Abstract
The paper critically evaluates the thesis of the interchangeability between the think-tank public intellectual and the academic public intellectual. It suggests that this thesis, while endorsing the rise of the think-tank public intellectual, pronounces the salience of the intellectual-social critic and undermines the authority of academic public intellectuals. It is argued that the think-tank expert doubling as the public intellectuals could limit the political relevance of the academic public intellectual and that the think-tank expert’s monopolization of the public forum could present a threat to the quality of public debates. While recognizing that there are many contradictions inherent in the role of intellectual and that there are now numerous factors that hinder the abilities of academics to act as public intellectuals, the paper emphasizes public academic intellectuals’ contribution to the dynamics of public opinion and the quality of democratic standards. In today’s context, with the omnipresent of media, the new conditions of knowledge production, the neo-liberal ethos and the social prominence of think-tank experts, the sources of the academic public intellectual authority are in a continuous need for reinvestment.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Abelson, D. E. (2002). Do think tanks matter? Montreal: McGill-Queen University Press.
Anthony, A.D. (2010). Willets: the brain of Tory Britain. The Observer. hhtp://www.guardain.co.uk/theobserver/2010/jan31/observer-profile-david-willett/
Bauman, Z. (1992). Love in adversity: on the state and the intellectuals, and the state of the intellectuals. Telos, 31, 81–105.
Booth, R. (2010). Spirited defence: how ‘ideas wreckers’ turned bestseller into political punchbag. The Guardian, August 3.
Bourdieu, P. (1989). The corporatism of the universal: the role of Intellectuals in the modern world. Telos, 81, 99–110.
Bourdieu, P. (1992). For a socio-analysis of Intellectuals’, an interview with L.J. D. Wacquant. Berkeley Journal of Sociology, 1, 1–29.
Bourdieu, P. (1993). Sociology in question (trans. Richard Nice). London: Sage.
Bourdieu, P. (2004). Science of science and reflexivity (trans. Richard Nice). Cambridge: Polity.
Buruma, I. (2012). Tony Judt: the right questions. New York Review of Book, 59, 28–31.
Chakrabortty, A. (2012). Angry academics can’t answer my criticism, The Guardian. http://www.guardian.co.uk/commentisfree/2012/may/07/academics-cant-answer-criticism-analysis
Collini, S. (2006). Absent minds. Intellectuals in Britain. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Collini, S. (2010). New left review. The Guardian, 10–11.
Coser, L. (1965). Men of ideas. New York: The Free Press.
Dahrendorf, R. (1996). The influence of liberal ideas in post-war Britain, interviewed by A. Seldon. In M. D. Kandlah & A. Seldon (Eds.), Ideas and think tanks in contemporary Britain (Vol. 1, pp. 137–143). London: Frank Cass.
Danowski, J. A., & Park, D. W. (2009). Networks of the dead or alive in cyberspace. New Media and Society, 11(3), 337–356.
Denham, A. (1998). British think tanks and the climate of opinion. London: Taylor and Francis.
Denham, A., & Garnet, M. (1999). Influence without responsibility. Think-tank in Britain. Parliamentary Affairs, 52(1), 46–57.
Eyerman, R. (1994). Between culture and politics. Intellectuals in modern society. Cambridge: Polity.
Eyerman, R. (2011). Intellectuals and cultural trauma. European Journal of Social Theory, 14(4), 453–467.
Galbraith, J. K. (1972). The new industrial state. Harmondsworth: Penguin.
Gattone, C. F. (2006). The social scientist as public intellectual. New York: Rowman and Littlefield.
Giddens, A. (2009). The politics of climate change. Cambridge: Polity.
Giroux, H. A. (2004). Edward Said and the politics of worldliness. Cultural Studies-Critical Methodologies, 4(3), 339–349.
Goldfarb, J. C. (1998). Civility and subversion the intellectual in democratic society. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Hobsbawm, R. (2012). After the Cold War. London Review of Book, 34, 12.
Judt, T. (1992). The past imperfect: French intellectuals 1944–56. Berkeley: University of California Press.
Judt, T. (2012). Thinking the twentieth century. London: William Heinemann.
Kalleberg, R. (2012). Sociologist as public intellectuals and experts. Journal of Applied Social Science, 6(1), 43–52.
Kaspersen, L. B. (2000). Anthony Giddens. Oxford: Blackwell.
Kenny, M. (2004). Reckless minds or democracy’s helpers? Intellectuals and politics in the twentieth century. Contemporary Political Theory, 3, 89–103.
Matthews, D. (2012). Sector urges give and stop. Time Higher Education. http://www.timeshighereducation.co.uk/story.asp?sectioncode=26&storycode=419673&c=1
Medvetz, T. (2010). Public policy is like having a vaudeville act. Qualitative Sociology, 33, 549–562.
Misztal, B. A. (2007). Intellectuals and the public good: creativity and courage. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Monbiot, G. (2010). Secretive thinktanks are crushing our democracy. The Guardian. hhtp://www.guardain.co.uk/cimmentsfree/thinktanks-crushing-democrarcy-pr-agencies
Pautz, H. (2007). Scottish think-tanks and policy networks. Scottish Affairs, 58, 57–77.
Pautz, H. (2010). Think-tanks in The United Kingdom and Germany. The British Journal of Politics and International Relations, 12(2), 274–294.
Porter, H. (2007). Where is our Orwell, where is our Dickens? The Observer, 29.
Posner, R. A. (2001). Public intellectuals. A study of decline. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.
Rich, A. (2004). Think tanks, public policy and expertise. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Runciman, D. (2011). Can democracy cope. The Public Quarterly, 82(4), 536–545.
Said, E. (1994). The representation of the intellectual. The 1993 Reith lectures. London: Vintage.
Saunders, P. (2011). Academic sociology and social policy think tank in Britain and Australia. Sociological Research Online, 16(3), 10.
Schlesinger, P. (2009). Creativity and the experts. International Journal of Press/Politics, 14(1), 3–20.
Shepherd, J. (2012). Oxford University institute to focus on eurozone. http://www.guardian.co.uk/education/2012/apr/12/oxford-university-institute-eurozone-financial-crisis?INTCMP=SRCH
Smith, J. A. (1991). The ideas brokers. New York: Free Press.
Stone, D., & Garnett, M. (1998). Introduction: think tanks, policy advice and governance. In D. Stone, A. Denham, & M. Garnett (Eds.), Think tanks across nations (pp. 1–20). Manchester: Manchester University Press.
Tickle, L. (2012).So you want to be the new Brian Cox? The Guardian. http://www.guardian.co.uk/education/2012/may/14/celebrity-academic-radion-tv-fundi
Turner, J. (2012). Superficially Pally. London Review of Books, 34, 29–31.
Waters, S. (2011). French intellectuals and globalization. French Cultural Studies, 22(4), 303–320.
Weaver, R. K. (1989). The changing world of think tanks. PS: Political Science and Politics, 22(3), 563–578.
Weidenbaum, M. (2010). Measuring the influence of think tanks. Social Science and Public Policy, 47, 134–137.
Wolfe, A. (2003). An intellectual in public. Ann Arbor: Michigan University Press.
Worth, R.F. (2011). Intellectuals sit out Arab Spring. New York Times, 1 and 4.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Misztal, B.A. Public Intellectuals and Think Tanks: A Free Market in Ideas?. Int J Polit Cult Soc 25, 127–141 (2012). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10767-012-9126-3
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10767-012-9126-3