Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Colonial Institutions: Uses, Subversions, and Material Afterlives

  • Published:
International Journal of Historical Archaeology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Archaeologically based explorations of colonialism or institutions are common case-studies in global historical archaeology, but the “colonial institution”—the role of institutions as operatives of colonialism—has often been neglected. In this thematic edition we argue that in order to fully understand the interconnected, global world one must explicitly dissect the colonial institution as an entwined, dual manifestation that is central to understanding both power and power relations in the modern world. Following Ann Laura Stoler, we have selected case studies from the Australia, Europe, UK and the USA which reveal that the study of colonial institutions should not be limited to the functional life of these institutions—or solely those that take the form of monumental architecture—but should include the long shadow of “imperial debris” (Stoler 2008) and immaterial institutions.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Baugher, S. (2010). Landscapes of power: middle class and lower class power dynamics in a New York charitable institution. International Journal of Historical Archaeology 14: 475–497.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Beisaw, A. M., and Gibb, J. G. (eds.) (2009). The Archaeology of Institutional Life, University of Alabama Press, Tuscaloosa.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bush, D. R. (2013). Johnson’s island US civil war military prison. In Mytum, H., and Carr, G. (eds.), Prisoners of War: Archaeology, Memory, and Heritage of Nineteenth- and Twentieth-Century Mass Internment, Springer, New York, pp. 59–74.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Casella, E. C. (2001). To watch or restrain: female convict prisons in nineteenth-century Tasmania. International Journal of Historical Archaeology 5: 45–72.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Casella, E. C. (2007). The Archaeology of Institutional Confinement, University Press of Florida, Gainsville.

    Google Scholar 

  • Davies, P. (2013). Clothing and textiles at the Hyde Park barracks destitute asylum, Sydney, Australia. Post-Medieval Archaeology 47: 1–16.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • De Cunzo, L. A. (1995). Reform, respite, ritual: an archaeology of institutions; the Magdalen society of Philadelphia, 1800–1850. Historical Archaeology 29(3): 1–168.

    Google Scholar 

  • De Cunzo, L. A. (2009). The future of the archaeology of institutions. In Beisaw, A. M., and Gibb, J. G. (eds.), The Archaeology of Institutional Life, University of Alabama Press, Tuscaloosa, AL, pp. 206–213.

    Google Scholar 

  • Foucault, M. (trans. Alan Sheridan) (1991). Discipline and punish: the birth of the modern prison. Penguin, London.

  • Gosden, C. (2004). Archaeology and Colonialism: Cultural Contact from 5000BC to the Present, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hobsbawm, E. (1989). The Age of Empire, 1875–1914, Weidenfeld and Nicolson, London.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lightfoot, K. G. (2005). Indians, Missionaries and Merchants: the Legacy of Colonial Encounters on the California Frontiers, University of California Press, Berkeley.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lindauer, O. (2009). Individual struggles and institutional goals: small voices from the phoenix school track site. In Beisaw, A. M., and Gibb, J. G. (eds.), The Archaeology of Institutional Life, University of Alabama Press, Tuscaloosa, AL, pp. 86–102.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lydon, J., and Ash, J. (2010). The archaeology of missions in Australasia: introduction. International Journal of Historical Archaeology 14: 1–14.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Martinez, I., and Zeischka-Kenzler, A. (2015). The hospital of San Juan de Dios: results of archaeological research. In Scholkmann, B., Schreg, R., and Zeischka-Kenzler, A. (eds.), A Step to a Global World: Historical Archaeology in Panamá, Archeopress, Oxford.

    Google Scholar 

  • McAtackney, L. (2014). An Archaeology of the Troubles: the Dark Heritage of Long Kesh/Maze Prison, Oxford University Press, Oxford.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Middleton, A. (2008). Te Puna: a New Zealand Mission Station: Historical Archaeology in New Zealand, Springer, New York.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Pétursdóttir, Þ., and Olsen, B. (2014). An archaeology of ruins. In Oslen, B., and Pétursdóttir, Þ. (eds.), Ruin Memories: Materialities, Aesthetics and the Archaeology of the Recent Past, Routledge, London, pp. 3–29.

    Google Scholar 

  • Scott, W. R. (1995). Institutions and Organizations, Sage, London.

    Google Scholar 

  • Spencer-Wood, S., and Baugher, S. (2001a). Introduction and historical context for the archaeology of institutions of reform. Part I: asylums. International Journal of Historical Archaeology 5: 1–17.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Spencer-Wood, S. and Baugher, S. (eds.). (2001b). Double special Issue on Almshouses and Asylums. International Journal of Historical Archaeology 5(1 and 2).

  • Starzmann, M. T. (2015). The materiality of forced labor: an archaeological exploration of punishment in Nazi Germany. International Journal of Historical Archaeology 19: 647–663.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Stoler, A. L. (2008). Imperial debris: reflections on ruins and ruination. Cultural Anthropology 23(2): 191–219.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Stoler, A. L. (ed.) (2013). Imperial Debris. On Ruins and Ruination, Duke University Press, Durham, NC.

    Google Scholar 

  • Thomas, N. (1991). Entangled Objects: Exchange, Material Culture, and Colonialism in the Pacific, Harvard University Press, Cambridge, MA.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

We would like to thank all the contributors for considerately addressing the theme and accepting multiple editorial directions. Not all presenters in the original SHA session (Quebec 2014) appear in this thematic issue, and we would like to thank them for their contributions and comments along the way.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Laura McAtackney.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

McAtackney, L., Palmer, R. Colonial Institutions: Uses, Subversions, and Material Afterlives. Int J Histor Archaeol 20, 471–476 (2016). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10761-016-0353-6

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10761-016-0353-6

Keywords

Navigation