Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

CHALLENGING THE WESTERN APPROACH TO CULTURAL COMPARISONS: YOUNG PUPILS’ AFFECTIVE STRUCTURES REGARDING MATHEMATICS IN FINLAND AND CHILE

  • Published:
International Journal of Science and Mathematics Education Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Large-scale studies measure mathematics-related affect using questionnaires developed by researchers in primarily English-based countries and according to Western-based theories. Influential comparative conclusions about different cultures and countries are drawn based on such measurements. However, there are certain premises involved in these kinds of “imposed-etic approaches,” such as (1) universalism within the examined components, (2) universalism within the components’ significances, (3) the congruence between languages and conceptions, and (4) the components’ coverage of the phenomena. Therefore, researchers have criticized these premises citing a large number of reasons. In this study, the validity of conclusions based on results relying on the imposed-etic approach is questioned by examining to what extent the premises behind this approach can be justified. We investigate the premise of universality within the examined components by scrutinizing the limitations of a typical questionnaire. To what extent can such a questionnaire reveal affective domain structures for pupils in two countries as dissimilar as Finland and Chile? We found that there can be no meaningful precision. Universalism across components within the mathematics-related affect structure is not guaranteed in the two cultures, and the use of such questionnaires is simply unjustifiable. We also thoroughly examined the three other premises underpinning the Western-based imposed-etic perspective.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Adediwura, A. A. (2011). The development and confirmatory factor analysis of a scale for the measurement of gifted students attitude towards mathematics. World Journal of Education, 1(1), 52–62.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Andrews, P. & Diego-Mantecón, J. (2014). Instrument adaptation in cross-cultural studies of students’ mathematics-related beliefs: Learning from healthcare research. Compare: A Journal of Comparative and International Education. doi:10.1080/03057925.2014.884346.

    Google Scholar 

  • Berry, J. W. (1989). Imposed etics-emics-derived etics: The operationalization of a compelling idea. International Journal of Psychology, 5, 165–171.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bronfenbrenner, U. (1993). The ecology of cognitive development: Research models and fugitive findings. In. R. H. Wozniak & K. W. Fischer (Eds.), Development in context: Acting and thinking in specific environments. The Jean Piaget symposium series., (pp. 3–44). Hillsdale, NJ, England: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.

  • Chamberlin, S. A. (2010). A review of instruments created to assess affect in mathematics. Journal of Mathematics Education, 3(1), 167–182.

    Google Scholar 

  • Clarke, D. (2013). The validity-comparability compromise in crosscultural studies in mathematics education. In B. Ubuz, Ç. Haser & M. A. Mariotti (Eds.), Proceedings of the Eighth Congress of the European Society for Research in Mathematics Education (pp. 1855–1864). Antalya, Turkey: ERME.

    Google Scholar 

  • Evans, J. (2006). Affect and emotion in mathematical thinking. In J. Maasz & W. Schloeglmann (Eds.), New mathematics education and practice (pp. 233–255). Rotterdam, The Netherlands: Sense Publishers.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fennema, E. & Sherman, J. A. (1976). Fennema-Sherman mathematics attitudes scales: Instruments designed to measure attitudes toward the learning of mathematics by females and males. Journal for Research in Mathematics Education, 7(5), 324–326.

  • Goldin, G. A. (2002). Affect, meta-affect, and mathematical belief structures. In G. C. Leder, E. Pehkonen & G. Törner (Eds.), Beliefs: A hidden variable in mathematics education? (pp. 59–72). Dordrecht, The Netherlands: Kluwer Academic Publishers.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hannula, M. S. (2011). The structure and dynamics of affect in mathematical thinking and learning. In M. Pytlak, E. Swoboda & T. Rowland (Eds.), Proceedings of the 7th CERME conference (pp. 34–60). Rzezsow, Poland: ERME.

  • Hannula, M. S. & Laakso, J. (2011). The structure of mathematics related beliefs, attitudes and motivation among Finnish grade 4 and grade 8 students. In B. Ubuz (Ed.), Proceedings of the 35th conference of the international group for the psychology of mathematics education, Vol. 3, (pp. 9–16). Ankara, Turkey: PME.

  • Harter, S. (1999). The construction of the self. A developmental perspective. New York, NY: The Guildford Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Harzing, A.-W. (2006). Response styles in cross-national survey research: A 26-country study. The International Journal of Crosscultural Management, 6(2), 243–266.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hautamäki, J., Laaksonen, S. & Kupiainen, S. (2008). PISA 2006—interest and attitudes. In z. Hautamäki, E. Harjunen, A. Hautamäki, T. Kajalainen, S. Kupianen, S. Laaksonen, J. Lavonen, E. Pehkonen, P. Rantanen & P. Scheinen (Eds.), PISA 06 Finland. Analyses, reflections and explanations (pp. 181–192). Finland: Ministry of Education.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hirvonen, K. (2012). Onko laskutaito laskussa? Matematiikan oppimistulokset peruskoulun päättövaiheessa 2011. [Are calculating skills decreasing? Mathematics learning outcomes at the end of the comprehensive school at 2011.] Helsinki, Finland: The Finnish National Board of Education.

  • Hofstede, G. & Hofstede, G. J. (2005). Cultures and organizations. Software of the mind. New York, NY: McGraw-Hill.

    Google Scholar 

  • Horan, P. M., DiStefano, C. & Motl, R. W. (2003). Wording effects in self-esteem scales: Methodological artifact or response style? Structural Equation Modeling: A Multidisciplinary Journal, 10(3), 435–455.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Joutsenlahti, J. & Vainionpää, J. (2010). Oppimateriaali matematiikan opetuksessa ja osaamisessa. In E. K. Niemi & J. Metsämuuronen (Eds.), Miten matematiikan taidot kehittyvät? Matematiikan oppimistulokset peruskoulun viidennen vuosiluokan jälkeen vuonna 2008. [How mathematics competences develop? Mathematics learning outcomes after grade 5 in comprehensive school at 2008.] (pp. 137–148). Helsinki, Finland: The Finnish National Board of Education.

  • Laine, A., Näveri, L., Pehkonen, E., Ahtee, M., Heinilä, L. & Hannula, M. S. (2012). Third-graders’ problem solving performance and teachers’ actions. In T. Bergqvist (Ed.), Proceedings of the ProMath meeting in Umeå (pp. 69–81). University of Umeå.

  • Leder, G. C. (2006). Affect and mathematics learning. In J. Maasz & W. Schloeglmann (Eds.), New mathematics education and practice (pp. 203–208). Rotterdam, The Netherlands: Sense Publishers.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lee, J. (2009). Universals and specifics of math self-concept, math self-efficacy, and math anxiety across 41 PISA 2003 participating countries. Learning and Individual Differences, 19, 355–365.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Leech, N. L., Barret, K. C. & Morgan, G. A. (2008). SPSS for intermediate statistics. New York, NY: Psychology press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Marsh, H. W., Ellis, L. A. & Graven, R. G. (2002). How do preschool children feel about themselves? Unraveling measurement and multidimensional self-concept structure. Developmental Psychology, 38(3), 376–393.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mattila, L. & Rautopuro, J. (2013). Taustatietoja oppilaista ja opetuksesta [Background information about students and teaching]. In J. Rautopuro (Ed.), Hyödyllinen pakkolasku. Matematiikan oppimistulokset peruskoulun päättövaiheessa 2012 [A useful emergency landing. Learning results in mathematics after comprehensive school 2012]. Helsinki, Finland: The Finnish National Board of Education.

  • McLeod, D. B. (1992). Research on affect in mathematics education: A reconceptualization. In D. A. Grows (Ed.), Handbook of research on mathematics learning and teaching (pp. 575–596). New York, NY: Macmillan.

    Google Scholar 

  • Metsämuuronen, J. (2010). Osaamisen ja asenteiden muutos perusopetuksen 3.-5. luokilla. [The changes of attainment and attitudes from grade 3 to grade 5 of comprehensive education. In E. K. Niemi & J. Metsämuuronen (Eds.), Miten matematiikan taidot kehittyvät? [How do the mathematics skills develop?] (pp. 93–136). Helsinki: National Board of Education.

  • Metsämuuronen, J. (2012). Challenges of the Fennema-Sherman ¨test in the international comparisons. International Journal of Psychological Studies, 4(3), 1–22.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Midgley, C., Maehr, M. L., Hruda, L. Z., Anderman, E., Anderman, L. Freeman, K. E., … Urdan, T. (2000). Manual of the patterns of adaptive learning scales. University of Michigan. Retrieved from http://www.umich.edu/~pals/PALS%202000_V13Word97.pdf.

  • Niemi, E. (2010). Matematiikan oppimistulokset 6. vuosiluokan alussa. [Mathematics learning outcomes at the beginning of 6th grade. In E. K. Niemi & J. Metsämuuronen (Eds.), Miten matematiikan taidot kehittyvät? Matematiikan oppimistulokset peruskoulun viidennen vuosiluokan jälkeen vuonna 2008. [How mathematics skills develop? Mathematics learning outcomes after grade 5 in comprehensive school at 2008.] (pp. 17–70). Helsinki, Finland: The Finnish National Board of Education.

  • OECD (2010a). PISA 2009 Results: What students know and can do—Student performance in reading, mathematics and science (Volume I). Retrieved from http://www.oecd.org/pisa/pisaproducts/48852548.pdf.

  • OECD (2010b). PISA 2009 Results: Overcoming social background—Equity in learning opportunities and outcomes (Volume II). Retrieved from http://www.oecd.org/pisa/pisaproducts/48852584.pdf.

  • OECD GIP (2010). Iberoamerica in PISA 2006. Regional report. Santillana Educatión, S.L. Retrieved from http://www.oecd.org/pisa/pisaproducts/pisa2006/45753892.pdf.

  • OECD (2011). Education at a Glance 2011: OECD indicators, OECD Publishing. Retrieved from http://www.oecd.org/education/skills-beyond-school/48631582.pdf.

  • OECD (2012). Education at a Glance 2012: OECD Indicators, OECD Publishing. Retrieved from http://www.uis.unesco.org/Library/Documents/education-at-a-glance-oecd-indicators-2012-en.pdf.

  • Op ’t Eynde, P., de Corte, E. & Verschaffel, L. (2002). Framing students’ mathematics-related beliefs. In G. C. Leder, E. Pehkonen & G. Törner (Eds.), Beliefs: A hidden variable in mathematics education? (pp. 13–37). Dordrecht, The Netherlands: Kluwer Academic Publishers.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Pehkonen, E. (1994). On differences in pupils’ conceptions about mathematics teaching. The Mathematics Educator, 5(1), 3–10.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pekrun, R. (2006). The control-value theory of achievement emotions: Assumptions, corollaries, and implications for educational research and practice. Educational Psychology Review, 18, 315–341.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pietilä, A. (2002). Luokanopettajaopiskelijoiden matematiikkakuva. Matematiikkakokemukset matematiikkakuvan muodostajina. [Preservice elementary teachers’ views of mathematics: The role of mathematics experiences in forming the views of mathematics.] A doctoral dissertation. Helsinki, Finland: University of Helsinki.

  • Pintrich, P. R. & Schunk, D. H. (2002). Motivation in education: theory, research, and applications (2nd ed.). Upper Saddle River, NJ: Pearson Education.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ramírez, M. (2005). Attitudes toward mathematics and academic performance among Chilean 8th graders. Estudios Pedagógicos, 31, 97–112.

    Google Scholar 

  • Roesken, B., Hannula, M. S. & Pehkonen, E. (2011). Dimensions of students’ views of themselves as learners of mathematics. ZDM, 43(4), 497–506.

  • Sumpter, L. (2012). Themes and interplay of beliefs in mathematical reasoning. International Journal of Science and Mathematics Education, 11(5), 1115–1135.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tapia, M. & Marsh, G. E., II. (2004). An instrument to measure mathematics attitudes. Academic Exchange Quarterly, 8(2), 16–21.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tapia, M. & Marsh, G. E., II. (2005). Attitudes towards mathematics inventory redux. Academic Exchange Quarterly, 9(3), 272–275.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tuohilampi, L. & Hannula, M. S. (2011). High expectations, low confidence – discrepancy in self-image as a reason for displeasure in mathematics. In B. Ubuz (Ed.), Proceedings of the 35th Conference of the International Group for the Psychology of Mathematics Education, Vol. 1, (p. 406). Ankara, Turkey: PME.

  • Tuohilampi, L., Hannula, M. & Varas, L. (2014). 9-year old students’ self-related belief structures regarding mathematics: a comparison between Finland and Chile. In M. S. Hannula, P. Portaankorva-Koivisto, A. Laine & L. Näveri (Eds.), Proceedings of the 18th conference of the mathematical views (pp. 15–26). Helsinki, Finland: MAVI.

  • Valenzuela, J.P., Bellei, C. & De Los Ríos, D. (2009). Evolución de la segregación socioeconómica de los estudiantes chilenos y su relación con el financiamiento compartido [Evolution of the socioeconomic segregation of Chilean pupils and their relation to the shared funding policy]. In Evidencias para Políticas Públicas en Educación, (pp. 231-284). FONIDE, Ministerio de Educación.

  • Wong, N. (2008). Confucian heritage culture learner’s phenomenon: from “exploring the middle zone” to “constructing a bridge”. ZDM—International Journal of. Mathematics Education, 40, 973–981.

    Google Scholar 

  • Zhu, Y. & Leung, F. S. (2011). Motivation and achievement: Is there an East Asian model? International Journal of Science and Mathematics Education, 9, 1189–1212.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. University of Helsinki, Helsinki, Finland

    Laura Tuohilampi, Markku S. Hannula, Anu Laine, Liisa Näveri & Laia Saló i Nevado

  2. University of Chile, Helsinki, Finland

    Leonor Varas & Valentina Giaconi

Authors
  1. Laura Tuohilampi
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Markku S. Hannula
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Leonor Varas
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  4. Valentina Giaconi
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  5. Anu Laine
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  6. Liisa Näveri
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  7. Laia Saló i Nevado
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Laura Tuohilampi.

Electronic Supplementary Material

Below is the link to the electronic supplementary material.

ESM 1

(DOC 51 kb)

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Tuohilampi, L., Hannula, M.S., Varas, L. et al. CHALLENGING THE WESTERN APPROACH TO CULTURAL COMPARISONS: YOUNG PUPILS’ AFFECTIVE STRUCTURES REGARDING MATHEMATICS IN FINLAND AND CHILE. Int J of Sci and Math Educ 13, 1625–1648 (2015). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10763-014-9562-9

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10763-014-9562-9

Key words

Search

Navigation