Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Introduction to the Special Issue: “Ethical Issues in Collecting Interactional Data”

  • Theoretical / Philosophical Paper
  • Published:
Human Studies Aims and scope Submit manuscript

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

References

  • Barton, B. (2011). My auto/ethnographic dilemma: Who owns the story? Qualitative Sociology, 34, 431–445.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bergmann, & Jörg, R. (1998). Introduction: Morality in discourse. Research on Language and Social Interaction, 31(3–4), 279–294.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bernstein, B. (1972). Class, codes and control, Volume l: Theoretical studies toward a sociology of language. London: Routledge and Kegan Paul.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bjelic, D., & Lynch, M. (1992). The work of a (scientific) demonstration: Respecifying Newton’s and Goethe’s theories of prismatic color. In G. Watson & R. Seiler (Eds.), Text in context: Contributions to ethnomethodology (pp. 52–78). London: Sage.

    Google Scholar 

  • Blee, K. M., & Currier, A. (2011). Ethics beyond the IRB: An introductory essay. Qualitative Sociology, 34, 401–413.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Brinkman, S. (2007). The good qualitative researcher. Qualitative Research in Psychology, 4, 127–144.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cavallaro Johnson, G., & Paoletti, I. (2004). Orienting to the category “ordinary—but special” in an Australian-Italian courtship and marriage narrative. Narrative Inquiry, 14(1), 191–218.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cazden, C. J. V., & Hymes, D. (Eds.). (1972). Functions of language in the classroom. New York: Teachers College.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cloke, P., Cooke, P., Cursons, J., Milbourne, P., & Widdowfield, R. (2000). Ethics, reflexivity and research: Encounters with homeless people. Ethics Place and Environment, 3(2), 133–154.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Currier, A. (2011). Representing gender and sexual dissidence in Southern Africa. Qualitative Sociology, 34, 463–481.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Denzin, N. K. (1992). Symbolic interactionism and cultural studies: The politics of interpretation. Oxford: Blackwell.

    Google Scholar 

  • Einwohner, R. L. (2011). Ethical considerations on the use of archived testimonies in Holocaust research: Beyond the IRB exemption. Qualitative Sociology, 34, 415–430.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ellis, C. (2007). Telling secrets, revealing lives. Relational ethics in research with intimate others. Qualitative Inquiry, 13(1), 3–29.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fairclough, N. (1995). Critical discourse analysis: The critical study of language. London: Longman.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fogel, C. (2007). Ethical issues in field-based criminological research in Canada. International Journal of Criminal Justice Sciences, 2(2), 109–118.

    Google Scholar 

  • Garfinkel, H. (1967). Studies in ethnomethodology. Englewood Cliffs: Prentice-Hall.

    Google Scholar 

  • Garfinkel, H. (2002). An ethnomethodological study of the work of Galileo’s inclined plane demonstration of the real motion of free falling bodies. In A. Rawls (Ed.), Ethnomethodology’s program: Working out Durkheim’s aphorism (pp. 263–286). Lanham MD: Rowman & Littlefield.

    Google Scholar 

  • Garfinkel, H., Lynch, M., & Livingston, E. (1981). The work of a discovering science construed with materials from the optically discovered pulsar. Philosophy of the Social Sciences, 11, 131–158.

    Google Scholar 

  • González-López, G. (2011). Mindful ethics: Comments on informant-centered practices in social research. Qualitative Sociology, 34, 447–461.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Goodwin, D., Pope, C., Mort, M., & Smith, A. (2003). Ethics and ethnography: An experiential account. Qualitative Health Research, 13(4), 567–577.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Guillemin, M., & Gillam, L. (2004). Ethics, reflexivity, and “ethically important moments” in research. Qualitative Inquiry, 10(2), 261–280.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Haggerty, K. D. (2004). Ethics creep: Governing social science research in the name of ethics. Qualitative Sociology, 27(4), 391–414.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hedgecoe, A. (2008). Research ethics review and the sociological research relationship. Sociology, 42, 873–886.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hurdley, R. (2010). In the picture or off the wall? Ethical regulation, research habitus, and unpeopled ethnography. Quality Inquiry, 16(6), 517–528.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Irwin, K. (2006). Into the dark hearth of ethnography: The lived ethics and inequality of intimate field relationships. Qualitative Sociology, 29, 155–175.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jayyusi, L. (1984). Categorization and the moral order. London: Routledge & Kegan Paul.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kohler Riessman, C., & Mattingly, C. (2005). Introduction: toward a context-based ethics for social research in health. An International Journal for the Social Study of Health Illness and medicine, 9(4), 427–429.

    Google Scholar 

  • Komesaroff, P. A. (2008). Experiments in love and death: Medicine. Postmodernism, Microethics and the Body. Melbourne: University Press.

  • Liberman, K. (1999). From walkabout to meditation: Craft and ethics in field inquiry. Qualitative Inquiry, 5(1), 47–63.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lynch, M. (1985). Art and artifact in laboratory science. London: Routledge and Kegan Paul.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lynch, Michael. (1993). Scientific practice and ordinary action: ethnomethodology and social studies of science. New York: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Marx, C. (1845). Thesis on Feuerbach. In K. Marx, & F. Engels (Eds.) (1998) The German Ideology (pp. 569–574). New York: Prometheus Book.

  • Maynard, D. W., Freese, J., & Schaeffer, N. C. (2010). Calling for participation: Requests, blocking moves, and rational (inter)action in survey introductions. American Sociological Review, 75, 791–814.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Maynard, D. W., & Schaeffer, N. C. (2002). Opening and closing the gate: The work of optimism in recruiting survey respondents. In D. W. Maynard, H. Houtkoop-Steenstra, N. C. Schaeffer, & J. van der Zouwen (Eds.), Standardization and tacit knowledge. Interaction and practice in the survey interview (pp. 179–205). New York: John Wiley.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mondada, L. (2006). La demande d’autorisation comme moment structurant pour l’enregistrement et l’analyse des pratiques bilingues. Travauxneuchâtelois de linguistique, 43, 129–155.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mueller, J. H. (2004). Research ethics: A tool for harassment in the academic workplace. In K. Westhues (Ed.), Workplace mobbing in academe: Reports from 20 Universities (pp. 290–313) Lewistone. Mellen Press: NY.

    Google Scholar 

  • Murphy, E., & Dingwall, R. (2001). The ethics of ethnography. In P. Atkinson, A. Coffey, S. Delamont, J. Lofland, & L. Lofland (Eds.), Handbook of ethnography (pp. 339–351). London: Sage.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Murphy, E., & Dingwall, R. (2007). Informed consent, anticipatory regulation and ethnographic practice. Social Science and Medicine, 65, 2223–2234.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Nuremberg Code (1949). Reprinted from Trials of War Criminals before the Nuremberg Military Tribunals under Control Council Law No. 10(2), 181-182. Washington, D.C.: U.S. Government Printing Office, 1949. http://ohsr.od.nih.gov/guidelines/nuremberg.html.

  • Paoletti, I. (1998). Handling “incoherence” according to the speaker’s on-sight categorisation. In C. Antaki & S. Widdicombe (Eds.), Identities in talk (pp. 171–190). London: Sage.

    Google Scholar 

  • Paoletti, I. (2001). Membership categorization and time appraisal in interviews with carers of disabled elderly. Human Studies, 24, 293–325.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Paoletti, I. (2002). Caring for older people: a gendered practice. Discourse and society, 13(6), 805–817. Special Issue on Language and Gender.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Paoletti, I., & Cavallaro Johnson, G. (2007). Doing “being ordinary” in an interview narrative with a second generation Italian-Australian woman. In M. Bamberg, A. De Fina, & D. Schiffrin (Eds.), Selves and identities in narrative and discourse (pp. 89–105). Amsterdam/Philadelphia: Benjamins.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Paoletti, I., Tomás, M. I., & Menéndez, F. (2013). Practices of ethics: An empirical approach to ethics in social Sciences research. Newcastle upon Tyne, UK: Cambridge Scholars Publishing.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rupp, L. J., & Taylor, V. (2011). Going back and giving back: The ethics of staying in the field. Qualitative Sociology, 34, 483–496.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Smith, D. (1974). Women’s perspective as a radical critique of sociology. Sociological Inquiry, 4(1), 1–13.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Smith, D. (2005). Institutional ethnography. A sociology for people. Lanham, MD, USA: Alta Mira.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sormani, P., González-Martínez, E., & Bovet, A. (2011). Discovering work: A topical introduction. Ethnographic Studies, 12, 1–11.

    Google Scholar 

  • Speer, S., & Hutchby, I. (2003a). From ethics to analytics: Aspects of participants’ orientations to the presence and relevance of recording devices. Sociology, 37, 315–337.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Speer, S., & Hutchby, I. (2003b). Methodology needs analytics: A rejoinder to Martyn Hammersley. Sociology, 37, 353–359.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Speer, S. A., & Stokoe, E. (2012), Ethics in action: Consent-gaining interactions and implications for research practice. British Journal of Social Psychology. doi:10.1111/bjso.12009.

  • Stein, A. (2010). Sex, truths, and audiotapes: Anonimity and the ethics of exposure in public ethnography. Journal of Contemporary Ethnography, 39, 554–568.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Swauger, M. (2011). Afterword: The ethics of risk, power and representation. Qualitative Sociology, 34, 497–502.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • van den Hoonaard, W. C. (2003). Is anonimity an artifact in ethnographic research? Journal of academic Ethics, 1, 141–151.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • van Dijk, T. A. (1993). Principles of critical discourse analysis. Discourse and Society, 4(2), 249–283.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Vasconcellos Sobrinho, M. (2003). Ethics in social research: Social researchers and their responsibilities in establishing ethical relationships with research respondents, research sponsors and co-researchers. Movendo Idéias, 8(13), 51–58.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wade, J., Donovan, J. L., Lane, J. A., Neal, D. E., & Hamdy, F. C. (2009). It’s not just what you say, it’s also how you say it: Opening the “black box” of informed consent appointments in randomised controlled trials. Social Science and Medicine, 68, 2018–2028.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Widdicombe, S. (1998). ‘But you don’t class yourself’: The interactional management of category membership and non-membership. In C. Antaki & S. Widdicombe (Eds.), Identities in talk (pp. 52–70). Sage: London.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wing, S. (2002). Social responsibility and research ethics in community driven studies of industrialized hog production. Environmental Health Perspectives, 110(5), 437–444.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wodak, R. (2013). Critical discourse analysis. London: Sage.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wood, E. J. (2006). The ethical challenges of field research in conflict zones. Qualitative Sociology, 29(3), 373–386.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Universidade Nova de Lisboa, CLUNL, ID, Av. De Berna 26 C, 1069-061, Lisbon, Portugal

    Isabella Paolettti

Authors
  1. Isabella Paolettti
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Isabella Paolettti.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Paolettti, I. Introduction to the Special Issue: “Ethical Issues in Collecting Interactional Data”. Hum Stud 37, 167–178 (2014). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10746-013-9306-9

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10746-013-9306-9

Keywords

Search

Navigation