Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Rhetoric Styles and Political Affiliations During Israel’s 2013 “Facebook Elections”

  • Published:
International Journal of Politics, Culture, and Society Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

In the last decade, bio-politics and psychology studies indicated a link between conservatives’ attraction to emotion-based appeals and liberals’ attraction to logic-based appeals. This study seeks to contribute to current analyses by using an innovative approach, that of Aristotelian rhetorical analysis. This study examines the rhetorical strategies used by Israel’s party leaders on Facebook and their reception during the 2013 elections. Addressing the prevalence of emotion-based appeals (pathos) versus logic-based appeals (logos), we found that left-wing leaders used more logo appeals than all other candidates whereas right-wing party leaders used the most pathos. We also found that the most shared and liked messages of right-wing candidates were mainly pathos-based ones, whereas the most shared messages of left-wing candidates were logos-based posts. The findings strengthen—from a unique perspective—the notion regarding the dominance of emotional appeals among conservatives versus the dominance of logical appeals among liberals.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2

Similar content being viewed by others

Notes

  1. Ethos (character-based) appeals were less relevant in the context of the study, as they can contain either emotional or logical appeals; nonetheless, we still included ethos in our analysis to get a better perspective of the breakdown between the use of the three rhetoric styles in politicians’ output.

References

  • Alford, J. R., Funk, C. L., & Hibbing, J. R. (2005). Are political orientations genetically transmitted? American Political Science Review, 99(2), 152–167. doi:10.1017/S0003055405051579.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Amodio, D. M., Jost, J. T., Master, S. L., & Yee, C. M. (2007). Neurocognitive correlates of liberalism and conservatism. Nat Neurosci, 10, 1246–1247.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Balmas, M., Rahat, G., Sheafer, T., & Shenhav, R. S. (2014). Two routes to personalized politics: centralized and decentralized personalization. Party Polit, 20(1), 37–51.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bar-Ilan, J., Bronstein, J., & Aharony, N. (2015). Israeli parties and party leaders on Facebook during the 2013 election campaign. In iConference 2015 Proceedings. https://www.ideals.illinois.edu/bitstream/handle/2142/73671/23_ready.pdf?sequence=2.

  • Bender, A. (2012). Labor party on Netanyahu’s Likes: It’s a mirage. NRG. Retrieved from http://www.nrg.co.il/online/1/ART2/356/323.html.

  • Block, J., & Block, J. H. (2005). Nursery school personality and political orientation two decades later. J Res Pers, 39, 395–422.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bronstein, J. (2013). Like me! Analyzing the 2012 presidential candidates’ Facebook pages. Online Inf Rev, 37(2), 173–192.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bronstein, J., & Aharoni, N. (2015). Personal and political elements of the use of social networking sites. Information Research, 20(1), 54–67.

  • Cacioppo, J. T., & Visser, P. S. (2003). Political psychology and social neuroscience: strange bedfellows or comrades in arms? Political Psychology, 24, 647–656.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Caprara, G. V., & Zimbardo, P. G. (2004). Personalizing politics: a congruency model of political preference. Am Psychol, 59, 581–594. doi:10.1037/0003-066X.59.7.581.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Carney, D., Jost, J. T., Gosling, S. D., & Potter, J. (2008). The secret lives of liberals and conservatives: personality profiles, interaction styles, and the things they leave behind. Political Psychology, 29, 807–840.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cohen, F., Solomon, S., Maxfield, M., Pyszczynski, T., & Greenberg, J. (2004). Fatal attraction: the effects of mortality salience on evaluations of charismatic, task-oriented, and relationship oriented leaders. Psychol Sci, 15, 846–851.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cohen, F., Ogilvie, D. M., Solomon, S., Greenberg, J., & Pyszczynski, T. (2005). American roulette: the effect of reminders of death on support for George W. Bush in the 2004 presidential election. Analyses of Social Issues and Public Policy, 5, 177–187.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • English, K., Sweetser, K. D., & Ancu, M. (2011). Youtube-Ification of political talk: an examination of persuasion appeals in viral video. American Behavioral Scientist, 55(6), 733–748.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Epstein, M. (2012). 2013 elections: The meme vs. meme war. TheMarker. Retrieved from http://www.themarker.com/technation/1.1848230.

  • Erikson, E. (2008). Hillary is my friend: MySpace and political fandom. Rocky Mountain Communication Review, 4(2), 3–16.

    Google Scholar 

  • Facebook (2014). Facebook reports fourth quarter and full year 2013 results. Retrieved from http://investor.fb.com/releasedetail.cfm?ReleaseID=821954.

  • Finlayson, A., & Martin, J. (2008). “it ain’t what you say …”: British political studies and the analysis of speech and rhetoric. British Politics, 3(4), 445–464.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • First, A., & Avraham, E. (2009). America in Jerusalem. Lanham: Lexuington Books.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gailliot, M. T., Schmeichel, B. J., & Baumeister, R. F. (2006). Self-regulatory processes defend against the threat of death: effect of self-control depletion and trait self-control on thoughts and fears of dying. J Pers Soc Psychol, 91, 49–62.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gerber, A. S., Huber, G. A., Doherty, D., Dowling, C. M., & Ha, S. E. (2010). Personality and political attitudes: relationships across issue domains and political contexts. American Political Science Review, 104, 111–133.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Golden, J. L., Berquist, G. F., Coleman, W. E., Golden, R., & Sproule, J. M. (Eds.) (2007). The rhetoric of western thought: from the Mediterranean world to the global setting (9th ed.). Dubuque: Kendal Hunt.

    Google Scholar 

  • Goldenberg, R. (2013). In Israel, Twitter struggles to take off. Globes, September 15, Retrieved from http://www.globes.co.il/en/article-1000879396.

  • Helzer, E., & Pizarro, D. A. (2011). Dirty liberals! Reminders of cleanliness promote conservative political and moral attitudes. Psychol Sci, 22, 517–522.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hodson, G., & Costello, K. (2007). Interpersonal disgust, ideological orientation, and dehumanization as predictors of intergroup attitudes. Psychol Sci, 18, 691–698.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Inbar, Y., Pizarro, D. A., & Bloom, P. (2009). Conservatives are more easily disgusted than liberals. Cognit Emot, 23, 714–725.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jenkins, H. (1992). Textual poachers. New York: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jost, J. T. (2009). “elective affinities”: on the psychological bases of left-right ideological differences. Psychol Inq, 20, 129–141.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jost, J. T., & Amodio, D. M. (2012). Political ideology as motivated social cognition: behavioral and neuroscientific evidence. Motivation and Emotion, 36(1), 55–64.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jost, J. T., Fitzsimons, G. M., & Kay, A. C. (2004). The ideological animal: a system justification view. In J. Greenberg, S. L. Koole, & T. Pyszczynski (Eds.), Handbook of experimental existential psychology (pp. 263–283). New York: Guilford.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jost, J. T., Glaser, J., Kruglanski, A. W., & Sulloway, F. J. (2003). Political conservatism as motivated social cognition. Psychol Bull, 129, 339–375.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jost, J. T., Napier, J. L., Thorisdottir, H., Gosling, S. D., Palfai, T. P., & Ostafin, B. (2007). Are needs to manage uncertainty and threat associated with political conservatism or ideological extremity? Personal Soc Psychol Bull, 33, 989–1007.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kabir, M., & Urbach, A. (2013). Facebook exposes: How many Israelis are surfing the social network? Calcalist. Retrieved from http://www.calcalist.co.il/internet/articles/0,7340,L-3602989,00.html.

  • Kahana, A. (2014). Netanyahu and Bennett: Mr. Television against the Facebook champ. Rotter. Retrieved from http://rotter.net/forum/scoops1/104798.shtml.

  • Kanai, R., Carmel, D., Bahrami, D., & Rees, G. (2011). Structural and functional fractionation of right superior parietal cortex in bistable perception. Curr Biol, 21(3), R106–R107.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kellner, D. (2009). Barack Obama and celebrity spectacle. International Journal of Communication, 3, 715–741.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kishik, Y. (2012). The first Facebook elections are launched. Mako. Retrieved from http://www.mako.co.il/news-elections-2013/Article-3607a3df11b4a31006.htm.

  • Lakoff, G. (2008). The political mind: why you can’t understand 21st-century American politics with an 18th-century brain. New York: Viking Adult.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lambert, A., Scherer, L., Schott, J. P., Olson, K., Andrews, R., O’Brien, T., et al. (2010). Rally effects, threat, and attitude change: an integrative approach to understanding the role of emotion. J Pers Soc Psychol, 98, 886–903.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Landau, M. J., Solomon, S., Greenberg, J., Cohen, F., Pyszczynski, T., & Arndt, J. (2004). Deliver us from evil: the effects of mortality salience and reminders of 9/11 on support for president George W. Bush. Personal Soc Psychol Bull, 30, 1136–1150.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lev-On, A. (2011). Campaigning online: use of the internet by parties, candidates and voters in national and local election campaigns in Israel. Policy & Internet, 3(1), 1–28.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lieberman, M. D., Schreiber, D., & Ochsner, K. (2003). Is political cognition like riding a bicycle? How cognitive neuroscience can inform research on political thinking. Political Psychology, 24, 681–704.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Malhotra, A., Kubowicz Malhotra, C., & See, A. (2013). How to create brand engagement on Facebook. MIT Sloan Manag Rev, 54(2), 1–4 Retrieved from http://sloanreview.mit.edu/article/how-to-create-brand-engagement-on-facebook/.

    Google Scholar 

  • Maltz, J. (2013). Israel’s Facebook politician finds that new media comes with a price. Haaretz. Retrieved from http://www.haaretz.com/news/national/israel-s-facebook-politician-finds-that-new-media-comes-with-a-price.premium-1.513232.

  • Mondak, J. J. (2010). Personality and the foundations of political behavior. New York: Cambridge University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Nail, P. R., & McGregor, I. (2009). Conservative shift among liberals and conservatives following 9/11/01. Soc Justice Res, 22, 231–240.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Orkibi, E. (2015). ‘new politics’, new media – new political language? A rhetorical perspective on candidates’ self-presentation in electronic campaigns in the 2013 Israeli elections. Israel Affairs, 21(2), 277–292.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Oxley, D. R., Smith, K. B., Alford, J. R., Hibbing, M. V., Miller, M. S., Hatemi, P. K., et al. (2008). Political attitudes vary with physiological traits. Science, 321, 1667–1670.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Peri, Y. (2004). Telepopulism: media and politics in Israel. Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Petty, R. E., & Cacioppo, J. T. (1986). Communication and persuasion: central and peripheral routes to attitude change. New York: Springer.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Rahat, G., & Sheafer, T. (2007). The personalization(s) of politics: Israel 1949-2003. Political Communication, 24(1), 65–80.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Samuel-Azran, T., Yarchi, M., & Wolfsfeld, G. (2015). Aristotelian rhetoric and Facebook success in Israel’s 2013 election campaign. Online Information Review, 39 (2).

  • Sheafer, T., & Wolfsfeld, G. (2009). Party systems and oppositional voices in the news media: a study of the contest over political waves in the United States and Israel. The International Journal of Press/Politics, 14(2), 146–165.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Shook, N. J., & Fazio, R. H. (2009). Political ideology, exploration of novel stimuli, and attitude formation. J Exp Soc Psychol, 45, 995–998.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Terrizzi Jr., J. A., Shook, N. J., & Ventis, W. L. (2010). Disgust: a predictor of social conservatism and prejudicial attitudes toward homosexuals. Personal Individ Differ, 49, 587–592.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ulrich, J., & Cohrs, J. C. (2007). Terrorism salience increases system justification: experimental evidence. Soc Justice Res, 20, 117–139.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Vitak, J., Zube, P., Smock, A., Carr, C. T., Ellison, N., & Lampe, C. (2011). It’s complicated: Facebook users’ political participation in the 2008 election. Journal of Cyberpsychology, Behavior, and Social Networking, 14, 107–114.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Weissflog, M. J., van Noordt, S. J. R., Choma, B. L., Dywan, J., & Segalowitz, S. J. (2010). Sociopolitical ideology and electrocortical responses. Psychophysiology, 47(Sup), S24.

    Google Scholar 

  • Westen, D. (2008). Political brain: the role of emotion in deciding the fate of the nation. New York: Public Affairs.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wolfsfeld, G. (1997). Media and political conflict: news from the Middle East. New York: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Yack, B. (2006). Rhetoric and public reasoning: an Aristotelian understanding of political deliberation. Political Theory, 34(4), 417–438.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Yarchi, M. (2014). Badtime’ stories: the frames of terror promoted by political actors. Democracy & Security, 10(1), 22–51.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Yaron, O. (2011). Israelis Lead World in Social Network Use, U.S. Study Shows. Haaretz, December 22, Retrieved from http://www.haaretz.com/israel-news/israelis-lead-world-in-social-network-use-u-s-study-shows-1.402981.

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Interdisciplinary Center Herzliya, Herzliya, Israel

    Tal Samuel-Azran, Moran Yarchi & Gadi Wolfsfeld

Authors
  1. Tal Samuel-Azran
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Moran Yarchi
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Gadi Wolfsfeld
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Tal Samuel-Azran.

Ethics declarations

Human and Animal Rights and Informed Consent

This article does not contain any studies with human participants performed by any of the authors.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Samuel-Azran, T., Yarchi, M. & Wolfsfeld, G. Rhetoric Styles and Political Affiliations During Israel’s 2013 “Facebook Elections”. Int J Polit Cult Soc 31, 15–30 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10767-016-9247-1

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10767-016-9247-1

Keywords

Search

Navigation