Abstract
This paper studies Hindu untouchable sweepers of Bangladesh, using a case study of two sweeper communities in Dhaka city. Due to their untouchability, Hindu sweepers in Bangladesh have historically been subjected to discrimination and marginalisation, and are deprived of choices such as free selection of occupation, access to housing, education and other benefits. Contending with the conventional notion that Hinduism maintains social order by caste hierarchies and divisions of labour, this shows how the sweepers of Dhaka city respond to the notion of untouchability and show resistance to caste discrimination. This paper also argues that it is not only a Hindu religious ideology but also historical, colonial, economic, political and social aspects of caste-based discrimination that can explain construction of the notion of Dalit and the marginalisation and resistance of Bangladeshi sweepers.
Similar content being viewed by others
Notes
The term ‘dalit’ is not widely accepted among the sweepers. Some sweepers use the term ‘Harijan’ to identify themselves (See Sultana 2014, 147–149 for further discussion).
The term was first coined by Dr. B. R. Ambedkar during the British rule (Bob 2007:168). Gandhi used the term ‘Harijan’ (People of God) to refer to the untouchables. However, this term was criticised due to broader conflict of the untouchable with Gandhi and the congress party in India on the ground that the term is associated with patronization (Mendelsohn and Vicziany 1998 quoted in Bob 2007:168). See Sultana (Sultana 2014:144–145, 148) for detailed discussion on this.
Interview with Mazharul Islam, 12 April, 2013.
See Sultana (Sultana 2014:145–147) for further discussion on development discourse and Dalits.
Interview Meghna Guhathakurta, 25 April, 2013.
In the late 1990s, caste discrimination gained official recognition as a human rights issue (Bob 2007:177).
See Sultana (Sultana 2014:158).
Author interview, Dhaka, 2013
A local chiefdom system operates an indigenous, non-formal justice system within the closed group of a traditional community.
Interviews with Kanpuri respondents, Dhaka 2013.
See (Sultana 2014:154)
Municipal committee was introduced in Dhaka in 1840 and metal roads and piped water supply was initiated (For details see Ahmed et al. 2014, 28).
Interview, Bodhanki Solomon 25 April, 2013.
See Malhotra 1979: 398 for discussion on Dhangar castes in Maharashtra, India.
Later on such initiatives were supported by the City Corporation as financial support was provided for construction of temples in Gonoktuli, Najirabazar, Wari and Sayedabad.
Both the Telegu and the Kanpuri sweepers have relatives in India. Frequent travel across the border is common. Some families seek brides and grooms from India.
See (Sultana 2014:159) for discussion on organic intellectuals and political participation.
See Sultana (Sultana 2014:155) for discussion on how subalternity is reproduced by conditions that make it difficult for the sweepers to educate themselves.
References
Abu-Lughod, L. (1990). The Romance of resistance: tracing transformations of power through Bedouin women. American Ethnologist, 17(1), 41–55.
Ahmed, S. J., Nahiduzzaman, K. M., & Bramley, G. (2014). From a town to a megacity: 400 years of growth. In A. Dewan & R. Corner (Eds.), Dhaka megacity: geospatial perspectives on urbanisation, environment and health (pp. 23–43). New York: Springer.
Arefeen, H. K. (1984). Bangladeshe Muslim Storbinnasher Dhara [Modalities of Muslim Stratification in Bangladesh]. Somaj Nirikhkhon, 14, 34–67.
Asaduzzaman, A. (2001). The ‘Pariah’ people: an ethnography of the urban sweepers in Bangladesh. Dhaka: University Press Limited.
Beall, J. (2006). Dealing with dirt and the disorder of development: managing rubbish in urban Pakistan. Oxford Development Studies, 34(1), 81–97. doi:10.1080/13600810500496087.
Bob, C. (2007). Dalit rights are human rights: caste discrimination, international activism, and the construction of a new human rights issue. Human Rights Quarterly, 29(1), 167–193.
Brown, G. K, Deneulin, S., & Joseph D. (2009). Contesting the boundaries of religion in social mobilization, Bath Papers in International Development no. 4 (pp. 1–21). The Centre for Development Studies, University of Bath, Retrieved from http://www.bath.ac.uk/cds/publications/bpid4.pdf
Chakrabarty, D. (1991). Open space/public place: garbage, modernity and India. South Asia: Journal of South Asian Studies, 14(1), 15–31. doi:10.1080/00856409108723146.
Chowdhury, I. U. (2009). Caste based discrimination in South Asia: A study of Bangladesh. Working Paper Series, New Delhi: Indian Instiute of Dalit Studies, III (7), 1–58. Retrieved from http://idsn.org/wp-content/uploads/user_folder/pdf/New_files/Bangladesh/Caste-based_Discrimination_in_Bangladesh__IIDS_working_paper_.pdf
Clarke, S. (1998). Dalits and christianity: subaltern religion and liberation theology in India. Delhi: Oxford University Press.
de Certeau, M. (1985). The practice of everyday life. Berkeley: University of California Press.
Deliege, R. (1992). Replication and consensus: untouchability, caste and ideology in India. Man, New Series, 7(1), 155–173.
Douglas, M. (2003). Purity and danger: an analysis of concepts of pollution and taboo. New York: Routledge.
Dumont, L. (1972). Homo Hierarchicus. London: Paladin.
Fernandes, W. (1994). Caste and conversion movements: religion and human rights. Delhi: Indian Social Institute.
Foucault, M. (1978). The history of sexuality, Vol. 1: An Introduction. New York: Random House.
Galanter, M. (1997). Law and society in modern India. Delhi: Oxford University Press.
Giddins, A. (1989). Sociology. Cambridge: Polity Press.
Guhathakurta, M. and Suraiya Begum .(2008). From research to Dalit Rights. In Annual Report, 2007–2008. Dhaka: Research Initiatives Bangladesh.
Gupta, D. (2000). Interrogating caste: understanding hierarchy and differences in Indian society. New Delhi: Penguin.
Gupta, C. (2014). Intimate desires: Dalit women and religious conversions in colonial India. The Journal of Asian Studies, 73(3), 661–687. doi:10.1017/S0021911814000400.
Hodges, S. (2008). Contraception, colonialism and commerce: birth control in South India, 1920–1940. Hampshire: Ashgate.
International Dalit Solidarity Network (IDSN) (2008). Dalits of Bangladesh: destined to a life of humiliation. Dhaka: IDSN.
Islam, M. (2009). Manobadhikar Songramer Notun Konthoshor Hoye Uthche Dalit Samaj [Dalits becoming the new Voice of Human Rights Struggle]. Manobadhikar Borshopotro [Annual Letter of Human Right]. 76–86.
Islam, M., & Parvez, A. (2013). Dalit initiatives in Bangladesh. Dhaka: Nagorik Uddyog and Bangladesh Dalit and excluded rights movement.
Islam, F., & Uddin, M. N. (2008). Intricate tale of social exclusion: Dalit women’s experience of caste, class, citizenship and gender in Dhaka City. The Jahangirnagar Review, Part II(XXXII), 5–32.
Malhotra, K. C. (1979). Inbreeding among Dhangar castes of Maharashtra, India. Journal of Biosocial Science, 11(4), 397–409.
Mendelsohn, O., & Vicziany, M. (1998). The untouchables: subordination, poverty and the state in modern India. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Mosse, D. (1994). Idioms of subordination and styles of Protest among Christian and Hindu Harijan castes in Tamil Nadu. Contributions to Indian Sociology, 28(1), 67–106. doi:10.1177/006996694028001003.
Naudet, J. (2008). Paying back to society: upward social mobility among Dalits. Contributions to Indian Sociology, 42(3), 413–441.
Parry, J. (1980). Ghost, greed and sin: the occupational identity of the Beneras funeral priests. Man, 15(1), 88–111.
Quigley, D. (1994). Is a theory of caste still possible? In M. Searle-Chatterjee & U. Sharma (Eds.), Contextualising caste: post-Dumontian approaches (pp. 25–48). London: Blackwell Publishers.
Quigley, D. (1999). The interpretation of caste. New Delhi: Oxford University Press.
Scott, J. C. (1990). Domination and the arts of resistance: hidden transcripts. New Haven: Yale University Press.
Sharma, U. (1999). Caste. Buckingham: Open University Press.
Singh, H. (2002). Caste, class and peasant agency in subaltern studies discourse: revisionist historiography, elite ideology. Journal of Peasant Studies, 30(1), 91–13.
Srinivas, M. N. (1962). Caste in modern India. Bombay: Asia Publising House.
Sultana, H. (2014). Methor Shomprodayer Atto Porichiti Nirman, Oshuchitar Protirodh O Punorutpadito Nimnobordo [Sweeper Communities’ Identity Construction, Resistance to Untouchability and Reproduction of Subalternity]. Nribiggan Potrika (Journal of Anthropology), 19, 143–164.
Webster, J. C. B. (1994). The Dalit Christians: a history, 2nd ed. Delhi: Indian Society for Promoting Christian Knowledge.
Webster, J. C. B. (1999). Religion and Dalit Liberation. Delhi: Manohar.
Zene, C. (2007). Myth, identity and belonging: the Rishi of Bengal/Bangladesh. Religion, 37(4), 257–281. doi:10.1016/j.religion.2007.10.002.
Zene, C. (2010). Self-consciousness of the Dalits as “Subalterns”: reflections on Gramsci in South Asia. Reflections on Gramsci in South Asia, Rethinking Marxism: A Journal of Economics, Culture & Society, 23(1), 83–99. doi:10.1080/08935696.2011.536342.
Acknowledgments
We would like to thank Professor John Scott, Queensland University of Technology for his comments on this article. We would like to express our gratitude to Shirin Ara Begum, Project Manager, Population Services and Training Center (PSTC) and Mokaddesa Kadery from Actionaid Bangladesh for their support during the field work period. We would also like to thank Meghna Guhathakurta of RIB, Dewan Akhtaruzzaman of FAIR, Mazharul Islam of Diakonia, Moni Rani Das and Bodhanki Solomon of BDERM for sharing their thoughts. Special thanks to our colleagues Taslima Atique, Tom Spencer and Johanna Garnett for their comments and editorial support. Finally, we want to thank two anonymous reviewers who provided useful comments and suggestions to improve the article.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Sultana, H., Subedi, D.B. Caste System and Resistance: The Case of Untouchable Hindu Sweepers in Bangladesh. Int J Polit Cult Soc 29, 19–32 (2016). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10767-015-9202-6
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10767-015-9202-6