Skip to main content
Log in

Public Intellectuals and Think Tanks: A Free Market in Ideas?

  • Published:
International Journal of Politics, Culture, and Society Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The paper critically evaluates the thesis of the interchangeability between the think-tank public intellectual and the academic public intellectual. It suggests that this thesis, while endorsing the rise of the think-tank public intellectual, pronounces the salience of the intellectual-social critic and undermines the authority of academic public intellectuals. It is argued that the think-tank expert doubling as the public intellectuals could limit the political relevance of the academic public intellectual and that the think-tank expert’s monopolization of the public forum could present a threat to the quality of public debates. While recognizing that there are many contradictions inherent in the role of intellectual and that there are now numerous factors that hinder the abilities of academics to act as public intellectuals, the paper emphasizes public academic intellectuals’ contribution to the dynamics of public opinion and the quality of democratic standards. In today’s context, with the omnipresent of media, the new conditions of knowledge production, the neo-liberal ethos and the social prominence of think-tank experts, the sources of the academic public intellectual authority are in a continuous need for reinvestment.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Abelson, D. E. (2002). Do think tanks matter? Montreal: McGill-Queen University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Anthony, A.D. (2010). Willets: the brain of Tory Britain. The Observer. hhtp://www.guardain.co.uk/theobserver/2010/jan31/observer-profile-david-willett/

  • Bauman, Z. (1992). Love in adversity: on the state and the intellectuals, and the state of the intellectuals. Telos, 31, 81–105.

    Google Scholar 

  • Booth, R. (2010). Spirited defence: how ‘ideas wreckers’ turned bestseller into political punchbag. The Guardian, August 3.

  • Bourdieu, P. (1989). The corporatism of the universal: the role of Intellectuals in the modern world. Telos, 81, 99–110.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bourdieu, P. (1992). For a socio-analysis of Intellectuals’, an interview with L.J. D. Wacquant. Berkeley Journal of Sociology, 1, 1–29.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bourdieu, P. (1993). Sociology in question (trans. Richard Nice). London: Sage.

  • Bourdieu, P. (2004). Science of science and reflexivity (trans. Richard Nice). Cambridge: Polity.

  • Buruma, I. (2012). Tony Judt: the right questions. New York Review of Book, 59, 28–31.

  • Chakrabortty, A. (2012). Angry academics can’t answer my criticism, The Guardian. http://www.guardian.co.uk/commentisfree/2012/may/07/academics-cant-answer-criticism-analysis

  • Collini, S. (2006). Absent minds. Intellectuals in Britain. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Collini, S. (2010). New left review. The Guardian, 10–11.

  • Coser, L. (1965). Men of ideas. New York: The Free Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dahrendorf, R. (1996). The influence of liberal ideas in post-war Britain, interviewed by A. Seldon. In M. D. Kandlah & A. Seldon (Eds.), Ideas and think tanks in contemporary Britain (Vol. 1, pp. 137–143). London: Frank Cass.

    Google Scholar 

  • Danowski, J. A., & Park, D. W. (2009). Networks of the dead or alive in cyberspace. New Media and Society, 11(3), 337–356.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Denham, A. (1998). British think tanks and the climate of opinion. London: Taylor and Francis.

    Google Scholar 

  • Denham, A., & Garnet, M. (1999). Influence without responsibility. Think-tank in Britain. Parliamentary Affairs, 52(1), 46–57.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Eyerman, R. (1994). Between culture and politics. Intellectuals in modern society. Cambridge: Polity.

    Google Scholar 

  • Eyerman, R. (2011). Intellectuals and cultural trauma. European Journal of Social Theory, 14(4), 453–467.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Galbraith, J. K. (1972). The new industrial state. Harmondsworth: Penguin.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gattone, C. F. (2006). The social scientist as public intellectual. New York: Rowman and Littlefield.

    Google Scholar 

  • Giddens, A. (2009). The politics of climate change. Cambridge: Polity.

    Google Scholar 

  • Giroux, H. A. (2004). Edward Said and the politics of worldliness. Cultural Studies-Critical Methodologies, 4(3), 339–349.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Goldfarb, J. C. (1998). Civility and subversion the intellectual in democratic society. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Hobsbawm, R. (2012). After the Cold War. London Review of Book, 34, 12.

  • Judt, T. (1992). The past imperfect: French intellectuals 1944–56. Berkeley: University of California Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Judt, T. (2012). Thinking the twentieth century. London: William Heinemann.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kalleberg, R. (2012). Sociologist as public intellectuals and experts. Journal of Applied Social Science, 6(1), 43–52.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kaspersen, L. B. (2000). Anthony Giddens. Oxford: Blackwell.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kenny, M. (2004). Reckless minds or democracy’s helpers? Intellectuals and politics in the twentieth century. Contemporary Political Theory, 3, 89–103.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Matthews, D. (2012). Sector urges give and stop. Time Higher Education. http://www.timeshighereducation.co.uk/story.asp?sectioncode=26&storycode=419673&c=1

  • Medvetz, T. (2010). Public policy is like having a vaudeville act. Qualitative Sociology, 33, 549–562.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Misztal, B. A. (2007). Intellectuals and the public good: creativity and courage. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Monbiot, G. (2010). Secretive thinktanks are crushing our democracy. The Guardian. hhtp://www.guardain.co.uk/cimmentsfree/thinktanks-crushing-democrarcy-pr-agencies

  • Pautz, H. (2007). Scottish think-tanks and policy networks. Scottish Affairs, 58, 57–77.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pautz, H. (2010). Think-tanks in The United Kingdom and Germany. The British Journal of Politics and International Relations, 12(2), 274–294.

    Google Scholar 

  • Porter, H. (2007). Where is our Orwell, where is our Dickens? The Observer, 29.

  • Posner, R. A. (2001). Public intellectuals. A study of decline. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rich, A. (2004). Think tanks, public policy and expertise. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Runciman, D. (2011). Can democracy cope. The Public Quarterly, 82(4), 536–545.

    Google Scholar 

  • Said, E. (1994). The representation of the intellectual. The 1993 Reith lectures. London: Vintage.

  • Saunders, P. (2011). Academic sociology and social policy think tank in Britain and Australia. Sociological Research Online, 16(3), 10.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Schlesinger, P. (2009). Creativity and the experts. International Journal of Press/Politics, 14(1), 3–20.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Shepherd, J. (2012). Oxford University institute to focus on eurozone. http://www.guardian.co.uk/education/2012/apr/12/oxford-university-institute-eurozone-financial-crisis?INTCMP=SRCH

  • Smith, J. A. (1991). The ideas brokers. New York: Free Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Stone, D., & Garnett, M. (1998). Introduction: think tanks, policy advice and governance. In D. Stone, A. Denham, & M. Garnett (Eds.), Think tanks across nations (pp. 1–20). Manchester: Manchester University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tickle, L. (2012).So you want to be the new Brian Cox? The Guardian. http://www.guardian.co.uk/education/2012/may/14/celebrity-academic-radion-tv-fundi

  • Turner, J. (2012). Superficially Pally. London Review of Books, 34, 29–31.

  • Waters, S. (2011). French intellectuals and globalization. French Cultural Studies, 22(4), 303–320.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Weaver, R. K. (1989). The changing world of think tanks. PS: Political Science and Politics, 22(3), 563–578.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Weidenbaum, M. (2010). Measuring the influence of think tanks. Social Science and Public Policy, 47, 134–137.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wolfe, A. (2003). An intellectual in public. Ann Arbor: Michigan University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Worth, R.F. (2011). Intellectuals sit out Arab Spring. New York Times, 1 and 4.

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Barbara A. Misztal.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Misztal, B.A. Public Intellectuals and Think Tanks: A Free Market in Ideas?. Int J Polit Cult Soc 25, 127–141 (2012). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10767-012-9126-3

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10767-012-9126-3

Keywords

Navigation