Abstract
This article addresses the question of how science learning can be improved. It recognizes that, while learners themselves are responsible for their own learning, the quality of this learning is greatly influenced when appropriate resources are available to learners. These resources are provided through a partnership between teachers and learners. Three different types of resource are discussed. Tools, in the form of computer tools and conceptual tools, make tasks easier and allow learners to undertake tasks they would not otherwise be able to do. Tasks can facilitate effective learning by creating effective spaces for learners to work in, embodying key aspects of the disciplines of science, providing effective and authentic opportunities for learners to learn, and facilitating a dialogue between learners’ ideas and their experiences of the natural world. Environment – the ecology in which learning happens – provides three sources of information through the human, social, and conceptual worlds. When key aspects of these worlds are manifested in the environment, they scaffold the learning of science content, the nature of science, and the learning process itself, all of which are required for the deep understanding of science that constitutes improved science learning.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Baird, J.R. (1990). Metacognition, purposeful enquiry and conceptual change. In Hegarty-Hazel (Ed.), The student laboratory and the science curriculum (pp. 183–200). London: Routledge.
Barron, B.J.S., Schwartz, D.L., Vye, N.J., Moore, A., Petrosino, A., Zech, L., Bransford, J.D. & The Cognition and Technology Group at Vanderbilt (1998). Doing with understanding: Lessons from research on problem- and project-based learning. Journal of the Learning Sciences, 7(3&4), 271–311.
Beeth, M.E. & Hewson, P.W. (1999). Learning goals in an exemplary science teacher’s practice: Cognitive and social factors in teaching for conceptual change. Science Education, 83(6), 738–760.
Bransford, J., Brown, A.L. & Cocking, R.R. (2000). How people learn: Brain, mind, experience, and school, expanded edn. Washington, DC: National Academy Press.
Danielson, C. (1996). Enhancing professional practice: A framework for teaching. Alexandria, VA: Association for Supervision and Curriculum Development.
Doyle, W. (1986). Classroom organization and management. In Wittrock (Ed.), Handbook of research on teaching, 3rd edn (pp. 392–431). New York: Macmillan.
Duckworth, E. (1999). Intellectual development. Washington, DC: Annenberg/CPB.
Duit, R. (Ed.) (2004). Bibliography – STCSE: Students’ and teachers’ conceptions and science education. Kiel, Germany: IPN.
Duschl, R.A. & Gitomer, D.H. (1991). Epistemological perspectives on conceptual change: Implications for educational practice. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 28(9), 839–858.
Flavell, J.H. (1976). Metacognitive aspects of problem solving. In Resnick (Ed.), The nature of intelligence (pp. 231–235). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
Gaba, D.M. & DeAnda, A. (1988). A comprehensive anesthesia simulation environment: Re-creating the operating room for research and training. Anesthesiology, 69, 387–394.
Gallagher, J.J. (2000). Teaching for understanding and application of science knowledge. School Science and Mathematics, 100(6), 310–318.
George, Y.S. & Van Horne, V.V. (1996). Science education reform for all. Washington, DC: AAAS.
Gunstone, R.F. (1994). The importance of specific science content in the enhancement of metacognition. In Fensham, Gunstone & White (Eds.), The content of science: A constructivist approach to its teaching and learning (pp. 131–146). Washington, DC: The Falmer Press.
Gustafson, B.J. (1991). Thinking about sound: Children’s changing conceptions. Qualitative Studies in Education, 4(3), 203–214.
Harlen, W. (1998). Teaching for understanding in pre-secondary science. In Fraser & Tobin (Eds.), International handbook of science education (pp. 183–197). Dordrecht, The Netherlands: Kluwer.
Hennessey, M.G. (1991). Analysis of conceptual change and status change in sixth graders’ concepts of force and motion. Unpublished Dissertation, University of Wisconsin-Madison, Madison, WI.
Hewson, P.W. & Hennessey, M.G. (1992). Making status explicit: A case study of conceptual change. In Duit, Goldberg & Niedderer (Eds.), Research in physics learning: Theoretical issues and empirical studies (pp. 176–187). Kiel, Germany: IPN.
Hewson, P.W. & Hewson, M.G.A.B. (1988). An appropriate conception of teaching science: A view from studies of science learning. Science Education, 72(5), 597–614.
Hewson, P.W. & Lemberger, J. (2000). Status as the hallmark of conceptual learning. In Millar, Leach & Osborne (Eds.), Improving science education: The contribution of research (pp. 110–125). Buckingham: Open University Press.
Hewson, P.W. & Thorley, N.R. (1989). The conditions of conceptual change in the classroom. International Journal of Science Education, 11(5), 541–553.
Johnston, K. & Scott, P. (1990). Approaches to teaching the particulate theory of matter [Videotape]. Hatfield: Association for Science Education.
Johnson, S.K. & Stewart, J. (1990). Using philosophy of science in curriculum development: An example from high school genetics. International Journal of Science Education, 12(3), 297–307.
Jungck, J.R. & Calley, J. (1993). Genetics Construction Kit. In Jungck, Soderberg, Calley, Peterson & Stewart (Eds.), The BioQUEST library. College Park, MD: University of Maryland Press.
Kahle, J.B., Rogg, S.R. & Tobin, K.G. (1996). Bridging the gap: Equity in systemic reform. Oxford, OH: Miami University.
Kelly, G.J. & Takao, A. (2002). Epistemic levels in argument: An analysis of university oceanography students’ use of evidence in writing. Science Education, 86(3), 314–342.
Minstrell, J. (1982). Explaining the “at rest” condition of an object. Physics Teacher, 20, 10–14.
Morgan, P.J., & Cleave-Hogg, D. (2002). A worldwide survey of the use of simulation in anesthesia. Canadian Journal of Anesthesia, 49(7), 659–662.
Olsen, T.P. (2000). Student learning and spatial analysis in the classroom. Unpublished Ph.D., University of Wisconsin-Madison, Madison, WI.
Palincsar, A.S., Magnusson, S.J., Collins, K.M. & Cutter, J. (2001). Promoting deep understanding of science in students with disabilities in inclusion classrooms. Learning Disabilities Quarterly, 24(1), 26–32.
Perkins, D.N. & Simmons, R. (1988). Patterns of misunderstanding: An integrative model for science, math, and programming. Review of Educational Research, 58, 303–326.
Pintrich, P.R., Marx, R.W. & Boyle, R.A. (1993). Beyond cold conceptual change: The role of motivational beliefs and classroom contextual factors in the process of conceptual change. Review of Educational Research, 63(2), 167–199.
Posner, G.J., Strike, K.A., Hewson, P.W. & Gertzog, W.A. (1982). Accommodation of a scientific conception: Toward a theory of conceptual change. Science Education, 66(2), 211–227.
Resnick, L.B. (1999). Making America smarter. Education Week Century Series, 18(40), 38–40.
Rolfe, J.M. & Staples, K.J. (1986). Flight simulation. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Toulmin, S. (1972). Human understanding, Vol. 1: The collective use and evolution of concepts. Princeton: Princeton University Press.
Treagust, D.F. (2003). Scientific literacy, meta-cognitive capabilities and explanatory frameworks. Paper presented at the International Conference on Science and Mathematics Learning, National Taiwan Normal University, Taipei, Taiwan.
Wiske, M.S. (Ed.) (1998). Teaching for understanding: Linking research with practice. San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass Publishers.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Hewson, P.W. Resources for Science Learning: Tools, Tasks, and Environment. Int J Sci Math Educ 2, 201–225 (2004). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10763-004-4057-8
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10763-004-4057-8