Abstract
A semiclassical method to determine if the classical limit of a quantum system shows a chaotic behavior or not based on Pesin theorem, is presented. The method is applied to a phenomenological Gamow–type model and it is concluded that in the classical limit the dynamics exhibited by its effective Hamiltonian is chaotic.
Similar content being viewed by others
Notes
Given two partitions A and B the partition A∨B is \(\{a_{i}\cup b_{j}: a_{i}\in A, b_{j}\in B\}\). That means A∨B is a refinement of A and B. Given a semigroup of preserving measure transformations T t , T −j is the inverse of T j , i.e. \(T^{-j}=T_{j}^{-1}\).
By “\(\mathcal {A}_{q}\) tends to \(\mathcal {A}_{cl}\)” we mean that in the classical limit, \(\hbar \rightarrow 0\), the quassiclassical algebra \(\mathcal {A}_{q}\) tends to the commutative algebra of functions defined over Γ, i.e. \(\mathcal {A}_{cl}\), where \(\hbar \) is the parameter of deformation quantization.
The classical algebra \(\mathcal {A}_{cl}\) of S c l is the limit of the quasiclassical \(\mathcal {A}_{q}\) of S when \(\hbar \rightarrow 0\), i.e. \(lim_{\hbar \rightarrow 0}\mathcal {A}_{q} =\mathcal {A}_{cl}\).
For instance, discretized evolutions are used in Hamiltonians with a time-dependent potential. In such cases, it is common to take \(\hat {U}(n)=\hat {F}(\tau n)\), where \(\hat {f}\) is the Floquet operator and τ is the periodicity of the potential.
In an irreversible process effective Hamiltonians are commonly used to describe open quantum systems, i.e. a quantum system in interaction with its environment. In general, it is not a self-adjoint operator, \(\hat {H}\neq \hat {H}^{\dag }\).
R n is well known as the topological entropy of B(−n). Roughly speaking, R n “measures” the degree of mixing of a dynamical system as it evolves in time. Typically, in a fully chaotic system the formation of fractal structures in a chaotic sea can produce numerous sets B(k 0,k 1,...,k n ) and therefore an increasing of R n .
For instance, if R n is uniformly bounded for all n, then from (3) it follows that \(\sup _{Q}\{...\}=0\). From (4) we obtain \({\int }_{\!\!{\Gamma }}\left [ {\sum }_{\sigma _{i}(\phi )>0}\sigma _{i}(\phi )\right ] d^{2(N+1)}\phi = 0\), which implies that σ i (ϕ)=0 for all i. Therefore, in such case there is no chaotic behavior.
From (12), it follows that if \(n\gg \frac {t_{R}}{\alpha }\), then \(\hat {I}_{A_{k_{n}}}(n)\simeq \alpha _{A_{k_{n}}}(0,0)|0\rangle \langle 0|\) is diagonal. Thus, \({\prod }_{j=0}^{n}\hat {I}_{A_{k_{j}}}(j)=\hat {I}_{A_{k_{0}}}(0).\hat {I}_{A_{k_{1}}}(1)...\hat {I}_{A_{k_{n}}}(n) \simeq \hat {I}_{A_{k_{0}}}(0).\hat {I}_{A_{k_{1}}}(1)...\alpha _{A_{k_{n}}}(0,0)|0\rangle \langle 0|=\left ({\prod }_{j=0}^{n}\alpha _{A_{k_{j}}}(0,0)\right )|0\rangle \langle 0|\) is diagonal, regardless if operators \(\hat {I}_{A_{k_{0}}}(0), \hat {I}_{A_{k_{1}}}(1),...,\hat {I}_{A_{k_{n-1}}}(n-1)\) are diagonals or not.
Typically, the phase space of a non-integrable chaotic system is a compact manifold. If motion is regular and integrable, the phase space can be taken as a torus.
If \(f(x)=x\log (x)\), then by definition f(0)=0.
References
Alicki, R., Lozinski, A., Pakonski, P., Zyczkowski, K.: Quantum dynamical entropy and decoherence rate. J. Phys. A 37, 5157–5172 (2004)
Slomczynski, W., Zyczkowski, K.: Quantum chaos: an entropy approach. J. Math. Phys. 35, 5674–5700 (1994)
Slomczynski, W., Zyczkowski, K.: Mean dynamical entropy of quantum maps on the sphere diverges in the semiclassical limit. Phys. Rev. Lett. 80, 1880–1883 (1998)
Zyczkowski, K., Wiedemann, H., Slomczynski, W.: How to generalize Lyapunov exponents for quantum mechanics. Vistas Astron. 37, 153–156 (1993)
Cucchietti, F.M., Dalvit, D.A.R., Paz, J.P., Zurek, W.H.: Decoherence and the Loschmidt Echo. Phys. Rev. Lett. 91, 210403 (2003)
Cucchietti, F.M., Pastawski, H.M., Jalabert, R.A.: Universality of the Lyapunov regime of the Loschmidt echo. Phys. Rev. B 70, 035311 (2004)
Monteoliva, D., Paz, J.P.: Decoherence and the Rate of Entropy Production in Chaotic Quantum Systems. Phys. Rev. Lett. 85, 3373 (2000)
Monteoliva, D., Paz, J.P.: Decoherence in a classically chaotic quantum system: Entropy production and quantum-classical correspondence. Phys. Rev. E. 64, 056238 (2001)
Bellot, G., Earman, J.: Studies in History and Philosophy of Modern Physics. Chaos out of order: Quantum mechanics, the correspondence principle and chaos 28, 147–182 (1997)
Berkovitz, J., Frigg, R., Kronz, F.: The Ergodic Hierarchy Randomness and Hamiltonian Chaos. Stud. Hist. Philos. Mod. Phys. 37, 661–691 (2006)
Berry, M.: Quantum chaology, not quantum chaos. Phys. Scr. 40, 335–336 (1989)
Castagnino, M., Lombardi, O.: Towards a definition of the quantum ergodic hierarchy: Ergodicity and mixing. Phys. A 388, 247–267 (2009)
Gomez, I., Castagnino, M.: Towards a definition of the Quantum Ergodic Hierarchy: Kolmogorov and Bernoulli systems. Phys. A 393, 112–131 (2014)
Gomez, I., Castagnino, M.: On the classical limit of quantum mechanics, fundamental graininess and chaos: Compatibility of chaos with the correspondence principle, Chaos. Solitons Fractals 68, 98–113 (2014)
Stockmann, H.: Quantum Chaos: An Introduction, page numbers. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge (1999)
Haake, F.: Quantum Signatures of Chaos, page numbers. Springer-Verlag, Heidelberg (2001)
Gutzwiller, M.C.: Chaos in Classical and Quantum Mechanics, page numbers. Springer Verlag, New York (1990)
Casati, G., Chirikov, B.: Quantum Chaos: between order and disorder, page numbers. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge (1995)
Tabor, M.: Chaos and Integrability in Nonlinear Dynamics: An Introduction, page numbers. Wiley, New York (1988)
Omnès, R.: The Interpretation of Quantum Mechanics, vol. 288. Princeton University, Princeton (1994)
Laura, R., Castagnino, M.: Functional approach for quantum systems with continuous spectrum. Phys. Rev. E 57, 3948 (1998)
Lichtenberg, A.J., Lieberman, M.A.: Regular and Chaotic Dynamics (Applied Mathematical Sciences), vol. 304. Springer, Berlin (2010)
Pesin, Y.: Characteristic exponents and smooth ergodic theory. Russ. Math. Surv. 32, 55–114 (1977)
Young, L.: Entropy, p 283. Princeton University Press, Princeton (2003)
Hillery, M., O’Connell, R., Scully, M., Wigner, E.: Distribution functions in physics: Fundamentals. Phys. Rep. 106, 121–167 (1984)
Dito, G., Sternheimer, D.: Deformation quantization: genesis, development and metamorphosis. IRMA Lect. Math. Theor. Phys. 1, 9–54 (2002)
Bayern, F., Flato, M., Fronsdal, M., Lichnerowicz, A., Sternheimer, D.: Deformation theory and quantization. II, Physical applications. Ann. Phys. 110, 111–151 (1978)
Antoniou, I., Suchanecki, Z., Laura, R., Tasaki, S.: Intrinsic irreversibility of quantum systems with diagonal singularity. Phys. A 241, 737–772 (1997)
Gadella, M., Pronko, G.: Fortschritte der Physik The Friedrichs model and its use in resonance phenomena, 59, 795–859 (2011)
Castagnino, M., Fortin, S.: New bases for a general definition for the moving preferred basis. Mod. Phys. Lett. A 26, 2365–2373 (2011)
Ordonez, G., Kim, S.: Complex collective states in a one-dimensional two-atom system. Phys. Rev. A 70, 032702 (2004)
Bohm, A.: Quantum mechanics, foundations and applications, pp 549–563. Springer Verlag, Berlin (1986)
Gilary, I., Fleischer, A., Moiseyev, N.: Calculations of time-dependent observables in non-Hermitian quantum mechanics: The problem and a possible solution. Phys. Rev. A 72, 012117 (2005)
Acknowledgments
This paper was supported partially by the CONICET (National Research Council, Argentina), the IFIR (Instituto de F´ısica de Rosario, Argentina), the IFLP (Instituto de Fsica de La Plata, Argentina) and Universidad de Buenos Aires, Argentina.
The authors would like to acknowledge the anonymous reviewer for helpful comments on the original manuscript.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Appendices
Appendix A: The Classical Quantity μ(B(k 0,k 1,...,k n )) Expressed as a Quantum Mean Value
In order to evaluate the KS entropy, we have to generate the following partition
If \(B(k_{0},k_{1},...,k_{n})=\bigcap _{j=0}^{n} T^{-j} A_{k_{j}}\) is a generic element of B(−n), then the measure of B(k 0,k 1,...,k n ) is
where we have used the following properties:
-
The characteristic function of an intersection of sets is the product of the characteristic functions of each set.
-
If T is bijective, then \(I_{T^{-j}A_{k_{j}}}(\phi )= I_{A_{k_{j}}}(T^{j}\phi )\).
-
If \(\hbar \approx 0\), then \(symb\left ({{\prod }_{j}^{n}}\hat {f}_{j}\right )(\phi ){\simeq {\prod }_{j}^{n}}f_{j}(\phi )\), where we have neglected terms of order \(\mathcal {O}(\hbar )\)). This property is the generalization of (5) for a product of n functions f i .
-
\(\widehat {I_{A_{k_{j}}}\circ T^{j}}=\hat {I}_{A_{k_{j}}}(j)=\hat {U}(j)\hat {I}_{A_{k_{j}}}(0)\hat {U}(j)^{\dag }\), where \(\hat {U}(j)=e^{-\frac {i}{\hbar }\hat {H}\alpha j}\) is the evolution operator and α is a real parameter which defines the time steps. This property is a consequence of the formula (6).
Appendix B: An Expansion for Operators \(\hat {I}_{A_{k_{j}}}\)
We consider a Hamiltonian of the form
where z r =R e(z r )+i I m(z r ) are complex eigenvalues and \(\{\vert r\rangle \},\{\langle \widetilde {s}|\}\) are its two sets of eigenvectors, left and righ respectively [33]. Then we have
Therefore,
where we have used the exponential of an operator (\(e^{\hat {A}}={\sum }_{k=0}^{\infty } \frac {\hat {A}^{k}}{k!}\)) and the orthogonal relations of the projectors \(\vert r \rangle \langle \widetilde {s} \vert \), that is
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Gomez, I., Losada, M., Fortin, S. et al. A Semiclassical Condition for Chaos Based on Pesin Theorem. Int J Theor Phys 54, 2192–2203 (2015). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10773-014-2437-6
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10773-014-2437-6