Abstract
Shade trees are an integral part of most cocoa growing systems across the world. This study assesses farmers’ local knowledge of shade trees at two locations in Ghana with different climatic conditions and vulnerability to climate change. Akumadan is located in the northern dry part of the cocoa belt representing marginal conditions for cocoa cultivation, whereas Asankragua is located in the southern wet part, more ecologically favorable for cocoa cultivation. Inventories were conducted to assess the abundance of species, their structural characteristics and benefits to cocoa systems. Results show that cocoa farmers have detailed knowledge on the functions of shade trees in cocoa systems and prefer species that provide specific needs according to the location. However, abundance of species in a location does not necessary translate into beneficial impacts on cocoa productivity. In the drier part of the cocoa belt, income diversification through shade trees is an adaptation strategy to the increasingly marginal conditions for cocoa production, which has led to the high proportion of fruit trees among the most abundant species. In contrast, farmers in the southern part of the cocoa belt select shade trees for their high cocoa compatibility. Adaptation strategies for cocoa farmers should therefore promote species that best accommodate farmers’ economic, agronomic and environmental needs.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Albertin A., and Nair P. K. R. (2004). Farmers’ perspectives on the role of shade trees in coffee production systems: an assessment from the Nicoya peninsula, Costa Rica. Human Ecology 32: 443–463.
Anglaaere L. C. N., Cobbina J., Sinclair F. L., and McDonald M. A. (2011). The effect of land use systems on tree diversity: farmer preference and species composition of cocoa-based agroecosystems in Ghana. Agroforestry Systems 81: 249–265.
Asare R. (2005). Cocoa agroforests in West Africa: a look at activities on preferred trees in the farming systems. Forest & landscape working papers no. 6–2005, Forest & Landscape, Denmark, p. 76.
Asare R., and Asare R. A. (2008). A participatory approach for tree diversification in cocoa farms: Ghanaian farmers’ experience. STCP working paper series issue 9, International Institute of Tropical Agriculture, Accra, p. 29.
Asare R., and Raebild A. (2016). Tree diversity and canopy cover in cocoa systems in Ghana. New Forests 47: 287–302.
Asare R., Afari-Sefa V., Osei-Owusu Y., and Pabi O. (2014). Cocoa agroforestry for increasing forest connectivity in a fragmented landscape in Ghana. Agroforestry Systems 88: 1143–1156.
Atkins J. E., and Eastin I. (2012). Seeing the trees: farmer perceptions of indigenous forest trees within the cultivated cocoa landscape. The Forestry Chronicle 88: 535–541.
Aulong S., Duray S., and Temple L. (2000). Dynamics and floristic structure of agroforests including citrus species in Central Cameroon. Fruits 55: 103–114.
Bally, I. S. E. (2006). Mangifera indica (mango). Species profiles for Pacific Island Agroforestry. www.traditionaltree.org.
Beer J., Muschler R., Kass D., and Somarriba E. (1998). Shade management in coffee and cacao plantations. Agroforestry Systems 38: 139–164.
Cerdán C. R., Rebolledo M. C., Soto G., Rapidel B., and Sinclair F. L. (2012). Local knowledge of impacts of tree cover on ecosystem services in smallholder coffee production systems. Agricultural Systems 110: 119–130.
Dawoe E. K., Quashie-Sam J., Isaac M. E., and Oppong S. K. (2012). Exploring farmers’ local knowledge and perceptions of soil fertility and management in the Ashanti Region of Ghana. Geoderma 179–180: 96–103.
Gockowski J., and Sonwa D. (2011). Cocoa intensification scenarios and their predicted impact on CO2 emissions, biodiversity conservation, and rural livelihoods in the Guinea rain forest of West Africa. Environmental Management 48: 307–321.
Gyau A., Smoot K., Kouame C., Diby L., Kahia J., and Ofori D. (2014). Farmer attitudes and intentions towards trees in cocoa (Theobroma cacao L.) farms in Côte d’Ivoire. Agroforestry Systems 88: 1035–1045.
Hawthorne W., and Gyakari N. (2006). Photoguide for the forest trees of Ghana, Oxford Forestry Institute, Oxford, p. 432.
Herzog F. (1994). Multipurpose shade trees in coffee and cocoa plantations in Côte d'Ivoire. Agroforestry Systems 27: 259–267.
Hoogendijk T., and Dahrs D. (2012). Shade tree guide for Ghanaian cocoa farmers, Agro Eco Luis Bolk Institute, Accra, p. 45.
Hundera K., Aerts R., Fontaine A., Van Mechelen M., Gijbels P., Honnay O., and Muys B. (2013). Effects of coffee management intensity on composition, structure, and regeneration status of Ethiopian moist evergreen afromontane forests. Environmental Management 51: 801–809.
Isaac M. E., Timmer V. R., and Quashie-Sam S. J. (2007). Shade tree effects in an 8-year-old cocoa agroforestry system: biomass and nutrient diagnosis of Theobroma cacao by vector analysis. Nutrient Cycling in Agroecosystems 78: 155–165.
Jagoret P., Kwesseu J., Messie C., Michel-Dounias I., and Malézieux E. (2014). Farmers’ assessment of the use value of agrobiodiversity in complex cocoa agroforestry systems in Central Cameroon. Agroforestry Systems 88: 983–1000.
Koko L. K., Snoeck D., Lekadou T. T., and Assiri A. A. (2013). Cacao-fruit tree intercropping effects on cocoa yield, plant vigor and light interception in Côte d’Ivoire. Agroforestry Systems 87: 1043–1052.
Läderach P., Martinez-Valle A., Schroth G., and Castro N. (2013). Predicting the future climatic suitability for cocoa farming of the world’s leading producer countries, Ghana and Côte d’Ivoire. Climatic Change 119: 841–854.
Manu M., and Tetteh E. (1987). A guide to cocoa cultivation, CRIG, New Tafo, p. 51.
Mbow C., Van Noordwijk M., Prabhu R., and Simons T. (2014). Knowledge gaps and research needs concerning agroforestry’s contribution to sustainable development goals in Africa. Current Opinion in Environmental Sustainability 6: 162–170.
Nomo B., Madong B. A., and Sinclair F. (2008). Status of non-cocoa tree species in cocoa multistrata systems of southern Cameroon. International Journal of Biological and Chemical Sciences 2(2): 207–215.
Pinard F., Joetzjer E., Kindt R., and Kehlenbeck K. (2014). Are coffee agroforestry systems suitable for circa situm conservation of indigenous trees? A case study from Central Kenya. Biodiversity and Conservation 23: 467–495.
Rice R. A., and Greenberg R. (2000). Cacao cultivation and the conservation of biological diversity. Ambio 29(3): 167–173.
Ruf F. O. (2011). The myth of complex cocoa agroforests: the case of Ghana. Human Ecology 39: 373–388.
Schroth G., Läderach P., Martinez-Valle A. I., Bunn C., and Jassogne L. (2016a). Vulnerability to climate change of cocoa in West Africa: patterns, opportunities and limits to adaptation. Science of the Total Environment 556: 231–241.
Schroth G., Läderach P., Martinez-Valle A. I., and Bunn C. (2016b). From site-level to regional adaptation planning for tropical commodities: cocoa in West Africa. Mitigation and Adaptation Strategies for Global Change. doi:10.1007/s11027-016-9707-y.
Sinclair F. L., and Walker D. H. (1999). A utilitarian approach to the incorporation of local knowledge in agroforestry research and extension. In Buck L. E., Lassoie J. P., and Fernandes E. C. M. (eds.), Agroforestry in sustainable agricultural systems, CRC Press, Boca Raton, pp. 253–283.
Smith Dumont E., Gnahoua G. M., Ohouo L., Sinclair F. L., and Vaast P. (2014). Farmers in Côte d’Ivoire value integrating tree diversity in cocoa for the provision of ecosystem services. Agroforestry Systems 88: 1047–1066.
Smith N., Williams J., Plucknett D., and Talbott J. (1992). Tropical forests and their crops, Cornell University Press, Ithaca, p. 568.
Sonwa D. J., and Weise S. F. (2008). Diversifying and intensifying the cocoa agroforest landscape: review and strategic approaches for managing the shade matrix in west and Central Africa, IITA, Accra, p. 60.
Soto-Pinto L., Villalvazo-López V., Jiménez-Ferrer G., Ramírez-Marcial N., Montoya G., and Sinclair F. L. (2007). The role of local knowledge in determining shade composition of multistrata coffee systems in Chiapas, Mexico. Biodiversity and Conservation 16: 419–436.
Tscharntke T., Clough Y., Bhagwat S. A., Buchori D., Faust H., Hertel D., Hölscher D., Juhrbandt J., Kessler M., Perfecto I., Scherber C., Schroth G., Veldkamp E., and Wanger T. C. (2011). Multifunctional shade-tree management in tropical agroforestry landscapes – a review. Journal of Applied Ecology 48: 619–629.
Vaast P., and Somarriba E. (2014). Trade-offs between crop intensification and ecosystem services: the role of agroforestry in cocoa cultivation. Agroforestry Systems 88: 947–956.
Vaast P., Harmand J. M., Rapidel B., Jagoret P., and Deheuvels O. (2016). Coffee and cocoa production in agroforestry - a climate-smart agriculture model. In Torquebiau E. (ed.), Climate change and agriculture worldwide, Springer, Heibelberg, pp. 197–208.
Acknowledgements
We are indebted to the participating farmers who shared their knowledge on shade trees and kindly responded to our questionnaires. We also express our gratitude to Aikins Nyamekye and Bismark Debrah for their great help as field assistants and translators, as well as to Joseph Owusu for identifying shade tree species. This research is part of the CGIAR programs on Climate Change, Agriculture and Food Security (CCAFS) and Forests, Trees and Agriculture (FTA). Funding through the German Ministry for Economic Cooperation and Development (BMZ) is gratefully acknowledged. L.M.-S. and K.C. received a thesis research grant of BEAF/GIZ. We also thank IITA for logistical support.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Ethics declarations
Funding
This study was funded by the German Ministry for Economic Cooperation and Development (BMZ), project number: 12.1433.7–001.00.
Conflict of Interest
The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Graefe, S., Meyer-Sand, L., Chauvette, K. et al. Evaluating Farmers’ Knowledge of Shade Trees in Different Cocoa Agro-Ecological Zones in Ghana. Hum Ecol 45, 321–332 (2017). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10745-017-9899-0
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10745-017-9899-0