Beauchamp, G., 2003. Group-size effects on vigilance: a search for the mechanisms. Behavioural Processes 63: 111–121.PubMedCrossRef
Bednekoff, P. A., 2003. Testing explanations of the group size effect on vigilance: let’s be direct. Behavioural Processes 63: 135–136.PubMedCrossRef
Bednekoff, P. A. & S. L. Lima, 1998. Randomness, chaos and confusion in the study of antipredator vigilance. Trends in Ecology and Evolution 13: 284–287.PubMedCrossRef
Bertram, B. C. R., 1980. Vigilance and group size in ostriches. Animal Behaviour 28: 278–286.CrossRef
Booth, D. J., 1995. Juvenile groups in a coral-reef damselfish: density-dependent effects on individual fitness and population demography. Ecology 76: 91–106.CrossRef
Brooks, J. L. & S. I. Dodson, 1965. Predation, body size and composition of plankton. Science 150: 28–35.PubMedCrossRef
Clark, C. W. & D. A. Levy, 1988. Diel vertical migrations by juvenile sockeye salmon and the antipredation window. American Naturalist 131: 271–290.CrossRef
Dodson, S. I., 1989. Predator-induced reaction norms. Bioscience 39: 447–452.CrossRef
Elgar, M. A., 1989. Predator vigilance and group size in mammals and birds: a critical review of the empirical evidence. Biological Reviews of the Cambridge Philosophical Society (London) 64: 13–33.CrossRef
Forrester, G. E., 1990. Factors influencing the juvenile demography of a coral reef fish. Ecology 71: 1666–1681.CrossRef
Foster, W. A. & J. E. Treherne, 1981. Evidence for the dilution effect in the selfish herd from fish predation on a marine insect. Nature 296: 466–467.CrossRef
George, D. G. & R. W. Edwards, 1973. Daphnia
distribution within Langmuir circulations. Limnology and Oceanography 18: 798–800.CrossRef
Gliwicz, Z. M., 1986. A lunar cycle in zooplankton. Ecology 67: 882–897.CrossRef
Gliwicz, Z. M., 2003. Between Hazards of Starvation and Risk of Predation: The Ecology of Offshore Animals. International Ecology Institute, Oldendorf/Luhe: 379.
Gliwicz, Z. M. & A. Jachner, 1992. Diel migrations of juvenile fish: a ghost of predation past or present? Archive für Hydrobiologie 124: 385–430.
Gliwicz, Z. M. & D. Wrzosek, 2008. Predation-mediated coexistence of large- and small-bodied Daphnia
at different food levels. American Naturalist 172: 358–374.PubMedCrossRef
Gliwicz, Z. M., P. Dawidowicz, A. Jachner & W. Lampert, 2001. Roach habitat shifts and foraging modified by alarm substance. 2. Reasons for different responses of fish in field and laboratory. Archiv für Hydrobiologie 150: 377–392.
Gliwicz, Z. M., J. Slon & I. Szynkarczyk, 2006. Trading safety for food: evidence from gut contents in roach and bleak captured at different distances offshore from their daytime littoral refuge. Freshwater Biology 51: 823–839.CrossRef
Gliwicz, Z. M., E. Szymanska & D. Wrzosek, 2010. Body size distribution in Daphnia
populations as an effect of prey selectivity by planktivorous fish. Hydrobiologia 643: 5–19.CrossRef
Grand, T. C. & L. M. Dill, 1999. The effect of group size on the foraging behavior of juvenile coho salmon: reduction of predation risk or increased competition? Animal Behavior 58: 443–451.CrossRef
Havel, J. E. & S. I. Dodson, 1984. Chaoborus
predation on typical and spine morphs of Daphnia pulex
: behavioral observations. Limnology and Oceanography 29: 487–494.CrossRef
Isaacson, A. J. & N. J. Westwood, 1971. The significance of gregarious feeding behaviour and adrenal stress in a population of wood-pigeons, Columba palumbus. Journal of Zoology (London) 165: 53–84.
Jachner, A., 1996. Alarm reaction in bleak (Alburnus alburnus
(L)) in response to chemical stimuli from injured conspecifics. Hydrobiologia 325: 151–155.CrossRef
Jachner, A. & T. Janecki, 1999. Feeding and growth response of roach, Rutilus rutilus
, to alarm substance. Environmental Biology of Fishes 54: 433–437.CrossRef
Johnsson, J. I., 2003. Group size influences foraging effort independent of predation risk: an experimental study on rainbow trout. Journal of Fish Biology 63: 863–870.CrossRef
Krebs, J. R., 1974. Colonial nesting and social feeding as strategies for exploiting food resources in the Great Blue Heron (Ardea
). Behaviour 51: 99–134.CrossRef
Krebs, J. R. & N. B. Davies, 1993. An Introduction to Behavioural Ecology, 3rd ed. Blackwell Science, Oxford: 420.
Krebs, J. R. & N. B. Davies, 1997. Behavioural Ecology: An Evolutionary Approach. Blackwell Science, Oxford: 446.
Krebs, J. R., M. H. MacRoberts & J. M. Cullen, 1972. Flocking and feeding in the great tit Parus major
: an experimental study. Ibis 114: 507–530.CrossRef
Krueger, D. A. & S. I. Dodson, 1981. Embryological induction and predation ecology of Daphnia pulex
. Limnology and Oceanography 26: 212–223.CrossRef
Lampert, W. & C. J. Loose, 1992. Plankton towers: bridging the gap between laboratory and field experiments. Archiv fűr Hydrobiologie 126: 53–66.
Lima, S. L., 1998. Stress and decision making under the risk of predation: developments from behavioral, reproductive, and ecological perspectives. In Møller, A. P., M. Milinski & P. J. B. Slater (eds), Stress and Behavior. Advances in the Study of Behavior, Vol. 27. Academic Press, San Diego: 215–290.
Lima, S. L., P. A. Zollner & P. A. Bednekoff, 1999. Predation, scramble competition, and the vigilance group size effect in dark-eyed juncos (Junco hyemalis
). Behavioral Ecology and Sociobiology 46: 110–116.CrossRef
Magurran, A. E., 1989. Acquired recognition of predator odour in the European minnow (Phoxinus phoxinus
). Ethology 82: 216–223.CrossRef
Magurran, A. E., W. J. Oulton & T. J. Pitcher, 1985. Vigilant behaviour and school size in minnows. Zeitschrift fur Tierpsychologie 67: 167–178.CrossRef
McNamara, J. M. & A. I. Houston, 1985. Optimal foraging and learning. Journal of Theoretical Biology 117: 231–249.CrossRef
McNaught, D. C. & A. D. Hasler, 1961. Surface schooling and feeding behavior in the white bass, Roccus chrysops
(Rafinesque), in Lake Mendota. Limnology and Oceanography 6: 53–60.CrossRef
Milinski, M. & R. Heller, 1978. Influence of a predator on the optimal foraging behaviour of sticklebacks (Gasterosteus aculeatus
L.). Nature 275: 642–644.CrossRef
Neill, S. R. & J. M. Cullen, 1974. Experiments on whether schooling by their prey affects the hunting behaviour of cephalopods and fish predators. Journal of Zoology (London) 172: 549–569.CrossRef
O’Brien, W. J., 1987. Planktivory by freshwater fish: thrust and parry in the pelagia. In Kerfoot, W. C. & A. Sih (eds), Predation: Direct and Indirect Impacts on Aquatic Communities. University Press of New England, Hanover and London: 5–16.
O’Brien, W. J., N. A. Slade & G. L. Viniard, 1976. Apparent size as the determinant of prey selection by bluegill sunfish (Lepomis macrochirus
). Ecology 57: 1304–1310.CrossRef
Pitcher, T. J., 1986. The function of schooling behaviour in teleosts. In Pitcher, T. J. (ed.), The Behaviour of Teleost Fishes. The John Hopkins University Press, Baltimore, Maryland: 294–337.
Pitcher, T. J. & J. K. Parrish, 1993. Functions of shoaling behaviour in teleosts. In Pitcher, T. J. (ed.), Behaviour of Teleost Fishes. Chapman & Hall, London: 363–439.
Pitcher, T. J., A. E. Magurran & T. J. Winfield, 1982. Fish in larger shoals find food faster. Behavioral Ecology and Sociobiology 10: 149–151.CrossRef
Rygielska-Szymanska, E., 2009. Size distribution and age structure of a Daphnia population as an effect of size-selective predation by planktivorous fishes. PhD Thesis, University of Warsaw (in Polish, English summary).
Smith, P. C. & P. R. Evans, 1973. Studies of shorebirds at Lindisfarne, Northumberland. I. Feeding ecology and behaviour of the bar-tailed godwit. Wildfowl 24: I35–I39.
White, J. W. & R. R. Warner, 2007. Behavioral and energetic costs of group membership in a coral reef fish. Oecologia 154: 423–433.PubMedCrossRef
Winfield, I. J., 1990. Predation pressure from above: observations on the activities of piscivorous birds at a shallow eutrophic lake. Hydrobiologia 191: 223–231.CrossRef