Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Resources for Science Learning: Tools, Tasks, and Environment

  • Published:
International Journal of Science and Mathematics Education Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

This article addresses the question of how science learning can be improved. It recognizes that, while learners themselves are responsible for their own learning, the quality of this learning is greatly influenced when appropriate resources are available to learners. These resources are provided through a partnership between teachers and learners. Three different types of resource are discussed. Tools, in the form of computer tools and conceptual tools, make tasks easier and allow learners to undertake tasks they would not otherwise be able to do. Tasks can facilitate effective learning by creating effective spaces for learners to work in, embodying key aspects of the disciplines of science, providing effective and authentic opportunities for learners to learn, and facilitating a dialogue between learners’ ideas and their experiences of the natural world. Environment – the ecology in which learning happens – provides three sources of information through the human, social, and conceptual worlds. When key aspects of these worlds are manifested in the environment, they scaffold the learning of science content, the nature of science, and the learning process itself, all of which are required for the deep understanding of science that constitutes improved science learning.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Baird, J.R. (1990). Metacognition, purposeful enquiry and conceptual change. In Hegarty-Hazel (Ed.), The student laboratory and the science curriculum (pp. 183–200). London: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Barron, B.J.S., Schwartz, D.L., Vye, N.J., Moore, A., Petrosino, A., Zech, L., Bransford, J.D. & The Cognition and Technology Group at Vanderbilt (1998). Doing with understanding: Lessons from research on problem- and project-based learning. Journal of the Learning Sciences, 7(3&4), 271–311.

    Google Scholar 

  • Beeth, M.E. & Hewson, P.W. (1999). Learning goals in an exemplary science teacher’s practice: Cognitive and social factors in teaching for conceptual change. Science Education, 83(6), 738–760.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bransford, J., Brown, A.L. & Cocking, R.R. (2000). How people learn: Brain, mind, experience, and school, expanded edn. Washington, DC: National Academy Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Danielson, C. (1996). Enhancing professional practice: A framework for teaching. Alexandria, VA: Association for Supervision and Curriculum Development.

    Google Scholar 

  • Doyle, W. (1986). Classroom organization and management. In Wittrock (Ed.), Handbook of research on teaching, 3rd edn (pp. 392–431). New York: Macmillan.

    Google Scholar 

  • Duckworth, E. (1999). Intellectual development. Washington, DC: Annenberg/CPB.

    Google Scholar 

  • Duit, R. (Ed.) (2004). Bibliography – STCSE: Students’ and teachers’ conceptions and science education. Kiel, Germany: IPN.

    Google Scholar 

  • Duschl, R.A. & Gitomer, D.H. (1991). Epistemological perspectives on conceptual change: Implications for educational practice. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 28(9), 839–858.

    Google Scholar 

  • Flavell, J.H. (1976). Metacognitive aspects of problem solving. In Resnick (Ed.), The nature of intelligence (pp. 231–235). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gaba, D.M. & DeAnda, A. (1988). A comprehensive anesthesia simulation environment: Re-creating the operating room for research and training. Anesthesiology, 69, 387–394.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Gallagher, J.J. (2000). Teaching for understanding and application of science knowledge. School Science and Mathematics, 100(6), 310–318.

    Google Scholar 

  • George, Y.S. & Van Horne, V.V. (1996). Science education reform for all. Washington, DC: AAAS.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gunstone, R.F. (1994). The importance of specific science content in the enhancement of metacognition. In Fensham, Gunstone & White (Eds.), The content of science: A constructivist approach to its teaching and learning (pp. 131–146). Washington, DC: The Falmer Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gustafson, B.J. (1991). Thinking about sound: Children’s changing conceptions. Qualitative Studies in Education, 4(3), 203–214.

    Google Scholar 

  • Harlen, W. (1998). Teaching for understanding in pre-secondary science. In Fraser & Tobin (Eds.), International handbook of science education (pp. 183–197). Dordrecht, The Netherlands: Kluwer.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hennessey, M.G. (1991). Analysis of conceptual change and status change in sixth graders’ concepts of force and motion. Unpublished Dissertation, University of Wisconsin-Madison, Madison, WI.

  • Hewson, P.W. & Hennessey, M.G. (1992). Making status explicit: A case study of conceptual change. In Duit, Goldberg & Niedderer (Eds.), Research in physics learning: Theoretical issues and empirical studies (pp. 176–187). Kiel, Germany: IPN.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hewson, P.W. & Hewson, M.G.A.B. (1988). An appropriate conception of teaching science: A view from studies of science learning. Science Education, 72(5), 597–614.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hewson, P.W. & Lemberger, J. (2000). Status as the hallmark of conceptual learning. In Millar, Leach & Osborne (Eds.), Improving science education: The contribution of research (pp. 110–125). Buckingham: Open University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hewson, P.W. & Thorley, N.R. (1989). The conditions of conceptual change in the classroom. International Journal of Science Education, 11(5), 541–553.

    Google Scholar 

  • Johnston, K. & Scott, P. (1990). Approaches to teaching the particulate theory of matter [Videotape]. Hatfield: Association for Science Education.

    Google Scholar 

  • Johnson, S.K. & Stewart, J. (1990). Using philosophy of science in curriculum development: An example from high school genetics. International Journal of Science Education, 12(3), 297–307.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jungck, J.R. & Calley, J. (1993). Genetics Construction Kit. In Jungck, Soderberg, Calley, Peterson & Stewart (Eds.), The BioQUEST library. College Park, MD: University of Maryland Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kahle, J.B., Rogg, S.R. & Tobin, K.G. (1996). Bridging the gap: Equity in systemic reform. Oxford, OH: Miami University.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kelly, G.J. & Takao, A. (2002). Epistemic levels in argument: An analysis of university oceanography students’ use of evidence in writing. Science Education, 86(3), 314–342.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Minstrell, J. (1982). Explaining the “at rest” condition of an object. Physics Teacher, 20, 10–14.

    Google Scholar 

  • Morgan, P.J., & Cleave-Hogg, D. (2002). A worldwide survey of the use of simulation in anesthesia. Canadian Journal of Anesthesia, 49(7), 659–662.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Olsen, T.P. (2000). Student learning and spatial analysis in the classroom. Unpublished Ph.D., University of Wisconsin-Madison, Madison, WI.

  • Palincsar, A.S., Magnusson, S.J., Collins, K.M. & Cutter, J. (2001). Promoting deep understanding of science in students with disabilities in inclusion classrooms. Learning Disabilities Quarterly, 24(1), 26–32.

    Google Scholar 

  • Perkins, D.N. & Simmons, R. (1988). Patterns of misunderstanding: An integrative model for science, math, and programming. Review of Educational Research, 58, 303–326.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pintrich, P.R., Marx, R.W. & Boyle, R.A. (1993). Beyond cold conceptual change: The role of motivational beliefs and classroom contextual factors in the process of conceptual change. Review of Educational Research, 63(2), 167–199.

    Google Scholar 

  • Posner, G.J., Strike, K.A., Hewson, P.W. & Gertzog, W.A. (1982). Accommodation of a scientific conception: Toward a theory of conceptual change. Science Education, 66(2), 211–227.

    Google Scholar 

  • Resnick, L.B. (1999). Making America smarter. Education Week Century Series, 18(40), 38–40.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rolfe, J.M. & Staples, K.J. (1986). Flight simulation. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Toulmin, S. (1972). Human understanding, Vol. 1: The collective use and evolution of concepts. Princeton: Princeton University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Treagust, D.F. (2003). Scientific literacy, meta-cognitive capabilities and explanatory frameworks. Paper presented at the International Conference on Science and Mathematics Learning, National Taiwan Normal University, Taipei, Taiwan.

  • Wiske, M.S. (Ed.) (1998). Teaching for understanding: Linking research with practice. San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass Publishers.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Peter W. Hewson.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Hewson, P.W. Resources for Science Learning: Tools, Tasks, and Environment. Int J Sci Math Educ 2, 201–225 (2004). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10763-004-4057-8

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10763-004-4057-8

Keywords

Navigation