Abstract
In the twenty-first century historical archaeologists have increasingly drawn on post-colonial theory to analyze the European conquest and colonization of the Americas, Australasia, and Africa. However, few have employed feminist theories to gain insights into the patriarchal power dynamics that were fundamental to institutionalized colonial ideologies and practices. This paper provides feminist theorizing of new concepts and a heterarchical model of multiple interacting powers that increase understanding of complex gender and sexual power dynamics between colonizers and colonized.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Alaimo, S., and Hekman, S. (2008). Introduction: emerging models of materiality in feminist theory. In Alaimo, S., and Hekman, S. (eds.), Material Feminisms, Indiana University Press, Bloomington, pp. 1–19.
Alexander, R. T. (1998). Afterword: toward an archaeological theory of culture contact. In Cusiek, J. G. (ed.), Studies in Culture Contact, Center for Archaeological Investigations, Southern Illinois University, Carbondale, pp. 476–495.
Anzaldúa, G. (2009). En rapport, in opposition: Cobrando cuentas a las nuestras. In Keating, A. (ed.), The Gloria Anzaldúa Reader, Duke University Press, Durham, NC, pp. 111–118.
Battle-Baptiste, W. (2011). Black Feminist Archaeology. Left Coast Press, Walnut Creek CA.
Benton, M. (1981). “Objective” interests and the sociology of power. Sociology 15: 161–184.
Blauner, R. (1972). Racial Oppression in America, Harper and Row, New York.
Broadbent, L. (2011). Rape in the US military: America’s dirty little secret. A female soldier in Iraq is more likely to be attacked by a fellow soldier than killed by enemy fire. The Guardian, December 9. http://www.theguardian.com/society/2011/dec/09/rape-us-military Accessed 5/3/2015.
Bulbeck, C. (1998). Reorienting Western Feminisms: Women’s Diversity in a Postcolonial World, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.
Camp, S. L. (2013). From reform to repatriation: gendering an Americanization movement in early twentieth-century California. In Spencer-Wood, S. M. (ed.), Historical and Archaeological Perspectives on Gender Transformations: From Private to Public, Springer, New York, pp. 363–390.
Cantwell, A., and Wall, D. (2011). Engendering New Netherland: implications for interpreting early colonial archaeology. Archaeologies 7: 121–154.
Cavanagh, S., Gladstone, L., and Teasley, D. (2002). Violence against women: an overview. In Gordon, L. P. (ed.), Violence Against Women, Nova Science, Hauppage, New York, pp. 1–27.
Clements, J. M. (2011). Sarah and the Puritans: feminist contributions to New England historical archaeology. Archaeologies: Special issue “The Impact of Feminist Theories on Archaeology,” Spencer-Wood, S. M. and Smith, L. (guest eds.), 7: 97–120.
Comaroff, J. L. (1989). Images of empire, contests of conscience: models of colonial domination in South Africa. American Ethnologist 16: 661–685.
Coronil, F. (2007). After empire: reflections on imperialism from the Americas. In Stoler, A. L., MGranahan, C., and Perdue, P. C. (eds.), Imperial Formations, School for Advanced Research Press, Santa Fe, NM, pp. 241–271.
Crumley, C. L. (1979). Three locational models: an epistemological assessment for anthropology and archaeology. Advances in Archaeological Method and Theory 2: 141–173.
Crumley, C. L. (1987). A dialectical critique of hierarchy. In Patterson, T. C., and Gailey, C. W. (eds.), Power Relations and State Formation, American Anthropological Association, Washington DC, pp. 155–169.
Deagan, K. A. (1973). Mestizaje in colonial St. Augustine. Ethnohistory 20: 55–65.
Deagan, K. A. (1983). Spanish St. Augustine: The Archaeology of a Colonial Creole Community, Academic Press, New York.
Deetz, J. F. (1963). Archaeological Investigations at La Purisima Mission, University of California Los Angeles, Los Angeles, pp. 163–208.
Delle, J. A. (2000). Gender, power, and space: negotiating social relations under slavery on coffee plantations in Jamaica 1790–1834. In Delle, J. A., Mrozowski, S. A., and Paynter, R. (eds.), Lines that Divide: Historical Archaeologies of Race, Class, and Gender, University of Tennessee Press, Knoxville, pp. 168–205.
Friedan, B. (1993). The Fountain of Age, Simon and Schuster, New York.
Frink, L. (2005). Gender and the hide production process in colonial western Alaska. In Weedman, K. (ed.), Frink, L, Gender and Hide Production, Altamira, pp. 89–105.
Funari, P. P. A. (1999). Maroon, race and gender: Palmares material culture and social relations in a runaway settlement. In Funari, P. P. A., Hall, M., and Jones, S. (eds.), Historical Archaeology: Back from the Edge, Routledge, London, pp. 308–327.
Gordon, L. (2006). Internal colonialism and gender. In Stoler, A. L. (ed.), Haunted by Empire: Geographies of Intimacy in North American History, Duke University Press, Durham, NC, pp. 427–452.
Habicht-Mauche, J. A. (2005). The shifting role of women and women’s labor on the protohistoric southern high plains. In Frink, L., and Weedman, K. (eds.), Gender and Hide Production, Altamira, Walnut Creek, pp. 37–47.
Hall, M. (2000). Archaeology and the Modern World: Colonial Transcripts in South Africa and the Chesapeake, Routledge, London.
Hann, J. H., and McEwan, B. G. (1998). The Apalachee Indians and Mission San Luis, University Press of Florida, Gainesville.
Holliman, S. E. (2005). Hideworking and changes in women’s status among the Arikara, 1700-1862. In Frink, L., and Weedman, K. (eds.), Gender and Hide Production, Altamira, Walnut Creek, CA, pp. 77–88.
Horwitz, S. (2014). New law offers protection to Native American women. Washington Post March 8. http://www.washingtonpost.com/world/national-security/new-law-offers-a-sliver-of-protection-to-abused-native-american-women/2014/02/08/0466d1ae-8f73-11e3-84e1-27626c5ef5fb_story.html Accessed 5/2/2015.
Hymowitz, C., and Weissman, M. (1978). A History of Women in America: From Founding Mothers to Feminists, How Women Shaped the Life and Culture of America, Bantam, New York.
Jackson, L. M. (1994). Cloth, clothing and related paraphernalia: a key to gender visibility in the archaeological record of Russian America. In Scott, E. M. (ed.), Those of “Little Note”: Gender, Race and Class in Historical Archaeology, University of Arizona Press, Tucson, pp. 27–55.
Jordan, K. A. (2009). Colonies, colonialism, and cultural entanglement: the archaeology of post-Columbian intercultural relations. In Gaimster, D., and Majewski, T. (eds.), International Handbook of Historical Archaeology, Springer, New York, pp. 31–49.
Kwolek-Folland, A. (2002). Incorporating Women: A History of Women and Business in the United States, Palgrave, New York.
La Purisima Mission State Park (2015). History 1787–1812. http://www.lapurisimamission.org/1787-1812/ Accessed 5/3/2015.
Levy, J. E. (1999). Gender, power, and heterarchy in middle-level societies. In Sweely, T. L. (ed.), Manifesting Power: Gender and the Interpretation of Power in Archaeology, Routledge, London, pp. 62–78.
Lightfoot, K. G. (2005). Indians, Missionaries and Merchants: The Legacy of Colonial Encounters on the California Frontiers. University of California Press, Berkeley.
Lindauer, O. (2009). Individual struggles and institutional goals: small voices from the Phoenix Indian School track site. In Beisaw, A., and Gibb, J. G. (eds.), The Archaeology of Institutional Life, University of Alabama Press, Tuscaloosa, pp. 86–104.
Lorber, J. (2001). Gender Inequality: Feminist Theories and Politics, Roxbury, Los Angeles.
Loren, D. D. (2012). Fear, desire, and material strategies in colonial Louisiana. In Voss, B. L., and Casella, E. C. (eds.), The Archaeology of Colonialism: Intimate Encounters and Sexual Effects, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, pp. 105–121.
Middleton, A. (2013). Missionization and the cult of domesticity, 1769–1850: local investigation of a global process. In Spencer-Wood, S. M. (ed.), Historical and Archaeological Perspectives on Gender Transformations: From Private to Public, Springer, New York, pp. 149–172.
Mies, M., Bennholdt-Thomsen, V., and von Werlhof, C. (1988). Women: The Last Colony, Zed, London.
Miller, D., and Tilley, C. (eds.) (1984). Ideology, Power, and Prehistory, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.
Moraga, C. (2002). From inside the first world, Foreward 2001. In Moraga, C., and Anzaldúa, G. (eds.), This Bridge Called My Back: Writings by Radical Women of Color, 3rd ed, Third Woman Press, Berkeley, pp. 15–23.
Nassaney, M. S. (2004). Native American gender politics and material culture in seventeenth-century southeastern New England. Journal of Social Archaeology 4: 334–367.
Orser Jr., C. E. (2007). The Archaeology of Race and Racialization in Historic America, University Press of Florida, Gainsville.
Paynter, R., and McGuire, R. H. (1991). The archaeology of inequality: material culture, domination, and resistance. In McGuire, R. H., and Paynter, R. (eds.), The Archaeology of Inequality, Basil Blackwell, Oxford, pp. 1–28.
Rothschild, N. A. (2003). Colonial Encounters in a Native American Landscape. The Spanish and Dutch in North America, Smithsonian Books, Washington, DC.
Ryan, M. P. (1975). Womanhood in America: From Colonial Times to the Present, Franklin Watts, New York.
Samford, P. (2004). Engendering enslaved communities on Virginia’s and North Carolina’s eighteenth- and nineteenth-century plantations. In Galle, J. E., and Young, A. L. (eds.), Engendering African American Archaeology: A Southern Perspective, University of Tennessee Press, Knoxville, pp. 151–177.
Shanks, M., and Tilley, C. (1992). Re-constructing Archaeology: Theory and Practice, 2nd ed. Routledge, London.
Silliman, S. W. (2005). Culture contact or colonialism? Challenges in the archaeology of Native North America. American Antiquity 70: 55–74.
Spencer-Wood, S. M. (1994). Diversity in 19th century domestic reform: relationships among classes and ethnic groups. In Scott, E. M. (ed.), Those “Of Little Note”: Gender, Race and Class in Historical Archaeology, University of Arizona Press, Tucson, pp. 175–208.
Spencer-Wood, S. M. (1996). Feminist historical archaeology and the transformation of American culture by domestic reform movements, 1840–1925. In De Cunzo, L. A., and Herman, B. L. (eds.), Historical Archaeology and the Study of American Culture, Winterthur Museum and University of Tennessee Press, Knoxville, pp. 397–446.
Spencer-Wood, S. M. (1999a). The formation of ethnic-American identities: Jewish communities in Boston. In Funari, P. P. A., Hall, M., and Jones, S. (eds.), Historical Archaeology: Back from the Edge, Routledge, London, pp. 284–307.
Spencer-Wood, S. M. (1999b). Gendering power. In Sweely, T. L. (ed.), Manifesting Power: Gender and the Interpretation of Power in Archaeology, Routledge, London, pp. 175–183.
Spencer-Wood, S. M. (2002). Utopian visions and architectural designs of turn-of-the-century social settlements. In Bingaman, A., Shapiro, L., and Zorach, R. (eds.), Embodied Utopias: Gender, Social Change and the Modern Metropolis, Routledge, London, pp. 116–132.
Spencer-Wood, S. M. (2007). Feminist theory and gender research in historical archaeology. In Nelson, S. M. (ed.), Women in Antiquity: Theoretical Approaches to Gender and Archaeology, Altamira, Lanham, pp. 29–75.
Spencer-Wood, S. M. (2010). A Feminist framework for analyzing powered cultural landscapes in historical archaeology. International Journal of Historical Archaeology 14: 498–527.
Spencer-Wood, S. M. (2013a). Commentary: how feminist theories increase our understanding of processes of gender transformation. In Spencer-Wood, S. M. (ed.), Historical and Archaeological Perspectives on Gender Transformations: From Private to Public, Springer, New York, pp. 391–424.
Spencer-Wood, S. M. (2013b). Western gender transformations from the 18th century to the early 20th century: combining the domestic and public spheres. In Spencer-Wood, S. M. (ed.), Historical and Archaeological Perspectives on Gender Transformations: From Private to Public, Springer, New York, pp. 173–214.
Stoler, A. L. (2006a). Intimidations of empire: predicaments of the tactile and unseen. In Stoler, A. L. (ed.), Haunted by Empire: Geographies of Intimacy in North American History, Duke University Press, Durham, NC, pp. 1–22.
Stoler, A. L. (2006b). Tense and tender ties: the politics of comparison in North American history and (post) colonial studies. In Stoler, A. L. (ed.), Haunted by Empire: Geographies of Intimacy in North American History, Duke University Press, Durham, NC, pp. 23–67.
Stoler, A. L. (2013). Introduction: “The Rot Remains”, from ruins to ruination. In Stoler, A. L. (ed.), Imperial Debris: On Ruins and Ruination, Duke University Press, Durham, NC, pp. 1–38.
Van Kirk, S. (1983). Many Tender Ties: Women in Fur-Trade Society, 1670–1870, University of Oklahoma Press, Norman.
Voss, B. V. (2000). Colonial sex: archaeology, structured space and sexuality in Alta California’s Spanish-colonial missions. In Schmidt, R. A., and Voss, B. L. (eds.), Archaeologies of Sexuality, Routledge, London, pp. 35–62.
Voss, B. V. (2008). Domesticating imperialism: sexual politics and the archaeology of empire. American Anthropologist 110: 191–203.
Voss, B. V., and Casella, E. C. (eds.) (2012). The Archaeology of Colonialism: Intimate Encounters and Sexual Effects, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.
Weber, D. J. (2009). The Spanish Frontier in North America, Yale University Press, New Haven.
Woodhouse-Beyer, K. (1999). Artels and identities: gender, power and Russian America. In Sweely, T. L. (ed.), Manifesting Power: Gender and the Interpretation of Power in Archaeology, Routledge, London, pp. 129–155.
Acknowledgments
I would like to thank Russell Palmer and Laura McAtackney for organizing the 2014 SHA symposium on Colonial Institutions and Their Enduring Material Aftermaths and editing this resulting special issue of IJHA. My thanks to Russ and Laura for including my feminist discussion of materializations of colonial institutions even though their invitation for me to be a discussant in their symposium didn’t work out due to conference scheduling of my symposium at the same time. And I greatly appreciate Russ and Laura’s comments that led me to further strengthen my article.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Spencer-Wood, S.M. Feminist Theorizing of Patriarchal Colonialism, Power Dynamics, and Social Agency Materialized in Colonial Institutions. Int J Histor Archaeol 20, 477–491 (2016). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10761-016-0356-3
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10761-016-0356-3