Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

The impact of government decentralization on county health spending for the uninsured in California

  • Published:
International Journal of Health Care Finance and Economics Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

We analyze Program Realignment, California’s 1991 policy of decentralizing control of health, mental health, and social services, from the state to the counties. Drawing from the economics literature on intergovernmental transfers and using data constructed for this study, we analyze the impact of Realignment on uninsured health spending. We find a change in the pattern of spending on indigent health services by counties following decentralization. Our results suggest, however, that county-level governments maintain a level of commitment to social-service spending that recent studies indicate may be lacking at the state level.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Baicker K., Staiger D. (2005). Fiscal Shenanigans, targeted federal health funds, and patient mortality. The Quarterly Journal of Economics, 120(1): 345–386

    Google Scholar 

  • Bradford D., Oates W. (1971). Towards a predictive theory of intergovernmental grants. American Economic Review, 61, 440–448

    Google Scholar 

  • California Department of Health Services (1999). Briefing paper on county financial maintenance of effort and county health services programs. Sacramento CA, Office of County Health Services and Local Public Health Assistance.

  • California Legislative Analyst’s Office (1993). Local sales taxes—what role can they play in the 1993–94 state budget? Sacramento, CA.

  • California Legislative Analyst’s Office (1995). Background information on the health care ‘safety net’. Sacramento, CA. Available online (accessed on 5/25/04): http://www.lao.ca.gov.handouts/pre_1999/ho112895html.

  • California Legislative Analyst’s Office (2002). Cal Facts: California’s economy and budget in perspective. Sacramento, CA. Available online (accessed on 4/05/05): http://www.lao.ca.gov/2002/cal_facts/2002_calfacts_pdf_toc.html

  • California State Controller (1987–1992). Counties annual report. Sacramento, CA

  • California State Controller (1991–2000). Health and welfare realignment allocation report. Sacramento, CA.

  • Duggan M. (2000). Hospital ownership and public medical spending. The Quarterly Journal of Economics, 115(4): 345–386

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fisher R.C. (1982). Income and grant effects on local expenditure: The flypaper effect and other difficulties. Journal of Urban conomics, 12, 324–345

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Grossman P.J. (1990). The impact of federal and state grants on local government spending: A test of the fiscal illusion hypothesis. Public Finance Quarterly, 18(3): 313–327

    Google Scholar 

  • Hill E.G. (2001). Realignment revisited: An evaluation of the 1991 experiment in state-county relations. Sacramento CA, California Legislative Analyst’s Office

    Google Scholar 

  • Huen W. (1999). California’s disproportionate share hospital program: Background paper. Oakland, CA: California Healthcare Foundation. Available online (accessed on 12/20/04): http://www.chcf.org/documents/policy/dsh.pdf

  • McGuire M. (1975). An econometric model of federal grants and local fiscal response. In: Oates W.E. (Eds), Financing the new federalism. Baltimore, The Johns Hopkins University Press

  • McGuire M. (1978). A method for estimating the effect of a subsidy on the receiver’s resource constraint: With an application to U.S. Local Governments 1964–1971 Journal of Public Economics, 10(1): 25–44

    Google Scholar 

  • National Health Law Program (1997). California state and local responsibility for indigent health care. Available online (accessed on 3/24/02): http://www.healthlaw.org/pubs/1997calindigentcare.html.

  • Rivlin A.M. (1991). Distinguished lecture on economics in government: the economy by rethinking the role of federal and state governments. The Journal of Economic Perspectives, 5(2): 3–14

    Google Scholar 

  • Rubinfeld D.L. (1987). The economics of the local public sector. In: Auerbach A.J., Feldstein M. (Eds), Handbook of public economics, Vol II. Amsterdam, North-Holland

    Google Scholar 

  • Scheffler R.M., Wallace N.T., Hu T.-W., Garrett A.B., Bloom J.R. (2000). The impact of risk shifting and contracting on mental health service costs in California. Inquiry, 37, 121–133

    Google Scholar 

  • Winer S.L. (1983). Some evidence on the effect of the separation of spending and taxing decisions. Journal of Political Economy, 91, 126–140

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Winston P. (2002). Welfare policymaking in the states: The devil in devolution. Washington DC, Georgetown University Press

    Google Scholar 

  • Wooldridge J.M. (2002). Econometric analysis of cross section and panel data. MA, The MIT Press

    Google Scholar 

  • Zampelli E.M. (1986). Resource fungibility, the flypaper effect, and expenditure impact of grants-in-aid. The Review of Economics and Statistics, 68(1): 33–40

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Richard B. Smith.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Scheffler, R., Smith, R.B. The impact of government decentralization on county health spending for the uninsured in California. Int J Health Care Finance Econ 6, 237–258 (2006). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10754-006-9003-6

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10754-006-9003-6

Keywords

JEL Classifications

Navigation