Skip to main content

Advertisement

SpringerLink
Log in

EXPLORING INDIVIDUAL AND SCHOOL-RELATED FACTORS AND ENVIRONMENTAL LITERACY: COMPARING U.S. AND CANADA USING PISA 2006

  • Published:
International Journal of Science and Mathematics Education Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Questions remain about how to best prepare students to be environmentally literate. Although Canada and U.S. share similarities in education systems, diversity in student population, and historical roots in formalizing environmental education, Canada is one of the top performing countries in international science assessments while U.S. matches average performing countries. This study examined the relationship of individual and school-related factors to environmental literacy by comparing students’ performances in knowledge, awareness, attitudes, and behavior about environmental issues between U.S. and Canada using PISA 2006. Findings suggest that knowledge, awareness, attitudes, and behavior are inter-related, and development of certain domains of environmental literacy may be enhanced by classroom student investigations. Prior explanations for U.S. lower performance in environmental literacy cannot be attributed only to low socio-economic status and student diversity.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Bates, G. R. (1978). The role of laboratory in secondary school science programs. In M. B. Rowe (Ed.), What research says to the science teacher. Washington, DC: National science Teachers Association.

    Google Scholar 

  • Beese, J. & Liang, X. (2010). Do resources matter? PISA science achievement comparisons between students in the United States, Canada and Finland. Improving Schools, 13(3), 266–279.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bybee, R. W. (2008). Scientific literacy, environmental issues, and PISA 2006: The 2008 Paul F-Brandwein lecture. Journal of Science Education and Technology, 17, 566–585.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Citizenship and Immigration Canada (CIC) (2011). Annual report to parliament 2011. Ottawa, ON: Author.

  • Cook, S. & Berrenberg, J. L. (1981). Approaches to encouraging conservation behavior: A review and conceptual framework. Journal of Social Issues, 37(2), 73–107.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Couertjens, L., Boeve-De Pauw, J., De Maeyer, S. & van Petegem, P. (2010). Do schools make a difference in their students’ environmental attitudes and awareness? Evidence from PISA 2006. International Journal of Science and Mathematics Education, 8, 497–522.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • DeChano, L. M. (2006). A multi-country examination of the relationship between environmental knowledge and attitudes. International Research in Geographical and Environmental Education, 15(1), 15–28.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • DiEnno, C. M. & Hilton, S. C. (2005). High school students’ knowledge, attitudes, and levels of enjoyment of an environmental education unit on nonnative plants. Journal of Environmental Education, 37(1), 13–25.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Eagles, F. J. & Demare, R. (1999). Factors influencing children’s environmental attitudes. Journal of Environmental Education, 30(4), 33–37.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gibson, H. L., & Van Strat, G. A. (2001). A longitudinal study of the impact of constructivist instructional methods on preservice teachers’ attitudes toward teaching and learning mathematics and science. Paper presented at the Annual Meeting of the National Association for Research in Science Teaching, St. Louis, MO.

  • Haberman, J. (2006). The impact of differential expenditures on school performance. Educational Researcher, 18, 45–62.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hart, P. (1994). Recent developments in environmental education in Canada—Local initiative with international implications. In R. Mrazek (Ed.), Pathways to partnerships: Coalitions for environmental education: Selected papers from the annual conference of North American association for environmental education (pp. 126–128). Troy: North American Association for Environmental Education.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hart, P. (2007). Environmental education. In S.K., Abell & N. G. Lederman (Eds.). Handbook on research on science education (pp. 689–726). Mahwah, New Jersey: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Pub.

  • Harvey, G. (1977). A conceptualization of EE. In J. Aldrich, A. Blackburn & G. Abel (Eds.), A report on the North American regional seminar on environmental education (pp. 66–72). Columbus: ERIC Clearinghouse for Science, Mathematics and Environmental Education.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hoftstein, A. & Lunetta, V. N. (1982). The role of the laboratory in science teaching: Neglected aspects of research. Review of Educational Research, 52(2), 201–217.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Huang, H. P. & Yore, L. D. (2003). A comparative study of Canadian and Taiwanese grade 5 children’s environmental behaviors, attitudes, concerns, emotional dispositions, and knowledge. International Journal of Science and Mathematics Education, 1, 419–448.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hungerford, H. R. & Volk, T. L. (1990). Changing learner behavior through environmental education. Journal of Environmental Education, 21(3), 8–21.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ingersoll, R. M. (2001). Teacher turnover and teacher shortages: An organizational analysis. American Educational Research Journal, 38(3), 499–534.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Iozzi, L. A. (1989). What research says to the educator: Environmental education and affective domain. The Journal of Environmental Education, 20(3–4), 3–13.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kirschner, P., Sweller, J. & Clark, R. (2006). Why minimal guidance during instruction does not work: An analysis of the failure of constructivist, discovery, problem-based, experiential, and inquiry-based teaching. Educational Psychologist, 41(2), 75–86.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kollmus, A. & Agyeman, J. (2002). Mind the gap: Why do people act environmentally and what are the barriers to pro-environmental behavior? Environmental Education Research, 8(3), 239–260.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lazarowitz, R. & Tamir, P. (1994). Research on using laboratory instruction in science. In D. L. Gabel (Ed.), Handbook of research on science teaching and learning (pp. 94–130). New York: Macmillan.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lester, B. T., Ma, L., Lee, O. & Lambert, J. (2006). Social activism in elementary science education: A science, technology, and society approach to teach global warming. International Journal of Science Education, 28(4), 315–339.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Liang, L. L. & Gabel, D. L. (2005). Effectiveness of a constructivist approach to science instruction for prospective elementary teachers. International Journal of Science Education, 27(10), 1143–1162.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lin, E. (2000). Environmental education in pre-service teacher training programs in Canadian tertiary institutions (unpublished doctoral dissertation). Ontario, Canada: University of Toronto.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lin, E. (2002). Trends of environmental education in Canadian pre-service teacher education programs from 1979 to 1996. The Canadian Journal of Environmental Education, 7(1), 199–215.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lipsey, M. (1977). Personal antecedents and consequences of ecologically responsible behavior: A review. Catalog of Selected Documents in Psychology, 7(4), 70.

    Google Scholar 

  • Littledyke, M. (2008). Science education for environmental awareness: Approaches to integrating cognitive and affective domains. Environmental Education Research, 14, 1–17.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lucas, A. M. (1979). Environment and environmental education: Conceptual issues and curriculum implications. Melbourne: Australian international Press & Pub.

    Google Scholar 

  • Marcinkowski, T. (2001). Predictors of responsible environmental behavior: A review of three dissertation studies. In H. Hungerford, W. Bluhm, T. Volk & J. Ramsey (Eds.), Essential readings in environmental education (pp. 247–276). Champaign: Stipes Publishing, L.L.C.

    Google Scholar 

  • McInnis, N. (1972). You are an environment. Evanston: Centre for Curriculum Design.

    Google Scholar 

  • National Academy of Science (NAS). (2007). Taking science to school: Learning and teaching science in grades K-8. Washington, D.C.: National Academy Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • North American Association for Environmental Education (NAAEE) (2011). Developing a framework for environmental literacy. Washington, DC: Author.

    Google Scholar 

  • Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development (OECD) (2007). PISA 2006: Science competences for tomorrow’s world, vol.1: Analysis. Paris: Organization for Economic Co-operation and Development.

    Google Scholar 

  • Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development (2009). Green at fifteen? How 15-year-olds perform in environmental science and geoscience in PISA. Paris: Organization for Economic Co-operation and Development.

    Google Scholar 

  • Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development (2011). Lessons from PISA for the United States, strong performers and successful reformers in education. OECD Publishing. http://dx.doi.org/10.1787/9789264096660-en

  • Pemberton, D. A. (1989). Definitional problems for environmental education and geographic education. The Journal of Environmental Education, 21(1), 5–14.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Posner, G. J., Strike, K. A., Hewson, P. W. & Gertzog, W. A. (1982). Accommodation of a scientific conception: Toward a theory of conceptual change. Science Education, 66(2), 211–227.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rehorek, S. J. (2004). Inquiry-based teaching: An example of descriptive science in action. The American Biology Teacher, 66(7), 493–499.

    Google Scholar 

  • Romberg, T. A. (1999). School mathematics: The impact of international comparisons on national policy. In G. Kaiser, E. Luna & L. Huntley (Eds.), International comparison in mathematics education (pp. 189–199). Philadelphia: Falmer Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Roth, C. (1992). Environmental literacy: Its roots, evolution, and directions in the 1990s. Columbus, OH: ERIC/SMEAC.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rumberger, R. W. & Palardy, G. J. (2005). Does resegregation matter? The impact of social composition on academic achievement in Southern high schools. In J. C. Boger & G. Orfield (Eds.), School resegregation: Must the South turn back? (pp. 127–147). Chapel Hill: The University of Northern Carolina Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schreen, J. (1993). Basic school effectiveness research: Items for a research agenda. School Effectiveness and School Improvement: An International Journal of Research, Policy and Practice, 4(1), 17–36.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Schreiner, C. & Sjoberg, S. (2004). The relevance of science education. Science Education, 63(2), 245–255.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schultz, P. W., Oskamp, S. & Mainieri, T. (1995). Who recycles and when? A review of personal and situational factors. Journal of Environmental Psychology, 15(2), 105–121.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Stamp, N. & O’Brien, T. (2005). GK-12 partnership: A model to advance change in science education. BioScience, 55(1), 70–77.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Stern, P. (2000). Toward a coherent theory of environmentally significant behavior. The Journal of Social Issues, 56(3), 407.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Studebaker, P. (1973). The justification of environmental education. The Journal of Environmental Education, 4(4), 48.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tilbury, D. (1994). An international development of environmental education: A basis for a teacher education model? International Journal of Environmental Education and Information, 13(1), 1–20.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tobin, K. G. (1990). Research on science laboratory activities: In pursuit of better questions and answers to improve learning. School Science and Mathematics, 90, 403–418.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Troy, T. D. & Schwaab, K. E. (1982). A decade of environmental education. School Science and Mathematics, 82(3), 209–216.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • United Nations Educational, Scientific and Cultural Organization (UNESCO) (2007). The UN decade of education for sustainable development (DESD 2005-2014): The first two years. Paris: UNESCO.

    Google Scholar 

  • Von Glasersfeld, E. (1989). Cognition, construction of knowledge, and teaching. Synthese, 80, 121–140.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wilke, R. (Ed.). (1995). Environmental education literacy/needs assessment project: Assessing environmental literacy of students and environmental education needs of teachers. Final report for 1993-1995 (pp. 5-6). Stevens Point: University of Wisconsin-Stevens Point.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wright, J. M. (2008). The comparative effects of constructivist versus traditional teaching methods on the environmental literacy of postsecondary nonscience majors. Bulletin of Science, Technology & Society, 28(4), 324–337.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zelezny, L. (1999). Educational interventions that improve environmental behaviors: A meta-analysis. The Journal of Environmental Education, 31(1), 5–14.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. University of Nevada-Las Vegas, Las Vegas, NV, USA

    Emily Lin & Qingmin Shi

Authors
  1. Emily Lin
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Qingmin Shi
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Emily Lin.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Lin, E., Shi, Q. EXPLORING INDIVIDUAL AND SCHOOL-RELATED FACTORS AND ENVIRONMENTAL LITERACY: COMPARING U.S. AND CANADA USING PISA 2006. Int J of Sci and Math Educ 12, 73–97 (2014). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10763-012-9396-2

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10763-012-9396-2

Key words

Search

Navigation