ABSTRACT
Many students encounter difficulties in science and mathematics. Earlier research suggested that although intuitions are often needed to gain new ideas and concepts and to solve problems in science and mathematics, some of students’ difficulties could stem from the interference of intuitive reasoning. The literature suggests that overcoming intuitive interference is associated with the activation of inhibitory control mechanisms. The goal of the current study was to find out whether indeed the reasoning processes associated with overcoming intuitive interference are different from the ones related to answering correctly in line with the intuition. To do so, we focused on the comparison-of-perimeters of geometrical shapes task that triggers intuitive responses and applied the prime–probe paradigm. High school students were presented with pairs of congruent and incongruent trials of different combinations. The findings showed that previous trial congruity affects response times of the probe. When congruent trials followed incongruent prime, an increase in response time was observed as compared with congruent trials that followed congruent ones, and vice versa. In addition, when congruent trials followed incongruent-equal prime, not only did response time increase but accuracy significantly dropped as well. The current study supports the suggestion that inhibitory control mechanisms play a key role in overcoming intuitive interference, even in adolescence, and points to the importance of enhancing students’ inhibitory control mechanisms.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Aron, A. R., Robbins, T. W. & Poldrack, R. A. (2004). Inhibition and the right inferior frontal cortex. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 8, 170–177.
Babai, R. & Amsterdamer, A. (2008). The persistence of solid and liquid naive conceptions: A reaction time study. Journal of Science Education and Technology, 17, 553–559.
Babai, R., Brecher, T., Stavy, R. & Tirosh, D. (2006a). Intuitive interference in probabilistic reasoning. International Journal of Science and Mathematics Education, 4, 627–639.
Babai, R., Levyadun, T., Stavy, R. & Tirosh, D. (2006b). Intuitive rules in science and mathematics: A reaction time study. International Journal of Mathematical Education in Science and Technology, 37, 913–924.
Babai, R., Sekal, R. & Stavy, R. (2010a). Persistence of the intuitive conception of living things in adolescence. Journal of Science Education and Technology, 19, 20–26.
Babai, R., Zilber, H., Stavy, R. & Tirosh, D. (2010b). The effect of intervention on accuracy of students’ responses and reaction times to geometry problems. International Journal of Science and Mathematics Education, 8, 185–201.
Dempster, F. N. (1995). Interference and inhibition in cognition: An historical perspective. In F. N. Dempster & C. J. Brainerd (Eds.), Interference and inhibition in cognition (pp. 3–26). New York: Academic.
Dempster, F. N. & Corkil, A. J. (1999). Interference and inhibition in cognition and behavior: Unifying themes for educational psychology. Educational Psychology Review, 11, 1–88.
Diamond, A., Barnett, W. S., Thomas, J. & Munro, S. (2007). Preschool program improves cognitive control. Science, 318, 1387–1388.
Duit, R. (2007). Students’ and teachers’ conceptions and science education: A bibliography, full version March 2007. Retrieved from http://www.ipn.uni-kiel.de/aktuell/stcse/stcse.html.
Houde, O. & Guichart, E. (2001). Negative priming effect after inhibition of number/length interference in a Piaget-like task. Developmental Science, 4, 119–123.
Fischbein, E. (1987). Intuition in science and mathematics. Dordrecht: Reidel.
Rueda, M. R., Rothbart, M. K., McCandliss, B. D., Saccomanno, L. & Posner, M. I. (2005). Training, maturation, and genetic influences on the development of executive attention. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 102, 14931–14936.
Schirlin, O. & Houde, O. (2007). Negative priming effect after inhibition of weight/number interference in a Piaget-like task. Cognitive Development, 22, 124–129.
Schoenfeld, A. H. (1985). Mathematical problem solving. New York: Academic.
Spieler, D. (2000). Encyclopedia of Psychology, 7, 12–14.
Stavy, R. & Babai, R. (2008). Complexity of shapes and quantitative reasoning in geometry. Mind, Brain, and Education, 2, 170–176.
Stavy, R. & Babai, R. (2010). Overcoming intuitive interference in mathematics: Insights from behavioral, brain imaging and intervention studies. ZDM Mathematics Education, 42, 621–633.
Stavy, R., Goel, V., Critchley, H. & Dolan, R. (2006). Intuitive interference in quantitative reasoning. Brain Research, 1073–1074, 383–388.
Stavy, R. & Tirosh, D. (2000). How students (mis-)understand science and mathematics. New York: Teachers College Press.
Tipper, S. P. (1985). The negative priming effect: Inhibitory priming by ignored objects. The Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 37A, 571–590.
Tirosh, D. & Stavy, R. (1999). Intuitive rules and comparison tasks. Mathematical Thinking and Learning, 1, 179–194.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Babai, R., Eidelman, R.R. & Stavy, R. PREACTIVATION OF INHIBITORY CONTROL MECHANISMS HINDERS INTUITIVE REASONING. Int J of Sci and Math Educ 10, 763–775 (2012). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10763-011-9287-y
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10763-011-9287-y