Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

From first reports to successful control: a plea for improved management of alien aquatic plant species in Germany

  • PLANTS IN HYDROSYSTEMS
  • Review Paper
  • Published:
Hydrobiologia Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Alien aquatic plant species can strongly affect all types of freshwater ecosystems. Their number has more than doubled between 1980 and 2009 in Germany, and currently 27 are known and their number is still increasing. Eleven have been classified as invasive, but only four are managed yet, mainly by weed cutting. Most of the alien aquatic plant species were probably introduced as aquarium and pond waste. Despite this fact, 18 of the 27 known alien species are traded as ornamentals for aquaria or garden ponds in German shops. Alien species can most successfully be controlled when their management starts as soon as possible after their introduction. In Germany, the delay between first records and start of management actions seems too long for successful control. The public awareness of alien aquatic plants and problems they can cause in Germany is still limited despite a number of recent projects. At present, Black lists are developed that help nature conservationists, stakeholders and politicians to select those alien species for which prevention measures should be implemented. These, however, are not legally binding and laws regulating trade in Black listed plant species are strongly needed to reduce their impact on the environment and economy.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1
Fig. 2

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Alberternst, B., S. Nawrath & F. Klingenstein, 2006. Biologie, Verbreitung und Einschleppungswege von Ambrosia artemisiifolia in Deutschland und Bewertung aus Naturschutzsicht. Nachrichtenblatt des Deutschen Pflanzenschutzdienstes 58: 279–285.

    Google Scholar 

  • BfN (Bundesamt für Naturschutz), 2012. Daten zur Natur 2012. Landwirtschaftsverlag, Münster.

  • Brundu, G., A. Stinca, L. Angius, G. Bonanomi, L. Celesti-Grapow, G. D’Auria, R. Griffo, A. Migliozzi, R. Motti & P. Spigno, 2012. Pistia stratiotes L. and Eichhornia crassipes (Mart.) Solms.: emerging invasive alien hydrophytes in Campania and Sardinia (Italy). EPPO Bulletin 42: 568–597.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Brunel, S., 2009. Pathway analysis: aquatic plants imported in 10 EPPO countries. EPPO Bulletin 39: 201–213.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • CBD, 2002. Alien species that threaten ecosystems, habitats or species. COP 6 Decision VI/23. http://www.cbd.int/decision/cop/?id=7197.

  • Champion, P. D., J. S. Clayton & D. E. Hofstra, 2010. Nipping aquatic plant invasion in the bud: weed risk assessment and the trade. Hydrobiologia 656: 167–172.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cook, C. D. K., 1985. Range extensions of aquatic vascular plant species. Journal of Aquatic Plant Management 23: 1–6.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dahl, Å., S. O. Standhede & J. Å. Wihl, 1999. Ragweed: an allergy risk in Sweden? Aerobiologia 15: 293–297.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • EPPO, 2006. Hydrocotyle ranunculoides. EPPO Bulletin 36: 3–6.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Essl, F., S. Nehring, F. Klingenstein, N. Milasowszky, C. Nowack & W. Rabitsch, 2011. Review of risk assessment systems of IAS in Europe and introducing the German-Austrian black list information system (GABLIS). Journal for Nature Conservation 19: 339–350.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • European Environment Agency, 2012. The impact of invasive alien species in Europe. EEA Technical Report 16/2012, Copenhagen.

  • Hilt, S., E. M. Gross, M. Hupfer, H. Morscheid, J. Mählmann, A. Melzer, J. Poltz, S. Sandrock, E. M. Scharf, S. Schneider & K. Van de Weyer, 2006. Restoration of submerged vegetation in shallow eutrophic lakes: guideline and state of the art in Germany. Limnologica 36: 155–171.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Hussner, A., 2011. Grundlagen für pflanzengesundheitliche Maßnahmen gegen invasive Arten: Untersuchung zur möglichen Ausrottung von Ludwigia grandiflora in Ostfriesland. Gutachten im Auftrag des Julius-Kühn-Instituts, Braunschweig, 27 S., unpublished.

  • Hussner, A., 2012. Alien aquatic plants in European countries. Weed Research 52: 397–406.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hussner, A. & T. Krause, 2007. Zur Biologie des aquatischen Neophyten Myriophyllum heterophyllum Michaux in Düsseldorfer Stadtgewässern. Acta Biologica Benrodis 14: 67–76.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hussner, A. & S. Heiligtag, 2013. Pistia stratiotes L. (Araceae), die Muschelblume, im Gebiet der unteren Erft/Nordrhein-Westfalen: Ausbreitungstendenz und Problempotenzial. Veröffentlichungen des Bochumer Botanischen Vereins 5: 1–6.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hussner, A., K. van de Weyer, E. M. Gross & S. Hilt, 2010. Comments on increasing number and abundance of non indigenous aquatic macrophyte species in Germany. Weed Research 50: 519–526.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kaiser, B. A. & K. M. Burnett, 2010. Spatial economic analysis of early detection and rapid response strategies for an invasive species. Resource and Energy Economics 32: 566–585.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Les, D. H. & L. J. Mehrhoff, 1999. Introduction of non-indigenous aquatic vascular plants in southern New England: a historical perspective. Biological Invasions 1: 281–300.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Nehring, S. & F. Klingenstein, 2008. Aquatic alien species in Germany: listing system and options for action. Neobiota 7: 19–33.

    Google Scholar 

  • Nehring, S. & D. Kolthoff, 2011. The invasive water primrose Ludwigia grandiflora (Michaux) Greuter & Burdet (Spermatophyta: Onagraceae) in Germany: first record and ecological risk assessment. Aquatic Invasions 6: 83–89.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Nehring, S., I. Kowarik, W. Rabitsch & F. Essl (eds.), 2013. Naturschutzfachliche Invasivitätsbewertungen für gebietsfremde Gefäßpflanzenarten in Deutschland. BfN-Skripten 352: 202 pp.

  • Newman, J. R. & F. H. Dawson, 1999. Ecology, distribution and chemical control of Hydrocotyle ranunculoides in the UK. Hydrobiologia 415: 295–298.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Podraza, P. & H. Knotte, 2010. Massenentwicklung von Elodea: Diskussion der Möglichkeiten zur Bestandsregulierung am Beispiel der Ruhrstauseen. Korrespondenz Wasserwirtschaft 6: 286–293.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pot, R., 2003. Invasion and management of Floating Pennywort (Hydrocotyle ranunculoides L.f.) and some other alien species in the Netherlands. In Caffrey, J. M., A. Dutartre, J. Haury, K. M. Murphy & P. M. Wade (eds), Proceedings of the 11 EWRS International Symposium on Aquatic Weeds, 435–438. Moliets et Maa, France.

  • Rabitsch, W., S. Gollasch, M. Isermann, U. Starfinger & S. Nehring, 2013. Erstellung einer Warnliste in Deutschland noch nicht vorkommender invasiver Tiere und Pflanzen. BfN-Skripten 331: 154 pp.

  • Šajna, N., M. Haler, S. Skarnik & M. Kaligaric, 2007. Survival and expansion of Pistia stratiotes in a thermal stream of Slovenia. Aquatic Botany 87: 75–79.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Santamaria, L., 2002. Why are most aquatic plants widely distributed? Dispersal, clonal growth and small-scale heterogeneity in a stressful environment. Acta Oecologia 23: 137–154.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Shaw, J. D., J. R. U. Wilson & D. M. Richardson, 2010. Initiating dialogue between scientists and managers of biological invasions. Biological Invasions 12: 4077–4083.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sheppard, A. W., R. H. Shaw & R. Sforza, 2006. Top 20 environmental weeds for classical biological control in Europe: a review of opportunities, regulations and other barriers to adoption. Weed Research 46: 93–117.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Stiers, I., N. Crohain, G. Josens & L. Triest, 2011. Impact of three aquatic invasive species on native plants and macroinvertebrates in temperate ponds. Biological Invasions 13: 2715–2726.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Vila, M., C. Basnou, P. Pysek, M. Josefsson, P. Genovesi, S. Gollasch, W. Nentwig, S. Olenin, A. Roque, D. Roy, P. E. Hulme, et al., 2009. How well do we understood the impacts of alien species on ecosystem services? A pan-European, cross-taxa assessment frontiers in ecology and the environment 8: 135–144.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wittenberg, R. (ed.), 2005. An Inventory of Alien Species and Their Threat to Biodiversity and Economy in Switzerland. CABI Bioscience Switzerland Centre Report to the Swiss Agency for Environment, Forests and Landscape. The Environment in Practice no. 0629. Federal Office for the Environment, Bern: 155 pp.

    Google Scholar 

  • Zentralverband Gartenbau e.V., 2008. Umgang mit invasiven Arten: Empfehlungen für Gärtner, Planer und Verwender.

Download references

Acknowledgments

We heartily thank L. Pavlovic (Toronto, Canada) for a critical language check.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Andreas Hussner.

Additional information

Guest editors: M. T. Ferreira, M. O’Hare, K. Szoszkiewicz & S. Hellsten / Plants in Hydrosystems: From Functional Ecology to Weed Research

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Hussner, A., Nehring, S. & Hilt, S. From first reports to successful control: a plea for improved management of alien aquatic plant species in Germany. Hydrobiologia 737, 321–331 (2014). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10750-013-1757-5

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10750-013-1757-5

Keywords

Navigation