Abstract
Learning to think spatially in mathematics involves developing proficiency with graphics. This paper reports on 2 investigations of spatial thinking and graphics. The first investigation explored the importance of graphics as 1 of 3 communication systems (i.e. text, symbols, graphics) used to provide information in numeracy test items. The results showed that graphics were embedded in at least 50 % of test items across 3 year levels. The second investigation examined 11 – 12-year-olds’ performance on 2 mathematical tasks which required substantial interpretation of graphics and spatial thinking. The outcomes revealed that many students lacked proficiency in the basic spatial skills of visual memory and spatial perception and the more advanced skills of spatial orientation and spatial visualisation. This paper concludes with a reaffirmation of the importance of spatial thinking in mathematics and proposes ways to capitalize on graphics in learning to think spatially.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Amorim, M. A. (2003). “What is my avatar seeing?”: The coordination of “out-of-body” and “embodied” perspectives for scene recognition across views. Visual Cognition, 10(2), 157–199.
Australian Curriculum, Assessment and Reporting Authority (2010). National Assessment program: Literacy and Numeracy. Retrieved 6 April, 2011, from http://www.naplan.edu.au/home_page.html
Barwise, J. & Etchemendy, J. (1991). Visual information and valid reasoning. In W. Zimmerman & S. Cunningham (Eds.), Visualization in teaching and learning mathematics (pp. 9–24). Washington, DC: Mathematical Association of America.
Bishop, A. (1980). Spatial abilities and mathematics education: A review. Educational Studies in Mathematics, 11(3), 257–269.
Carpenter, T. P., Fennema, E. & Franke, M. L. (1996). Cognitively guided instruction: A knowledge base for reform in primary mathematics instruction. The Elementary School Journal, 97(1), 3–20.
Goldin-Meadow, S. (2006). Nonverbal communication: The hand’s role in talking and thinking. In D. Kuhn, K. S. Siegler, W. Damon & R. M. Lerner (Eds.), Handbook of child psychology (Cognition, perception and language 6th ed., Vol. 2, pp. 336–369). Hoboken, NJ: Wiley.
Del Grande, J. (1990). Spatial sense. Arithmetic Teacher, 37(6), 14–20.
Diezmann, C. M. & Lowrie, T. (2009a) The role of fluency in a mathematics item with an embedded graphic: Interpreting a pie chart. ZDM: The International Journal on Mathematics Education, 41(5), 651–662.
Diezmann, C. M. & Lowrie, T. (2009b). An instrument for assessing primary students’ knowledge of information graphics in mathematics. Assessment in Education: Principles, Policy and Practice, 16(2), 131–147.
Educational Testing Centre (2002). Year 4 primary schools mathematics competition. Sydney, Australia: The University of New South Wales.
Gagatsis, A. & Elia, I. (2004). The effects of different modes of representation on mathematical problem solving. In M. J. Høines & A. B. Fuglestad (Eds.), Proceedings of the 28th annual meeting of the International Group for the Psychology of Mathematics Education (Vol. 2, pp. 447–454). Bergen, Norway: International Group for the Psychology of Mathematics Education.
Harris, R. L. (1996). Information graphics: A comprehensive illustrated reference. Atlanta, GA: Management Graphics.
Logan, T. (2010). Primary students’ interpretation of maps: Gesture use and mapping knowledge (Unpublished master’s thesis). Queensland University of Technology, Brisbane.
Lowrie, T. & Diezmann, C. M. (2007). Solving graphics problems: Student performance in the junior grades. The Journal of Educational Research, 100(6), 369–377.
Lowrie, T. & Diezmann, C. M. (2009). National numeracy tests: A graphic tells a thousand words. Australian Journal of Education, 53(2), 141–158.
MacFarlane Smith, I. (1964). Spatial ability: Its educational and social significance. London: University of London Press.
Mackinlay, J. (1999). Automating the design of graphical presentations of relational information. In S. K. Card, J. D. Mackinlay & B. Schneiderman (Eds.), Readings in information visualization: Using vision to think (pp. 66–81). San Francisco: Morgan Kaufmann.
Mathewson, J. H. (1998). Visual–spatial thinking: An aspect of science overlooked by educators. Science Education, 83(1), 33–54.
McGee, M. G. (1979). Human spatial abilities: Psychometric studies and environmental, genetic, hormonal, and neurological influences. Psychological Bulletin, 86(5), 889–918.
Ministerial Council on Education, Employment, Training and Youth Affairs (2008a). National Assessment Program Literacy and Numeracy: Numeracy year 3 2008. Retrieved April 23, 2010, from http://www.naplan.edu.au/verve/_resources/nap08_num_y3_netversion.pdf
Ministerial Council on Education, Employment, Training and Youth Affairs (2008b). National Assessment Program: Literacy and Numeracy: Numeracy year 5 2008. Retrieved April 23, 2010, from http://www.naplan.edu.au/verve/_resources/nap08_num_y5_netversion.pdf
Ministerial Council on Education, Employment, Training and Youth Affairs (2010a). National Assessment Program: Literacy and Numeracy. Numeracy year 3 2010. Retrieved September 16, from http://www.naplan.edu.au/verve/resources/nap10_numeracy_3.pdf
Ministerial Council on Education, Employment, Training and Youth Affairs (2010b). National Assessment Program: Literacy and Numeracy. Numeracy year 5 2010. Retrieved September16, 2010, from http://www.naplan.edu.au/verve/_resources/nap10_numeracy_5.pdf
Ministerial Council on Education, Employment, Training and Youth Affairs (2010c). National Assessment Program: Literacy and Numeracy. Numeracy (non-calculator) year 7 2010. Retrieved September 16, 2010, from http://www.naplan.edu.au/verve/_resources/nap10_numeracy_7_noncalc.pdf
Ministerial Council on Education, Employment, Training and Youth Affairs (2010d). National Assessment Program: Literacy and Numeracy. Numeracy (calculator allowed) year 7 2010. Retrieved September 16, 2010, from http://www.naplan.edu.au/verve/_resources/nap10_numeracy_7_calc.pdf
National Academies (2006). Learning to think spatially. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press.
Newcombe, N. S. (2010). Picture this: Increasing math and science learning by improving spatial thinking. American Educator, 34(2), 29–35.
Parzysz, B. (1991). Representations of space and students’ conceptions at high school level. Educational Studies in Mathematics, 22(6), 575–593.
Presmeg, N. C. (2006). Research on visualization in learning and teaching mathematics. In A. Gutiérrez & P. Boero (Eds.), Handbook of research on the psychology of mathematics education: Past, present and future (pp. 205–235). Rotterdam, the Netherlands: Sense.
Queensland Studies Authority (2002). 2002 Queensland Year 5 Test: Aspects of numeracy. Brisbane, QLD, Australia: Author.
Queensland Studies Authority (2004). Mathematics year 1 to 10 syllabus. Retrieved from http://www.qsa.qld.edu.au/downloads/early_middle/kla_maths_syll.pdf
Winn, W. (1994). Contributions of perceptual and cognitive processes to the comprehension of graphics. In W. Schnotz & R. W. Kulhavy (Eds.), Comprehension of graphics (pp. 3–27). Amsterdam, the Netherlands: Elsevier Science.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Additional information
© Australian Curriculum, Assessment and Reporting Authority 2008 ACARA neither endorses nor verifies the accuracy of the information provided and accepts no responsibility for incomplete or inaccurate information. This material is reproduced with the permission of ACARA.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Diezmann, C.M., Lowrie, T. LEARNING TO THINK SPATIALLY: WHAT DO STUDENTS ‘SEE’ IN NUMERACY TEST ITEMS?. Int J of Sci and Math Educ 10, 1469–1490 (2012). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10763-012-9350-3
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10763-012-9350-3