Skip to main content

Advertisement

SpringerLink
Log in

UNDERSTANDING THE ALTERNATIVE CONCEPTIONS OF PRE-SERVICE SECONDARY SCIENCE TEACHERS ABOUT TIDAL PHENOMENA BASED ON TOULMIN’S ARGUMENTATION

  • Published:
International Journal of Science and Mathematics Education Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Constructing explanations and participating in argumentative discourse are seen as essential practices of scientific inquiry. The objective of this study was to explore the elements and origins of pre-service secondary science teachers’ alternative conceptions of tidal phenomena based on the elements used in Toulmin’s Argument Model through qualitative research. The data were collected from three pre-service secondary school teachers (D.-K. University, Teachers’ Colleges, junior and senior) in the Republic of Korea using a variety of qualitative research methods. We present three pre-service teachers as examples of 20 pre-service teachers for determining each pre-service teacher whether the pattern of his/her responses to all of the questions investigating a given concept can be explained by the consistent use of components of argument. The results of this study showed “the model with the Earth’s center at rest” backing their warrants as an element of Toulmin’s Argument Model. As a result, science educators must explicitly address these presuppositions or implicit beliefs and must help the students form links between their everyday experiences and scientific knowledge. Therefore, educators must be aware of the influence of students’ presuppositions and must use acceptable scientific concepts (the center of mass of the Earth–Moon system) based on argumentation to guide their construction of scientific concepts.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Benson, H. (1996). University physics (Revth ed.). New York: Wiley.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cros, D., Chastrette, M. & Fayol, M. (1987). Conceptions of second year university students of some fundamental notions of chemistry. International Journal of Science Education, 10, 331–336.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Driver, R., Guesne, E. & Tiberghien, A. (1985). Children’s ideas and the learning of science. In R. Driver, E. Guesne & A. Tiberghien (Eds.), Children’s ideas in science (pp. 1–9). Milton Keynes: Open University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Feldman, A. (2000). Decision making in the practical domain: a model of practical conceptual change. Science Education, 84, 606–623.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ford, M. J. & Wargo, B. M. (2012). Dialogic framing of scientific content for conceptual and epistemic understanding. Science Education, 96, 369–391.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gable, D. & Bunce, D. (1984). Research on problem solving in chemistry. In D. Gabel (Ed.), Handbook of research on science teaching and learning (pp. 301–326). New York: Macmillan.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lee, S. K. (2012). Improving science teachers’ teaching professionism: research and practice (Korean Language). Seoul: Kyoyookbook.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lortie, D. (2002). Schoolteacher: a sociological study (2nd ed.). Chicago: The University of Chicago Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lythcott, J. & Duschl, R. (1990). Qualitative research: from methods to conclusions. Science Education, 74(4), 445–460.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Oh, J.-Y. & Kim, Y. S. (2006). Preservice elementary teacher mental models about astronomical phenomena: seasons and moon phases. Journal of Korean Association for Research in Science, 26, 68–87.

    Google Scholar 

  • Oh, J.-Y. & Kim, Y. S. (2009). The advocation and educational applications about Toulmin’s argument model. The Journal of Pan-Korean Philosophical Society, 55, 379–425.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rea-Ramirez, M. A. & Núñez-Oviedo, M. C. (2008). Role of discrepant questioning leading to model element modification. In J. J. Clement & M. A. Rea-Ramirez (Eds.), Model based learning and instruction in science (pp. 195–213). New York: Springer.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Rieke, R. & Sillars, M. O. (2005). Argumentation and decision making process (2nd ed.). Glenview, IL: Scott, Foresman and Company.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schwarz, B. B., Neuman, Y., Gil, J. & Ilya, M. (2003). Construction of collective and individual knowledge in argumentation activity. Journal of the Learning Sciences, 12(2).

  • Thompson, C. (1989). Discrepant events: what happens to those who watch? School Science and Mathematics, 89(1), 26–27.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Toulmin, S. (1958). The use of argument. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Verheij, B. (2005). Evaluating arguments based on Toulmin’s scheme. Argumentation, 19, 347–371.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Hanyang University, Seoul, 133-791, Republic of Korea

    Jun-Young Oh

Authors
  1. Jun-Young Oh
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Jun-Young Oh.

Electronic supplementary material

Below is the link to the electronic supplementary material.

ESM 1

(DOC 108 kb)

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Oh, JY. UNDERSTANDING THE ALTERNATIVE CONCEPTIONS OF PRE-SERVICE SECONDARY SCIENCE TEACHERS ABOUT TIDAL PHENOMENA BASED ON TOULMIN’S ARGUMENTATION. Int J of Sci and Math Educ 12, 353–370 (2014). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10763-013-9403-2

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10763-013-9403-2

Key words

Search

Navigation