Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Community Member Viewpoints on the Ría Celestún Biosphere Reserve, Yucatan, Mexico: Suggestions for Improving the Community/Natural Protected Area Relationship

  • Published:
Human Ecology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The results of an analysis of the viewpoints of Celestún community members regarding the Ría Celestún Biosphere Reserve, Mexico, are used as the basis for recommendation to improve the community/natural protected area (NPA) relationship. Participant observation was used to record the opinions of 80 people (8–83 years of age) between April and August 2002. Twenty semistructured interviews were held with local young people randomly selected from the participant observation group and their fathers; one interview was held with a municipal officer. Results indicate that the informants perceived a lack of communication between community members and the Reserve concerning its objectives and action areas, minimal community participation in Reserve regulation development, an absence of alternative productive activities and unjustified restriction of natural resources. These perceived conditions can potentially generate conflict between the community and the Reserve administration, preventing fulfillment of the Reserve’s environmental protection mission and negatively affecting community welfare. It is suggested that communication between the Reserve and the community be mutual and free-flowing, that Reserve objectives be identified in conjunction with the community, that community members be included in Reserve activities and administration, that interdisciplinary teams be formed to encourage communication and participation and that alternative productive activities be developed. Particular emphasis is placed on the need to listen to and address the concerns of young people because they will define the community/Reserve relationship in the near future.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1

Similar content being viewed by others

Notes

  1. There are, of course, many cases in the literature in which indigenous societies were unable to attain long-term, sustainable natural resource management, that is, over hundreds or thousands of years. Cf. Diamond 2005.

  2. From the mid-19th century to the 1920s (about 70 years) monoculture of henequen (Agave fourcroydes Lem.) formed the foundation of an agroindustry that made Yucatan the richest state in Mexico at the time. After the Second World War the henequen market steadily declined due to the rise of synthetic fibers, and the industry in Yucatan was further undercut by national and state-level politics and economic processes. It effectively collapsed in the 1990s, forcing a massive internal displacement of peasants towards the coasts of Yucatan and the tourist center of Cancun on the Caribbean coast.

  3. This group of people is not a statistically representative sample of the population of Celestún, but the group of individuals whom we observed according to the objectives of the wider research from which this paper derives.

  4. Lancheros is the local term for guides that take tourists on tours of the lagoon in fiberglass boats (lanchas) with outboard motors. They are also called turisteros.

  5. As mentioned, this study derives from research on the attitudes of Celestun’s young people towards natural resources (Méndez-Contreras 2004), part of which was to determine how local people conceptualize “natural resources”.

References

  • Agrawal, A. (2005). Environmentality. Technologies of Government and the Making of Subjects, Duke University Press, Durham, North Carolina.

    Google Scholar 

  • Agrawal, A., and Gibson, C. C. (2001). The role of community in natural resource conservation. In Agrawal, A., and Gibson, C. C. (eds.), Communities and the Environment. Ethnicity, Gender, and the State in Community-Based Conservation, Rutgers University Press, New Brunswick, New Jersey, pp. 1–31.

    Google Scholar 

  • Andrews, A. (1980). Salt-making, Merchants and Markets: The Role of a Critical Resource in the Development of Maya Civilization, Department of Anthropology. Phoenix, University of Arizona.

  • Batllori, E. (1988). Productividad Secundaria en el Estero de Celestún. Departamento de Recursos del Mar. Mérida, México, Centro de Investigación y de Estudios Avanzados del I.P.N. Unpublished master thesis.

  • Batllori, E. (1990). Caracterización ecológica del Refugio Faunístico “Ría Celestún” al noroeste de la Península de Yucatán, Mérida, Cinvestav-Mérida.

    Google Scholar 

  • Batllori, E. (2003). Estudio técnico para el desarrollo del Ordenamiento Ecológico del Territorio de la Reserva de la Biosfera Ría Celestún, ubicada entre los estados de Yucatán y Campeche, Reporte Técnico Final, Mérida, Cinvestav-Mérida.

  • Berkes, F. (1999). Sacred Ecology. Traditional Ecological Knowledge and Resource Management, Taylor & Francis, Philadelphia.

    Google Scholar 

  • Berlanga, M., and Wood, P. (1996). Áreas de importancia para la conservación de las aves en la Península de Yucatán. II Workshop on Important Areas for Bird Conservation in Mexico (AICAS), Huatulco, Mexico.

  • Bernard, H. R. (1995). Research Methods in Anthropology. Qualitative and Quantitative Approaches. Altamira Press, Walnut Creek, California.

    Google Scholar 

  • Brechin, S. R. (2003). Wandering boundaries and illegal residents. The political ecology of protected area deforestation in South Sumatra Indonesia from 1979 to 1992. In Brechin, S. R., Wilshusen, P. R., Fortwangler, C. L., and West, P. C. (eds.), Contested Nature. Promoting International Biodiversity with Social Justice in the Twenty-first Century, State University of New York Press, Albany, New York, pp. 59–71.

    Google Scholar 

  • Brechin, S. R., Wilshusen, P. R., et al. (Eds.) (2003). Contested Nature. Promoting International Biodiversity with Social Justice in the Twenty-first Century, State University of New York Press, Albany, New York.

  • Cabrera, M., and PRONATURA (2002). La Reserva de la Biosfera Ría Celestún. Usos y valores económicos. Resumen ejecutivo. Mérida, p. 8.

  • Castilla, J. C., and Defeo, O. (2001). Latin America Shellfisheries: Emphasis on Co-management and Experimental Practices. Reviews in Fish Biology Fisheries 11: 1–30.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Castillo, M. T., Dickinson, F., et al. (1995). State Policies, Natural Resources, and Community Participation in Rural Mexico. Human Ecology: Progress Through Integrative Perspectives, The Society for Human Ecology, Bar Harbor, Maine, USA.

    Google Scholar 

  • CONANP (2000). Programa de Manejo Reserva de la Biosfera Ría Celestún. México, D. F., Secretaría de Medio Ambiente y Recursos Naturales.

  • CONANP (2006). Qué son las ANP, México, D.F., Secretaría de Medio Ambiente y Recursos Naturales/Comisión Nacional de Áreas Naturales Protegidas, 2006.

  • Dall, W., Hill, B. J., et al. (1990) The Biology of Penaeidae, Academic, London.

    Google Scholar 

  • Defeo, O., Andrade Hernández, M., et al. (2005). Pautas para el manejo de la pesquería de jaiba y camarón en un área natural protegida: El caso de la Ría Celestún, Yucatán-Campeche. Mérida, México, Centro de Investigación y de Estudios Avanzados, Comisión Nacional para la Biodiversidad y Pronatura Península de Yucatán.

  • Diamond, J. (2005). Collapse: How Societies Choose to Fail or Succeed, Viking, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dickinson, F., and Castillo, M. T. (2003). Participación comunal e innovación de vivienda en la costa de Yucatán. Revista de la Universidad Autónoma de Yucatán 18(224): 53–66.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dickinson, F., and Lizarraga, I. (2001). Palafitos para la costa yucateca. Cuadernos de Arquitectura 13: 62–68.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dickinson, F., Viga, D., et al. (1998). Communal participation and sociocultural change in rural Yucatan: Participatory research, health, and quality of life. Human Ecology Review 5(2): 58–65.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dickinson, F., Viga, D., et al. (2006). Collaboration and difficulties in an applied human ecology project. Implications for the local coastal environment. Landscape and Urban Planning 74: 204–222.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • DOF (1997). SEMARNAP. Aviso por el que se da a conocer el establecimiento de épocas y zonas de veda de las especies de camarón en aguas marinas y de los sistemas lagunarios estuarinos de jurisdicción federal del Golfo de México y Mar Caribe. Diario Oficial de la Federación. México, D.F., pp. 6–8.

  • DOF (2000). SEMARNAP. Aviso por el que se da a conocer el establecimiento de épocas y zonas de veda de las especies de camarón en aguas marinas y de los sistemas lagunarios estuarinos de jurisdicción federal del Golfo de México y Mar Caribe. Diario Oficial de la Federación. México, D.F., pp. 15–16.

  • Fontana, A., and Frey, J. H. (1994). Interviewing. The art of science. In Denzin, N. K., and Lincoln, Y. S. (eds.), Handbook of Qualitative Research, Sage, Thousand Oaks, California, pp. 361–376.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fraga, J. (1993). La inmigración y sus principales efectos en la costa yucateca. Estudio de caso en Celestún y Sisal. Facultad de Ciencias Antropológicas. Mérida, México, Universidad Autónoma de Yucatán, p. 291. Unpublished master thesis.

  • Fraga, J., Arias, Y., et al. (2006). Comunidades y actores sociales en áreas marinas protegidas del Caribe (México, Cuba y República Dominicana). In Breton, Y., Brown, D. N., Davy, B., Huaghton, M., and Ovares, L. (eds.), Manejo de Recursos Costeros en el Gran Caribe: Resiliencia, Adaptación y Diversidad Comunitaria, Mayol/IDRC, Bogotá.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gadgil, M., Hemam, N. S., et al. (1998). People, refugia and resilience. In Berkes, F., and Folke, C. (eds.), Linking Social and Ecological Systems. Management Practices and Social Mechanisms for Building Resilience, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, pp. 30–47.

    Google Scholar 

  • Geisler, C. (2003). Your park, my poverty. Using impact assessment to counter the displacement effects of environmental greenlining. In Brechin, S. R., Wilshusen, P. R., Fortwangler, C. L., and West, P. C. (eds.), Contested Nature. Promoting International Biodiversity with Social Justice in the Twenty-first Century, State University of New York, Albany, New York, pp. 217–230.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ghimire, K., and Pimbert, M. (1997). Social change and conservation: An overview of issues and concepts. In Ghimire, K., and Pimbert, M. (eds.), Social Change and Conservation. Environmental Politics and Impacts of National Parks and Protected Areas, Earthscan, London.

    Google Scholar 

  • Goudie, A. (2000). The Human Impact on the Natural Environment. The MIT Press, Cambridge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gunderson, L. H., and Holling, C. H. (eds.) (2002). Panarchy. Understanding Transformations in Human and Natural Systems, Island Press, Washington, D.C.

  • Haenn, N. (1999). The power of environmental knowledge: Ethnoecology and environmental conflicts in Mexican conservation. Human Ecology 27(3): 477–492.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hamú, D., Pellerano, M., et al. (2004). Strategic communication to build support for protected areas: principles, lessons and recommendations. In Hamú, D., Auchincloss, E., and Goldstein, W. (eds.), Communicating Protected Areas, Commission on Education and Communication, IUCN, Gland, Switzerland and Cambridge, UK, pp. 9–23.

    Google Scholar 

  • INEGI (2006a). Población total por municipio según grandes grupos de edad, 2005, Instituto Nacional de Estadística, Geografía e Informática, Aguascalientes, Mexico.

  • INEGI (2006b). Programa de Ordenamiento Ecológico Territorial Costero del Estado de Yucatán. Principales flujos migratorios: Comportamiento migratorio 1995–2000. Centro de Investigación y de Estudios Avanzados del I.P.N., Mérida, México.

  • INEGI (2006c). Programa de Ordenamiento Ecológico Territorial Costero del Estado de Yucatán. Principales flujos migratorios: Inmigración. Centro de Investigación y de Estudios Avanzados del I.P.N., Mérida, México.

  • Kobelkowsky, R. (2003). Qué son las áreas naturales protegidas, Comisión Nacional de Áreas Naturales Protegidas, Mexico, D.F., 2003.

  • Kuppe, R. (1999). Indígenas y medio ambiente. Conservacionismo a espaldas de los guardianes de la tierra. Boletín de Antropología Americana 35: 96–104.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lavides, M., Plantilla, A., et al. (2004). Building support for and beyond protected areas in the Phillippines: A Haribon’s journey of transformations. In Hamú, D., Auchincloss, E., and Goldstein, W. (eds.), Communicating Protected Areas, Commission on Education and Communication, IUCN, Gland, Switzerland and Cambridge, UK, pp. 46–57.

    Google Scholar 

  • Méndez-Contreras, J. I. (2004). Actitudes hacia los recursos naturales y su uso en los jóvenes de Celestún. Un estudio de caso. Departamento de Ecología Humana. Mérida, México, Centro de Investigación y de Estudios Avanzados del I.P.N., Unidad Mérida, p. 194. Unpublished master thesis. This work could be read at http://www.mda.cinvestav.mx/eh02b.htm.

  • Millennium Ecosystem Assessment (2005). Ecosystems and Human Well-being Synthesis, Island Press, Washington, D.C.

    Google Scholar 

  • Moran, E. (1993). La ecología humana de los pueblos de la Amazonia, Fondo de Cultura Económica, México, D.F.

    Google Scholar 

  • Müller-Glodde, U. (1994). ProzeBbegleitende Beratung im Resource Management, GTZ, Bonn.

    Google Scholar 

  • O’Riordan, T., and Stoll-Kleeman, S. (2002). Deliberative democracy and participatory biodiversity. In O’Riordan, T., and Stoll-Kleeman, S. (eds.), Biodiversity, Sustainability and Human Communities. Protecting beyond the protected, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, pp. 87–112.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ostrom, E. (1990). Governing the Commons. The Evolution of Institutions for Collective Action, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pennington, D. C., Gillen, K., et al. (1999). Social Psychology, Arnold, London.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pérez-Farfante, I., and Kensley, B. (1997). Penaeoid and Sergestoid Shrimps and Prawns of the Word. Keys and diagnoses for the Families and Genera. Paris.

  • Reid, F. (1997). A Field Guide to the Mammals of Central America and Southeast Mexico, Oxford University Press, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rigel, B. A. (1978). Censo de patos cazados en Yucatán. Temporada de 1977–1978. Programa de Desarrollo Faunístico del Mayab. Secretaría de Agricultura y Recursos Hidráhulicos, Mérida, México.

  • Robles de Benito, R. (2005). Apropiación de recursos naturales y relaciones sociales en la Reserva de la Biosfera Ría Celestún, Yucatán. Departamento de Ecología Humana, Centro de Investigación y de Estudios Avanzados del I.P.N., Unidad Mérida, Mérida, México, pp. vii+203. Unpublished master thesis. This work could be read at http://www.mda.cinvestav.mx/eh02b.htm.

  • Salud, C. D. (2004). Microdiagnóstico Familiar de Celestún, Secretaría de Salud, Celestún, México.

    Google Scholar 

  • Singleton, S. (2001). Communities, states, and the governance of Pacific Northwest salmon fisheries. In Argawal, A., and Gibson, C. C. (eds.), Communities and the Environment.Ethnicity, Gender, and the State in Community-Based Conservation, Rutgers University Press, New Brunswick, New Jersey, pp. 138–156.

    Google Scholar 

  • Smardon, R. C., and Faust, B. B. (2006). Introduction: International policy in the biosphere reserves of Mexico’s Yucatan Peninsula. Landscape and Urban Planning 74(3–4): 160–192.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • SPP (1982). Manual de Estadísticas Básicas del estado de Yucatán. Tomo I. México, D. F., Secretaría de Programación y Presupuesto, Coordinación General de Servicios Nacionales del INEGI, Gobierno del Estado de Yucatán.

  • Stern, M. J. (2004). Understanding local reactions to protected areas. In Hamú, D., Auchincloss, E., and Goldstein, W. (eds.), Communicating Protected Areas, Commission on Education and Communication, IUCN, Gland, Switzerland and Cambridge, UK, pp. 40–45.

    Google Scholar 

  • Stoll-Kleeman, S. (2001). Barriers to nature conservation in Germany: A model explaining opposition to protected areas. Journal of Environmental Psychology 21(4): 369–385.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Taylor, S. J., and Bogdan, R. (1984). Introducción a los Métodos Cualitativos de Investigación, Paidós, Barcelona.

    Google Scholar 

  • Taylor, S. J., and Bogdan R. (1996). Introducción a los Métodos Cualitativos de Investigación, Paidós, Barcelona.

    Google Scholar 

  • Terborgh, J. (1999). Requiem for Nature, Island Press, Washington, D.C.

    Google Scholar 

  • van Weerd, M., van Boven, G., et al. (2004). Using communication to involve local communities and local governments in protected area management: Two related cases from northeast Luzon, Philippines. In Hamú, D., Auchincloss, E., and Goldstein, W. (eds.), Communicating Protected Areas, Commission on Education and Communication, Gland, Switzerland and Cambridge, UK, pp. 139–154.

    Google Scholar 

  • Vidal, R. M., Lucia, G., et al. (2004). Strategic communication planning for a national system of protected areas, Mexico. In Hamú, D., Auchincloss, E., and Goldstein, W. (eds.), Communicating Protected Areas, Commission on Education and Communication, Gland, Switzerland and Cambridge, UK, pp. 69–86.

    Google Scholar 

  • Western, D., Wright, R. M., et al. (eds.) (1994). Natural Connections. Perspectives in Community-based Conservation, Island Press, Washington DC.

  • Wilshusen, P. R. (2003). Territory, nature, and culture. Negotiating the boundaries of biodiversity conservation in Colombia’s Pacific coastal region. In Brechin, S. R., Wilshusen, P. R., Fortwangler, C. L., and West, P. C. (eds.), Contested Nature. Promoting International Biodiversity with Social Justice in the Twenty-first Century, State University of New York Press, Albany, New York, pp. 73–88.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wilshusen, P. R., Brechin, S. R., et al. (2003). Contested nature. Conservation and development at the turn of the twenty-first century. In Brechin, S. R., Wilshusen, P. R., Fortwangler, C. L., and West, P. C. (eds.), Contested Nature. Promoting International Biodiversity with Social Justice in the Twenty-first Century, State University of New York Press, Albany, New York, pp. 1–22.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wilson, E. O. (1992). The Diversity of Life, Norton, New York.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

The authors thank the participating community members, the Cohuo family for housing one of the authors (JMC), Pronatura Península de Yucatán, A. C., for its support during the field work, and the Consejo Nacional de Ciencia y Tecnología for granting JMC a scholarship to study her Human Ecology M.Sc. The map included in the paper was prepared in the Laboratory of Cartographic Analysis of the Department of Human Ecology, Cinvestav-Merida. The criticisms and suggestions of five anonymous reviewers helped to greatly improve this manuscript.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Federico Dickinson.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Méndez-Contreras, J., Dickinson, F. & Castillo-Burguete, T. Community Member Viewpoints on the Ría Celestún Biosphere Reserve, Yucatan, Mexico: Suggestions for Improving the Community/Natural Protected Area Relationship. Hum Ecol 36, 111–123 (2008). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10745-007-9135-4

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10745-007-9135-4

Keywords

Navigation