Skip to main content
Log in

Students’ Thinking and Alternative Conceptions of Transport Systems in Plants: A Follow-up Study

  • Published:
International Journal of Science and Mathematics Education Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The purpose of the study was to explore students’ alternative conceptions and their associative thinking regarding internal transport in plants through administration of a refined diagnostic test. Questions of associative thinking and explanation were added to form a third tier of the previous two-tier test. The study found three terms related to alternative conceptions: capillary action, minerals, and nutrients produced by photosynthesis. The students’ associative thinking related to these three terms suggested that: (1) capillary action is linked to a hair-water relation, (2) minerals are in the nutrients group, and (3) oxygen is linked to nutrients. Finally, issues regarding the impacts of language on conceptual learning are discussed under three strands: effects of language, Chinese language, and textbook language.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Adams, A.D. & Griffard, P.B. (2001). Analysis of alternative conceptions in physics and biology: Similarities, differences, and implications for conceptual change. Paper presented at the annual meeting of the National Association for Research in Science Teaching, St. Louis, Missouri, USA, March.

  • Bohlken, B. (1995). The bare facts about the listener’s responsibility in understanding semantic meaning. Paper presented at the annual meeting of the International Listening Association, Little Rock, Arkansas, USA, March. ERIC document no. ED 379 666.

  • Chi, M.T.H. (2005). Commonsense conceptions of emergent process: Why some misconceptions are robust. Journal of the Learning Sciences, 14(2), 161–199.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Edwards, D. & Mercer, N. (1987). Common knowledge: The development of understanding in classroom. London: Methuen.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fisher, K.M. (2000). Meaningful and mindful learning. In K.M. Fisher, J.H. Wandersee, & D.E. Moody (Eds.), Mapping biology knowledge (pp. 77–94). Dordrecht: Kluwer.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gee, J.P. (2004). Language in the science classroom: Academic social languages as the heart of school-based literacy. In E.W. Saul (Ed.), Crossing borders in literacy and science instruction: Perspectives in theory and practice (pp. 13–32). Newark, DE: International Reading Association/National Science Teachers Association.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lemke, J. (2004). The literacies of science. In E.W. Saul (Ed.), Crossing borders in literacy and science instruction: Perspectives in theory and practice (pp. 33–47). Newark, DE: International Reading Association/National Science Teachers Association.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lin, C. & Shu, Y. (2002). Grade seven students’ preconceptions about homeostasis of blood glucose. Chinese Journal of Science Education, 10(4), 373–388. (In Chinese).

    Google Scholar 

  • Marker, G. & Mehlinger, H. (1992). Social studies. In P.W. Jackson (Ed.), Handbook of research on curriculum. New York: Macmillan.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ogden, C.K. & Richards, I.A. (1923). The meaning of meaning. New York: HBJ Book.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ortony, A. (Ed.) (1979). Metaphor and thought. New York: Cambridge University Press.

  • Sutton, C. (1992). Words, science and learning. Buckingham, UK: Open University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tamir, P. (1989). Some issues related to the use of justifications to multiple-choice answers. Journal of Biological Education, 23(4), 285–292.

    Google Scholar 

  • Vygotsky, L.S. (1962). Thought and language. New York: Wiley.

    Google Scholar 

  • Vygotsky, L.S. (1978). Minds in society: The development of higher psychological processes. In M. Cole, V. John-Steiner, S. Scribner, E. Souberman (Eds.), Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.

  • Wandersee, J.M. (2000). Language, analogy, and biology. In K.M. Fisher, J.H. Wandersee, & D.E. Moody (Eds.), Mapping biology knowledge (pp. 95–108). Dordrecht: Kluwer.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wang, J. (2004). Development and validation of a two-tier instrument to examine understanding of internal transport in plant and the human circulatory system. International Journal of Science and Mathematics Education, 2(2), 115–130.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wellington, J. & Osborne, J. (2001). Language and literacy in science education. Philadelphia, PA: Open University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wertsch, J.V. (1998). Mind as action. New York: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wittgenstein, L. (1953). Philosophical investigations. Oxford: Blackwell.

    Google Scholar 

  • Yildirim, A. (1999). An assessment of high school history textbooks in Turkey: Teachers’ and students’ perceptions. ERIC document no. ED 432 510.

  • Yore, L.D., Bisanz, G.L., & Hand, B.M. (2003). Examining the literacy component of science literacy: 25 years of language arts and science research. International Journal of Science Education, 25(6), 689–725.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Yore, L.D., Florence, M.L., Pearson, T.W., & Weaver, A.J. (2006). Written discourse in scientific communities: A conversation with two scientists about their views of science, use of language, role of writing in doing science, and compatibility between their epistemic views and language. International Journal of Science Education, 28(2–3), 109–141.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Yore, L.D. & Treagust, D.F. (2006). Current realities and future possibilities: Language and science literacy—empowering research and informing instruction. International Journal of Science Education, 28(2–3), 291–314.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Jing-Ru Wang.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Wang, JR. Students’ Thinking and Alternative Conceptions of Transport Systems in Plants: A Follow-up Study. Int J Sci Math Educ 5, 307–328 (2007). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10763-006-9038-7

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10763-006-9038-7

Key words

Navigation