Abstract
We analyze Program Realignment, California’s 1991 policy of decentralizing control of health, mental health, and social services, from the state to the counties. Drawing from the economics literature on intergovernmental transfers and using data constructed for this study, we analyze the impact of Realignment on uninsured health spending. We find a change in the pattern of spending on indigent health services by counties following decentralization. Our results suggest, however, that county-level governments maintain a level of commitment to social-service spending that recent studies indicate may be lacking at the state level.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Baicker K., Staiger D. (2005). Fiscal Shenanigans, targeted federal health funds, and patient mortality. The Quarterly Journal of Economics, 120(1): 345–386
Bradford D., Oates W. (1971). Towards a predictive theory of intergovernmental grants. American Economic Review, 61, 440–448
California Department of Health Services (1999). Briefing paper on county financial maintenance of effort and county health services programs. Sacramento CA, Office of County Health Services and Local Public Health Assistance.
California Legislative Analyst’s Office (1993). Local sales taxes—what role can they play in the 1993–94 state budget? Sacramento, CA.
California Legislative Analyst’s Office (1995). Background information on the health care ‘safety net’. Sacramento, CA. Available online (accessed on 5/25/04): http://www.lao.ca.gov.handouts/pre_1999/ho112895html.
California Legislative Analyst’s Office (2002). Cal Facts: California’s economy and budget in perspective. Sacramento, CA. Available online (accessed on 4/05/05): http://www.lao.ca.gov/2002/cal_facts/2002_calfacts_pdf_toc.html
California State Controller (1987–1992). Counties annual report. Sacramento, CA
California State Controller (1991–2000). Health and welfare realignment allocation report. Sacramento, CA.
Duggan M. (2000). Hospital ownership and public medical spending. The Quarterly Journal of Economics, 115(4): 345–386
Fisher R.C. (1982). Income and grant effects on local expenditure: The flypaper effect and other difficulties. Journal of Urban conomics, 12, 324–345
Grossman P.J. (1990). The impact of federal and state grants on local government spending: A test of the fiscal illusion hypothesis. Public Finance Quarterly, 18(3): 313–327
Hill E.G. (2001). Realignment revisited: An evaluation of the 1991 experiment in state-county relations. Sacramento CA, California Legislative Analyst’s Office
Huen W. (1999). California’s disproportionate share hospital program: Background paper. Oakland, CA: California Healthcare Foundation. Available online (accessed on 12/20/04): http://www.chcf.org/documents/policy/dsh.pdf
McGuire M. (1975). An econometric model of federal grants and local fiscal response. In: Oates W.E. (Eds), Financing the new federalism. Baltimore, The Johns Hopkins University Press
McGuire M. (1978). A method for estimating the effect of a subsidy on the receiver’s resource constraint: With an application to U.S. Local Governments 1964–1971 Journal of Public Economics, 10(1): 25–44
National Health Law Program (1997). California state and local responsibility for indigent health care. Available online (accessed on 3/24/02): http://www.healthlaw.org/pubs/1997calindigentcare.html.
Rivlin A.M. (1991). Distinguished lecture on economics in government: the economy by rethinking the role of federal and state governments. The Journal of Economic Perspectives, 5(2): 3–14
Rubinfeld D.L. (1987). The economics of the local public sector. In: Auerbach A.J., Feldstein M. (Eds), Handbook of public economics, Vol II. Amsterdam, North-Holland
Scheffler R.M., Wallace N.T., Hu T.-W., Garrett A.B., Bloom J.R. (2000). The impact of risk shifting and contracting on mental health service costs in California. Inquiry, 37, 121–133
Winer S.L. (1983). Some evidence on the effect of the separation of spending and taxing decisions. Journal of Political Economy, 91, 126–140
Winston P. (2002). Welfare policymaking in the states: The devil in devolution. Washington DC, Georgetown University Press
Wooldridge J.M. (2002). Econometric analysis of cross section and panel data. MA, The MIT Press
Zampelli E.M. (1986). Resource fungibility, the flypaper effect, and expenditure impact of grants-in-aid. The Review of Economics and Statistics, 68(1): 33–40
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Scheffler, R., Smith, R.B. The impact of government decentralization on county health spending for the uninsured in California. Int J Health Care Finance Econ 6, 237–258 (2006). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10754-006-9003-6
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10754-006-9003-6