ABSTRACT
Teachers’ curricular role identities are those dimensions of their professional identities concerned with the use of curriculum materials. In a previous study, we developed and tested a survey instrument designed to measure preservice elementary teachers’ development of curricular role identity for science teaching through their use of science curriculum materials. In this follow-up study, a revised version of the survey was administered to a second group of preservice elementary teachers in the same science methods course, and data were analyzed within and across years. Results from this study suggest that preservice teachers articulated important similarities and differences between the curricular role identities for science teaching they attributed to themselves and to more experienced elementary teachers. Over time, they were often able to begin to appropriate the curricular role identities for science teaching that they attributed to more experienced elementary teachers. However, findings from the second survey administration also suggest that preservice teachers’ curricular role identities for science teaching are more stable when characterized by their actual curriculum design practices than when characterized by comparative, probabilistic means. These findings have important implications for science teacher education and curriculum development, as well as the operationalization of curricular role identity in education research.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Ball, D. L. & Forzani, F. M. (2009). The work of teaching and challenge of teacher education. Journal of Teacher Education, 60(5), 497–511.
Barab, S. A. & Luehmann, A. L. (2003). Building sustainable science curriculum: Acknowledging and accommodating local adaptation. Science & Education, 87, 454–467.
Black, K. (2004). Science in the trenches: An exploration of four pre-service teachers’ first attempts at teaching science in the classroom. International Journal of Science and Mathematics Education, 2, 25–44.
Brown, M. (2009). Toward a theory of curriculum design and use: Understanding the teacher–tool relationship. In J. Remillard, B. Herbel-Eisenman & G. Lloyd (Eds.), Mathematics teachers at work: Connecting curriculum materials and classroom instruction (pp. 17–37). New York: Routledge.
Collier, P. (2001). A differentiated model of role identity acquisition. Symbolic Interaction, 24(2), 217–235.
Collopy, R. (2003). Curriculum materials as a professional development tool: How a mathematics textbook affected two teachers’ learning. The Elementary School Journal, 103(3), 287–311.
Davis, E. A. (2006). Preservice elementary teachers’ critique of instructional materials for science. Science Education, 90(2), 348–375.
Davis, E. A. & Krajcik, J. (2005). Designing educative curriculum materials to promote teacher learning. Educational Researcher, 34(3), 3–14.
Drake, C., Spillane, J. P. & Hufferd-Ackles, K. (2001). Storied identities: Teacher learning and subject-matter context. Journal of Curriculum Studies, 33(1), 1–23.
Enyedy, N. & Goldberg, J. (2004). Inquiry in interaction: How local adaptations of curricula shape classroom communities. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 41(9), 905–935.
Enyedy, N., Goldberg, J. & Welsh, K. M. (2006). Complex dilemmas of identity and practice. Science & Education, 90, 68–93.
Forbes, C. T. & Davis, E. A. (2008). The development of preservice elementary teachers’ curricular role identity for science teaching. Science Education, 92(5), 909–940.
Forbes, C. T. & Davis, E. A. (2010). Curriculum design for inquiry: Preservice elementary teachers’ mobilization and adaptation of science curriculum materials. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 47(7), 365–387.
Gee, J. P. (2000–2001). Identity as an analytic lens for research in education. Review of Research in Education, 25, 99–125.
Grossman, P., Compton, C., Shahan, E., Ronfeldt, M., Igra, D. & Shiang, J. (2009). Teaching practice: A cross-professional perspective. Teachers College Record, 111(9), 2055–2100.
Haney, J. J. & McArthur, J. (2002). Four case studies of prospective science teachers’ beliefs concerning constructivist teaching practices. Science & Education, 86(6), 783–802.
Kesidou, S. & Roseman, J. (2002). How well do middle school science programs measure up? Findings from Project 2061’s curriculum review. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 39(6), 522–549.
Lemke, J. L. (2000). Across the scales of time: Artifacts, activities, and meanings in ecosocial systems. Mind, Culture, and Activity, 7(4), 273–290.
Mahlios, M. (2002). Teacher role formation. Action in Teacher Education, 24(1), 9–21.
Nunnally, J. C. & Bernstein, I. H. (1994). Psychometric theory. New York: McGraw-Hill.
Peressini, D., Borko, H., Romagnano, L., Knuth, E. & Willis, C. (2004). A conceptual framework for learning to teach secondary mathematics: A situative perspective. Educational Studies in Mathematics, 56, 67–96.
Pintó, R. (2004). Introducing curriculum innovations in science: Identifying teachers’ transformations and the design of related teacher education. Science & Education, 89, 1–12.
Remillard, J. T. (2005). Examining key concepts in research on teachers’ use of mathematics curricula. Review of Educational Research, 75(2), 211–246.
Roehrig, G. H. & Kruse, R. A. (2005). The role of teachers’ beliefs and knowledge in the adoption of a reform-based curriculum. School Science and Mathematics, 105(8), 412–422.
Schneider, R. M., Krajcik, J. & Blumenfeld, P. (2005). Enacting reform-based science materials: The range of teacher enactments in reform classrooms. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 42(3), 283–312.
Schwarz, C., Gunckel, K., Smith, E., Covitt, B., Enfield, M., Bae, M. & Tsurusaki, B. (2008). Helping elementary pre-service teachers learn to use science curriculum materials for effective science teaching. Science & Education, 92(2), 345–377.
Sfard, A. & Prusak, A. (2005). Telling identities: In search of an analytic tool for investigating learning as a culturally shaped activity. Educational Researcher, 34(4), 14–22.
Southerland, S. A. & Gess-Newsome, J. (1999). Preservice teachers’ views of inclusive science teaching as shaped by images of teaching, learning, and knowledge. Science & Education, 83(2), 131–150.
Stets, J. E. & Burke, P. J. (2000). Identity theory and social identity theory. Social Psychology Quarterly, 63(3), 224–237.
Stylianides, G. J. (2008). Investigating the guidance offered to teachers in curriculum materials: The case of proof in mathematics. International Journal of Science and Mathematics Education, 6(1), 191–215.
Wenger, E. (1998). Communities of practice: Learning, meaning, and identity. New York: Cambridge University Press.
Zeichner, K. M. & Conklin, H. G. (2005). Teacher education programs. In M. Cochran-Smith & K. Zeichner (Eds.), Studying teacher education: The report of the AERA Panel on Research and Teacher Education (pp. 645–736). Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.
Zembal-Saul, C., Blumenfeld, P. & Krajcik, J. (2000). Influence of guided cycles of planning, teaching and reflection on prospective elementary teachers’ science content representations. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 37(4), 318–339.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Forbes, C.T., Davis, E.A. OPERATIONALIZING IDENTITY IN ACTION: A COMPARATIVE STUDY OF DIRECT VERSUS PROBABILISTIC MEASURES OF CURRICULAR ROLE IDENTITY FOR INQUIRY-BASED SCIENCE TEACHING. Int J of Sci and Math Educ 10, 267–292 (2012). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10763-011-9292-1
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10763-011-9292-1