Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Validation of the Science, Mathematics, and English Task Value Scales Based on Longitudinal Data

  • Published:
International Journal of Science and Mathematics Education Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Motivation for an action is determined by the expectation for success and subjective judgment on task values according to the expectancy-value theory. Task values, including intrinsic value, attainment value, utility value, and cost, influence and predict the students’ engagement in learning activities and their choices in the future. This study validated the science, mathematics, and English task value scales using a longitudinal data. Data were collected from the 1234 middle school students of different school types, sizes, and districts in the Taipei metropolitan area. Confirmatory factor analysis, invariance, explanatory power, and higher order factor analysis were used to test the reliability and validity of the Chinese version across the three repeated annual collections of data and to develop a short version. The results showed that both the long and short task value scales are valid and reliable for measuring in-depth task values for different subjects, grades, and for long-term study. From seventh to ninth grade, the students’ science task values decrease, the English task values are relatively stable, and the mathematics task values improve in Grade 8, but then decline in Grade 9. The implications of the scales for monitoring, intervening, and enhancing the students’ task values are discussed.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Ariely, G., & Davidov, E. (2012). Assessment of measurement equivalence with cross-national and longitudinal surveys in political science. European Political Science, 11, 363–377.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Beier, M. E., Kim, M. H., Saterbak, A., Leautaud, V., Bishnoi, S., & Gilberto, J. M. (2019). The effect of authentic project-based learning on attitudes and career aspirations in STEM. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 56, 3–23.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bentler, P. M. (1990). Comparative fit indexes in structural models. Psychological Bulletin, 107, 238–246.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Blankenburg, J. S., Höffler, T. N., & Parchmann, I. (2016). Fostering today what is needed tomorrow: Investigating students’ interests in science. Science Education, 100, 364–391.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bøe, M. V. (2012). Science choices in Norwegian upper secondary school: What matters? Science Education, 96, 1–20.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Britner, S. L., & Pajares, F. (2001). Self-efficacy beliefs, motivation, race, and gender in middle school science. Journal of Women and Minorities in Science and Engineering, 7, 271–285.

    Google Scholar 

  • Browne, M. W., & Cudeck, R. (1993). Alternative ways of assessing model fit. In K. A. Bollen & J. S. Long (Eds.), Test structural equation models (pp. 136–162). Newbury Park, CA: Sage.

  • Bryan, R. R., Glynn, S. M., & Kittleson, J. M. (2011). Motivation, achievement, and advanced placement intent of high school students learning science. Science Education, 95, 1049–1065.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Carmines, E. G., & McIver, J. P. (1981). Analyzing models with unobserved variables: Analysis of covariance structures. In G. W. Bohrnstedt & E. F. Borgatta (Eds.), Social measurement: Current issues (pp. 65–115). Newbury Park, CA: Sage.

  • Caspi, A., Gorsky, P., Nitzani-Hendel, R., Zacharia, Z., Rosenfeld, S., Berman, S., & Shildhouse, B. (2019). Ninth-grade students’ perceptions of the factors that led them to major in high school science, technology, engineering, and mathematics disciplines. Science Education, 103, 1176–1205.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chang, Y. (2015). Science motivation across Asian countries: Links among future-oriented motivation, self-efficacy, task values, and achievement outcomes. The Asia-Pacific Education Researcher, 24, 247–258.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chen, A., & Liu, X. (2009). Task values, cost, and choice decisions in college physical education. Journal of Teaching in Physical Education, 28, 192–213.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chow, A., Eccles, J. S., & Salmela-Aro, K. (2012). Task value profiles across subjects and aspirations to physical and IT-related sciences in the United States and Finland. Developmental Psychology, 48, 1612–1628.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Conley, A. M. (2012). Patterns of motivation beliefs: Combining achievement goal and expectancy-value perspectives. Journal of Educational Psychology, 104, 32–47.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • DiBenedetto, M. K., & Bembenutty, H. (2013). Within the pipeline: Self-regulated learning, self-efficacy, and socialization among college students in science courses. Learning and Individual Differences, 23, 218–224.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Eccles, J. S., & Wigfield, A. (1995). In the mind of the actor: The structure of adolescents’ achievement task values and expectancy-related beliefs. The Society for Personality and Social Psychology, 21, 215–225.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Eccles, J. S., & Wigfield, A. (2002). Motivational beliefs, values, and goals. Annual Review of Psychology, 53, 109–132.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Flake, J. K., Barron, K. E., Hulleman, C., McCoach, B. D., & Welsh, M. E. (2015). Measuring cost: The forgotten component of expectancy-value theory. Contemporary Educational Psychology, 41, 232–244.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fredricks, J. A., Hofkens, T., Wang, M. T., Mortenson, E., & Scott, P. (2018). Supporting girls’ and boys’ engagement in math and science learning: A mixed methods study. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 55, 271–298.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gaspard, H., Dicke, A.-L., Flunger, B., Schreier, B., Häfner, I., Trautwein, U., & Nagengast, B. (2015). More value through greater differentiation: Gender differences in value beliefs about math. Journal of Educational Psychology, 107, 663–677.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gaspard, H., Häfner, I., Parrisius, C., Trautwein, U., & Nagengast, B. (2017). Assessing task values in five subjects during secondary school: Measurement structure and mean level differences across grade level, gender, and academic subject. Contemporary Educational Psychology, 48, 67–84.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gottlieb, J. J. (2018). STEM career aspirations in black, Hispanic, and white ninth-grade students. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 55, 1365–1392.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Guo, J., Nagengast, B., Marsh, H. W., Kelava, A., Gaspard, H., Brandt, H., . . . Trautwein, U. (2016). Probing the unique contributions of self-concepts, task values, and their interactions using multiple value facets and multiple academic outcomes. AERA Open, 2(1), 1–20.

  • Hu, L., & Bentler, P. M. (1999). Cutoff criteria for fit indexes in covariance structure analysis: Conventional criteria versus new alternatives. Structural Equation Modeling, 6, 1–55.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Leibham, M. B., Alexander, J. M., & Johnson, K. E. (2013). Science interests in preschool boys and girls: Relations to later self-concept and science achievement. Science Education, 97, 574–593.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lou, Y. C., Lin, H. F., & Lin, C. W. (2012). Development and confirmatory factory analysis of achievement task value scale for university students. Journal of Psychoeducational Assessment, 31, 482–492.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • National Research Council (1996). National science education standards. Washington, DC: National Academic Press.

  • National Research Council (2000). Inquiry and the national science education standards: A guide for teaching and learning. Washington, DC: National Academy Press.

  • Newsom, J. T. (2015). Longitudinal structural equation modeling: A comprehensive introduction. New York, NY: Routledge.

  • Ng, C. (2019). Disadvantaged students’ motivation, aspiration and subject choice in mathematics: A prospective qualitative investigation. International Journal of Science and Mathematics Education. Advance online publication. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10763-019-09981-4.

  • Oppermann, E., Brunner, M., Eccles, J. S., & Anders, Y. (2018). Uncovering young children’s motivational beliefs about learning science. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 55, 399–421.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pintrich, P. R., & de Groot, E. V. (1990). Motivational and self-regulated learning components of classroom academic performance. Journal of Educational Psychology, 82, 33–40.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pintrich, P. R., & Schunk, D. H. (1996). Motivation in education: Theory, research, and applications. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Merrill.

  • Rozek, C. S., Hyde, J. S., Svoboda, R. C., Hulleman, C. S., & Harackiewicz, J. M. (2014). Gender differences in the effects of a utility-value intervention to help parents motivate adolescents in mathematics and science. Journal of Educational Psychology, 107, 195–206.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Schunk, D. H., Pintrich, P. R., & Meece, J. L. (2008). Motivation in education: Theory, research, and applications (3rd ed.). Upper Saddle River, NJ: Pearson/Merrill Prentice Hall.

  • Simpkins, S. D., Davis-Kean, P. E., & Eccles, J. S. (2006). Math and science motivation: A longitudinal examination of the links between choices and beliefs. Developmental Psychology, 42, 70–83.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Skaalvik, E. M., & Skaalvik, S. (2004). Self-concept and self-efficacy: A test of the internal/external frame of reference model and predictions of subsequent motivation and achievement. Psychological Reports, 95, 1187–1202.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Trautwein, U., Marsh, H. W., Nagengast, B., Lüdtke, O., Nagy, G., & Jonkmann, K. (2012). Probing for the multiplicative term in modern expectancy-value theory: A latent interaction modeling study. Journal of Educational Psychology, 104, 763–777.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Trizano-Hermosilla, I. & Alvarado, J. M. (2016). Best alternatives to Cronbach’s alpha reliability in realistic conditions: Congeneric and asymmetrical measurements. Frontier in psychology. Retrieved August 2, 2018, from https://eprints.ucm.es/38053/1/fpsyg-07-00769.pdf

  • Wang, C. L., & Liou, P. Y. (2018). Patterns of motivational beliefs in the science learning of total, high-, and low-achieving students: Evidence of Taiwanese TIMSS 2011 data. International Journal of Science and Mathematics Education, 16, 603–618.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wang, M. T., Fredricks, J. A., Ye, F., Hofkens, T. L., & Linn, J. S. (2016). The math and science engagement scale: Scale development, validation, and psychometric properties. Learning and Instruction, 43, 16–25.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Watkinson, E. J., Dwyer, S. A., & Nielsen, A. B. (2005). Children theorize about reasons for recess engagement: Does expectancy-value theory apply? Adapted Physical Activity Quarterly, 22, 179–197.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Watt, H. M. G. (2004). Development of adolescents’ self-perceptions, values, and task perceptions according to gender and domain in 7th- through 11th-grade Australian students. Child Development, 75, 1556–1574.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Funding

This study was funded by the Ministry of Science and Technology, Republic of China (MOST 105-2511-S-011-009-MY3; 108-2511-H-011-002-MY4) and the Academy of Finland (318380).

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Science Education Center, Faculty of Science, Srinakharinwirot University, Bangkok, Thailand

    Navara Seetee

  2. Graduate Institute of Digital Learning and Education, National Taiwan University of Science and Technology, Taipei, Taiwan, Republic of China

    Chi Chi & Sufen Chen

  3. Optentia Research Focus Area, North-West University, Vanderbijlpark, South Africa

    Amandeep Dhir & Sufen Chen

  4. School of Business and Management, Lappeenranta University of Technology, Lappeenranta, Finland

    Amandeep Dhir

Authors
  1. Navara Seetee
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Chi Chi
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Amandeep Dhir
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  4. Sufen Chen
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Sufen Chen.

Electronic supplementary material

ESM 1

(DOCX 32 kb)

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Seetee, N., Chi, C., Dhir, A. et al. Validation of the Science, Mathematics, and English Task Value Scales Based on Longitudinal Data. Int J of Sci and Math Educ 19, 443–460 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10763-020-10081-x

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10763-020-10081-x

Keywords

Search

Navigation