Abstract
We describe and analyze a situation involving symbolic representation and graphical visualization of the solution of a system of two linear differential equations, using a computer algebra system. Symbolic solution and graphical representation complement each other. Graphical representation helps to understand the behavior of the symbolic solution. Together with it, the symbolic solution and its analysis are needed to understand the graphical representation and to overcome the limiting constraints of the CAS. The study described in this paper points out the importance of flexibility in building connections between different mathematical registers, together with the fact that the balance between the usage of symbolic representations and of graphical representations can be very different from one student to the other.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Abell, M. & Braselton, J. (1996). Modern differential equations. Saunders College Publishing, Orlando, FL.
Arcavi, A. (2003). The role of visual representations in the learning of mathematics. Educational Studies in Mathematics, 52, 215–241.
Artigue, M. (2002). Learning mathematics in a CAS environment: The genesis of a reflection about instrumentation and the dialectics between technical and conceptual work. International Journal of Computers for Mathematical Learning, 7(3), 245–274.
Balacheff, N. (1994). La transposition numérique: Note sur un nouveau probleme sur la didactique. In M. Artigue et al. (Eds.), Vingt ans de didactique en France. La Pensée Sauvage, Grenoble, pp 364–370.
Chevallard, Y. (1992). Concepts fondamentaux de la didactique: Perspectives apportées par une approche anthropologique. Recherches en Didactique des Mathématiques, 12(1), 77–111.
Chevallard, Y. (1999). L’analyse des pratiques enseignantes en théorie anthropologique du didactique, Recherches en Didactique des Mathématiques, 19(2), 221–266.
Dana-Picard, Th. (2005). Enhancing conceptual insight: Plane curves in a computerized learning environment. International Journal of Technology in Mathematics Education, 12(1), 33–43.
Dana-Picard, Th. (2006). Motivating constraints of a pedagogy-embedded computer algebra system (to appear in International Journal of Science and Mathematics Education).
Duval, R. (1999). Representation, vision and visualization: Cognitive functions in mathematical thinking. Basic issues for learning. In F. Hitt, & M. Santos (Eds.), Proceedings of 21st Conference of the North American Chapter of the International Group for the Psychology of Mathematics Education Vol. 1. Cuernavaca, Mexico: PME-NA.
Gharibyan Paulson, H. (2002). Computer science students need adequate mathematical background. Proceedings of 2nd International Conference on the Teaching of Mathematics at the undergraduate level. Hersonissos, Greece, available: http://www.math.uoc.gr/~ictm2/Proceedings/pap398.pdf.
Guin, D., & Trouche, L. (1999). The complex process of converting tools into mathematical instruments: The case of calculators. International Journal of Computers for Mathematical Learning, 3, 195–227.
Kidron, I., & Dana-Picard, Th. (2006). To see or not to see. International Journal of Technology in Mathematics Education, 12(3), 115–124.
Koepf, W. (1995). Numeric versus symbolic computation. Plenary Lecture at the 2nd International Derive Conference, Bonn, http://www.zib.de/koepf/bonn.ps.Z.
Lagrange, J.-B. (2000). L’intégration d’instruments informatiques dans l’enseignement: Une approche par les techniques. Educational Studies in Mathematics, 43, 1–30.
Nemirovsky, R., & Rasmussen, C. (2005). A case study of how kinesthetic experiences can participate in and transfer to work with equations. In H.L. Chick, & J.L. Vincent (Eds.), Proceedings of the 29th Conference of the International Group for the Psychology of Mathematics Education 4 (pp. 9–16). PME, Melbourne.
Poynter, A., & Tall, D. (2005). Relating theories to practice in the teaching of mathematics. Fourth Congress of the European Society for Research in Mathematics Education, available from http://www.warwick.ac.uk/staff/David.Tall/pdfs/dot2005a-cerme4_poynter_tall.pdf.
Presmeg, N. (2006). A semiotic view of the role of imagery and inscriptions in mathematics teaching and learning. In J. Novotna, H. Moraova, & N. Stehlikova (Eds.), Proceedings 30th Conference of the International Group for the Psychology of Mathematics Education Vol. 1. PME, Prague, pp 19–34.
Rasmussen, C. (1997). Qualitative problem solving strategies of first-order differential equations: The case of Amy. Electronic Proceedings of the Fifth Conference on the Teaching of Mathematics, available: http://archives.math.utk.edu/CTM/5th.html#Rasmussen.
Tall, D. (2000). Cognitive development in mathematics using technology. Mathematics Education Research Journal, 12(3), 210–230.
Trouche, L. (2000). La parabole du gaucher et de la casserole à bec verseur: Étude des processus d’apprentissages dans un environnement de calculatrices symboliques. Educational Studies in Mathematics, 41, 239–264.
Trouche, L. (2004). Managing the complexity of human/machine interaction in computerized learning environments: Guiding students’ command process through instrumental orchestration. International Journal of Computers in Mathematical Learning, 9, 281–307.
Trouche, L. (2005). Instrumental genesis, individual and social aspects. In D. Guin, K. Ruthven, & L. Trouche (Eds.), The didactical challenge of symbolic calculators: Turning a computational device into a mathematical instrument. Springer, Berlin Heidelberg New York, pp 197–230.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Additional information
Research supported by Israel Science Foundation, grant number 1340/05.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Dana-Picard, T., Kidron, I. Exploring the phase space of a system of differential equations: different mathematical registers. Int J of Sci and Math Educ 6, 695–717 (2008). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10763-007-9099-2
Received:
Revised:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10763-007-9099-2