Skip to main content
Log in

The WISER way of organising ecological data from European rivers, lakes, transitional and coastal waters

  • WATER BODIES IN EUROPE
  • Published:
Hydrobiologia Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The implementation of the Water Framework Directive has required intense research in applied aquatic ecology in Europe, and thus created challenges for data management in international research projects. In the project Waterbodies in Europe: Integrative Systems to assess Ecological status and Recovery (WISER), biological and environmental data from rivers, lakes, transitional and coastal waters in 26 European countries were collated. More than one million records of biological observations were stored in the project’s central database, representing phytoplankton, macrophytes, macroalgae, angiosperms, phytobenthos, invertebrates and fish. The central database includes new data from the WISER field campaign in lakes and transitional/coastal waters during 2009–2010 (more than 6,000 biological samples from 58 waterbodies in 14 countries). The purpose of this paper is to provide an overview of the data collated within WISER, in order to facilitate future re-use of these data by other scientists. More specifically, the objectives are to (1) describe the data management in WISER, (2) describe the structure and content of the WISER central database and (3) share experiences and give recommendations for data management in large ecological research projects.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Alvarez, M. C., A. Franco, R. Pérez-Domínguez & M. Elliott, 2012. Sensitivity analysis to explore responsiveness and dynamic range of multimetric fish-based indices for assessing the ecological status of estuaries and lagoons. Hydrobiologia. doi:10.1007/s10750-012-1314-7.

  • Angeler, D. G., R. K. Johnson, S. J. Moe & D. Hering, 2012. Cross-taxon responses to stress gradients in streams and lakes. Report and manuscript on the use of BQEs, habitats and ecosystems for detecting human-induced change WISER deliverable 6(3–2): 39.

    Google Scholar 

  • Argillier, C., S. Caussé, M. Gevrey, S. Pédron, J. D. Bortoli, S. Brucet, M. Emmrich, E. Jeppesen, T. Lauridsen, T. Mehner, M. Olin, M. Rask, P. Volta, I. J. Winfield, F. Kelly, T. Krause, A. Palm & K. Holmgren, 2012. Development of a fish-based index to assess the eutrophication status of European lakes. Hydrobiologia. doi:10.1007/s10750-012-1282-y.

  • Balsby, T. J. S., J. Carstensen & D. Krause-Jensen, 2012. Sources of uncertainty in estimation of eelgrass depth limits. Hydrobiologia, this issue.

  • Beier, U., E. Degerman, A. Melcher, C. Rogers & H. Wirlöf, 2007. Processes of collating a European fisheries database to meet the objectives of the European Union Water Framework Directive. Fisheries Management and Ecology 14: 407–416.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Beniston, M., M. Stoffel, R. Harding, M. Kernan, R. Ludwig, E. Moors, P. Samuels & K. Tockner, 2012. Obstacles to data access for research related to climate and water: implications for science and EU policy-making. Environmental Science & Policy 17: 41–48.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Birk, S., W. Bonne, A. Borja, S. Brucet, A. Courrat, S. Poikane, A. Solimini, W. van de Bund, N. Zampoukas & D. Hering, 2012. Three hundred ways to assess Europe’s surface waters: an almost complete overview of biological methods to implement the Water Framework Directive. Ecological Indicators 18: 31–41.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Borja, A., M. Elliott, P. Henriksen & N. Marbà, 2012. Transitional and coastal waters ecological status assessment: advances and challenges resulting from implementing the European Water Framework Directive. Hydrobiologia. doi:10.1007/s10750-012-1276-9.

  • Borja, A., E. Barbone, A. Basset, G. Borgersen, M. Brkljacic, M. Elliott, J. M. Garmendia, J. C. Marques, K. Mazik, I. Muxika, J. M. Neto, K. Norling, J. G. Rodríguez, I. Rosati, B. Rygg, H. Teixeira & A. Trayanova, 2011. Response of single benthic metrics and multi-metric methods to anthropogenic pressure gradients, in five distinct European coastal and transitional ecosystems. Marine Pollution Bulletin 62: 499–513.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Caroni, R., W. van de Bund, R.T. Clarke & R.K. Johnson, 2012. Combination of multiple biological quality elements into waterbody assessment of surface waters. Hydrobiologia. doi:10.1007/s10750-012-1274-y.

  • Carvalho, L., S. Poikane, A. L. Solheim, G. Phillips, G. Borics, J. Catalan, C. d. Hoyos, S. Drakare, B. Dudley, M. Jarvinen, C. Laplace-Treyture, K. Maileht, C. McDonald, U. Mischke, J. Moe, G. Morabito, P. Nõges, T. Nõges, I. Ott, A. Pasztaleniec, B. Skjelbred & S. Thackeray, 2012. Strength and uncertainty of lake phytoplankton metrics for assessing eutrophication impacts in lakes. Hydrobiologia. doi:10.1007/s10750-012-1344-1.

  • Clarke, R., 2012. Estimating confidence of European WFD ecological status class and WISER Bioassessment Uncertainty Guidance Software (WISERBUGS). Hydrobiologia. doi:10.1007/s10750-012-1245-3.

  • Costello, M. J., 2009. Motivating online publication of data. BioScience 59: 418–427.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dahm, V., D. Hering, D. Nemitz, W. Graf, A. Schmidt-Kloiber, P. Leitner, A. Melcher & C. K. Feld, 2012. Effects of physico-chemistry, land use and hydromorphology on three riverine organism groups: a comparative analysis with monitoring data from Germany and Austria. Hydrobiologia, this issue.

  • Dromph, K., S. Agusti, A. Basset, J. Franco, P. Henriksen, J. Icely, S. Lehtinen, S. Moncheva, M. Revilla, K. Sørensen & L. Roselli, 2012. Sources of uncertainty in assessment of marine phytoplankton communities. Hydrobiologia. doi:10.1007/s10750-012-1353-0.

  • Dudley, B., J. Moe, A. Schmidt-Kloiber & L. Carvalho, 2012a. Extraction of data from WISER databases. Paper Presented at the Current Questions in Water Management Book of Abstracts to the WISER Final Conference, Tallinn, Estonia, 25–26 January 2012.

  • Dudley, B. J., M. Dunbar, E. Penning, A. Kolada, S. Hellsten, A. Oggioni, V. Bertrin, F. Ecke & M. Søndergaard, 2012b. Measurements of uncertainty in macrophyte metrics used to assess European lake water quality. Hydrobiologia. doi:10.1007/s10750-012-1338-z.

  • European Commission, 2000. Directive 2000/60/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council of 23 October 2000 establishing a framework for Community action in the field of water policy Official Journal of the European Communities L 327. vol Official Journal of the European Communities, 72.

  • Feld, C. K., S. Birk, D. C. Bradley, D. Hering, J. Kail, A. Marzin, A. Melcher, D. Nemitz, M. L. Petersen, F. Pletterbauer, D. Pont, P. F. M. Verdonschot & N. Friberg, 2011. From natural to degraded rivers and back again: a test of restoration ecology theory and practice. Advances in Ecological Research 44: 119–209.

    Google Scholar 

  • Furse, M., D. Hering, O. Moog, P. Verdonschot, R. Johnson, K. Brabec, K. Gritzalis, A. Buffagni, P. Pinto, N. Friberg, J. Murray-Bligh, J. Kokes, R. Alber, P. Usseglio-Polatera, P. Haase, R. Sweeting, B. Bis, K. Szoszkiewicz, H. Soszka, G. Springe, F. Sporka & I. Krno, 2006. The STAR project: context, objectives and approaches. Hydrobiologia 566: 3–32.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Haase, P., D. Hering, S. C. Jähnig, A. W. Lorenz & A. Sundermann, 2012. The impact of hydromorphological restoration on river ecological status: a comparison of fish, benthic invertebrates, and macrophytes. Hydrobiologia. doi:10.1007/s10750-012-1255-1.

  • Hering, D., A. Borja, L. Carvalho & C. K. Feld, 2012. Assessment and recovery of European water bodies: key messages from the WISER project. Hydrobiologia, this issue.

  • Järvinen, M., S. Drakare, G. Free, A. Lyche-Solheim, G. Phillips, B. Skjelbred & U. Mischke, 2012. Phytoplankton indicator taxa for reference conditions in lowland Northern and Central European lakes. Hydrobiologia. doi:10.1007/s10750-012-1315-6.

  • Karus, K. & T. Feldmann, 2012. Factors influencing macrophyte metrics in Estonian coastal lakes in the light of ecological status assessment. Hydrobiologia. doi:10.1007/s10750-012-1300-0.

  • Maileht, K., T. Nõges, P. Nõges, O. Ingmar, U. Mischke, L. Carvalho & B. Dudley, 2012. Water colour, phosphorus and alkalinity are the major determinants of the dominant phytoplankton species in European lakes. Hydrobiologia. doi:10.1007/s10750-012-1348-x.

  • Marbà, N., D. Krause-Jensen, T. Alcoverro, S. Birk, A. Pedersen, J. M. Neto, S. Orfanidis, J. M. Garmendia, I. Muxika, A. Borja, K. Dencheva & C. M. Duarte, 2012. Diversity of European seagrass indicators: patterns within and across regions. Hydrobiologia, this issue.

  • Mascaró, O., T. Alcoverro, K. Dencheva, D. Krause-Jensen, N. Marbà, J. Neto, V. Nikolic, S. Orfanidis & A. Pedersen, 2012. Exploring the robustness of the main macrophyte-based indices developed to assess the ecological status of coastal ecosystems under the Water Framework Directive: an uncertainty analysis. Hydrobiologia, this issue.

  • Mjelde, M., S. Hellsten & F. Ecke, 2012. Developing av water level regulation index for aquatic macrophytes in Nordic lakes. Hydrobiologia. doi:10.1007/s10750-012-1323-6.

  • Moe, S. J., B. Dudley & R. Ptacnik, 2008. REBECCA databases: experiences from compilation and analyses of monitoring data from 5,000 lakes in 20 European countries. Aquatic Ecology 42: 183–201.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Phillips, G., A. Lyche Solheim, B. Skjelbred, U. Mischke, S. Drakare, G. Free, M. Järvinen, C. de Hoyos, G. Morabito, S. Poikane & L. Carvalho, 2012. A phytoplankton trophic index to assess the status of lakes for the Water Framework Directive. Hydrobiologia, this issue.

  • Refsgaard, J. C., L. F. Jørgensen & A. L. Højberg, 2007. Data availability and accessibility. State of the art on existing data required for modelling for research purposes and for the implementation of the Water Framework Directive. Geological Survey of Denmark and Greenland, Copenhagen.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schmidt-Kloiber, A. & D. Hering, 2012. www.freshwaterecology.info - the taxa and autecology database for freshwater organisms, version 5.0. In. http://www.freshwaterecology.info/. Accessed 4 April 2012.

  • Schmidt-Kloiber, A., S. J. Moe, B. J. Dudley, J. Strackbein & R. Vogl, 2012. The WISER metadatabase: the key to more than 100 ecological datasets from European rivers, lakes and coastal waters. Hydrobiologia. doi:10.1007/s10750-012-1295-6.

  • Solheim, A. L., 2012. Comparison of different biological quality elements for assessment of ecological status in lakes. Hydrobiologia, this issue.

Download references

Acknowledgments

We thank Roar Brænden, Jan Karud, Jörg Strackbein and Robert Vogl for constructive discussions and technical advice. All WP data managers (Table 1) are acknowledged for collaboration and delivery of data to the central database. The WISER project was funded by the European Union under the 7th Framework Programme, Theme 6 (Environment including Climate Change), contract no. 226273. We thank Christian Feld, Laurence Carvalho and two anonymous reviewers for helpful comments to the manuscript.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to S. Jannicke Moe.

Additional information

Guest editors: C. K. Feld, A. Borja, L. Carvalho & D. Hering / Water bodies in Europe: integrative systems to assess ecological status and recovery

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Moe, S.J., Schmidt-Kloiber, A., Dudley, B.J. et al. The WISER way of organising ecological data from European rivers, lakes, transitional and coastal waters. Hydrobiologia 704, 11–28 (2013). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10750-012-1337-0

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10750-012-1337-0

Keywords

Navigation