Abstract
The phenomenon of public intellectuals (PIs) continue to be debated, as their status and significance evolve under changing historical circumstances. I suggest PIs still play an important role in democracies, despite alterations in their circumstances, activities, and practices. While most of the familiar questions remain, it is important to take into account a number of changes that impact on PIs, their situation, and their activities. I explore the contingencies that make possible, as well as delimit and alter, the phenomenon of PIs in contemporary democratic societies. The discussion is organised around three sets of evolving circumstances in which PIs are inexorably embedded: the structural setting of mediated public spheres, with a particular emphasis on the online sector; the dynamic realm of practices associate with online civic participation more broadly; and lastly, the cultural and political climate of democratic societies confronted by serious dilemmas. The interface of these circumstances is ushering PIs into a new historical phase, where the web obviously looms large yet where the contours are still taking shape. These circumstances put new demands on PIs.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Anonymous (2011). On public intellectuals. Philosphy Compass, 9 May. http://philosophy-compass.com/2011/05/09/on-public-intellectuals/ Accessed 18 Aug 2012.
Bauman, Z. (2007). Liquid times: living in an age of uncertainty. Cambridge: Polity Press.
Baym, N. K. (2010). Personal connections in the digital age. Cambridge: Polity Press.
Beck, U. (2009). World at risk. Cambridge: Polity Press.
Benkler, Y. (2006). The wealth of networks: how social production transforms markets and freedom. New Haven: Yale University Press.
Borg, C., & Mayo, P. (Eds.). (2007). Public intellectuals, radical democracy and social movements: a book of interviews. New York: Peter Lang.
Carr, N. (2010). The shallows: how the internet is changing the way we think, read and remember. London: Atlantic Books.
Caslon Analytics (2011). Blog statistics and demographics. www.caslon.com.au/weblogprofile1.htm#many. Accessed 18 Aug 2012.
Castells, M. (2010). Communication power. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Chatfield, T. (2009). ‘The world's top intellectuals on our website’. Prospect Magazine, September. http://www.prospectmagazine.co.uk/prospect-100-intellectuals/. Accessed 18 Aug 2012.
Couldry, N. (2010). Why voice matters: culture and politics after neoliberalism. London: Sage.
Dahlgren, P. (2009). Media and political engagement. New York: Cambridge University Pess.
Danowski, J. A., & Park, D. W. (2009). Networks of the dead or alive in cyberspace: public intellectuals in the mass and internet media. New Media and Society, 11(3), 337–356.
Davis, R. (2009). Typing politics: the role of blogs in American politics. New York: Oxford University Press.
Dezner, D. W. (2008a). Public intellectuals 2.0. Foreign Policy 13 May http://drezner.foreignpolicy.com/posts/2008/05/13/blogs_public_intellectuals_and_the_academy. Accessed 18 Aug 2012.
Dezner, D. W. (2008b). Am I defining public intellectuals down? Foreign Policy 12 June http://drezner.foreignpolicy.com/posts/2008/06/12/am_i_defining_public_intellectuals_down. Accessed 18 Aug 2012.
Etzioni, A., & Bowditch, A. (Eds.). (2006). Public intellectuals: an endangered species? Lanham: Rowman and Littlefield.
Fisher, M. (2009). Capitalist realism: is there no alternative? Ropley: Zero Books.
Gewen, B. (2008). Who is a public intellectual? New York Times 11 June. Available at: http://artsbeat.blogs.nytimes.com/2008/06/11/who-is-a-public-intellectual/. Accessed 18 Aug 2012.
Habermas, Jurgen (1984, 1987). Theory of communicative action. 2 vol. Cambridge: Polity Press
Habermas, J. (1989). Structural transformation of the public sphere. Cambridge: Polity.
Habermas, J. (2008). An avantgardistic instinct for relevances: intellectuals and their public. Social Science Research Council: Public Sphere Forum Available at: http://publicsphere.ssrc.org/habermas-intellectuals-and-their-public/ Accessed 18 Aug 2012.
Harvey, D. (2006). A brief history of neoliberalism. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Harvey, D. (2011). The enigma of capital and the crises of capitalism. London: Profile Books.
Hindman, M. (2009). The myth of digital democracy. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Hitchens, C. (2008). How to be a public intellectual. Prospect Magazine, May. Available at: http://www.prospectmagazine.co.uk/2008/05/what-is-a-public-intellectual/ Accessed 18 Aug 2012.
Jacoby, R. (1987). The last intellectuals: American culture in the age of academe. New York: Basic Books.
Jacoby, R. (2008). Big brains, small impact. Chronicle of Higher Education, v54 n18 pB5. http://chronicle.com/article/Big-Brains-Small-Impact/11624. Accessed 18 Aug 2012.
Jacoby, S. (2009). The age of American unreason. New York: Vintage Books.
Joffe, J. (2003). The decline of the public intellectual and the rise of the pundit. In A. M. Melzer, M. Arthur, J. Weinberger, & M. R. Zinman (Eds.), The public intellectual: between philosophy and politics (pp. 109–122). Lanham: Rowman and Littlefield.
Keen, A. (2008). The cult of the amateur. New York: Doubleday.
Lewis, J. (2011). Crisis in the global mediasphere: desire, displeasure and cultural transformation. Basingstoke: Palgrave.
Lievrouw, L. A. (2011). Alternative and activist new media. Cambridge: Polity Press.
Loader, B., & Mercea, D. (Eds.). (2012). Social media and democracy. Abingdon: Routledge.
Melzer, A. M., Weinberger, J., & Zinman, M. R. (Eds.). (2003). The public intellectual: between philosophy and politics. Lanham: Rowman and Littlefield.
Michael, J. (2000). Anxious intellectuals: academic professionals, public intellectuals, and enlightenment values. Durham: Duke University Press.
Morozov, E. (2011). The net delusion: how not to liberate the world. London: Allen Lane.
Naughton, J. (2011). Britain's to 300 intellectuals. The Guardian, 8 May. http://www.guardian.co.uk/culture/2011/may/08/top-300-british-intellectuals. Accessed 18 Aug 2012.
Papacharissi, Z. (Ed.). (2009). Journalism and citizenship: new agendas in communication. London: Routledge.
Pasquali, F. (2011). Participating audiences, authorship and the digitalization of the publishing industry. CM: Communication Management Quarterly, 21, 203–219.
Posner, R. A. (2003). Public intellectuals: a study of decline. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.
Rettberg, J. W. (2008). Blogging. Cambridge: Polity Press.
Rosenberry, J., & St. John, B., III (Eds.). (2010). Public journalism 2.0: the promise and reality of a citizen-engaged press. London: Routledge.
Sloterdijk, P. (1987). Critique of cynical reason. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press.
Small, H. (2002). The public intellectual. Oxford: Blackwell.
Song, F. W. (2009). Virtual communities: bowling alone, online together. New York: Peter Lang.
Striphas, T. (2009). The late age of print: everyday book culture from consumerism to control. New York: Columbia University Press.
Sunstein, C. (2008). Infotopia: how many minds produce knowledge. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Surowiecki, J. (2004). The wisdom of crowds. New York: Anchor Books.
Tapscott, D., & Williams, A. D. (2006). Wikinomics: how mass collaboration changes everything. New York: Portfolio (Penguin).
Thompson, J. B. (2010). Merchants of culture: the publishing business in the twenty-first century. Cambridge: Polity Press.
Young, J. (2007). The vertigo of late modernity. London: Sage.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Dahlgren, P. Public Intellectuals, Online Media, and Public Spheres: Current Realignments. Int J Polit Cult Soc 25, 95–110 (2012). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10767-012-9124-5
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10767-012-9124-5