenau P. (2003) Sociability and positive emotionality: Genetic and environmental contributions to the covariation between different facets of extraversion. Journal of Personality 71(3): 319–346

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ehrlich P.R. (2000) Human natures: Genes, cultures and the human nature. Penguin, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Fehr E., Gachter S. (2000) Cooperation and punishment in public goods experiment. The American Economic Review 90(4): 980–994

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fox R. (1975) Encounter with anthropology. London, UK, Peregrine

    Google Scholar 

  • Giorgi A. (2003) Phenomenology and psychological research. Duquesne University, Pittsburgh, PA

    Google Scholar 

  • Hamer D. (2004) The God gene: How faith is hardwired into our genes. Anchor, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Hegel G.F. (1977) Phenomenology of spirit. Oxford University Press, Oxford, UK

    Google Scholar 

  • Hopcke R.H. (1999) A guided tour of the collected works of C.G. Jung. Shambala, Boston, MA

    Google Scholar 

  • Husserl, E. (2000). Logical investigations, Vol. 2. New York: Humanity.

  • Jung C.G. (2002) Answer to Job. (Fiftieth anniversary edition.). Princeton University Press, Princeton

    Google Scholar 

  • Jung, C.G. (1977). The collected works of C.G. Jung, Volume 9: The archetypes and the collective unconscious. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.

  • Jung C.G., Jung C.G. (1972) Two essays on analytical psychology (2nd ed). Princeton University Press, Princeton, NJ

    Google Scholar 

  • Kant I. (1998). Critique of pure reason (P. Guyer, & A.W. Wood, Trans.). Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kazadin A.E. (1975) Behaviour modification in applied settings. Dorsey, Homewood

    Google Scholar 

  • Ketsde Vries M. (1995) Organizational paradoxes: Clinical approaches to management. London, UK, Routledge

    Google Scholar 

  • Ketsde Vries M. (2001) The leadership mystique: A user’s manual for the human enterprise. Financial Times Prentice Hall, London, UK

    Google Scholar 

  • Kierkegaard S. (1941) For self-examination and judge for yourselves and three discourses. Princeton University Press, Princeton, NJ

    Google Scholar 

  • Kierkegaard S. (2005) Fear and trembling (A Hannay, Trans.). Penguin, London, UK

    Google Scholar 

  • Kierkegaard S. (1987) Either/or (H.V. Hong & S. H. Hong, Trans.). Princeton University Press, Princeton, NY

    Google Scholar 

  • Krueger R.F., Markon K.E., Bouchard T.J. Jr. (2003) The extended genotype: The heritability of personality accounts for the heritability of recalled family environments in twins reared apart. Journal of Personality 71(5): 809–833

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lumsden C.J., Wilson E.O. (1981) Genes, minds and culture. Harvard University Press, Cambridge, MA

    Google Scholar 

  • Mullen J.D. (1981) Kierkegaard’s philosophy. New American Library, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Murdock G.P. (1945) The common denominator of culture. In: Linden R.(eds) The science of man in the world crisis. Columbia University Press, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Neumann E. (1974) The great Mother: An analysis of the archetype. Princeton University Press, Princeton, NJ

    Google Scholar 

  • O’Neill J. (1995) The poverty of postmodernism. Routledge, London, UK

    Google Scholar 

  • Peterson G.R. (2003) Minding God: Theology and the cognitive sciences. Minneapolis, Fortress

    Google Scholar 

  • Pickett, J.P. (eds) (2000) The American heritage dictionary of the English language (4th ed). Houghton Mifflin, Boston, MA

    Google Scholar 

  • Rosenberg, D. (2006). Abraham: The first historical biography. New York; Basic.

  • Scheler M. (1973) Formalism in ethics and non-formal ethics of values. Northwestern University, Evanston, IL

    Google Scholar 

  • Segal, R.A. (2004). Myth: A very short introduction. Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press.

  • Senyshyn Y. (1998) Kierkegaardian implications of punishment, guilt, and forgiveness for education. Interchange 29(4): 425–437

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sharp, D. (1998). Jungian psychology unplugged. Toronto, ON: Inner City.

  • Sievers B. (1996) Greek mythology as means of organizational analysis: The battle of Larkfield. Leadership and Organization Development Journal 17(6): 32–40

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Spinelli E. (2005) The interpreted world: An introduction to phenomenological psychology (2nd ed). Sage, London, UK

    Google Scholar 

  • Stein M. (1998) Jung’s map of the soul: An introduction. Open Court, Chicago IL

    Google Scholar 

  • Stein M. (2005) The Othelo conundrum: The inner contagion of leadership. Organization Studies 26(9): 1405–1419

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Stevens A. (2003) Archetype revisited: An updated natural history of the self. Inner City Books, Toronto, ON

    Google Scholar 

  • Suggs M.J., Sakenfeld K.B., Mueller J.R. (1992) The Oxford study Bible: Revised English Bible with the apocrypha. Oxford University, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Tinbergen N. (1951) The study of instinct. Oxford University Press, London, UK

    Google Scholar 

  • Tyler T.R., Blader S.L. (2005) Can businesses effectively regulate employee conduct? The antecedents of rule following in work settings. Academy of Management Journal 48(6): 1143–1158

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Velarde-Mayol V. (2000) OnHusserl. Wadsworth Thompson Learning, Belmont, CA

    Google Scholar 

  • Waddington C.H. (1957) The strategy of the genes: A discussion of Some aspects of theoretical biology. George Allen & Unwin, London UK

    Google Scholar 

  • Walker S.F. (2002) Jung and the Jungians on myth: An introduction. Routledge, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Weick K. (1979) The social psychology of organizing. Addison-Wesley, Reading, MA

    Google Scholar 

  • Wilson, E.O. (1975). Sociobiology: The new synthesis. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press

  • Winstanley D. (2004) Phaethon: Seizing the reins of power. In: Gabriel Y.(eds) Myths, stories and organizations: Premodern narratives for our times. Oxford University Press, Oxford, UK

    Google Scholar 

  • Wittgenstein, L. (1945-1947). Remarks on the philosophy of psychology. London, UK: Blackwell.

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Neil Remington Abramson.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Abramson, N.R., Senyshyn, Y. Punishment and Forgiveness: A Phenomenological Analysis of Archetypal Leadership Patterns and the Implications for Educational Practice. Interchange 40, 373–402 (2009). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10780-009-9101-8

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10780-009-9101-8

Keywords

Navigation