Skip to main content
Log in

Modernity and Evil: Kurt H. Wolff’s Sociology and the Diagnosis of Our Time

  • Theoretical / Philosophical Paper
  • Published:
Human Studies Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Can sociology comprehend evil? The contemporary relevance of Kurt H. Wolff’s sociology is his lucid, critical vision of modernity which does not shy away from understanding what evil is. This is accompanied not by pessimism, but by trust in human beings and their positive ability to appeal to the moral conscience. Read today, Wolff’s pages must be placed in the category of a new understanding of the human subject and the diagnosis of our time, the request for which threads in and out of contemporary social theory. Awareness of history, rejection of sociological nominalism, emphasis upon the role of the human subject in an unprecedented situation: in Wolff, these themes converge and invite us to open ourselves to the re-enchantment of the world. After describing with some detail the main concepts of Wolff’s sociological theory and phenomenological approach, the paper suggests a reading of the re-enchantment of the world in terms of a sociological confrontation with evil, which has all too often been bypassed by sociology. We cannot grasp the evildoer's motivations from the perspective of an autonomous, rationally disengaged and masterful subject which tends to eclipse emotive and embodied senses of selfhood. By suspending the taken-for-granted definitions which exist in mainstream literature, by making an excruciating effort in looking at or reading detailed descriptions of evildoing, by assuming the victim’s suffering as part of our sociological explanation, we can start understanding what evil is today and in what way it is connected to modernity.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

Notes

  1. The most important of these were brought together and republished in Wolff (1974), Part IV, Sociology of Knowledge.

  2. Until the middle of the 1980s, Wolff used the male noun “man” as a neutral covering the two genders. Here I prefer to use the phrase “the human”. I agree with the observation of R. Brague according to whom it is the adjective “human” (more than the noun) which defines human beings for what they are (Brague 2013: 41). In other cases, I also use the phrase “the person, the human subject”.

  3. In his essay of 1948 this effort of Wolff is so evident that we are led to ask whether it was not influenced by the climate of the American sociology of the time, a sociology that had greatly moved towards the development of quantitative methods and the quest for objectivity. For an excellent discussion of these subjects see Bannister (1987).

  4. It is no chance that Wolff himself was fond of drawing. Art was not only an intellectual interest (Wolff 1985, 1991), but a daily activity which he performed with a very ironic style. Some of his drawings are featured as book covers (Wolff 1989, 1991), and many were offered as presents to friends and students.

  5. The author recalls the work of Comte, Marx, Durkheim, Mannheim and Wright Mills; he also refers to two studies published in 1984: Henry Greenspan’s interviews with Holocaust survivors (Greenspan 1984) and Roger Tulin’s participant observation on the lives of skilled workers in small factories (Tulin 1984; see Wolff 1991: 5f.).

  6. Surrender-and-catch is one of the principal topics of Wolff’s work. It is an original notion which benefits from his very many lines of analysis: the human-studies conception of sociology, the phenomenological approach, and the approach to unprecedented situations. For a survey, I refer the reader first of all to the original work (Wolff 1976) and to critical comments. For example Heller (1980), Mackie (1981), Zaner (1981), Backhaus (2003).

References

  • Alexander, J. (2001). Toward a sociology of evil: getting beyond modernist common sense about the alternative to “the good”. In M. P. Lara (Ed.), Rethinking evil contemporary perspectives (pp. 153–172). Berkeley-Los Angeles: University of California Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Allen, B. (1996). Rape warfare. The hidden genocide in Bosnia-Herzegovina and Croatia. Minneapolis-London: University of Minnesota Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Axel, B. K. (2001). The Nation’s tortured body. Violence, representation and the formation of the Sikh ‘Diaspora’. Durham and London: Duke University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Backhaus, G. (2003). Vindication of the human and social science of Kurt H. Wolff. Human Studies, 26(3), 309–335.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bannister, R. C. (1987). Sociology and scientism. The American quest for objectivity, 1880–1940. Chapel Hill and London: The University of North Carolina Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Baron-Cohen, S. (2011). The science of evil. On empathy and the origins of cruelty. New York: Basic Books.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bauman, Z. (1989). Modernity and the holocaust. Cambridge: Polity Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Benhabib, S. (2002). The claims of culture. Equality and diversity in the global era. Princeton: Princeton University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Brague, R. (2013). Le propre de l’homme. Sur une légitimité menacée [What pertains to the human. On a menaced legitimacy]. Paris: Flammarion.

  • Corradi, C. (2007). Il corpo della donna come luogo della guerra [Women’s body as a place of war]. Difesa sociale, 86(2), 5–17.

  • Das, V., Kleinman, A., Ramphele, M., & Reynolds, P. (Eds.). (1997). Violence and subjectivity. Berkeley-Los Angeles: University of California Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gambetta, D. (Ed.). (2005). Making sense of suicide missions. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gourevitch, Ph. (1998). We wish to inform you that tomorrow we will be dead with our families. Stories from Rwanda. New York: Picador.

    Google Scholar 

  • Greenspan, H. (1984). Who can retell? On the recounting of life history by Holocaust survivors. Brandeis University. Ph.D. dissertation.

  • Heller, A. (1980). The existential sociology of Kurt H. Wolff: A study of the categories of surrender and catch. The Philosophical ForumI, 12(1), 82–94.

    Google Scholar 

  • Holmes, S. (2005) ‘Al-Qaeda, September 11, 2001’, in Gambetta (2005).

  • Hopgood, S. (2005) ‘Tamil Tigers, 1987–2002’, in Gambetta (2005).

  • Imber, J. (1996). The vocation of Kurt H. Wolff: Reflections on critical subjectivity in sociology. Human Studies, 19(3), 337–342.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kristeva, J. (1980). Pouvoirs de l’horreur. Paris: Seuil.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lagrange, H., & Oberti, M. (2006). (sous la direction de) Émeutes urbaines et protestations. Une singularité française, Paris: Presses de Sciences Po.

  • Lapeyronnie, D. (2006). Révolte primitive dans les banlieues françaises. Essai sur les émeutes de l’automne 2005. Déviance et Société, 30(4), 431–448.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mackie, F. (1981). A sociology of survival? Human Studies, 4(1), 391–396.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Malkki, L. (1995). Purity and exile. Violence, memory, and national cosmology among Hutu refugees in Tanzania. Chicago: The University of Chicago Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Nussbaum, M. (2001a). The fragility of goodness. Luck and ethics in Greek tragedy and philosophy. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Nussbaum, M. (2001b). Upheavals of thoughts. The intelligence of emotions. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Rosati, M. (2008). Evil and collective responsibility: The durkheimian legacy and contemporary debates. In W. S. F. Pickering & M. Rosati (Eds.), Suffering and evil: The durkheimian legacy (pp. 136–147). New York-Oxford: Berghahn Books.

    Google Scholar 

  • Scarry, E. (1985). The body in pain. The making and unmaking of the world. New York-Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Seligman, A. (2000). Modernity’s wager: Authority, the self, and transcendence. Princeton: Princeton University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sen, A. (2006). Identity and violence. The illusion of destiny. New York: W. W. Norton & Co.

    Google Scholar 

  • Taylor, C. (2007). A secular age. Cambridge and London: The Belknap Press of Harvard University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tulin, R. (1984). A Machinist’s semi-automated life. San Pedro, CA: Singlejack Books.

    Google Scholar 

  • Vetlesen, A. J. (2005). Evil and human agency. Understanding collective evildoing. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Wagner-Pacifici, R. (2005). The art of surrender. Decomposing sovereignty at conflict’s end. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wieviorka, M. (2005). La violence. Paris: Hachette.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wolff, K. H. (1935). La sociologia del sapere. Ricerca di una definizione [The sociology of knowledge. Search for a definition]. Degree thesis: University of Florence.

  • Wolff, K. H. (1948). The unique and the general: Toward a philosophy of sociology. Reprinted in Wolff (1974), 487–509.

  • Wolff, K. H. (1950). A preliminary inquiry into the sociology of knowledge from the standpoint of the study of man. Reprinted in Wolff (1974), 510–553.

  • Wolff, K. H. (1956a). Before and after sociology. Reprinted in Wolff (1974), 262–273.

  • Wolff, K. H. (1956b). On Germany and ourselves. Reprinted in Wolff (1974), 128–145.

  • Wolff, K. H. (1961). Exercise in commemoration. Reprinted in Wolff (1974), 115–127.

  • Wolff, K. H. (1965). A Note on morality and society. Reprinted in Wolff (1974), 220–224.

  • Wolff, K. H. (1969). For a sociology of evil. Journal of Social Issues, XXV, 1, 111–125.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wolff, K. H. (Ed.). (1971). From Karl Mannheim. New York: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wolff, K. H. (1973). This is the time for radical anthropology. Reprinted in Wolff (1974), 431–447.

  • Wolff, K. H. (1974). Trying sociology. New York: Wiley.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wolff, K. H. (1976). Surrender and catch. Experience and inquiry today. Dordrecht-Boston: Reidel.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Wolff, K. H. (1978). Phenomenology and sociology. In T. Bottome & R. Nisbet (Eds.), A history of sociological analysis (pp. 499–556). New York: Basic Books.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wolff, K. H. (1985). Art Now? Kairos, 1(4), 72–81.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wolff, K. H. (1986). Exploring relations between surrender-and-catch and poetry, sociology, evil. Human Studies, 9(4), 347–364.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wolff, K. H. (1989). O Loma! constituting a self (1977–1984). Northampton, MA: Hermes House.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wolff, K. H. (1991). Survival and sociology. Vindicating the human subject. New Brunswick-London: Transaction Publishers.

    Google Scholar 

  • Zaner, R. (1981). The disciplining of reason’s cunning: Kurt H. Wolff’s surrender and catch. Human Studies, 4(1), 365–389.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

The author would like to thank two anonymous reviewers and the Villa Vigoni German-Italian Center for European Excellence, which provided support and funding to organize an international seminar on Kurt H. Wolff and existential sociology. In October 2013, an earlier version of this article was presented at the seminar.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Consuelo Corradi.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Corradi, C. Modernity and Evil: Kurt H. Wolff’s Sociology and the Diagnosis of Our Time. Hum Stud 39, 465–480 (2016). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10746-015-9349-1

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10746-015-9349-1

Keywords

Navigation