ABSTRACT
This study investigates how the illustrations in a science textbook, with their design modified according to cognitive process principles, affected students’ learning performance. The quasi-experimental design recruited two Grade 5 groups (N = 58) as the research participants. The treatment group (n = 30) used the modified version of the textbook, and the comparison group (n = 28) used the standard textbook published in Taiwan. Scores from a researcher-developed performance assessment for the two groups were examined with a one-way ANCOVA, using the first unit examination as the covariate. Results showed that the modified textbook with a cognitive principles-driven design enhanced the participants’ learning performance in terms of conceptual knowledge, as well as transfer and retention, compared with that of the group using the standard textbook. However, such improvement did not occur in procedural knowledge. Thus, the learning benefits of cognitive principles-driven illustrations warrant further investigation.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Adesope, O. O. & Nesbit, T. C. (2012). Verbal redundancy in multimedia learning environments: A meta-analysis. Journal of Educational Psychology, 104(1), 250–263.
Canham, M. & Hegarty, M. (2010). Effects of knowledge and display design on comprehension of complex graphics. Learning and Instruction, 20, 155–166.
Carney, R. & Levin, J. (2002). Pictorial illustrations still improve students’ learning from text. Educational Psychology Review, 14, 5–26.
Chou, P.-I. (2010). Content analysis on illustrations in science and technology textbooks used in Taiwan's junior high schools. Paper presented at the 6th International Conference on Science, Mathematics and Technology Education. Taiwan: Hualien.
Clark, R. C. & Lyons, C. (2004). Graphics for learning. San Francisco: Pfeiffer.
Clark, R. C., Nguyen, F. & Sweller, J. (2006). Efficiency in learning: Evidence-based guidelines to manage cognitive load. San Francisco: John Wiley & Sons.
Cook, M. P. (2006). Visual representations in science education: The influence of prior knowledge and cognitive load theory on instructional design principles. Science Education, 90(6), 1073–1091.
Cook, M. P. (2008). Students’ comprehension of science concepts depicted in textbook illustrations. Electronic Journal of Science Education, 12(1), 39–54.
DeLeeuw, K. E. & Mayer, R. E. (2008). A comparison of three measures of cognitive load: Evidence for separable measures of intrinsic, extraneous, and germane load. Journal of Educational Psychology, 100(1), 223–234.
Florax, M. & Ploetzner, R. (2010). What contributes to the split-attention effect? The role of text segmentation, picture labelling, and proximity. Learning and Instruction, 20, 216–224.
Kester, L., Lehen, C., van Gerven, P. & Kirschner, P. (2006). Just-in-time, schematic supportive information presentation during cognitive skill acquisition. Computers in Human Behavior, 22(1), 93–112.
Latour, B. (1987). Science in action: How to follow scientists and engineers through society. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.
Lee, V. R. (2010). Adaptations and continuities in the use and design of visual representations in US middle school science textbooks. International Journal of Science Education, 32(8), 1099–1126.
Levin, J., Anglin, G. & Carney, R. (1987). On empirically validating functions of pictures in prose. In D. Willows & H. Houghton (Eds.), The psychology of illustration, volume 2: Instructional issues (pp. 51–85). New York: Springer-Verlag.
Lynch, M. & Woolgar, S. (1990). Representation in scientific practice. Cambridge: MIT Press.
Mayer, R. E. (2001). Multimedia learning. New York: Cambridge University Press.
Mayer, R. E., Steinhoff, K., Bower, G. & Mars, R. (1995). A generative theory of textbook design: Using annotated illustration to foster meaningful learning of science text. Educational Technology Research and Development, 43(1), 31–43.
Miller, G. A. (1956). The magic number seven, plus or minus two: Some limits on our capacity for processing information. Psychological Review, 63, 81–97.
Moreno, R. & Mayer, R. E. (1999). Cognitive principles of multimedia learning: The role of modality and contiguity. Journal of Educational Psychology, 91, 358–368.
Paivio, A. (1986). Mental representation: A dual coding approach. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Pintó, R. & Ametller, J. (2002). Students’ difficulties in reading images. Comparing results from four national research groups. International Journal of Science Education, 24(3), 333–341.
Pozzer, L. L. & Roth, W.-M. (2003). Prevalence, function, and structure of photographs in high school biology textbooks. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 40(10), 1089–1114.
Reber, A. S., Reber, E. & Allen, R. (2009). The Penguin dictionary of psychology (4th ed.). New York: Penguin.
Stevens, J. P. (2009). Applied multivariate statistics for the social sciences (5th ed.). New York: Routledge.
Stull, A. T. & Mayer, R. E. (2007). Learning by doing versus learning by viewing: Three experimental comparisons of learner-generated versus author-provided graphic organizers. Journal of Educational Psychology, 99(4), 808–820.
Sweller, J., van Merriënboer, J. J. G. & Paas, F. G. W. C. (1998). Cognitive architecture and instructional design. Educational Psychology Review, 10, 251–296.
Tabachnick, B. G. & Fidell, L. S. (2001). Using multivariate statistics (4th ed.). Boston: Allyn & Bacon.
Tippett, C. D. (2011). Exploring middle school students’ representational competence in science: Development and verification of a framework for learning with visual representations (PhD dissertation). University of Victoria, Victoria, British Columbia, Canada. Retrieved from http://hdl.handle.net/1828/3250.
van Merriënboer, J. J. G. & Sweller, J. (2005). Cognitive load theory and complex learning: Recent developments and future directions. Educational Psychology Review, 17(2), 147–177.
Yore, L. D., Anderson, J. O. & Chiu, M.-H. (2010). Moving PISA results into the policy arena: Perspectives on knowledge transfer for future considerations and preparations. International Journal of Science and Mathematics Education, 8(3), 593–609.
Yore, L. D., Bisanz, G. L. & Hand, B. (2003). Examining the literacy component of science literacy: 25 years of language arts and science research. International Journal of Science Education, 25(6), 689–725.
Yore, L. D., Craig, M. T. & Maguire, T. O. (1998). Index of science reading awareness: An interactive-constructive model, test verification, and grades 4–8 results. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 35(1), 27–51.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Cheng, MC., Chou, PI., Wang, YT. et al. LEARNING EFFECTS OF A SCIENCE TEXTBOOK DESIGNED WITH ADAPTED COGNITIVE PROCESS PRINCIPLES ON GRADE 5 STUDENTS. Int J of Sci and Math Educ 13, 467–488 (2015). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10763-013-9471-3
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10763-013-9471-3