Skip to main content
Log in

Abstract

Using the case of the Holocaust as a cultural trauma in the Jewish-Israeli context, some insights are suggested as to the ways younger members of collectives view cultural trauma as a symbolic boundary. The findings obtained from three groups of students, each expressing their views on a different facet of the Holocaust as a symbolic boundary, suggest that the major contributing factor that turns cultural trauma into a symbolic boundary is the way in which members of the collective categorize the modes through which others, within and outside the collective, relate to that cultural trauma.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

Notes

  1. See for example Jerusalem Post, May 5, 2006; Jerusalem Post, September 10, 2007; and Ha’Aretz, November 3, 2007.

References

  • Alexander, J. C. (2004). Toward a theory of cultural trauma. In J. C. Alexander, R. Eyerman, B. Giesen, N. J. Smelser & P. Sztompka (Eds.), Cultural trauma and collective identity (pp. 1–30). Berkeley, CA: University of California Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Blumner, N. (2006). The Holocaust as stark reminder: Ethno-national identity, Diaspora and the ideological process(es) of Memory. Paper presented at the annual meeting of the American Sociological Association, Montreal Convention Center, Montreal, Quebec, Canada, Aug. 10, 2006.

  • Brug, M. (1996). From the top of Masada to the heart of the ghetto: Myth as history. In D. Ohana & R. S. Wistrich (Eds.), Myth and memory: Transfiguration of Israeli consciousness (pp. 203–227). Jerusalem: Van Lear Institute and HaKibutz HaMeuchad. (in Hebrew).

    Google Scholar 

  • Cohen, E. H. (2004). Components and symbols of ethnic identity: A case study in informal education and identity formation in Diaspora. Applied Psychology: An International Review, 53(1), 87–112.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Edmunds, J., & Turner, B. S. (2005). Global generations: Social change in the twentieth century. The British Journal of Sociology, 56(4), 559–577.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Epstein, C. F. (1992). Tinker-bells and pinup: The construction and reconstruction of gender boundaries at work. In M. Lamont & M. Founrnier (Eds.), Boundaries and the making of inequality (pp. 232–256). Chicago: University of Chicago Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fuller, S. (2003). Creating and contesting boundaries: Exploring the dynamics of conflict and classification. Sociological Forum, 18(1), 3–30.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Half, L. M., Singer, J. A., & Mackinnon, J. R. (1999). Jewish identity, hostility toward Germany, and knowledge about the Holocaust in the United States and Germany. Journal of Psychology and Judaism, 23(3), 107–124.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kurtz, L. R. (1983). The politics of heresy. American Journal of Sociology, 88(6), 1085–1115.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lamont, M., & Molnár, V. (2002). The study of boundaries in the social sciences. Annual Review of Sociology, 28, 167–195.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lazar, A., Litvak-Hirsch, T., & Chaitin, J. (2008). Between culture and family: Jewish-Israeli young adults relation to the Holocaust as a cultural trauma. Traumatology, 14(4), 93–102. doi:10.1177/1534765608321071.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lessl, T. M. (1988). Heresy, orthodoxy, and the politics of science. Quarterly Journal of Speech, 74, 18–34.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Levy, D., & Sznaider, N. (2005). The Holocaust and memory in the global age. Philadelphia: Temple University.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mayring, P. (2000). Qualitative content analysis. Forum Qualitative Sozialforschung/Forum: Qualitative Social Research, 1(2) (online journal). http://www.qualitative-research.net/fqs-texte/2-00/2-00mayring-e.htm. Accessed 28 November 2007.

  • Smelser, N. J. (2004). Psychological trauma and cultural trauma. In J. C. Alexander, R. Eyerman, B. Giesen, N. J. Smelser & P. Sztompka (Eds.), Cultural trauma and collective identity (pp. 31–59). Berkeley, CA: University of California Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Stamm, B. H., Stamm, H. E., Hudnall, A. C., & Higson- Smith, C. (2003). Considering a theory of cultural trauma and loss. Journal of Trauma and Loss, 9(1), 89–111.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Volkan, V. D. (2001). Transgenerational transmissions and chosen traumas: An aspect of large-group identity. Group Analysis, 34(1), 79–97.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Vopel, S. (2007). Germen-Jewish dialog—A survey in Germany. Israel: Bretelsmann Stiftung, Güterloh.

    Google Scholar 

  • Werbner, P. (2002). The place which is Diaspora: Citizenship, religion and gender in the making of chaordic transnationalism. Journal of Ethnic and Migration Studies, 28(1), 119–133.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Alon Lazar.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Lazar, A., Litvak-Hirsch, T. Cultural Trauma as a Potential Symbolic Boundary. Int J Polit Cult Soc 22, 183–190 (2009). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10767-009-9060-1

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10767-009-9060-1

Keywords

Navigation