Skip to main content

Advertisement

SpringerLink
Log in

Towards a numerical model to simulate the observed displacement of harbour porpoises Phocoena phocoena due to pile driving in Belgian waters

  • OFFSHORE WIND FARM IMPACTS
  • Published:
Hydrobiologia Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The impact of impulsive pile driving on marine mammals is a major environmental concern in offshore wind farm construction. Odontocetes, depending on emission and reception of sound for foraging, spatial orientation and social interactions, are likely to be impacted most. In Belgian and adjacent waters, specific concerns exist about the impact of underwater sound generated during pile driving on the harbour porpoise Phocoena phocoena, the most common cetacean in these waters. The results of visual aerial line-transect surveys performed before and during pile driving at the Thorntonbank (Belgian waters, North Sea) suggested a displacement of porpoises to a distance of around 20 km from the piling location. Such an apparent large-scale avoidance reaction is similar to the one observed in other countries’ waters in the North Sea. Using survey data, we developed a simple numerical model that could reproduce the harbour porpoises’ redistribution pattern during disturbance. The further development of our initial model can be useful to predict or simulate the redistribution of harbour porpoises in cases when field investigations are not possible or impractical, for pre-construction environmental impact assessments and for impact assessments in case of multiple piling operations ongoing in the same area.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Au, W. W. L. (ed.), 1993. The Sonar of Dolphins. Springer, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Au, W. W. L., A. N. Popper & R. R. Fay (eds), 2000. Hearing by Whales and Dolphins. Springer Verlag, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bailey, H., B. Senior, D. Simmons, J. Rusin, G. Picken & P. M. Thompson, 2010. Assessing underwater noise levels during pile-driving at an offshore windfarm and its potential effects on marine mammals. Marine Pollution Bulletin 60: 888–897.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Boonstra, M., Y. Radstake, K. Rebel, G. Aarts & C. J. Camphuysen, 2013. Harbour porpoises (Phocoena phocoena) in the Marsdiep area, the Netherlands: new investigations in a historical study area. Lutra 56: 59–71.

    Google Scholar 

  • Brandt, M. J., A. Diederichs, K. Betke & G. Nehls, 2011. Responses of harbour porpoises to pile driving at the Horns Rev II offshore wind farm in the Danish North Sea. Marine Ecology Progress Series 421: 205–216.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Brandt, M. J., A. Diederichs, K. Betke & G. Nehls, 2012. Effects of offshore pile driving on harbor porpoises (Phocoena phocoena). In Popper, A. N. & A. Hawkins (eds), The Effects of Noise on Aquatic Life. Advances in Experimental Medicine and Biology, Vol. 730. Springer, New York: 281–284.

  • Buckland, S. T., D. R. Anderson, K. P. Burnham, J. L. Laake, D. L. Borchers & L. Thomas, 2001. Introduction to Distance Sampling: Estimating Abundance of Biological Populations. Oxford University Press, London.

    Google Scholar 

  • Camphuysen, C. J. & G. Peet, 2006. Walvissen en dolfijnen in de Noordzee. Fontaine Uitgevers, Kortenhoef.

    Google Scholar 

  • Camphuysen C. J. & M. L. Siemensma, 2011. Conservation plan for the Harbour Porpoise Phocoena phocoena in The Netherlands: towards a favourable conservation status. NIOZ Report 2011-07, Royal Netherlands Institute for Sea Research, Texel.

  • Carstensen, J., O. D. Henriksen & J. Teilmann, 2006. Impacts on harbour porpoises from offshore wind farm construction: acoustic monitoring of echolocation activity using porpoise detectors (T-PODs). Marine Ecology Progress Series 321: 295–308.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dähne, M., A. Gilles, K. Lucke, V. Peschko, S. Adler, K. Krügel, J. Sundermeyer & U. Siebert, 2013. Effects of pile-driving on harbour porpoises (Phocoena phocoena) at the first offshore wind farm in Germany. Environmental Research Letters 8: 025002.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dähne, M., V. Peschko, A. Gilles, K. Lucke, S. Adler, K. Ronneberg & U. Siebert, 2014. Marine mammals and windfarms: effects of alpha ventus on harbour porpoises. In Beierdorf, A. & K. Wollny-Goerke (eds), Ecological Research at the Offshore Windfarm Alpha Ventus – Challenges, Results and Perspectives. Springer Fachmedium, Wiesbaden: 133–149.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • EC, 2008. European Commission Directive 2008/56/EC of 17 June 2008 establishing a framework for community action in the field of marine environmental policy (Marine Strategy Framework Directive). Official Journal of the European Union L164: 19–40.

    Google Scholar 

  • Evans, P. G. H. & J. A. Raga (eds), 2001. Marine Mammals: Biology and Conservation. Kluwer Academic/Plenum Publishers, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Finneran, J. J., D. A. Carder, C. E. Schlundt & R. L. Dear, 2010. Growth and recovery of temporary threshold shift at 3 kHz in bottlenose dolphins: experimental data and mathematical models. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America 127: 3256–3266.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Geelhoed, S. C. V., M. Scheidat, R. S. A. van Bemmelen & G. Aarts, 2013. Abundance of harbour porpoises (Phocoena phocoena) on the Dutch Continental Shelf, aerial surveys in July 2010-March 2011. Lutra 56: 45–57.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gilles, A., M. Scheidat & U. Siebert, 2009. Seasonal distribution of harbour porpoises and possible interference of offshore wind farms in the German North Sea. Marine Ecology Progress Series 383: 295–307.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Haelters, J., 2009. Monitoring of marine mammals in the framework of the construction and exploitation of offshore windfarms in Belgian marine waters. In Degraer, S. & R. Brabant (eds), Offshore Windfarms in the Belgian part of the North Sea: State of the art After Two Years of Environmental Monitoring. Royal Belgian Institute of Natural Sciences, Brussels, Belgium: 237–266.

    Google Scholar 

  • Haelters, J., F. Kerckhof, T. G. Jacques & S. Degraer, 2011. The harbour porpoise Phocoena phocoena in the Belgian part of the North Sea: trends in abundance and distribution. Belgian Journal of Zoology 141: 75–84.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hammond, P. S., K. Macleod, P. Berggren, D. L. Borchers, L. Burt, A. Cañadas, G. Desportes, G. P. Donovan, A. Gilles, D. Gillespie, J. Gordon, L. Hiby, I. Kuklik, R. Leaper, K. Lehnert, M. Leopold, P. Lovell, N. Øien, C. G. M. Paxton, V. Ridoux, E. Rogan, F. Samarra, M. Scheidat, M. Sequeira, U. Siebert, H. Skov, R. Swift, M. L. Tasker, J. Teilmann, O. Van Canneyt & J. A. Vázquez, 2013. Cetacean abundance and distribution in European Atlantic shelf waters to inform conservation and management. Biological Conservation 164: 107–122.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hiby, L., 2008. Effective strip half-width estimates from aerial survey data. In SCANS II, 2008. Small Cetaceans in the European Atlantic and North Sea (SCANS II). Final Report to the European Commission, Appendix D3.1.

  • Johnston, D. W., A. J. Westgate & A. J. Read, 2005. Effects of fine-scale oceanographic features on the distribution and movements of harbour porpoises Phocoena phocoena in the Bay of Fundy. Marine Ecology Progress Series 295: 279–293.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kastelein, R. A., J. Hardemann & H. Boer, 1997. Food consumption and body weight of harbour porpoises (Phocoena phocoena). In Read, A. J., P. R. Wiepkema & P. E. Nachtigall (eds), The biology of the Harbour Porpoise. De Spil Publishers, Woerden: 217–234.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kastelein, R. A., R. Gransier, L. Hoek & J. Olthuis, 2012. Temporary threshold shifts and recovery in a harbor porpoise (Phocoena phocoena) after octave-band noise at 4 kHz. The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America 132: 3525–3537.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Kastelein, R. A., D. van Heerden, R. Gransier & L. Hoek, 2013a. Behavioral responses of a harbour porpoise (Phocoena phocoena) to playbacks of broadband pile driving sounds. Marine Environmental Research 92: 206–214.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Kastelein, R. A., R. Gransier & L. Hoek, 2013b. Comparative temporary threshold shifts in a harbor porpoise and harbor seal, and severe shift in a seal. The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America 134: 13–16.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Lucke, K., P. A. Lepper, M.-A. Blanchet & U. Siebert, 2008. Testing the acoustic tolerance of harbour porpoise hearing for impulsive sound. Bioacoustics 17: 329–331.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lucke, K., U. Siebert, P. A. Lepper & M. Blanchet, 2009. Temporary shift in masked hearing thresholds in a harbor porpoise (Phocoena phocoena) after exposure to seismic airgun stimuli. The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America 125: 4060–4070.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Lucke, K., M. Dähne, S. Adler, A. Brandecker, K. Krügel, J. K. Sundermeyer & U. Siebert, 2012. Evaluating the effects of offshore pile driving on Phocoena phocoena (harbor porpoises) by using passive acoustic monitoring. In Popper, A. N. & A. Hawkins (eds), The Effects of Noise on Aquatic Life. Advances in Experimental Medicine and Biology, Vol. 730. Springer, New York: 285–287.

  • Madsen, P. T., M. Wahlberg, J. Tougaard, K. Lucke & P. L. Tyack, 2006. Wind turbine underwater noise and marine mammals: implications of current knowledge and data needs. Marine Ecology Progress Series 309: 279–295.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Murphy, S., J. Tougaard, B. Wilson, S. Benjamins, J. Haelters, K. Lucke, S. Werner, K. Brensing, D. Thompson, G. Hastie, S. Geelhoed, S. Braeger, G. Lees, I. Davies, K.-U. Graw & E. Pinn, 2012. Assessment of the marine renewables industry in relation to marine mammals: synthesis of work undertaken by the ICES Working Group on Marine Mammal Ecology (WGMME). Report to the International Whaling Commission, IWC/64/SC MRED1, Panama City, Panama.

  • Nedwell, J. R, J. Langworthy & D. Howell, 2003. Assessment of sub-sea acoustic noise and vibration from offshore wind turbines and its impact on marine wildlife; initial measurements of underwater noise during construction of offshore windfarms, and comparison with background noise. Subacoustech Report No. 544R0424 to COWRIE Ltd.

  • Nedwell, J. R., S. J. Parvin, B. Edwards, R. Workman, A. G. Brooker & J. E. Kynoch, 2007a. Measurement and interpretation of underwater noise during construction and operation of offshore windfarms in UK waters. Subacoustech Report No. 544R0738 to COWRIE Ltd. ISBN: 978-0-9554279-5-4.

  • Nedwell, J., A. Turnpenny, J. Lovell, S. Parvin, R. Workman, J. Spinks & D. Howell, 2007b. A validation of the dBht as a measure of the behavioural and auditory effects of underwater noise. Subacoustech Report No. 534R1231 [http://www.subacoustech.com/]. Accessed 18 Feb 2014.

  • Nehls, G., K. Betke, S. Eckelmann & M. Ros, 2007. Assessment and costs of potential engineering solutions for the mitigation of the impacts of underwater noise arising from the construction of offshore windfarms. BioConsult SH report ENG-01-2007 to COWRIE Ltd.

  • Norro, A., B. Rumes & S. Degraer, 2012. Differentiating between underwater construction noise of monopile and jacket foundation wind turbines: a case study from the Belgian part of the North Sea. In Degraer, S., R. Brabant & B. Rumes (eds), Offshore Windfarms in the Belgian Part of the North Sea: Heading for an Understanding of Environmental Impacts. Royal Belgian Institute of Natural Sciences, Brussels, Belgium: 145–155.

    Google Scholar 

  • Norro, A., D. Botteldooren, L. Dekoninck, J. Haelters, B. Rumes, T. Van Renterghem & S. Degraer, 2013. Qualifying and quantifying offshore wind farm-generated noise. In Degraer, S., R. Brabant & B. Rumes (eds), Environmental Impacts of the Offshore Windfarms in the Belgian Part of the North Sea: Learning from the Past to Optimize Future Monitoring Programmes. Royal Belgian Institute of Natural Sciences, Brussels: 62–69.

    Google Scholar 

  • Otani, S., Y. Naito, A. Kato & A. Kawamura, 2001. Oxygen consumption and swim speed of the harbor porpoise Phocoena phocoena. Fishery Science 67: 894–898.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Reid, J. B., P. G. H. Evans & S. P. Northridge (eds), 2003. Atlas of Cetacean Distribution in North-West European Waters. Joint Nature Conservation Committee, Peterborough.

    Google Scholar 

  • Richardson, W. J., C. R. Green, C. I. Malme & D. H. Thomson, 1995. Marine Mammals and Noise. Academic Press, San Diego, California.

    Google Scholar 

  • Robinson, S. P., P. D. Theobald & P. A. Lepper, 2013. Underwater noise generated from marine piling. Proceedings of Meetings on Acoustics 17: 070080.

    Google Scholar 

  • Scheidat, M., A. Gilles & U. Siebert 2005. Applying the circle-back method to estimate g(0)- Experiences and results from aerial surveys in German waters. In Thomsen, F., F. Ugarte & P. G. H. Evans (eds), Estimation of g(0) in line-transect surveys of cetaceans. ECS Newsletter 44(special issue): 18–24.

  • Scheidat, M., A. Gilles, K.-H. Kock & U. Siebert, 2008. Harbour porpoise Phocoena phocoena abundance in the south-western Baltic Sea. Endangered Species Research 5: 215–223.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Scheidat, M., H. Verdaat & G. Aarts, 2012. Using aerial surveys to estimate density and distribution of harbour porpoises in Dutch waters. Journal of Sea Research 69: 1–7.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Skov, H. & F. Thomsen, 2008. Resolving fine-scale spatio-temporal dynamics in the harbour porpoise Phocoena phocoena. Marine Ecology Progress Series 373: 173–186.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Southall, B. L., A. E. Bowles, W. T. Ellison, J. Finneran, R. Gentry, C. R. Green, C. R. Kastak, D. R. Ketten, J. H. Miller, P. E. Nachtigall, W. J. Richardson, J. A. Thomas & P. L. Tyack, 2007. Marine mammal noise exposure criteria: initial scientific recommendations. Aquatic Mammals 33: 411–521.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Thomas, L., J. L. Laake, E. Rextad, S. Strindberg, F. F. C. Marques, S. T. Buckland, D. L. Borchers, D. R. Anderson, K. P. Burnham, M. L. Burt, S. L. Hedley, J. H. Pollard, J. R. B. Bishop & T. A. Marques, 2009. Distance 6.0. Release 2. Research Unit for Wildlife Population Assessment, University of St. Andrews, Fife.

  • Thompson, P. M., P. Lusseau, T. Barton, D. Simmons, J. Rusin & H. Bailey, 2010. Assessing the responses of coastal cetaceans to the construction of offshore wind turbines. Marine Pollution Bulletin 60: 1200–1208.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Thompson, P. M., G. D. Hastie, J. Nedwell, R. Barham, K. L. Brookes, L. S. Cordes, H. Bailey & N. McLean, 2013. Framework for assessing impacts of pile-driving noise from offshore wind farm construction on a harbour seal population. Environmental Impact Assessment Review 43: 73–85.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Thomsen, F., F. Ugarte & P. G. H. Evans (eds), 2005. Estimation of g(0) in line transect surveys of cetaceans. European Cetacean Society (ECS) News Letter 44 (Special Issue).

  • Tougaard, J., J. Carstensen, J. Teilmann, H. Skov & P. Rasmussen, 2009. Pile driving zone of responsiveness extends beyond 20 km for harbor porpoises (Phocoena phocoena). Journal Acoustical Society of America 126: 11–14.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tougaard, J. L. A. Kyhn, M. Amundin, D. Wennerberg & C. Bordin, 2012. Behavioral reactions of harbor porpoise to pile-driving noise. In Popper, A. N. & A. Hawkins (eds), The Effects of Noise on Aquatic Life. Advances in Experimental Medicine and Biology, Vol. 730. Springer, New York: 277–280.

  • Vlaamse Hydrografie, 2006. Vlaamse Banken – Van Gravelines tot Oostkapelle. International Chart Series D11, Vlaams Ministerie van Mobiliteit en Openbare Werken.

  • Weibull, W., 1951. A statistical distribution function of wide applicability. Journal of Applied Mechanics 18: 293–297.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

We acknowledge the cooperation of the pilots and colleagues assisting in the aerial surveys, and thank the anonymous reviewers for their valuable comments on the manuscript. This paper results from the monitoring programme on the ecological effects of offshore wind farms in Belgian waters.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Operational Directorate Natural Environment, Marine Ecology and Management, Royal Belgian Institute of Natural Sciences, 3de en 23ste Linieregimentsplein, 8400, Ostend, Belgium

    J. Haelters & S. Degraer

  2. Operational Directorate Natural Environment, Marine Ecology and Management, Royal Belgian Institute of Natural Sciences, Gulledelle 100, 1200, Brussels, Belgium

    V. Dulière, L. Vigin & S. Degraer

Authors
  1. J. Haelters
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. V. Dulière
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. L. Vigin
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  4. S. Degraer
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to J. Haelters.

Additional information

Guest editors: Steven Degraer, Jennifer Dannheim, Andrew B. Gill, Han Lindeboom & Dan Wilhelmsson / Environmental impacts of offshore wind farms

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Haelters, J., Dulière, V., Vigin, L. et al. Towards a numerical model to simulate the observed displacement of harbour porpoises Phocoena phocoena due to pile driving in Belgian waters. Hydrobiologia 756, 105–116 (2015). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10750-014-2138-4

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10750-014-2138-4

Keywords

Search

Navigation