Skip to main content
Log in

Workplace Faculty Friendships and Work-Family Culture

  • Published:
Innovative Higher Education Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Although various work-family policies are available to faculty members, many underuse these policies due to concerns about negative career consequences. Therefore, we believe it is important to develop an academic work culture that is more supportive of work-family needs. Using network data gathered from faculty members at a Midwestern university, this study investigated the relationship between friendship connections with colleagues and perceived work-family supportiveness in the department. It also explored the role of parental status in the relationship for men and women. Results show that faculty with larger friendship networks have more positive perceptions of work-family culture compared to faculty with smaller friendship networks, for all faculty except women without children.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Acker, J. (1990). Hierarchies, jobs, bodies: A theory of gendered organizations. Gender & Society, 4, 139–158.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Allen, T. D. (2001). Family-supportive work environments: The role of organizational perceptions. Journal of Vocational Behavior, 58, 414–435.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Anderson, S. E., Coffey, B. S., & Byerly, R. T. (2002). Formal organizational initiatives and informal workplace practices: Links to work-family conflict and job-related outcomes. Journal of Management, 28, 787–810.

    Google Scholar 

  • Andreassi, J. K. (2011). What the person brings to the table: Personality, coping, and work-family conflict. Journal of Family Issues, 32, 1474–1499.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Blair-Loy, M. (2003). Competing devotions: Career and family among women executives. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Blair-Loy, M., & Wharton, A. S. (2002). Employees’ use of work-family policies and the workplace social context. Social Forces, 80, 813–845.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Burt, R. S. (1995). Structural holes: The social structure of competition. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Burt, R. S. (2000). The network structure of social capital. Research in Organizational Behavior, 22, 345–423.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Coleman, J. S. (1988). Social capital in the creation of human capital. American Journal of Sociology, 94, 95–120.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Deutsch, F. M., & Yao, B. (2014). Gender differences in faculty attrition in the USA. Community, Work & Family, 17, 392–408.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dow, M. M., Burton, M. L., & White, D. R. (1982). Network autocorrelation: A simulation study of a foundational problem in regression and survey research. Social Networks, 4, 169–200.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Drago, R. W., Colbeck, C. L., Stauffer, K. D., Pirretti, A., Burkum, K., Fazioli, J., … Habasevich, T. (2006). The avoidance of bias against caregiving: The case of academic faculty. American Behavioral Scientist, 49, 1222–1247.

  • Eagan, K., Stolzenberg, E. B., Lozano, J. B., Aragon, M. C., Suchard, M. R., & Hurtado, S. (2014). Undergraduate teaching faculty: The 2013–2014 HERI Faculty Survey. Los Angeles, CA: Higher Education Research Institute, UCLA. Retrieved from http://heri.ucla.edu/monographs/HERI-FAC2014-monograph.pdf

  • Eaton, S. C. (2003). If you can use them: Flexibility policies, organizational commitment, and perceived performance. Industrial Relations, 42, 145–167.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fehr, C. (2008). Are smart men smarter than smart women? The epistemology of ignorance, women, and the production of knowledge. In A. M. May (Ed.), The “woman question” and higher education: Perspectives on gender and knowledge production in America (pp. 102–116). Cheltemham, United Kingdom: Edward Elgar.

    Google Scholar 

  • Good, P. I. (2005). Permutation, parametric and bootstrap tests of hypotheses (3rd ed.). New York, NY: Springer.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gough, M., & Noonan, M. (2013). A review of the motherhood wage penalty in the United States. Sociology Compass, 7, 328–342.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Goulden, M., Mason, M. A., & Frasch, K. (2011). Keeping women in the science pipeline. The ANNALS of the American Academy of Political and Social Science, 638, 141–162.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Granovetter, M. (1973). The strength of weak ties. American Journal of Sociology, 78, 1360–1380.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hollenshead, C. S., Sullivan, B., Smith, G. C., August, L., & Hamilton, S. (2005). Work/family policies in higher education: Survey data and case studies of policy implementation. New Directions for Higher Education, 130, 41–65.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jackson, J. (2004). The story is not in the numbers: Academic socialization and diversifying the faculty. NWSA Journal, 16, 172–185.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jacobs, J. A., & Winslow, S. E. (2004). The academic life course, time pressures and gender inequality. Community, Work & Family, 7, 143–161.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kadushin, C. (2012). Understanding social networks. Oxford, United Kingdom: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kelly, E. L., Kossek, E. E., Hammer, L. B., Durham, M., Bray, J., Chermack, K., … Kaskubar, D. (2008). Getting there from here: Research on the effects of work–family initiatives on work–family conflict and business outcomes. The Academy of Management Annals, 2, 305–349.

  • Kilduff, M., & Corley, K. G. (2000). Organizational culture from a network perspective. In N. Ashkanasy, C. Wilderom, & M. Peterson (Eds.), Handbook of organizational culture & climate (pp. 211–221). Thousand Oaks, CA: SAGE.

    Google Scholar 

  • Killewald, A. (2013). A reconsideration of the fatherhood premium: Marriage, coresidence, biology, and fathers’ wages. American Sociological Review, 78, 96–116.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kinnunen, U., Mauno, S., Geurts, S., & Dikkers, J. (2005). Work-family culture in organizations: Theoretical and empirical approaches. In S. A. Y. Poelmans (Ed.), Work and family: An international research perspective (pp. 87–120). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.

    Google Scholar 

  • Knoke, D., & Yang, S. (2008). Social network analysis (2nd ed.). Thousand Oaks, CA: SAGE.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Kossek, E. E., Lewis, S., & Hammer, L. B. (2010). Work-life initiatives and organizational change: Overcoming mixed messages to move from the margin to the mainstream. Human Relations, 63, 3–19.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kossek, E. E., Pichler, S., Bodner, T., & Hammer, L. B. (2011). Workplace social support and work-family conflict: A meta-analysis clarifying the influence of general and work-family-specific supervisor and organizational support. Personnel Psychology, 64, 289–313.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lee, S., & Bozeman, B. (2005). The impact of research collaboration on scientific productivity. Social Studies of Science, 35, 623–702.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mason, M. A., & Ekman, E. M. (2007). Mothers on the fast track: How a new generation can balance family and careers. Oxford, United Kingdom: Oxford University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Mason, M. A., Wolfinger, N. H., & Goulden, M. (2013). Do babies matter?: Gender and family in the ivory tower. New Brunswick, NJ: Rutgers University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mauno, S., Kinnunen, U., & Ruokolainen, M. (2006). Exploring work- and organization-based resources as moderators between work–family conflict, well-being, and job attitudes. Work & Stress, 20, 210–233.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Michel, J. S., Kotrba, L. M., Mitchelson, J. K., Clark, M. A., & Baltes, B. B. (2011). Antecedents of work-family conflict: A meta-analytic review. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 32, 689–725.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Misra, J., Lundquist, J. H., & Templer, A. (2012). Gender, work time, and care responsibilities among faculty. Sociological Forum, 27, 300–323.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • National Science Foundation (2015). Women, minorities, and persons with disabilities in science and engineering: 2015 (No. Special Report NSF 13–304). Arlington, VA: National Science Foundation, National Center for Science and Engineering Statistics. Retrieved from http://www.nsf.gov/statistics/wmpd/

  • O’Meara, K., & Campbell, C. M. (2011). Faculty sense of agency in decisions about work and family. The Review of Higher Education, 34, 447–476.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Preston, A. E. (2004). Leaving science: Occupational exit from scientific careers. New York, NY: Russell Sage.

    Google Scholar 

  • Reddick, R. J., Rochlen, A. B., Grasso, J. R., Reilly, E. D., & Spikes, D. D. (2012). Academic fathers pursuing tenure: A qualitative study of work-family conflict, coping strategies, and departmental culture. Psychology of Men & Masculinity, 13, 1–15.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ridgeway, C. L., & Correll, S. J. (2004). Unpacking the gender system: A theoretical perspective on gender beliefs and social relations. Gender & Society, 18, 510–531.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rothausen, T. J. (1999). “Family” in organizational research: A review and comparison of definitions and measures. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 20, 817–836.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sallee, M. W. (2012). The ideal worker or the ideal father: Organizational structures and culture in the gendered university. Research in Higher Education, 53, 782–802.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Smith, J. W., & Calasanti, T. (2005). The influence of gender, race, and ethnicity on workplace experiences of institutional and social isolation: An exploratory study of university faculty. Sociological Spectrum, 25, 307–334.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Thompson, C. A., & Prottas, D. J. (2006). Relationships among organizational family support, job autonomy, perceived control, and employee well-being. Journal of Occupational Health Psychology, 11, 100–118.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Valian, V. (1999). Why so slow? The advancement of women. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Voydanoff, P. (2005). Toward a conceptualization of perceived work-family fit and balance: A demands and resources approach. Journal of Marriage and Family, 67, 822–836.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ward, K., & Wolf-Wendel, L. (2012). Academic motherhood: How faculty manage work and family. New Brunswick, NJ: Rutgers University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ward, K., & Wolf-Wendel, L. (2014). Academic mothers: Exploring disciplinary perspectives. Innovative Higher Education, 40, 19–35.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wasserman, S., & Faust, K. (1994). Social network analysis: Methods and applications. Cambridge, United Kingdom: Cambridge University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Wellman, B. (1988). Structural analysis: From method and metaphor to theory and substance. In B. Wellman & S. D. Berkowitz (Eds.), Social structures: A network approach (pp. 19–61). Cambridge, United Kingdom: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Williams, J. C. (2004). Hitting the Maternal Wall. Academe, 90, 16–20.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Yan, E., & Ding, Y. (2009). Applying centrality measures to impact analysis: A coauthorship network analysis. Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology, 60, 2107–2118.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

This research was supported by an NSF ADVANCE-IT grant #0811250.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Megumi Watanabe.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Watanabe, M., Falci, C. Workplace Faculty Friendships and Work-Family Culture. Innov High Educ 42, 113–125 (2017). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10755-016-9373-8

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10755-016-9373-8

Keywords

Navigation