Abstract
Systemic functional linguistics (SFL) was the foundation for this study that explored the effect of science text and image integration on grade 9 students’ reading comprehension. Two texts in Chinese on the moon phase with different print and image integration were compared—a traditional textbook (TT) used in Taiwanese junior high schools and a systemic functional linguistics text (SFLT) created by the authors for this study. These two texts contained similar concepts but had major differences in several features: technicality, representational structure, degree of modality, and interaction between print and image. A control-experimental design with pretest, posttest, and semi-structured interviews was used. In total, 132 junior high school students were randomly assigned to two groups: one group (n=69) read the TT and the other group (n=63) read the SFLT. Sixteen students with both high and low performances in the posttest were purposely selected as the subjects of the follow-up interviews. Major findings were: (a) students who read the SFLT demonstrated significantly better achievement than those who read the TT, and (b) students who read the TT generated more misconceptions about the moon phase and had greater difficulty in making sense of the images than the students who read the SFLT. Accordingly, SFL may serve as a useful theoretical framework and tool in the design of textbooks and may have a practical application in the science classroom.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Bazerman, C. (1998). Emerging perspectives on the many dimensions of scientific discourse. In J. R. Martin & R. Veel (Eds.), Reading science: Critical and functional perspectives on discourses of science (pp. 3–14). London & New York: Routledge.
Best, R. M., Rowe, M., Ozuru, Y. & McNamara, D. S. (2005). Deep-level comprehension of science texts: The role of the reader and the text. Topics in Language Disorders, 25(1), 65–83.
Craig, M. T. & Yore, L. D. (1996). Middle school students’ awareness of strategies for resolving comprehension difficulties in science reading. Journal of Research and Development in Education, 29(4), 226–238.
Fang, Z. (2005). Scientific literacy: A systemic functional linguistic perspective. Science Education, 89, 335–347.
Halliday, M. A. K. (1993). The analysis of scientific texts in English and Chinese. In M. A. K. Halliday & J. R. Martin (Eds.), Writing science: Literacy and discursive power (pp. 124–132). London: Falmer Press.
Halliday, M. A. K. (1994). An introduction to functional grammar (2nd ed.). London: Edward Arnold.
Halliday, M. A. K. (1998). Things and relations—regrammaticising experience as technical knowledge. In J. R. Martin & R. Veel (Eds.), Reading science: Critical and functional perspectives on discourses of science (pp. 185–235). London & New York: Routledge.
Hong, W. T. (1997). Reading comprehension of scientific articles. Science Education Monthly, 5, 14–25.
Hu, Z. L. (1990). Language system and function. Bei-Jing, China: Bei-Jing University Press.
Hu, Z. L., Zhu, Y. S. & Chang, D. R. (1987). The outline of systemic functional linguistics. Hunan, China: Hunan Educational Publisher.
Huang, G. W. (2001). The theory and practice of textual analysis—the advertising language research. Shanghai: Shanghai Foreign Language Education Publisher.
Kintsch, W. (1998). Comprehension: A paradigm for cognition. New York: Cambridge University Press.
Kress, G. & van Leeuwen, T. (1996). Reading images: The grammar of visual design. London & New York: Routledge.
Lee, M. M. (2002). A study of factors associated with the interpretation of diagrams in biology texts by eleventh graders. Unpublished master’s thesis, National Taiwan Normal University, Taipei, Taiwan.
Lin, J. Z. (2003). Using systemic functional linguistics perspective to explore the reading comprehension of different scientific text structures — take “Heat and Temperature” for example. Unpublished master’s thesis, National Taiwan Normal University, Taipei, Taiwan.
Martin, J. R. (1993). Life as a noun: Arresting the universe in science and humanities. In M. A. K. Halliday & J. R. Martin (Eds.), Writing science: Literacy and discursive power (pp. 221–267). London: Falmer Press.
Mayer, R. E. (1989). Systematic thinking fostered by illustrations in scientific text. Journal of Educational Psychology, 81(2), 240–246.
Newton Publishing Group. (2002). Natural and living technology science textbook for middle schools. Taipei, Taiwan: Newton.
Ruddell, R. B. & Unrau, N. J. (2004). Reading as a meaning-construction process: The reader, the text and the teacher. In R. B. Ruddell & N. J. Unrau (Eds.), Theoretical models and processes of reading (pp. 1462–1521). Newark, Delaware: International Reading Association.
Spence, D. J., Yore, L. D. & Williams, R. L. (1999). The effects of explicit science reading instruction on selected grade 7 students’ metacognition and comprehension of specific science text. Elementary Science Education, 11(2), 15–30.
Sung, Y. T. (1999). The effect of prior knowledge, text structure, and multimedia presentations on text learning. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, National Taiwan Normal University, Taipei, Taiwan.
Unsworth, L. (1997). Explaining explanations: Enhancing science learning and literacy development. Australian Science Teachers Journal, 43(1), 34–49.
Unsworth, L. (2000). Investigating subject-specific literacies in school learning. In L. Unsworth (Ed.), Researching language in schools and communities: SFL perspectives (pp. 245–274). London: Cassell.
Unsworth, L. (2001a). Evaluating the language of different types of explanations in junior high school science texts. International Journal of Science Education, 23(6), 585–609.
Unsworth, L. (2001b). Teaching multiliteracies across the curriculum: Changing contexts of text and image in classroom practice. Buckingham, UK: Open University Press.
Veel, R. (1997). Learning how to mean-scientifically speaking: Apprenticeship into scientific discourse in secondary school. In F. Christie & J. R. Martin (Eds.), Genres and institutions: Social process in the workplace and school (pp. 161–195). London: Cassell.
Veel, R. (1998). The greening of school science: Ecogenesis in secondary classrooms. In J. R. Martin & R. Veel (Eds.), Reading science: Critical and functional perspectives on discourses of science (pp. 114–151). London & New York: Routledge.
Wellington, J. & Osborne, J. (2001). Language and literacy in science education. Philadelphia: Open University Press.
Wignell, P., Martin, J. R. & Eggins, S. (1993). Literacy in science: Learning to handle texts as technology. In M. A. K. Halliday & J. R. Martin (Eds.), Writing science: Literacy and discursive power (pp. 136–165). London: Falmer Press.
Yore, L. D. & Shymansky, J. A. (1991). Reading in science: Developing an operational conception to guide instruction. Journal of Science Teacher Education, 2(2), 29–36.
Yore, L. D., Craig, M. T. & Maguire, T. O. (1998). Index of science reading awareness: An interactive-constructive model, test verification, and grades 4–8 results. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 35, 27–51.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Hsu, PL., Yang, WG. Print and Image Integration of Science Texts and Reading Comprehension: A Systemic Functional Linguistics Perspective. Int J of Sci and Math Educ 5, 639–659 (2007). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10763-007-9091-x
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10763-007-9091-x